For Our Freedom: The Leaders Behind the Movement and Americanpromise.net

Rep. Chad Perkins on Missouri's 137–0 Vote to Restore State Authority

18 min · 9. juli 2026
episode Rep. Chad Perkins on Missouri's 137–0 Vote to Restore State Authority cover

Description

In this episode of For Our Freedom, Jeff Clements is joined by Missouri Speaker Pro Tem Chad Perkins to discuss the Missouri House's unanimous 137–0 vote calling for a constitutional amendment to restore states' authority over campaign finance. Perkins explains how outside spending has increasingly shaped Missouri's ballot initiative process, why lawmakers across the political spectrum united behind the resolution, and how restoring state authority would allow each state to set rules that reflect its own values and priorities. Together, they explore the principles of federalism, the role of states in protecting self-government, and why returning these decisions to voters and their elected representatives is central to preserving America's constitutional system.

Comments

0

Be the first to comment

Sign up now and become a member of the For Our Freedom: The Leaders Behind the Movement and Americanpromise.net community!

Get Started

1 month for 9 kr.

Then 99 kr. / month · Cancel anytime.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

All episodes

7 episodes

episode Rep. Chad Perkins on Missouri's 137–0 Vote to Restore State Authority artwork

Rep. Chad Perkins on Missouri's 137–0 Vote to Restore State Authority

In this episode of For Our Freedom, Jeff Clements is joined by Missouri Speaker Pro Tem Chad Perkins to discuss the Missouri House's unanimous 137–0 vote calling for a constitutional amendment to restore states' authority over campaign finance. Perkins explains how outside spending has increasingly shaped Missouri's ballot initiative process, why lawmakers across the political spectrum united behind the resolution, and how restoring state authority would allow each state to set rules that reflect its own values and priorities. Together, they explore the principles of federalism, the role of states in protecting self-government, and why returning these decisions to voters and their elected representatives is central to preserving America's constitutional system.

9. juli 202618 min
episode Sen. David Argall on Money in Politics, Outside Spending, and Why States Are Pushing Back artwork

Sen. David Argall on Money in Politics, Outside Spending, and Why States Are Pushing Back

In this episode of For Our Freedom, Jeff Clements sits down with Pennsylvania State Senator David Argall to discuss how campaign finance has changed over decades of public service — from volunteer-driven local races to today’s high-cost, consultant-heavy political landscape. They explore the growing influence of outside money in state elections, how national spending is reshaping local campaigns, and why lawmakers across the country are advancing a constitutional amendment to restore the authority of states and Congress to set the rules for money in politics. As Pennsylvania considers its role in this national effort, Sen. Argall reflects on democracy, federalism, and what it would take to build a healthier political system ahead of America’s 250th anniversary.

21. maj 202619 min
episode Rep. Tex Fischer on Federalism and Who Decides the Rules for Money in Elections artwork

Rep. Tex Fischer on Federalism and Who Decides the Rules for Money in Elections

In this episode of For Our Freedom, American Promise CEO and host Jeff Clements speaks with Ohio State Representative Tex Fischer about federalism, election law, and who should decide the rules for money in elections. Rep. Fischer discusses Ohio’s recent efforts to prohibit foreign spending in state elections and the legal challenges those laws now face in federal court. He also explains why he is sponsoring a resolution in the Ohio legislature calling on Congress to advance the For Our Freedom Constitutional Amendment—restoring the authority of states and Congress to decide the rules for money in elections. Together, they explore the role of states as “laboratories of democracy,” the growing tension between state authority and federal court rulings, and what stronger transparency and accountability in elections could look like in the years ahead.

4. mar. 202617 min