Here's the Scoop
Supreme Court Edition, Chatrie v. United States: Can police use cellphone location data to catch suspects?
Description
Police in Richmond, Virginia, had no leads after an armed bank robbery in 2019, so they got a “geofence” warrant — a novel type of warrant that allowed them to request Google location data from all devices that had been near the bank around the time of the crime. That data helped authorities identify Okello Chatrie, whom they arrested and charged in federal court. But Chatrie argues that the geofence warrant violated his Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Host Laura Jarrett speaks with the ACLU’s Nathan Freed Wessler, who won the precedent-setting case Carpenter v. United States about whether the police’s use of digital dragnets is consistent with the Fourth Amendment. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com [https://pcm.adswizz.com] for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
1 month for 9 kr.
Then 99 kr. / month · Cancel anytime.
- Podcasts kun på Podimo
- 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
- Gratis podcasts
All episodes
259 episodes
Comments
0Be the first to comment
Sign up now and become a member of the Here's the Scoop community!