Constitutional Chisme: Roper v. Simmons

Constitutional Chisme: Roper v. Simmons

Constitutional Chisme is your weekly mini-episode where your host Stephanie and co-host Harleigh break down the cases you’re most likely to see in law school! This week, we are covering Roper v. Simmons. The case raised important questions about the constitutionality of the death penalty for juvenile offenders and whether executing individuals who were under the age of 18 at the time of their crimes violates the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Use code PASSWITHPONZ to get an additional $100 off whatever sale Kaplan Bar Prep is currently offering. Click the link to support the podcast and keep the chisme coming! Link: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli [https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli]

Maggie: From Law School to Federal Clerkship

In this episode, Maggie Maddox shares her extraordinary journey from foster care to becoming an attorney, proving that our beginnings do not define our future. Adopted at the age of four after spending her early childhood in foster care, Maggie reflects on how her experiences shaped not only her life but also her passion for advocating for children and families navigating the legal system. We also discuss her law school experience, including the many opportunities to learn from federal judges, the importance of on-campus interviews, and the unconventional path that led to securing her clerkship.  Follow us on social media, support the show, and never miss an episode: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli [https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli] Kaplan Bar Prep Discount: Use code PASSWITHPONZ to save an additional $100 off Kaplan Bar Prep, and it stacks with current promotions and sales!

Constitutional Chisme Obergefell v. Hodges

Constitutional Chisme is your weekly mini-episode where your host Stephanie and co-host Harleigh break down the cases you’re most likely to see in law school. This week, in honor of the 11th anniversary of Obergefell v. Hodges, we are revisiting the landmark Supreme Court decision that recognized same-sex marriage as a fundamental right. Under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, all states must license a marriage between two people of the same sex and recognize such a marriage if it was lawfully licensed and performed in another state. Use code PASSWITHPONZ to get an additional $100 off whatever sale Kaplan Bar Prep is currently offering. Click the link to support the podcast and keep the chisme coming! Link: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli [https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli]

Constitutional Chisme: Garratt v. Dailey

Constitutional Chisme is your weekly mini-episode where your host Stephanie and co-host Harleigh break down the cases you’re most likely to see in law school. This week, we are covering Garratt v. Dailey. The case raised important questions about intent in battery and whether a person can be liable for battery if they did not specifically intend to harm someone but knew with substantial certainty that harmful contact would occur. Use code PASSWITHPONZ to get an additional $100 off whatever sale Kaplan Bar Prep is currently offering. Click the link to support the podcast and keep the chisme coming! Link: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli [https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli]

Constitutional Chisme: Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals v. Thompson

Constitutional Chisme is your weekly mini-episode where your host Stephanie and co-host Harleigh break down the cases you’re most likely to see in law school. This week, we are covering Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals v. Thompson. The case raised important questions about federal-question jurisdiction and whether a state-law claim that references a federal statute can be heard in federal court.  Use code PASSWITHPONZ to get an additional $100 off whatever sale Kaplan Bar Prep is currently offering. Click the link to support the podcast and keep the chisme coming! Link: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli [https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli]