Ghostly Futures and Organization Studies (Fleming & Rhodes, 2026) | In Memoriam

The Market for “Lemons” (Akerlof 1970) - Weekend Classics

English Podcast starts at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:44:11 Hindi Podcast Starts at 01:02:54 Danish Podcast Starts at 01:16:05 Reference Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431 Professor Jishnu Das's Substack, The Cranky Corner article on Alerkof's Retirement https://jishnudas.substack.com/p/george-akerlof-retires ‌Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher Podcast Website https://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmit/ 🎙️✨ Welcome to Revise and Resubmit, and to another episode of Weekend Classics. I'm so glad you're here. ☕📚 Some papers don't just answer a question. They quietly change the way we see the world. Today's classic is one of those rare works. At first glance, it seems to be about used cars. 🚗 But if you stay with it, you realize it is really about people, trust, and the invisible bargains we make every single day. Have you ever wondered why someone selling something always seems to know a little more than you do? Why a deal that looks fair can still leave you uneasy? George A. Akerlof took those ordinary feelings and transformed them into one of the most influential ideas in economics. Published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics on 1 August 1970, "The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism" explores what happens when sellers possess information that buyers simply cannot see. 🤔 Buyers become cautious. They offer only an average price. The best products quietly disappear, leaving behind the "lemons." Before long, an entire market begins to lose its quality, not because people stopped producing good things, but because trust itself became scarce. 🌍 What makes this paper unforgettable is that it reaches far beyond used cars. It helps explain medical insurance, hiring decisions, lending in developing economies, and the enormous economic cost of dishonesty. It also reminds us why brands, warranties, certifications, and professional licenses matter so much. They are not just symbols. They are promises that help strangers trust one another. 💡 Sometimes the strongest economies are built not only on money, but on credibility. So as we revisit this timeless classic together, I invite you to think beyond markets and ask yourself this. If trust is the most valuable currency we share, what happens when we can no longer tell the difference between what's genuine and what's just convincing? 🤯 🙏 My sincere thanks to George A. Akerlof and The MIT Press for this remarkable contribution to scholarship. 🎧 If you enjoy episodes like this, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, and subscribe to the Weekend Researcher YouTube channel. You can also listen on Amazon Prime Music and Apple Podcasts. Thanks for being part of the journey! 🚀

Ghostly Futures and Organization Studies (Fleming & Rhodes, 2026) | In Memoriam

English Podcast Start at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Start at 00:30:49 Hindi Podcast Start at 00:49:08 Danish Podcast Start at 01:02:50 Reference Fleming, P., & Rhodes, C. (2026). Ghostly Futures and Organization Studies. Organization Studies. onlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406261447713 ‌Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher Podcast Website https://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmit EGOS In memoriam Peter Fleming https://www.egos.org/egos/about/in_memoriam_Fleming 🎙️👻 Welcome to Revise and Resubmit. Some papers arrive quietly. Others arrive carrying a silence that is impossible to ignore. Today's episode is one of those moments. Before we begin, we pause to remember Dr. Peter Fleming, who passed away in July 2026 at the age of 54. 🌹🕊️ We offer our deepest respect and our sincere condolences to his family, friends, colleagues, students, and the global academic community. His voice challenged complacency. His scholarship questioned power. His kindness shaped generations of researchers. Though he is no longer with us, his ideas continue to speak. Today we turn to Ghostly Futures and Organization Studies, a remarkable collaboration between Peter Fleming and Carl Rhodes, published online in Organization Studies, one of the world's most prestigious journals, recognized on both the emeritus FT and ABDC A* journal lists. 📚✨ This is not a paper about ghosts in the ordinary sense. It is about the futures that never arrived. The futures we quietly abandoned. The futures we fear are already waiting for us. The authors ask us to imagine organizations as places haunted not only by memories but also by possibilities. Some futures have been lost. Others have been denied. Still others appear on the horizon like approaching storms. Together they shape how people work, hope, hesitate, and sometimes surrender. 👥⏳ As I read this paper, I found myself thinking about every unfinished project, every abandoned reform, every promise that once felt within reach. Organizations often tell us to look ahead. Yet Fleming and Rhodes remind us that looking ahead can also fill us with disappointment, fatalism, or even despair. And perhaps the most unsettling realization is this. Sometimes the future controls the present long before it ever arrives. There is something deeply moving about reading these words now. They feel both intellectually daring and quietly personal. They remind me that scholarship can outlive the scholar. A thoughtful idea continues its journey even after its author has taken leave. So, as we begin today's conversation, I leave you with a question. 👀💭 What if the greatest force shaping our organizations is not the past we remember, but the future we have already stopped believing in? 🙏 Our heartfelt thanks to Dr. Peter Fleming, Professor Carl Rhodes, Organization Studies, and SAGE Publications for this profound and thought provoking contribution to organizational scholarship. 🎧 If you enjoy conversations like this, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, and our YouTube channel, Weekend Researcher. You can also find us on Amazon Prime Music and Apple Podcasts. Your support helps us keep important research alive, one conversation at a time. 🌟📖

Dark Academia (In Memoriam Peter Fleming 2021) - Weekend Book Review

English Podcast starts at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:38:03 Hindi Podcast Starts at 00:57:32 Danish Podcast Starts at 01:16:23 Reference Peter Fleming (2021). Dark Academia: How Universities Die. Pluto Press. https://www.plutobooks.com/product/dark-academia/ ‌Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher Podcast Website https://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmit EGOS In memoriam Peter Fleming https://www.egos.org/egos/about/in_memoriam_Fleming 🎙️📚 Welcome to Revise and Resubmit, and to another episode of Weekend Book Review. Some books arrive at exactly the moment when they become impossible to read as ordinary books. They become conversations with someone whose voice we now know has fallen silent. Today feels like one of those moments. I come to Dark Academia: How Universities Die with a mixture of admiration and quiet sadness. Reading it now, I cannot help but hear more than an argument about universities. I hear the voice of a scholar who cared deeply about what a university could be, and who refused to mistake efficiency for education or management for wisdom. 🌧️📖 Peter Fleming never wrote to comfort institutions. He wrote to challenge them. Throughout a remarkable career spanning the University of Cambridge, Queen Mary University of London, Cass Business School, and later the University of Technology Sydney, he became one of the most fearless critics of corporate culture, neoliberalism, and the quiet erosion of human dignity in modern workplaces. Yet those who knew him remember something equally important. They remember a generous mentor, an ironic wit, and a colleague whose kindness matched the sharpness of his intellect. His passing in July 2026 leaves the academic world immeasurably poorer, but his ideas continue to ask difficult questions that refuse to disappear. 🕯️ In this book, Fleming invites me into what he calls the "zombie university," a place where metrics replace meaning, rankings eclipse curiosity, and scholars slowly surrender time, imagination, and even their health to systems that measure almost everything except genuine learning. The pages are often unsettling because they feel painfully familiar. Behind discussions of managerialism, commercialization, surveillance, and competition lies a quieter grief. It is the grief of watching an institution built for discovery gradually forget why it existed in the first place. As someone who has spent years inside academic life, I found myself pausing often. I was not simply reading about universities. I was thinking about corridors, supervisors, classrooms, late night writing sessions, and the fragile hope that knowledge can still change both people and society. Perhaps that is why this book feels less like a critique and more like a warning offered with genuine affection. 🍂✨ So today, let us revisit a work that asks uncomfortable questions with remarkable honesty. And as we begin, I wonder whether the real question is not whether universities are dying, but whether we still remember what they were meant to keep alive. 🤔💭 🙏 My heartfelt thanks to Professor Peter Fleming and Pluto Press for giving us a book that continues to provoke, unsettle, and inspire. 🎧 If you enjoy thoughtful conversations like this, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, and our YouTube channel, Weekend Researcher. You can also find us on Amazon Prime Music and Apple Podcasts. Your support helps us keep important books and important conversations alive. 🌟📚

Unwind the clock? (Koo et al., 2026) | FT50 SMJ

English Podcast Starts at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:43:49 Hindi Podcast Starts at 01:04:49 Danish Podcast Starts at 01:23:28 Reference Koo, W. W., Zhang, M., & Choudhury, P. (2026). Unwind the clock? Temporal distance and user interactions on a digital platform. Strategic Management Journal, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70105 ‌ ‌Youtube Channel ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠ Podcast Website https://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmit Academy of Management PDW on Space Economy Registration Flyer https://cto.aom.org/discussion/flagship-aom-2026-pdw-space-economy-consolidating-a-research-agenda-8 AOM SIM Curriculum Committee https://sim.aom.org/curriculum/curriculum-committee AOM SIM-Bytes Episode 1 - Dr Ed Freeman https://www.youtube.com/shorts/EBSA7WvQNSI Linkedin Post By Professor Erica Steckler https://www.linkedin.com/posts/erica-steckler-ph-d-427272_simbyte-episode-1-ed-freeman-activity-7469092002098225152-PbHM 🎙️🌍 Welcome to Revise and Resubmit, a place where research is not merely read, but remembered. Thank you for joining me. There are moments when the world feels astonishingly connected. A question is asked in one country. An answer appears from another. Somewhere between midnight and sunrise, knowledge quietly crosses an ocean. We often imagine this journey to be effortless. Yet perhaps it is not. 🌌💭 Today, I invite you to linger over a remarkable paper titled "Unwind the Clock? Temporal Distance and User Interactions on a Digital Platform." Written by Wesley W. Koo, Miaomiao Zhang, and Prithwiraj Choudhury, and published in the Strategic Management Journal, one of the world's most prestigious FT50 academic journals, this study asks us to notice something we rarely see. ⏰📚✨ Time, after all, leaves no footprints. It slips quietly between people who may never know they almost met. Using proprietary data from StackOverflow, the authors reveal that every additional hour separating two regions quietly weakens the exchange of ideas. Fewer questions are seen. Fewer answers receive recognition. Conversations that might have changed someone's understanding simply fade into silence because the participants happen to live on different sides of the clock. 🌎⌛💻 What touched me most was not the mathematics, elegant though it is. It was the thought that the smallest and most specialized communities bear the greatest burden. The familiar subjects continue to find listeners. But the rare questions, the unusual skills, the lonely corners where expertise patiently waits, often remain unseen because nobody happens to be awake at the right moment. 🌱💡 And yet the paper offers quiet hope. It suggests that platforms need not surrender to the tyranny of chronology. By gently reshaping how content is presented, by allowing important ideas to surface beyond the instant they were created, technology can become less of a clock and more of a bridge. 🌉✨ Perhaps that is the deeper story here. Progress is not always about moving faster. Sometimes it begins by waiting long enough for someone else, somewhere else, to arrive. So as we begin today's conversation, I leave you with a question. 🤔💫 If knowledge can disappear simply because two curious minds greet the same day at different hours, how many remarkable conversations have already passed us by without either person ever realizing they almost met? 🙏 My heartfelt thanks to Wesley W. Koo, Miaomiao Zhang, and Prithwiraj Choudhury, and to John Wiley & Sons Ltd. for publishing this outstanding contribution in the Strategic Management Journal, a globally respected FT50 journal that continues to shape the frontiers of management research. 🌟📖 🎧 If you enjoy these journeys into influential scholarship, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, subscribe to Weekend Researcher on YouTube, and remember that our episodes are also available on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcasts. Until next time, thank you for listening. 🌍🎙️📚

False-Positive Psychology (Simmons et al. 2011) - Weekend Classics

English Podcast starts at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:24:36 Hindi Podcast Starts at 00:47:20 Danish Podcast Starts at 01:10:11 Reference Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359-1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 ‌Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher Podcast Website https://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmit/ 🎙️✨ Welcome to Revise and Resubmit, and to another episode of Weekend Classics. Grab your favorite cup of coffee, settle into your chair, and join me for a journey through one of those rare research papers that quietly changed the way an entire generation of scholars thinks about science. 📚☕ Have you ever wondered whether a statistically significant result is always telling the truth? Or could it simply be the product of a hundred tiny decisions that nobody ever gets to see? 🤔 Today, I am opening a paper that did exactly that. In 2011, Joseph P. Simmons, Leif D. Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn held up a mirror to psychological research and asked an uncomfortable question. What if researchers, often with no dishonest intention at all, could make almost any hypothesis appear significant simply by making ordinary choices about collecting data, selecting variables, or deciding when enough participants had been tested? 📊🔍 The brilliance of this paper is not that it accuses science. It reminds us that science is deeply human. Every spreadsheet carries judgment. Every analysis carries choice. Every manuscript tells a story about what was included and what quietly remained in the shadows. 🌱 To make their point unforgettable, the authors even presented a delightfully absurd experiment suggesting that listening to music could literally make people younger. It sounds ridiculous, and that is exactly why it works. The satire exposes a serious weakness. If flexibility hides in the research process, almost anything can look convincing. 🎵⏳😄 But this is not a story about broken science. It is a story about better science. The paper ends with practical recommendations for authors and reviewers, showing that transparency does not require expensive tools or impossible standards. It simply requires the courage to reveal the full journey instead of only the polished destination. 💡📖 So, before we begin, ask yourself this. If truth depends not only on the data we collect but also on the choices we never report, how many celebrated discoveries would survive if every hidden decision stepped into the light? 🌍✨ 🙏 My sincere thanks to Joseph P. Simmons, Leif D. Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn, and to the Association for Psychological Science for publishing this remarkable work in Psychological Science. 🎧 If you enjoy episodes like this, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, subscribe to Weekend Researcher on YouTube, and remember that you can also listen on Amazon Prime Music and Apple Podcasts. Your support helps keep thoughtful research conversations alive. 🚀📚