Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties

Wolford v. Lopez

Welcome to Supreme Court Opinions. In this episode, you’ll hear the Court’s opinion in Wolford v Lopez. In this case, the court considered this issue: Does a law that makes it a crime for a licensed concealed carry permit holder to bring a handgun onto private property open to the public—such as a store or restaurant—unless the property owner gives “express authorization” violate the Second Amendment? The case was decided on June 25, 2026.  The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.

Monsanto v. Durnell

Welcome to Supreme Court Opinions. In this episode, you’ll hear the Court’s opinion in Monsanto v Durnell. In this case, the court considered this issue: Does the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempt a label-based failure-to-warn claim where EPA has not required the warning? The case was decided on June 25, 2026.  The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.

Mullin v. Doe

Welcome to Supreme Court Opinions. In this episode, you’ll hear the Court’s opinion in Mullin v Doe. In this case, the court considered this issue: Did the Trump administration lawfully end the Temporary Protected Status program for Syrian nationals?  The case was decided on June 25, 2026.  The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.

Mullin v. Al Otro Lado

Welcome to Supreme Court Opinions. In this episode, you’ll hear the Court’s opinion in Mullin v Al Otro Lado. In this case, the court considered this issue: Does a noncitizen who is stopped on the Mexican side of the U.S.-Mexico border “arrive in the United States” within the meaning of Immigration and Nationality Act? The case was decided on June 25, 2026.  The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe

Welcome to Supreme Court Opinions. In this episode, you’ll hear the Court’s opinion in Cisco Systems, Inc.v Doe. In this case, the court considered this issue: Does either the Alien Tort Statute or the Torture Victim Protection Act allow a judicially-implied private right of action for aiding and abetting? The case was decided on June 23, 2026. The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.