The Tolle Lege Podcast
Richard Caldwell argues that Christians should stop using the phrase “prophetic voice” because biblical prophecy involved direct revelation from God. The problem is that his conclusion depends on treating the adjective prophetic as though it must always carry the full technical meaning of the noun prophecy. In this response, I slow the argument down, expose the hidden premise, and show why it does not follow. Caldwell proves that prophets received revelation. He does not prove that faithful preaching cannot be described as prophetic by analogy. By conflating prophecy and prophetic, office and function, identity and resemblance, his approach gives the appearance of precision while obscuring the real issue. Unfortunately, this has become normative for Rick. The brother has one move, and he uses it no matter the subject. The question is not merely whether someone uses the word prophetic. The question is whether they are claiming new revelation, binding consciences where Scripture has not spoken, or faithfully applying God’s already revealed Word to the sins of the present generation. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit tollelegeministries.substack.com [https://tollelegeministries.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]
25 episodes
Comments
0Be the first to comment
Sign up now and become a member of the The Tolle Lege Podcast community!