Voices Inside and Out

Joseph Lauren Part 2: Post-custody Employment Challenges and Solutions

28 min · 6 de jun de 2020
Portada del episodio Joseph Lauren Part 2: Post-custody Employment Challenges and Solutions

Descripción

This episode raises some interesting issues: a. what is the best strategy for addressing the fact of a criminal record when dealing with a prospective employer: mention it up front or wait to be asked? b.  given the prejudicial effects of a criminal record, should Canada adopt 'right to be forgotten' approaches with social media? c.  given the challenges of finding an employer, should more efforts be made to help former prisoners start their own businesses and be self-employed? Check out the documentary "Collared" for more information about Joseph's crime and lessons learned.

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Voices Inside and Out!

Empezar

2 meses por 1 €

Después 4,99 € / mes · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts exclusivos
  • 20 horas de audiolibros / mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

14 episodios

Portada del episodio Commentary: COVID-19 and Unrest at Donnacona

Commentary: COVID-19 and Unrest at Donnacona

As of the date of publishing this episode, we now know  that 2 federal prisoners have died of COVID-19, almost 300 federal prisoners tested positive (a rate 13 times higher than the general population in Canada), 5 penitentiaries are contaminated with COVID-19, 400 prisoners are being held in extreme conditions in medical isolation, and 100s more in cruel, prolonged solitary confinement-like conditions.  All visits by families, friends, and volunteers have stopped.  Programs have ended and prisoners are not able to make progress on correctional plans.  Temporary absences, both escorted and unescorted, have been suspended so progress toward being paroled for many has ceased.  Both prisoners and correctional staff are likely worried about contracting the virus. It is little wonder that tensions behind bars have increased. When tensions are high, is it more important to follow the protocols and attempt to de-escalate disputes before relying on force? Was the amount of force described by Mr. Farrier more than was appropriate in the circumstances? If the video tapes confirm that Mr. Farrier had his hands up and was attempting to comply with instructions when he was shot, what accountability and corrective action  is appropriate? Should the video tapes of such uses of force be made public?

6 de may de 202022 min