The Congressional Oversight Committee Releases The Epstein Related Bill Gates Transcript (6/25/26)

Western Australia Police Review The Circumstances Leading To Virginia Robert's Death (6/25/26)

Western Australian police have agreed to review how officers handled their interactions with Virginia Giuffre before her death by suicide in April 2025. Giuffre’s brother, Sky Roberts, and sister-in-law, Amanda Roberts, wrote to both police and the state coroner asking for scrutiny of the response to a domestic violence dispute involving Giuffre and a former partner. Police commissioner Col Blanch confirmed during a parliamentary hearing that the family’s letter had been received and that a review was underway, while saying he did not yet know the details of the police response and wanted the review to establish what happened. The family says they are not challenging the official circumstances of Giuffre’s death, but they want answers about whether police failed to properly follow up after she reportedly went to a police station more than once. Amanda Roberts questioned where those reports are and why further action did not appear to continue, while Sky Roberts framed the push as part of a broader demand to examine systemic failures around domestic and family violence. Family violence experts and advocates have also backed the request for an inquest, arguing that Giuffre’s case could expose wider failures in how authorities respond to victims before tragedy strikes to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Western Australian police to review response to Virginia Giuffre domestic violence dispute | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/24/western-australian-police-to-review-response-to-virginia-giuffre-domestic-violence-dispute-ntwnfb]

Lesley Groff and the Daily Machinery of Jeffrey Epstein’s Abuse (6/25/26)

Lesley Groff, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime executive assistant, told the House Oversight Committee in a closed-door interview that she booked massage appointments for Epstein “almost daily,” but denied knowingly arranging appointments with anyone she believed was underage. Groff said Epstein usually gave her names and phone numbers, that the calls were brief, and that massages were treated as a routine part of his schedule. Lawmakers pressed her hard on how she could work for Epstein for 18 years and not recognize what was happening, with Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi saying her explanation “strains credibility.” Groff maintained that nobody she spoke with sounded underage and that she was not “evaluating voices.” Groff also said Epstein manipulated her after his 2008 arrest by claiming he had been blackmailed and set up, and that she believed his explanation at the time because he could appear kind and generous. She said she now sees that as part of his manipulation, expressed sorrow for survivors, and said she believes them. The testimony matters because Groff was identified years ago as a potential co-conspirator but was never charged, and her account highlights one of the central unresolved questions in the Epstein case: how someone so close to the daily machinery of his life could claim not to understand that the endless “massage” appointments were part of the abuse pipeline. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Congressional Oversight Committee Releases The Epstein Related Bill Gates Transcript (6/25/26)

Bill Gates told the House Oversight Committee that his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was, in his telling, about philanthropy — Epstein claimed he could connect Gates to wealthy donors who might put major money into global health work. Gates said he met Epstein beginning in 2011, after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, and continued interactions until 2014, when he concluded Epstein could not deliver on those promises. He denied witnessing Epstein commit crimes, denied visiting Epstein’s island, ranch, or Florida home, and said he “never victimized anyone,” while acknowledging that he may have been in the presence of Epstein victims during his dealings with Epstein. The more damaging part is that Gates admitted Epstein gained access to sensitive information about his personal life, including extramarital affairs, and allegedly tried to use that information — mixed with falsehoods, according to Gates — to pressure him back into contact. Gates portrayed Epstein as a manipulator who used proximity to powerful people to launder his reputation, while lawmakers pressed the obvious question: why Gates kept engaging with a convicted sex offender at all. Gates expressed regret, saying he should never have met with Epstein, but the testimony still adds another example of Epstein’s method: insinuating himself into elite circles, collecting leverage, and using access as currency. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bill Gates says he didn’t witness crimes but may have been in presence of Epstein victims | CNN Politics [https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/23/politics/bill-gates-epstein-deposition]

The Great Epstein Runaround: Hearings, Transcripts, and Institutional Fog (6/25/26)

Ghislaine Maxwell remained publicly loyal to Prince Andrew throughout the collapse of Jeffrey Epstein’s network and the scrutiny that followed. She helped facilitate Andrew’s access to Epstein’s social circle, hosted him at her London home and was present during key periods later examined by journalists, investigators and civil litigants. Even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, Maxwell continued moving within overlapping social circles connected to Andrew, and she never publicly turned against him as allegations mounted. During her own legal troubles, she avoided offering any public account that would implicate Andrew or clarify disputed episodes involving him, Epstein and Virginia Giuffre. That loyalty continued after Maxwell’s conviction. In interviews and statements from prison, she defended Andrew’s character, questioned the authenticity of the photograph showing him with Giuffre and Maxwell, and described him in sympathetic terms rather than distancing herself from him. She has never publicly accused Andrew of wrongdoing, never portrayed him as part of Epstein’s abuse operation and never provided the kind of detailed testimony that might have placed greater pressure on him. Whatever Maxwell may know about Andrew’s relationship with Epstein, her public position has remained consistent: protect the friendship, challenge the evidence against him and refuse to become a witness against him. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Mega Edition: Mark Epstein, Ian Maxwell And Their Opinion Of The Official Narrative (6/25/26)

Ian Maxwell and Mark Epstein have both become loud, persistent critics of the official Epstein-Maxwell process, though from different angles and with obvious family interests at stake. Ian Maxwell has argued that Ghislaine was turned into a convenient stand-in for Epstein after Epstein died before trial, claiming her trial was flawed, that she was scapegoated, and that the government used her conviction to create the appearance of accountability while leaving the broader network untouched. He has defended her refusal to answer congressional questions by saying she had already answered hundreds of questions during a DOJ interview with Todd Blanche, and he has continued pushing the idea that her conviction and sentence should be overturned or reduced. Mark Epstein has attacked the process from the other side, focusing on Jeffrey Epstein’s death in federal custody and the government’s explanation afterward. He has repeatedly rejected the DOJ inspector general’s conclusion that Epstein died by suicide, demanded a new investigation, questioned the autopsy, the jail video, the missing or disputed footage, the handling of evidence, and the speed with which officials closed ranks around the suicide ruling. Whether one accepts his claims or not, Mark has become one of the most vocal critics of the official story, arguing that the government has hidden information and that the public has been fed a managed narrative instead of a transparent accounting. Together, Ian and Mark represent two family-driven attacks on the same system: one saying Maxwell was used as a scapegoat, the other saying Epstein’s death was covered up, and both insisting that the real truth has been buried behind procedure, secrecy, and institutional self-protection. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com