Bards, Rise!

Bards, Rise!, April 9, 2026

Bards, Rise! with host Michael Deem The Quantum Financial System - Reclaiming Economic Freedom with Guest Kelly An introduction to the transition from legacy debt slavery to decentralized asset-backed sovereignty. This episode of Bards Rise features guest expert Kelly, who provides a comprehensive overview of the transition from traditional centralized banking to the Quantum Financial System (QFS). The discussion explores how this new infrastructure aims to eliminate "debt slavery" by implementing a decentralized, asset-backed, and technologically superior financial framework. The Evolution of Global Finance: From Control to Autonomy The Quantum Financial System (QFS) is described not merely as a technical upgrade, but as a revolutionary shift in the world's financial network infrastructure. Its primary objective is to eliminate the control of central banks and provide humanity with freedom from debt-based economic systems. Unlike the current binary systems (0s and 1s), the QFS utilizes quantum computing for high-speed, complex processing, ensuring that transactions are completed and settled in near real-time—often within 15 to 20 seconds. This system incorporates advanced encryption to prevent unauthorized access and is designed to be highly resistant to the fraud and middleman fees prevalent in the legacy "Swift" system. Technical Pillars: Blockchain, ISO 20022, and Digital Assets A critical component of the QFS is the adoption of the ISO 20022 standard, a global overhaul of financial messaging that officially began its major transition on November 22, 2025. This standard ensures interoperability between different countries and institutions, effectively ending the monetary monopoly of the old Swift system. Within this ecosystem, digital assets like XRP (Ripple) and XLM (Stellar) play vital roles. XRP recently won a significant legal battle against the SEC, confirming its status as a digital currency rather than a security. Meanwhile, the Stellar network acts as a decentralized, open-source bridge for cross-border transfers, aiming to empower billions of "unbanked" individuals by allowing them to control their own finances without traditional intermediaries. Historical Context and the Legal Battle for Rights The need for the QFS is rooted in a historical critique of fractional reserve banking and "usury" practices dating back to ancient Babylon. The discussion highlights how the Federal Reserve, though perceived as a government entity, was actually controlled by a small elite group until a reported takeover by "White Hat" elements in March 2020. This economic transition is linked to legal battles over property rights and land patents, where the conflict lies between "Common Law" rights and the "Equitable Title" used by banks to foreclose on properties. The QFS is framed as a return to a "level playing field" supported by various executive orders (e.g., EO 13818) aimed at blocking the assets of those involved in corruption and human rights abuses. Security and Participation in the New Era As the QFS continues its phased rollout, participants are urged to exercise extreme caution. The transition involves using digital wallets like "Lobstr," where the security of "secret keys" is paramount; losing these keys or sharing them with scammers results in the total loss of assets. The community often gathers on Telegram, following educators like "Whiplash347," but users are warned to avoid "get rich quick" schemes and only invest what they can afford to lose. The ultimate goal of the system is a "transfer of wealth" that equalizes buying power globally and provides abundance for all, moving away from the fear-based tactics of the old financial guard. The transition to the Quantum Financial System represents a paradigm shift from centralized debt slavery to a decentralized, asset-backed future. By combining quantum technology with historical legal principles like Common Law, the QFS aims to return financial power to the people, ensuring transparency, speed, and global economic equity.

Bards, Rise!, March 26, 2026

Bards, Rise! with host Michael Deem A legal battle for constitutional property rights against Debt Slavery This episode of Bard’s Rise features host Michael Dean and guests Mike and Leah as they discuss their high-stakes legal battle to reclaim their properties through Federal Land Patents. The discussion covers the constitutional superiority of legal title over bank-held equitable title and details a recent physical confrontation regarding warning signs placed for prospective buyers. The Legal Framework: Federal Land Patents vs. Equitable Title Mike and Leah's defense rests on the "Federal Land Patent" process, which traces property ownership back to the original grant from the U.S. government. According to the Michigan Supreme Court case Klais and U.S. Supreme Court precedent in Fenn v. Holme, a federal land patent represents the highest form of legal title. The host argues that while state courts often allow banks to foreclose using "equitable title" (mortgages and sheriff's deeds), federal law and the Seventh Amendment grant patent holders the right to a common law trial where such equitable claims cannot defeat a superior legal title. Active Litigation and the "Fire Sale" Mike and Leah are currently engaged in two major lawsuits. The first, Mike and Leah v. Choice One Bank (Case 26cv163), is pending in the Western District of Michigan, with an emergency appeal currently before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding a preliminary injunction. Simultaneously, they are suing the State of Michigan, including Governor Whitmer and Attorney General Nessel, challenging the constitutionality of the state's foreclosure statutes. Amidst this litigation, Choice One Bank has initiated "fire sales" of the Mike and Leah's properties—a school and a custom-built home—listing them at roughly half their estimated market value to quickly transfer the "hot potato" to unsuspecting buyers. The Signage Confrontation and "Caveat Emptor" To protect potential buyers, Mike and Leah placed a 6x9 foot warning sign on an adjacent property owned by Leah’s mother, stating "Buyer Beware" and citing their federal case number. The sign was repeatedly removed, leading to a confrontation with a Choice One Bank representative and local police. Mike and Leah emphasize the doctrine of Caveat Emptor (buyer beware), warning that if they win their federal case, any third-party purchaser would likely be evicted by U.S. Marshals without recourse against Mike and Leah. Mike and Leah's case represents a fundamental challenge to the modern banking and foreclosure system, positioning the 19th-century Federal Land Patent as a constitutional shield against 21st-century debt practices. While Choice One Bank continues to push for a rapid sale of the contested properties, the pending federal litigation and Mike and Leah's aggressive public notice campaign have created a complex legal environment that may set a significant precedent for property rights nationwide.

Bards, Rise!, March 12, 2026

Bards, Rise! with host Michael Deem Bard's Rise: The Struggle for Property Rights and Land Patents Bard's Rise: The Homesteading Siege Saga Mike & Leah’s legal crusade to reclaim property rights through Land Patents. Broadcast: March 12, 2026 #LandPatent #7thAmendment #PropertyRights #CaveatEmptor Host: Michael Deem | Guest: Mike & Leah Duration: 49:19 | Target: Homeowners & Legal Reformers Active Legal Fronts 6th Circuit Court of Appeals (Case 26-1238) Motion for Preliminary Injunction to restore possession of the family home. Quiet Title vs. Choice One Bank Challenging "equitable title" with superior Land Patents and 7th Amendment jury rights. Constitutional Challenge vs. Michigan Naming 5 defendants including the Governor and AG regarding statutory framework violations. Strategic Outreach Contacted Top 25 Podcasters (Rogan, Carlson, Kelly). Received encouraging response from White House staff regarding "restoring fairness." Educating the public on Land Patents and the "debt slavery" mortgage system. The Human Cost “ All I want for my birthday is our house back. — Mike's Birthday Wish Incident Log • Police Presence: Multiple vehicles observed at the property; suspected bank-ordered escort. • Cramped Living: Large family currently managing in temporary, restricted space. • Business Limbo: Daughter's coffee shop startup paused; equipment in storage. This episode of Bard's Rise features host Michael Deem and guests Mike and Leah as they discuss their ongoing legal battle to reclaim their homestead and community center. The conversation centers on the emotional impact of their eviction, the strategic use of federal land patents, and the broader movement to protect American homeowners from corporate foreclosure systems. Detailed Summary Personal Impact and Recent Developments Mike and Leah recently finished vacating their community center and home, a process that included moving heavy construction equipment and coffee shop fixtures over a difficult weekend. The family is currently staying on a property adjacent to their former home, allowing them to witness police presence and unidentified cleaning crews occupying their house, which has caused significant emotional distress for both the parents and their children. During the show, it was revealed that Mike’s only wish for his recent birthday was simply to have his home back. ⚖️ Active Legal Framework Case 1: Quiet Title vs. Choice One Bank to establish superior legal title via land patents. Case 2: Constitutional Challenge vs. State of Michigan regarding statutory foreclosure frameworks. Case 3: Federal Appeal (Case #26-1238) seeking a preliminary injunction for immediate repossession. Legal Strategy and Federal Appeals The legal team has escalated the fight to the federal level, filing a motion for a preliminary injunction with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (Case #26-1238). This motion seeks to return the family to their property while the case is finalized. Michael Deem noted that Choice One Bank has recently conceded facts in their filings that support an action for "ejectment," which the team plans to use to supplement their complaint. The strategy relies heavily on educating the court about the history of land patents and the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial, which they argue is being bypassed by Michigan’s current state laws. Corporate Exploitation and Public Outreach The discussion highlighted the role of "HP Foreclosure Solutions" and "BSJ Real Estate," entities that purchased the property for significantly less than its accumulated equity. Mike and Leah shared their frustration after attempting to serve these companies with legal notices, only to have all certified mail returned because the entities provided no valid physical address. To bring national attention to these "windfall" foreclosures, the hosts have reached out to the top 25 podcasters in the country. They also shared an encouraging response from White House staff, indicating that their situation is being monitored as part of a larger effort to restore fairness to property law. Media & Government Outreach 🎙️ Top 25 Podcasters Information sent to Rogan, Carlson, and others. 🏛️ White House Received encouraging message regarding "clarity and resolution." Key Data Sixth Circuit Court Case Number: 26-1238. Public Call-in Numbers: 888-627-6008 (Toll-free USA) and 323-744-4831 (Direct). Involved Entities: Choice One Bank, HP Foreclosure Solutions, and BSJ Real Estate. Historical Context: The Homestead Act entitlement of 160 acres was cited as the intended foundation for American land ownership. To-Do / Next Steps Michael Deem will post the five primary legal documents to the current show page for public review. The legal team will file a motion to supplement the First Amended Complaint based on recent concessions made by Choice One Bank. Mike and Leah are considering installing large banners on their adjacent family-owned land to warn potential buyers of the active litigation and "Caveat Emptor" (Buyer Beware) status. The team will continue to monitor the Sixth Circuit Court for a decision on the preliminary injunction. Conclusion The episode underscores a pivotal moment in the "homesteading siege saga," transitioning from a local property dispute to a federal legal challenge with national implications. While the family remains in a state of "limbo," the hosts maintain that the slow movement of the justice system is finally turning in their favor, supported by potential high-level government interest and a robust strategy centered on constitutional land rights.

Bards, Rise!, March 5, 2026

Bards, Rise! with host Michael Deem The Legal Siege of Bard's Rise: Federal Land Patents and the Reality of Eviction Bard's Rise: The Homesteading Saga Episode Analysis: Legal Battles, Federal Land Patents, and the Reality of Eviction (March 5, 2026) "It's a paper war. A war on who can write the best papers... but the system feels rigged against those without an attorney." — Leah & Mike, on their Pro Se legal battle Core Legal Arguments Federal Land Patent vs. Sovereign Citizen Explicitly distancing from the "Sovereign Citizen" movement to maintain legal credibility in federal court. Irreparable Harm Eviction from "Unique Property" (a custom-built 20-year home and a 60k sq ft community center) cannot be remedied by money. Procedural Failure Magistrate judge effectively denied the TRO by scheduling hearings after the eviction dates. Key Context #LandPatent #PropertyRights #ProSe #Eviction #FederalCourt Case Status Home Eviction:Completed (Mar 3) Business Eviction:In Progress Active Case 1:26-cv-163 (ChoiceOne) Active Case 2:26-cv-449 (vs. Michigan) Appeal:6th Circuit Pending Human Impact 3 of 4 children raised in the home. Mike built the house personally 21 years ago. Massive loss of equipment and inventory (siding, tools, coffee shop gear) due to storage constraints. Host: Michael Deem | Guests: Mike & Leah Est. Reading Time: 4 mins | Length: 36:52 Introduction This episode of Bard's Rise features host Michael Deem and guests Mike and Leah as they recount the harrowing experience of being evicted from their long-term family home and business properties. The discussion centers on the legal distinction of federal land patents, the systemic challenges faced by pro se litigants, and the emotional toll of a "paper war" against institutional banking and state interests. 1. Defining the Legal Identity: Federal Land Patents vs. Sovereign Citizens A critical portion of the discussion is dedicated to clarifying the legal framework Mike and Leah are utilizing. Host Michael Deem explicitly distances their movement from "sovereign citizens," a term often used by opposing counsel to discredit litigants. Instead, they identify strictly as federal land patent holders. While the term "allodial title" was previously used by AI-generated summaries of the show, Deem clarifies that they acknowledge state regulation and are not claiming to be above the law but rather seeking to invoke specific rights granted under federal land patents. The guests emphasize that they have never identified as sovereign citizens and believe such labels are tactical attempts by the opposition to prejudice the court. Legal Framework Comparison Position Description Sovereign Citizen Often associated with total immunity from taxes/laws; rejected by the guests. Land Patent Holder Reliance on federal land grants and constitutional supremacy; subject to state law. Note: The defense relies on the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution to argue that federal land patents supersede state court eviction orders. 2. The Physical and Emotional Toll of Eviction The narrative shifts to the recent evictions of Mike and Leah from two distinct properties: their custom-built family home and a massive community center. On March 3rd, the family was forced to vacate the home they built 20 years ago and where they raised their four children. Due to the speed of the eviction and a lack of storage, they were forced to abandon significant personal property, including heavy furniture and full kitchen cupboards. The second eviction involved a 60,000 to 70,000 square foot building that served as a hub for three family businesses: a construction company, a coffee shop, and a community center. Despite having a crew of 15 people helping, the sheer volume of equipment and inventory—including commercial kitchen appliances and 80 squares of siding—meant that more was left behind and likely destroyed than was successfully moved. 3. The "Paper War" and Systemic Hurdles Michael Deem criticizes the legal system's handling of the case, specifically the magistrate judge's failure to grant a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) or preliminary injunction. He argues that "irreparable harm" was clearly established because the properties are unique—one being a former middle school and the other a custom-built home. The guests express frustration with the "rigged" nature of the system, noting that while they cite dozens of cases in their filings, the opposing banks provide minimal citations yet receive favorable treatment. Furthermore, they highlight a lack of professional courtesy from the court, claiming that their phone calls as pro se litigants go unreturned. Active Legal Cases Case 1 26cv163 vs. ChoiceOne Bank Case 2 26cv449 Dalton v. Michigan Required for Injunction: 1. Likelihood of success on merits. 2. Irreparable harm (Unique Property). Key Data Property Size: The community center/business building is estimated between 60,000 and 70,000 square feet. Duration of Residency: The family lived in and owned their home for over 20 years (since 2005). Litigation Success Rate: Mike cites a statistic that only 12% of pro se cases typically win in court. Timeline: The current federal legal battle began around January 15th, leading up to the March 3rd eviction. To-Do Michael Deem will post the First Amended Complaint, Motion to Dismiss, and Opposition Brief for the ChoiceOne Bank case on the show page once BBS creates it. The legal team will file the bank's reply brief on the show page as soon as it is submitted. A complaint will be filed against the State of Michigan in case 26cv449, with the court to determine the specific individual defendants. Listeners are encouraged to open a PACER account to monitor the filings for cases 26cv163 and 26cv449. The host and guests plan to provide a more positive update in the coming weeks as the case moves to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Conclusion Despite the "doom and gloom" of the recent evictions, the participants remain committed to their legal strategy. Michael Deem likens the struggle to a long-term war that must be won "one bite at a time," asserting that this case will eventually be recognized as a landmark civil rights and property fight in American history.

Bards, Rise!, February 26, 2026

Bards, Rise! with host Michael Deem The Fight for Property Rights: Federal Land Patent (Legal Title) vs. Sheriff's Deed (Equitable Title) Bards, Rise!: The Battle for Freedom Defending constitutional property rights against systemic foreclosure, and legislative and judicial corruption. Mode B: Editorial Abstract 🎙️ The Case: Mike & Leah Dalton "They took garbage bags and just started dumping... Tables scratched, TVs in the parking lot. They didn't even honor the leases for our daughters' coffee shop." •The Eviction: Forced removal from a custom-built home (20 years) and a community school building by Choice One Bank. •Judicial Conflict: Allegations of ex parte communications between Magistrate Ray Kent's chambers and bank attorneys. •Systemic Crisis: 40,500 foreclosures recorded in the U.S. in January 2026 alone. ⚖️ Legal Doctrine Primary Claim Federal Land Patent Title Type Legal Title vs. Equitable Title Key Arguments: LAW: 7th Amendment: Right to a common law trial by jury, not a "mixed court of law and equity." PRECEDENT: Fenn v. Holme: Federal constitution and courts recognize the distinction between legal and equitable jurisdiction, claims and remedies, and honor those distinctions in proper cases. DEFENSE Caveat Lendor: Lenders must perform due diligence; equity cannot trump a federal land patent. #PropertyRights #CommonLaw #LegalTitle #JudicialReform #ImpeachRayKent Action Required: Contact federal representatives to investigate Case 26CV00163. Duration: 112 min Target: Property Owners & Activists In this episode of Bards, Rise!, host Michael Deem joins Mike and Leah Dalton to discuss their high-stakes legal battle against ChoiceOne Bank. The discussion centers on the use of Federal Land Patents to claim superior legal title which cannot be attacked in a court of law, by equitable title. If a state gives you a mixed court of law and equity, it's violating your Seventh Amendment rights and setting you up for failure. The mortgagee (bank) will win and you will lose your home. Detailed Summary of Proceedings The State Court Conflict and Jurisdictional Silencing The Daltons' struggle began in Michigan state court, where they faced foreclosure on two properties: a community school building and their custom-built home. During these summary proceedings, the Daltons were largely prevented from speaking because they were not licensed attorneys representing their LLC, despite being the holders of the federal land patent and the warranty deed. They argued that the state court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because their claim involved a federal land patent, which they believe requires a common law trial by jury under the Seventh Amendment. However, the presiding judges repeatedly ignored their motions to dismiss and their demands for a strictly common law venue, instead proceeding within a "mixed" court of law and equity that favors the bank's equitable title. Title Classification Comparison Equitable Title Mortgages, Sheriff's Deeds, and Bank Liens. Subject to foreclosure in equity courts. Federal Land Patent is unassailable in a court of law. A special type of equity comes in the aid of legal title and prevents equitable titles from attacking / challenging a federal land patent (legal title). Derived from Federal Land Patents. Claimed as superior, unassailable legal title "forever." As argued in Case Law: Fenn v. Holme & Wilcox v. Jackson Federal Litigation and Allegations of Judicial Bias Moving the fight to the Federal District Court for the Western District of Michigan (Case 26CV00163), the Daltons filed a First Amended Complaint seeking to eject the bank and quiet their legal title. The plaintiffs allege significant procedural irregularities, including an ex parte communication where the bank's attorney reportedly knew the court's jurisdictional ruling before it was issued. Host Michael Deem has called for the recusal of Magistrate Judge Ray Kent, accusing the court of acting in "bad faith" by mischaracterizing the Daltons' pro se filings and denying three separate requests for Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) that would have stayed their evictions. The Physical Impact: Eviction and Community Loss The human cost of the legal battle manifested in the abrupt eviction from the Daltons' community center. Despite previous assurances that tenants—including the Daltons' daughters' coffee shop—could remain, the bank changed the locks and reportedly "ransacked" the building, dumping personal property and business equipment into the parking lot in garbage bags. The Daltons are now facing a final eviction deadline for their primary residence, a custom home they built 20 years ago, which is scheduled for March 2, 2026. Despite these losses, the Daltons claim they have received multiple "offers to deal" from bank representatives and realtors, which they interpret as a sign that the bank is desperate to avoid a final ruling on the validity of the land patent. Property Status Dashboard Community School Evicted / Locks Changed Custom Family Home Eviction Set: March 2, 2026 Federal Case Status Active (26-cv-00163) Key Data Foreclosure Statistics: There were 40,500 foreclosures recorded in the United States in January 2026 alone. Federal Case Number: The Daltons' litigation is filed under index number 26-cv-00163 in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan (WDMI). Financial Disparity: One example cited involved a homeowner paying $36,000 over two years, with only $2,000 applied to the principal balance. To-Do / Next Steps Political Action: Contact federal congressmen and senators to demand an investigation into Case 26CV00163 and the impeachment of US Magistrate Judge Ray Kent. Public Awareness: Share the podcast episode and the "Gold Dust Titles" website (goldustitle.com) to educate others on the land patent process. Legal Monitoring: Open a PACER account to follow the filings in the Western District of Michigan for index 26-cv-00163. Eviction Readiness: Complete the packing and relocation of valuables from the family home prior to the March 2nd deadline. Conclusion The Daltons view their struggle not merely as a private property dispute, but as a "new civil rights movement" aimed at breaking the perceived stranglehold of central banking on American homeownership. By standing their ground on the "forever benefits" of federal land patents, they hope to establish a precedent that restores absolute property rights to "We the People".