Episode 7: Alfred Chandler, "The Visible Hand," 1977 with Dr. Richard John

Episode 10: Bernard Bailyn and Caroline Robbins, 250 Series

This episode explores the ideological foundations of the American Revolution, focusing on Bernard Bailyn's "Ideological Origins of the American Revolution," and Caroline Robbins' "The Eighteenth Century Commonwealthmen." We discuss how ideas from British political culture influenced American revolutionary thought, the role of pamphlets, and the enduring legacy of English liberalism. At the heart is our understanding of the United States as a uniquely creedal nation. After a wonderful summary and analysis of Bailyn's "Ideological Origins," Rob does his best to explain Robbins' exemplary "Eighteenth Century Commonwealthmen" which inspired Bailyn's work. Even though he admits that his knowledge of English history between 1650 and 1750 was not strong enough to get as much out of it as he could have. Key Topics: * Bailyn's argument on ideological origins of the revolution * Robbins' analysis of English liberalism and republican ideas * The influence of pamphlets and political culture in Boston * Miscommunication and conspiracy theories in colonial America * The legacy of English political traditions in American founding documents

Episode 9: 250 Series, Charles Beard, "Economic Interpretation of the Constitution," 1913

Have you ever thought of the US Constitution as an economic document? Charles Beard, one of the most important historians of the 20th century, did. In this episode, Robert Ferguson and Marie Totten explore Charles Austin Beard's influential work, 'An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution,' analyzing its impact on American historiography and its relevance to understanding the founding fathers' motivations. They discuss the economic interests behind the Constitution, the historiographical debates, and the legacy of Beard's theories. keywords: Charles Austin Beard, American historiography, Constitution, economic interests, founding fathers, Federalist Papers, revolutionary America, political economy, historiographical debate

Episode 8: John Hope Franklin, "Reconstruction After the Civil War," 1961

In this episode, Robert Ferguson and Marie Totten explore John Hope Franklin's influential work on Reconstruction, challenging traditional narratives and emphasizing the progress and potential of the era. They discuss Franklin's background, his impact on historiography, and the importance of understanding Reconstruction as a complex, political, and transformative period. Key questions we are left with are the role played by the early revisionists in the transition from the Dunning School to Foner.

Episode 7: Alfred Chandler, "The Visible Hand," 1977 with Dr. Richard John

Rob and Marie are joined by Columbia Distinguished Research Professor Dr. Richard John, author of Spreading the News and Network Nation, to discuss the life and magnum opus of his mentor Alfred Chandler. Rob and Marie pepper Dr. John with questions about how Alfred Chandler's "Visible Hand" shaped the field of business history, engaged with political history, and why his insights remain relevant today. Dr. John explains not only how this book redefined business history, but illustrated the crucial role of managerial practices in shaping economic outcomes. About Richard John Richard John is a distinguished research professor at Columbia University, specializing in the history of business and economic development.

Episode 6: William A Williams "Tragedy of American Diplomacy," 1959 with Grant Madsen

Grant Madsen from BYU pinch hits for Marie this week as Rob and Grant discuss this classic of the diplomatic history field. They keep coming back to Williams the man, and how this book reflects both a deep connection with America and yet a deep alienation from it. Both Grant and Rob, while not explicitly diplomatic historians, dabble in that field enough for this book (and books inspired by it) to have shaped the way they consider their own works. Therefore, there is a lot of interplay with their own research and it makes for a really personal discussion about the material. Any historian who has never read Williams should listen to this podcast for an introduction to him and his work, and anyone who has read him should listen too. If for not other reason than you can send your feedback on why Rob is wrong.