Poor Performer or Poor Environment? Neurodiversity & Performance Management
Before you start performance management, ask six critical questions:
Is this person capable of the work when conditions are right?
Is the struggle consistent across everything or specific to certain tasks?
Did performance change after something happened?
Are they trying?
What are we actually measuring?
Have we actually removed barriers or are you assuming that if they needed something they'd ask?
I share three case studies. Dave, a marketing officer with ADHD who missed deadlines and seemed distracted in meetings. His manager was ready for capability procedures. But Dave's missed deadlines were his ADHD brain struggling with time estimation. His incomplete reports were executive function challenges. His fidgeting helped him focus. The solutions were straightforward. Pair him with someone who thrives on organisation. Break projects into smaller milestones. Let him deliver updates verbally. His performance transformed.
Priya, a program manager who had been a star performer for three years before everything changed. She started missing meetings, her reports had errors, she seemed withdrawn. Her manager was frustrated. What had changed? Priya is Autistic and experiencing burnout. The charity restructured. New office layout, new systems, new team members. Every routine she'd built was disrupted. The open plan office was sensory hell. This wasn't poor performance. This was burnout from working in a non-inclusive environment. The solution was reduced workload while she recovered, noise-cancelling headphones, flexible working, and rebuilding routines.
Marcus, a fundraising officer with ADHD. His manager had made adjustments. Flexible hours, check-ins, smaller steps, headphones, a buddy system. But Marcus still wasn't performing. He missed donor meetings. He didn't follow up. His targets were unmet. And he didn't seem bothered. Sometimes people just aren't good at their jobs. Being ADHD didn't make Marcus a poor performer. Being in the wrong role with no motivation made him a poor performer. This one needed performance management, but neuro-inclusive performance management.
I walk through what inclusive neurodivergent performance management looks like. Write everything down. Be specific and concrete. Explain the process. Get external input to check for bias. Use a reasonable timeline. Document what you've tried. The cost of getting it wrong, either keeping someone who genuinely can't do the job or losing someone who could thrive with the right support, is too high to guess.
Key Takeaways:
* Before performance management, ask six questions to distinguish barriers from performance
* If someone can do the work sometimes, that suggests barriers not capability issues
* If performance dropped after a change, restructure, or new manager, that suggests barriers
* Autistic burnout can look like sudden poor performance. It's caused by working in non-inclusive environments
* Sometimes people aren't good at their jobs. Being neurodivergent doesn't excuse lack of effort or motivation
* Inclusive performance management means writing everything down, being specific, explaining the process, getting external input, and documenting what you've tried
* The cost of getting it wrong is too high. Get expert help if you're unsure
Resources:
* Sign up for additional resources: subscribepage.io/5aVJvV [https://subscribepage.io/5aVJvV]
* Book a free call: https://calendly.io/leahmilnercampbell/30min [https://calendly.io/leahmilnercampbell/30min]
* More info: https://leahmilnercampbell.co.uk [https://leahmilnercampbell.co.uk]