THR Unfiltered #1 | Navigating the prohibitionist landscape of THR in the States

The economic impacts of prohibition | #GFN26 Keynote

The session will explore the economic dimensions of prohibition through a political economy lens. Drawing on data and insights from multiple markets, it considers how regulatory actions may influence consumer behaviour, demand across product categories and public perceptions. It will also examine potential fiscal effects and the dynamics of illicit trade in response to prohibition. Bringing together policy, data, and market insight, this session explores how prohibition shapes real-world outcomes for consumers, governments, and public health.

GFN.TV Interviews #90 | BLACK MARKET MAJORITY | 76% of Global Vaping Is Now Illicit

Over seven out of every ten vapes sold worldwide now come from the illicit market. Worth an astounding $47 billion USD annually, the global black market for vaping products accounts for 76% of all vapes sold, dwarfing the legal trade and proving restrictions largely ineffective. Shot on location at GFN 2026 in Warsaw, Poland, Shane MacGuill of Euromonitor International explains how taxes, restrictions, product bans, and regulatory barriers are driving consumers into illicit markets around the world. Featuring: SHANE MACGUILL Global Lead, Nicotine & Cannabis Euromonitor International euromonitor.com @ShaneMacGuill

Dealing with the health, wellbeing and ethical impacts of prohibition #GFN26

Safer nicotine products are increasingly popular for assisting those quitting smoking. Evidence continues to support the game-changing effect this can have on individual and community health. Some questions emerge from this. What should be the role of public health in this? Why do some public health professionals continue to ignore or dismiss the emerging evidence? Does ideology cloud judgements? Should personal choice and freedom be a priority? What legitimate role is there for regulation in this area?

The impact of prohibition on health and ethics #GFN26

How does prohibition of safer alternatives square with the Hippocratic oath? What are the ethics of accepting smokers' lives and wellbeing as collateral damage, in pursuit of the war on the nicotine industries? Why is giving alternatives to people who misuse substances viewed differently to permitting people who smoke access to less harmful alternatives? Supported by evidence from work successfully debunking bad science, including exposing research claims correlating viral TikTok videos about nicotine pouches to sales. Shouldn't we allow people to make informed judgements about their behaviour and their health?

THR Unfiltered #1 | Navigating the prohibitionist landscape of THR in the States

THR Unfiltered #1 | Navigating the prohibitionist landscape of THR in the States by GFN.TV