Jackie On:

Ep. 45 Curiosity

12 min · 30. apr. 2026
episode Ep. 45 Curiosity cover

Description

In the forty fifth episode of Jackie On:, Jackie discusses her thoughts on the types of curiosity, how they influence the ways people act in society today, and maybe what to do about it. Sources: Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. San Francisco: Harper And Row. Jackie’s thoughts and her experiences as a human being.

Comments

0

Be the first to comment

Sign up now and become a member of the Jackie On: community!

Get Started

1 month for 9 kr.

Then 99 kr. / month · Cancel anytime.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

All episodes

10 episodes

episode Ep. 44 Objectivity artwork

Ep. 44 Objectivity

In the forty fourth episode of Jackie On:, Jackie discusses her thoughts on objectivity as a practice in the scientific and journalistic fields alongside the belief that shapes it. Sources: Bahlai, Christie, Lewis J. Bartlett, Kevin R. Burgio, Auriel M. V. Fournier, Carl N. Keiser, Timothée Poisot, and Kaitlin Stack Whitney. 2019. “Open Science Isn’t Always Open to All Scientists.” American Scientist. January 30, 2019. https://www.americanscientist.org/article/open-science-isnt-always-open-to-all-scientists#. Clark, Stuart. 2018. “A Brief History of Stephen Hawking: A Legacy of Paradox.” New Scientist. March 14, 2018. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2053929-a-brief-history-of-stephen-hawking-a-legacy-of-paradox/. Crow, Michael M, and Greg Tananbaum. 2020. “We Must Tear down the Barriers That Impede Scientific Progress.” Scientific American. December 18, 2020. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/we-must-tear-down-the-barriers-that-impede-scientific-progress. Douglas, Heather. 2023. “The Importance of Values for Science.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 48 (2): 251–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2023.2191559. Meyer, Will. 2020. “The Abuses of Objectivity.” The New Republic. February 6, 2020. https://newrepublic.com/article/156486/abuses-objectivity. Radsken, Jill . 2019. “In ‘Why Trust Science?’ Naomi Oreskes Explains Why the Process of Proof Is Worth Trusting.” Harvard Gazette. October 22, 2019. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2019/10/in-why-trust-science-naomi-oreskes-explains-why-the-process-of-proof-is-worth-trusting/. Reiss, Julian, and Jan Sprenger. 2020. “Scientific Objectivity.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. October 30, 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-objectivity. Singh, Ajay. 2019. “Objective Journalism Doesn’t Exist | Opinion | the Harvard Crimson.” Www.thecrimson.com. October 22, 2019. https://www.thecrimson.com/column/little-nuances/article/2019/10/22/singh-objective-journalism/.

16. apr. 202619 min
episode Ep. 42 Wackiest Legal Defenses artwork

Ep. 42 Wackiest Legal Defenses

In the forty second episode of Jackie On:, Jackie explores a variety of wacky legal defenses and some of the ways they have been used in the court of law. Sources: Pogash, Carol. 2003. “Myth of the ‘Twinkie Defense’ / the Verdict in the Dan White Case Wasn’t Based on His Ingestion of Junk Food.” Archive.org. November 23, 2003. https://web.archive.org/web/20031202025625/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/11/23/INGRE343501.DTL. Price, Chris. 2009. “Identical Twin Escapes Hanging in Malaysia after Judge Fails to Tell Brothers Apart.” The Telegraph. February 8, 2009. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/malaysia/4559065/Identical-twin-escapes-hanging-in-Malaysia-after-judge-fails-to-tell-brothers-apart.html. Schone, Mark. 2003. “Boston.com / News / Boston Globe / Ideas / the Matrix Defense.” Web.archive.org. November 9, 2003. https://web.archive.org/web/20120324091019/http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2003/11/09/the_matrix_defense/. Wallin, Paul. 2014. “7 Unusual Criminal Defenses That Actually Worked | WK Law.” Wallin & Klarich. November 17, 2014. https://www.wklaw.com/7-unusual-criminal-defenses-actually-worked/. Additional sources were the Wikipedia entries for each legal defense.

19. mar. 202615 min