#24 - Anthropic's $1 Trillion Pause, Apple Glasses Slip to 2027, and the Pymetrics Hiring-Bias Audit

#24 - Anthropic's $1 Trillion Pause, Apple Glasses Slip to 2027, and the Pymetrics Hiring-Bias Audit

Joel and Stephen open on Anthropic's June 4 blog post "When AI Builds Itself," which calls for the industry to keep open the option of pausing frontier AI development — conditional on rival labs verifiably doing the same. The timing is the story: Anthropic confidentially filed an S-1 with the SEC on June 1, reportedly targeting a valuation between $965 billion and $1 trillion on roughly a tenth of that in revenue. With Rob Enderle of the Enderle Group calling the post strategic marketing rather than a concrete initiative, the hosts work through whether an industry-wide pause is even enforceable when Chinese labs aren't slowing down, and what a Walmart-sized valuation gap says about where the AI market sits right now. The second segment turns to Apple's N50 smart glasses, which Bloomberg's Mark Gurman now reports have slipped from late 2026 to late 2027. The first generation will ship with cameras, speakers, and Apple Intelligence but no in-lens display, priced between $200 and $500 against Meta's Ray-Bans — which currently move about 85% of global AI-glasses volume. The project lands squarely on Tim Cook's desk before he hands the CEO role to John Ternus on September 1. Stephen makes the case that Apple is chasing visual AI and tight iPhone integration rather than a Meta clone, with the caveat that the voice assistant needs a real upgrade before any of it works. Then the AI layoff reversal. A February CareerMinds survey of 600 HR professionals found two-thirds of employers who ran AI-driven layoffs are already rehiring, and over 90% regret the cuts. Gartner projects half of all AI-attributed customer service reductions will be undone by 2027. Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski, who once said AI was doing the work of 700 customer service agents, admitted the company "went too far" — even as Intuit is still cutting 3,000 jobs this summer citing AI. Joel and Stephen argue the layoffs were rooted in profitability and geographic labor arbitrage more than AI itself, and flag a separate reckoning coming once companies see their first real token bills. The episode closes on a Stanford, Chapman, and Northeastern study of the Pymetrics hiring platform — the largest independent audit of AI hiring algorithms to date, covering over 4 million applications between 2018 and 2022 and slated for the ACM FAccT conference in Montreal. The researchers found that more than one in four Black applicants went to roles where the algorithm produced outcomes severe enough to trigger federal discrimination scrutiny, and because scores are reused across employers, a rejection by one company predicts rejection by the next. With the EU AI Act now classifying hiring algorithms as high-risk under Annex III, the conversation lands on whether a score generated in January should still be deciding interviews in June.

#23 - Musk vs. Altman: Vendetta or Principle?

In April 2026, Elon Musk and Sam Altman faced each other in a federal courthouse in Oakland, California — two men who co-founded OpenAI in 2015 on a shared promise to build AI for humanity, now arguing in front of nine jurors about who owns the soul of it. In this episode, Joel and Stephen go deep on the full story. Who are these two men, really? Where did they come from, what drives them, and were they ever actually compatible? Joel breaks down the founding, the power struggle, and the trial itself — including the Greg Brockman diary entry that's now sitting in front of a federal jury, and the Microsoft partnership restructuring that OpenAI announced on the same morning the trial opened. Stephen, drawing on decades of experience inside technology organisations, gives his unfiltered read on whether this is a values clash, a power struggle, or — as he puts it — just petty bullshit at the highest level of the industry. They also get into what the verdict actually means: whether OpenAI is already too big to unwind regardless of the outcome, why Anthropic may be the quiet winner of this whole saga, and what it signals about AI governance when the most important question in the industry is being decided by a judge in Oakland rather than anyone who was elected to decide it. Stephen's prediction: OpenAI wins. Musk walks away looking like an angry, disgruntled founder. The law book will settle it — and it'll come down to what was written, not what was promised over dinner in 2015. ---------------------------------------- Also referenced in this episode: Van Wijk & Ferreira Gomes, "The GOALS of the Techno-Libertarian", Netherlands Institute of International Relations, 2026 · Drexel & Withers, "Terms & Concerns," Catalyzing Crisis, Center for a New American Security, 2024 · Fuchs, "The World in the Age of Trump 2.0", University of Westminster Press, 2025 · Polan, "Growth's Imagination", Bristol University Press, 2025 Signal — listen wherever you get your podcasts.

#22 — Mythos: The AI Model That Spooked the World

Anthropic built an AI model that can find hidden vulnerabilities in the software running the world's banks, power grids, and governments. They called it Mythos. Then they decided who gets access — and every country outside the US and UK found out they weren't on the list. In this episode, Joel and Stephen break down what Mythos actually does, why the geopolitical fallout was immediate and global, and what it means for the rest of us when a private company in San Francisco becomes the most important actor in global cybersecurity — whether anyone elected them to or not.

#21 – The Altman Problem, the Chip War & the Shoe Company That Became an AI Firm

Sam Altman was fired from OpenAI in 2023 for not being "consistently candid." He was back five days later. The question his board raised never went away — and a recent New Yorker investigation digs directly into it. Joel and Stephen unpack what the reporting actually says, and why it matters that the person running the world's most influential AI company has a documented credibility problem. Then: Elon Musk is reportedly trying to build his own chip factory from scratch — bypassing NVIDIA, ASML, and the entire global semiconductor supply chain. Stephen explains what that actually costs, how long it takes, and why vertical integration might be the only real play. Finally: Allbirds, the wool sneaker company that peaked at a $4B valuation and has since lost 95% of its stock value, just rebranded as NewBird AI. Their stock jumped 700% in a single session. No product. No customers. No revenue in the new category. Signal — listen wherever you get your podcasts.

#20 - Dario, Sam & Karp: Who's Actually Walking the Walk?

In February 2026, Dario Amodei, Sam Altman, and Alex Karp all faced the same external pressure — a Pentagon contract, a binary choice — and responded in completely different ways. This episode uses that moment as an entry point into a deeper question: what does a leader's behavior under real-cost, real-consequence pressure reveal that normal operations never can? Joel and Stephen go through each of the three, examining their backgrounds, what shaped them, and what their public actions that week expose about how they actually lead. From Amodei turning a government blacklisting into $5 billion in monthly revenue growth, to Altman's public walkback of a deal he'd called sloppy hours after signing it, to Karp's twenty-year track record of saying exactly what Palantir does and never flinching — the episode draws out a clear through-line: leaders who are unambiguous about what they stand for create more durable organizations than those who try to be everything to everyone. Signal — listen wherever you get your podcasts.