The FCC Reshapes the Satellite Landscape, and That Market is Poised to Thrive

NASA Shuffles the Directorate Deck, and the Realities of Orbital Refueling

NASA is reshaping its leadership structure [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/nasa-reorganizes-mission-directorates] in what Administrator Jared Isaacman is calling a realignment to accelerate mission delivery. Under the reorganization announced last week, the agency is consolidating its five mission directorates into three. The ‘Exploration Systems Development’ mission directorate and the ‘Space Operations’ mission directorate are merging into a new ‘Human Spaceflight’ mission directorate. On the technology side, the ‘Aeronautics Research’ and ‘Space Technology’ directorates will combine into a new ‘Research and Technology’ mission directorate, which will also take on nuclear power and propulsion development. The ‘Science Mission Directorate’ remains unchanged. One of the more significant structural shifts: all directorate leaders will now report directly to the Administrator, rather than through layers of management. Isaacman says the goal is to cut bureaucratic drag and focus the agency’s talent on its top priorities, returning humans to the Moon, building a sustainable lunar base, and expanding the commercial economy in low Earth orbit. The reorganization also brings new leadership to three field centers, Goddard, Glenn, and Kennedy, and sets up a competition for the contract to manage the Jet Propulsion Laboratory when Caltech’s current agreement expires in 2028. For the commercial space industry, the realignment signals where NASA is directing its institutional weight. A leaner, more mission-focused NASA, with directorates reporting directly to the top, could mean faster decisions on commercial partnerships, procurement actions, and program commitments. That matters for anyone in the supply chain waiting on a government signal to move. -0- Blue Origin is making one of the largest single manufacturing investments [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/upper-stage-facility-to-bring-500] in Florida’s space history. The Jeff Bezos-founded rocket company announced a 600-million-dollar expansion of its Rocket Park campus at Cape Canaveral, a project the company is calling Project Horizon. The centerpiece is an 830-thousand-square-foot upper stage manufacturing facility designed to increase the volume and mass Blue Origin can deliver to orbit from Florida. The project is expected to generate 500 aerospace jobs, with average salaries topping 98-thousand dollars a year. For the Space Coast, this is more than a construction announcement. Upper stage manufacturing is a high-precision, high-skill segment of the launch supply chain, the kind of facility that anchors a regional industrial base and draws sub-tier suppliers into the area. Blue Origin’s investment is a long-term signal that it intends to compete aggressively in the launch market from Florida. And the ripple effects on local suppliers, workforce pipelines, and adjacent infrastructure could be substantial. -0- Meanwhile, about 1,000 miles to the west, Firefly Aerospace is executing a different kind of manufacturing buildout [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/spacecraft-production-capacity-expands], one focused on turning spacecraft production from a one-at-a-time process into a repeatable assembly line. The Cedar Park, Texas company has moved into a new headquarters campus, adding two new buildings to its existing spacecraft facility. Put together, the new buildings give Firefly roughly 144-thousand square feet of unified space — double what it had before. That campus sits less than 30 miles from the Rocket Ranch in Briggs, Texas, a 200-acre complex with six test stands dedicated to launch vehicle development. The centerpiece of the expansion is a new cleanroom ... four times larger than Firefly’s existing one and funded by a Texas Space Commission grant ... designed to support dedicated assembly lines for Blue Ghost lunar landers and Elytra orbital vehicles. Running multiple vehicles through integration concurrently is a direct answer to the production bottlenecks that have slowed spacecraft manufacturers trying to scale. Firefly has also established an in-house innovation lab called Gloworks, bringing propulsion, carbon composites, robotics, and 3-D printing capabilities under one roof. The idea is to compress lead times and keep critical intellectual property inside the company rather than farming it out to external suppliers. The company says the Cedar Park investments allow Firefly to template its Blue Ghost lunar lander into a production line capable of supporting multiple lunar missions per year. For a commercial space industrial base that is still largely built around one-off fabrication, that kind of throughput ambition is worth watching closely. -0- A new report released at the 2026 ASCEND Conference is putting hard numbers on a concern that has been building quietly in the launch industry: the United States may not have enough capacity to handle what’s coming. The report is titled “SCRUBBED: America’s Launch Capacity Challenge” [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/us-launch-capacity-could-fall-short]. It was produced by Rational Futures in partnership with the Commercial Space Federation using FCC regulatory filings, government budget data, and orbital mechanics modeling to map three demand scenarios against existing U.S. launch infrastructure. The numbers are significant. With more than 180 launches conducted from U.S. soil in 2025, the report finds that demand could require up to 7,000 launches per year depending on which satellite constellations move to full operation. Annual spacecraft demand could range from 6,000 to as many as 230,000 satellites. The report identifies two categories of concern. At traditional launch sites like Cape Canaveral and Vandenberg, the primary obstacle isn’t physical space, it’s coordination. The report calls for a central management authority to handle zoning, shared infrastructure scheduling, and a reduction of evacuation zones through improved analysis of methane explosive yield. For newer and non-traditional inland spaceports, the challenge is economics. Standing up a site capable of supporting 10 to 20 orbital launches per year costs roughly 200-million dollars, a figure that market activity alone is unlikely to recover. The report identifies federal tools that could bridge the gap, including anchor tenancy arrangements and direct capital funding. The findings are landing at a policy-active moment. The Trump Administration is currently revising the National Space Transportation Policy, and the report’s authors are explicit: waiting for market forces to solve this problem on their own is not a viable approach. Every time a rocket lifts off, the camera follows the name on the side of the vehicle. The prime contractor gets the headline, the press release, and the investor call. The hundreds of suppliers who built the guidance system, the valves, the thermal protection, the power electronics, they get nothing but a purchase order. [Paywall] That gap between visibility and contribution has a name. Michael Daily, president of NewSpace Brand Builders and Ex Terra Media contributor, calls it the Integration Illusion [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/brandspace-the-integration-illusion], and he argues it isn’t just a communications problem. It’s a strategic market power problem with consequences that run through the entire space industrial base. Here’s how it works. System primes capture nearly all market visibility, investor attention, political prestige, and public brand authority. The component suppliers who enable mission success remain commercially anonymous, even when their technology is the actual source of mission differentiation. A propulsion supplier may solve an historic efficiency problem. A sensor company may create breakthrough imaging capability. A materials firm may engineer survivability essential for deep space. But the market only remembers the name painted on the spacecraft exterior. Daily identifies four downstream effects that should concern anyone tracking the health of the space industrial base. First, invisibility weakens supplier pricing power. When buyers treat subsystem providers as interchangeable, procurement gets driven by cost pressure alone. That compresses margins across the supply chain and discourages long-term innovation investment. Second, it damages capital formation. Investors gravitate toward companies with visible market narratives. Suppliers without strategic brand presence often struggle to communicate their relevance beyond technical specs, and their innovations end up hidden inside someone else’s story. Third, invisible suppliers lose the talent competition. The next generation of engineers increasingly wants to work for companies associated with purpose and recognition. Technical excellence isn’t enough if nobody knows you exist. Fourth, and this is the one that should keep program managers up at night, invisibility increases systemic industrial fragility. If critical suppliers can’t sustain profitability, attract investment, or recruit expertise, the broader ecosystem becomes structurally vulnerable. Large primes may appear stable while the niche suppliers beneath them are quietly undercapitalized and at risk. Daily’s prescription isn’t louder marketing. It’s repositioning. Suppliers need to stop describing themselves through technical specifications and start communicating strategic consequence. Not “we manufacture radiation-hardened electronics.” But rather: mission survivability and national space resilience depend on our capability. That’s the kind of narrative that changes a procurement conversation. -0- The regulatory door for commercial on-orbit refueling [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/fill-er-up-and-check-the-fluids] has officially opened, and the suppliers who were already positioning themselves are pulling ahead. [Paywall] On March 24th of this year, the Office of Space Commerce released its proposal for a voluntary Space Commerce Certification process. The framework creates a consolidated interagency review pathway for commercial activities that fall outside existing regulatory regimes, explicitly including satellite servicing, on-orbit refueling, proximity operations, and orbital computing. The certification process is opt-in, not mandatory. But it provides something more valuable than a mandate: a predictable approval process that institutional customers, including the Department of War, can point to when justifying commercial service contracts. That’s the bridge between demonstration missions and recurring revenue. And the demonstrations are coming fast. Four U.S. government missions in 2026 represent the most concentrated refueling test push the industry has ever seen. Astroscale U.S. is the highest-profile. Funded by the Space Force’s Space Systems Command, its refueler is manifested for a summer 2026 launch. It will attempt the first-ever hydrazine refueling operations above geosynchronous Earth orbit, targeting Space Force Tetra-5 satellites. This is a live operational mission, not a lab experiment. Orbit Fab is pursuing a parallel commercial track. Its Rapid Attachable Fluid Transfer Interface, known as RAFTI, was approved by the Defense Innovation Unit as an accepted standard in 2024 and is already embedded in government procurement language. Orbit Fab has signed the first government and commercial fuel delivery agreements in geosynchronous orbit. The company holds a European Space Agency contract worth approximately 830-thousand dollars to work with telecom primes on integrating xenon refueling technology into commercial satellites. The standardization angle is critical. RAFTI is positioning itself the way USB-C positioned itself in consumer electronics, a single interface that makes every compatible satellite a potential refueling customer. Every GEO satellite launched without that interface is a satellite that cannot access Orbit Fab’s service. That’s a supply chain dependency that satellite manufacturers, operators, and investors need to be mapping right now. The commercial refueling market entered 2026 with analyst estimates in the range of $1.65-billion. The question isn’t whether the market is real. The question is whether your supply chain is positioned to capture the first contract cycle, or whether you’ll be watching someone else walk through the door. -0- A geopolitical sorting mechanism is quietly restructuring the technology supply chains [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/pax-silica-is-sorting-your-suppliers] behind commercial space hardware, and it’s moving faster than most vendor qualification timelines. [Paywall] In December 2025, the United States launched the Pax Silica Initiative, aligning twelve nations around a shared trusted-vendor framework for semiconductors, artificial intelligence hardware, critical mineral refining, and advanced manufacturing. The founding coalition includes Japan, South Korea, the Netherlands, Israel, Australia, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, India, and Qatar. Under-Secretary of State Jacob Helberg described the coalition as equivalent to what the G7 was to the industrial age. U.S. diplomats have been directed globally to use Pax Silica to identify infrastructure projects and coordinate economic security practices. Export controls, foreign investment screening, and anti-dumping enforcement are being coordinated across member nations. Those input categories; semiconductors, AI hardware, critical minerals, and advanced manufacturing, run through virtually every satellite, launch vehicle, and space-services platform in commercial production today. The companies with the most immediate exposure share two characteristics: significant revenue from U.S. government or allied-nation primes, and a production or sourcing base concentrated in China. In the commercial space sector, that describes a meaningful slice of the hardware ecosystem. Firms supplying radio-frequency systems, printed circuit board assemblies, power electronics, and electro-optical sensors frequently source sub-tier inputs from Chinese manufacturers. The same applies to launch vehicle suppliers sourcing carbon fiber composites, precision-machined aluminum structures, and rare-earth permanent magnets used in actuators and reaction wheels. The practical deadline is Q3 2026. Coalition members are actively identifying supply chain chokepoints and designing joint ventures to displace them. Suppliers whose sourcing remains China-anchored, without a documented diversification plan, are accumulating qualification exposure that will surface as program award risk before the end of this year. Worth a Second Look Strategic Investment Backs Commercial Space Station as ISS Retirement Nears [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/strategic-investment-backs-commercial] Vertical Integration Powers Rocket Lab’s $90M Space Force GEO Satellite Award [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/vertical-integration-powers-rocket] NASA Outlines First Missions, Awards Rover Contracts for Permanent Moon Base [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/nasa-outlines-first-missions-awards] The Professional Infrastructure Gap in Space Communications [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/the-professional-infrastructure-gap] [Paywall] European Launch Capacity as a U.S. Supply Chain Hedge [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/european-launch-capacity-as-a-us] [Paywall] StockTheme Music [https://www.pond5.com/royalty-free-music/item/108525138-interesting-facts-60sec-technology-science-production-fun] Provided by Pond 5 [https://www.pond5.com] This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.exterrajsc.com/subscribe [https://www.exterrajsc.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2]

NASA GAO Questions the Moon Lander Program, and AIAA Publishes Satellite Operator Best Practices

NASA’s own watchdog is raising serious concerns [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/auditors-flag-cost-overruns-safety] about the agency’s commercial lunar lander programs, and the findings touch everything from cost controls to crew safety. The agency’s Office of Inspector General has issued audits covering both the Commercial Lunar Payload Services initiative, known as C-L-P-S, and the Human Landing Systems program, or H-L-S, which is developing crewed landers for the Artemis campaign. On the C-L-P-S side, auditors found that costs had risen by more than 208 million dollars across the portfolio, with average schedule delays reaching at least 14 months per task order. NASA’s original delivery timelines were based on overly optimistic assumptions about the commercial market, assumptions that failed to account for supply chain constraints and technical development challenges. The average time from contract award to launch was running 44 months, compared to the 30-month target NASA originally set. The firm-fixed-price contracting model NASA uses, which puts financial risk squarely on vendors, created enough pressure that one C-L-P-S contractor went bankrupt. Others continue to operate under financial strain. The Human Landing Systems program tells a more nuanced story. Auditors found that contracting costs had been largely controlled, the SpaceX H-L-S contract increased by just six percent, and the Blue Origin contract by less than one percent. But technical and integration hurdles remain, and the crew safety picture is incomplete. Specifically, auditors found gaps in NASA’s testing posture and said crew survival analyses were not finished. And there is a live disagreement between NASA and SpaceX over whether the company is meeting the requirement for manual astronaut control during lunar descent, a potentially critical safety issue if something goes wrong during final approach. NASA has confirmed that Artemis Three will include critical on-orbit tests, rendezvous and docking with one or both landers, as a precursor to Artemis Four, which would return humans to the lunar surface for the first time in more than 50 years. -0- The aerospace industry has raised the bar for satellite operations, releasing what may be the most comprehensive orbital safety document [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/industry-leaders-unveil-expanded] yet published, and the timing is deliberate. The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics published Version 3-point-0 of its Orbital Safety Best Practices for Satellite Operators this week. The document carries signatures from Amazon, Eutelsat, Iridium Communications, and SpaceX, a cross-section of the industry that reflects both the document’s reach and its ambition. The release coincides with ASCEND 2026, the A-I-A-A’s flagship conference running through this week in Washington, where orbital traffic management and space sustainability are front-and-center topics. The document covers the full lifecycle of a satellite, from design through disposal, and is written for global applicability. It is not a government regulation. It is a voluntary framework, and the authors are explicit about why: technology evolves faster than rulemaking, and guidelines built around goals are more durable than rigid rules that can’t keep pace. Some of the specific standards are worth noting. Satellites must be designed with reliable maneuvering capability and a radar cross-section large enough for tracking authorities to catalog them. Operators are expected to achieve a greater-than-90-percent probability of completing planned disposal. On orbit, operators are required to submit predicted position and velocity data to conjunction assessment authorities at least three times daily for low Earth orbit satellites. The standard threshold for a required collision avoidance maneuver remains one-in-ten-thousand, but when a potential collision could produce more than 50 debris fragments, the recommended threshold tightens to one-in-one-hundred-thousand. The disposal rule is direct: L-E-O satellites that cannot naturally decay within five years must be actively deorbited. And the document takes a firm position on pre-launch transparency, requiring operators to publicly share planned orbits, launch cadences, and satellite counts before launch. The governing principle is this: if something is discoverable after launch, it should be shared before. -0- A Jacksonville, FL company just closed a major funding round [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/star-catcher-65-million-round-targets] to build what it’s calling the first power grid in space. Star Catcher Industries has raised 65 million dollars in a Series A round — bringing total capital raised to 88 million dollars. The company uses optical power beaming to deliver electricity on demand to satellites in orbit, with no retrofit or custom hardware required on the receiving spacecraft. The first-ever space-based demonstration of that technology is scheduled to launch later this year. I spoke with Star Catcher co-founder and C-E-O Andrew Rush about what this raise means for the program and what comes next. (See Interview Transcript) Andrew Rush is co-founder and C-E-O of Star Catcher Industries. Joining the board as part of the Series A round is General John “Jay” Raymond, the first Chief of Space Operations of the United States Space Force. The satellite broadband race has a real second competitor now, and the stakes are significant. (Paywall) Amazon Leo, the low Earth orbit broadband service formerly known as Project Kuiper, is moving toward a mid-2026 commercial launch. Amazon rebranded the initiative last November, retiring the Project Kuiper name in favor of Amazon Leo. The company currently has more than 240 satellites in space and is working toward a constellation of more than 3-thousand, authorized by the F-C-C and planned across five deployment phases. The performance targets are competitive. Amazon Leo’s enterprise-grade terminal is designed to deliver up to one gigabit per second on downloads. Its standard residential terminal targets up to 400 megabits per second. Latency is expected in the 30-to-50 millisecond range, comparable to what Starlink delivers today. But scale is the key variable. Starlink currently operates roughly nine-thousand active satellites and has years of operational head start. Amazon Leo is just entering the market. Where Amazon may have its most meaningful edge is not in raw satellite count, it’s in ecosystem. Amazon Leo is being built with deep integration into Amazon Web Services, making it a natural connectivity layer for enterprises already running A-W-S cloud workloads. That positioning moves this competition out of a simple speed-and-price fight and into the enterprise infrastructure market, which is a very different battleground. Amazon C-E-O Andy Jassy recently described the service as “on the verge of launching,” noting the company has already secured revenue commitments from enterprises and governments. The broader commercial rollout is expected throughout the rest of 2026. -0- The in-space mobility sector keeps attracting serious capital, and the latest raise carries signals [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/portal-space-systems-50m-series-a] that go well beyond the headline number. (Paywall) Portal Space Systems, based in Bothell, Washington, closed a 50-million-dollar Series A in April, valuing the company at 250 million dollars. The round was led by Geodesic Capital and Mach33, with participation from Booz Allen Ventures, ARK Invest, AlleyCorp, and FUSE. It follows a 17-and-a-half-million-dollar seed round, one of the largest publicly disclosed seed financings in the sector at the time. The company was founded in 2021 by Jeff Thornburg, a former SpaceX engineer who helped develop the Merlin engine program. Its core technology is solar thermal propulsion, a system that concentrates sunlight directly to heat ammonia-based propellant, generating specific impulse approaching nuclear thermal performance levels, without a reactor and without the regulatory burden that comes with one. Portal’s Supernova spacecraft is designed to deliver up to 6 kilometers per second of delta-v across orbital regimes from low Earth orbit all the way to cislunar space. Orbital maneuvers that currently take weeks using conventional propulsion can be executed in hours or days. The investor mix tells the real story here. Booz Allen Ventures does not back science projects. Its director Travis Bales stated directly that the investment was made to, and this is a quote, “advance orbital warfare through the development of rapidly maneuverable spacecraft, something we know our customers need.” That is not investor relations language. That is a requirements statement delivered in a press release. Portal also carries a 45-million-dollar Strategic Funding Increase award, known as a S-T-R-A-T-F-I, from the U.S. Space Force’s SpaceWERX program. That award preceded the Series A close. When the Space Force backstops a commercial round before private capital comes in, that sequencing is a procurement signal, not a coincidence. The near-term proof point is Starburst-1, a smaller demonstration vehicle manifested on a SpaceX rideshare mission in the fourth quarter of 2026, designed to demonstrate rendezvous, proximity operations, and rapid orbital retasking. Eighty-one percent of Starburst and Supernova components are shared, a deliberate design decision that builds flight heritage for the full solar thermal system while generating near-term program revenue. The supply chain risk is real and worth noting. Portal’s production depends on additive manufacturing vendors capable of working with advanced thermal materials to tolerances that legacy aerospace manufacturing does not routinely hold. That sub-tier supplier base is small and not yet publicly mapped. The company has a C-E-O-stated target of four spacecraft per month by end of 2027, a production rate that has not been verified against confirmed facility capacity or supplier commitments. That is where the program risk concentrates, and it is the detail that procurement and program management professionals should be tracking. -0- The commercial space station race is further along than most people realize, and a close look at Starlab’s production architecture [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/starlabs-supply-chain-is-being-built] reveals both how far the program has come, and where the risks are hiding. (Paywall) On February 23rd, Starlab Space completed its Commercial Critical Design Review with NASA in attendance, the 28th milestone under its NASA Space Act Agreement. That review transitions the program from design into manufacturing and systems integration, and it positions Starlab for a milestone payment from NASA. The hardware is already being built. Vivace Corporation, a New Orleans-based manufacturer, was under contract before the review closed. It was awarded the job in September 2025 to build Starlab’s primary aluminum structure, one of the largest single spaceflight structures developed for launch in the commercial station era. Production is underway at NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility in Louisiana, the same facility that built the core stage for the Space Launch System. The supply chain architecture is what the industry calls a best-of-class assembly, a deliberate strategy to use proven aerospace integrators for each major component. But that strategy creates a specific risk profile. Vivace is a single-source contract for the primary structure. There is no publicly disclosed backup manufacturer. Leidos has been named as the sole assembly, integration, and testing provider, all at a single Alabama facility. And Airbus Defense and Space is not a minor partner in this program. It is the exclusive provider of technical design and engineering services, and co-owner of the European Starlab subsidiary. Three single-source dependencies, primary structure, integration, and design authority, in a program targeting a 2029 launch. The NASA Commercial Low Earth Orbit Destinations Phase 2 award decision, which shapes the funding future of this program, remains in open flux as of this week. Worth a Second Look Multi-Country Supply Chain Delivers Critical Systems for ESA-China Solar Wind Mission [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/multi-country-supply-chain-delivers] Flight-Proven Space Station Technology Powers New High-Power Satellite Bus Line [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/flight-proven-space-station-technology] Record Launch Contract and Robotics Acquisition Expand Rocket Lab’s Mission Capabilities [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/record-launch-contract-and-robotics] Satellite Communication Service and Equipment Market Projected to Reach $86.92 Billion by 2030 [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/satellite-communication-service-and] The Space Industrial Base Capacity Gap [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/the-space-industrial-base-capacity] (Paywall) Theme Stock Music [https://www.pond5.com/royalty-free-music/item/108525138-interesting-facts-60sec-technology-science-production-fun] Provided by Pond 5 [https://www.pond5.com] This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.exterrajsc.com/subscribe [https://www.exterrajsc.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2]

The FCC Rewrites the Rulebook on Direct-to-Device, and the Satellite Industry’s Annual Report

On May first, the Commission released a landmark Report and Order replacing decades-old energy caps with a performance-based spectrum sharing framework. The ruling is designed to sharpen competition between satellite, cable, and terrestrial wireless providers. And then, on May twelfth, the F-C-C issued a separate approval for SpaceX [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/fcc-approves-40-billion-echostar] to acquire approximately 65 megahertz of mid-band spectrum from EchoStar Corporation -- in a 17-billion-dollar transaction. That spectrum -- covering AWS-4, AWS H-Block, and unpaired AWS-3 licenses -- is the foundational layer SpaceX needs for its next-generation Direct-to-Device network. Commercial D-2-D services could begin as early as late 2026 for initial messaging and emergency alerts, with full constellation buildout extending through the next several years. Layer on top of that what the F-C-C had already done in April for AST SpaceMobile. The Commission granted AST commercial authorization to deploy a constellation of 248 satellites providing supplemental coverage from space -- using low-band 700 and 800 megahertz spectrum in coordination with Verizon, AT&T, and FirstNet. Half the constellation -- 124 satellites -- must be in orbit by August of 2030. And then this week, the story got even bigger. AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon announced plans for a joint venture to expand satellite-based direct-to-device connectivity across the United States -- specifically targeting unserved and underserved areas. The joint venture would pool spectrum, create common technical standards, and build what the carriers are calling a technology-neutral platform that any qualified satellite operator can plug into. The three carriers aren’t just customers here. They are becoming the infrastructure layer that determines which satellite operators succeed at commercial scale. For investors and supply chain managers watching the D-2-D market -- the regulatory and commercial framework just got a lot more real. -0- NASA has proposed a CLPS 2-point-0 procurement -- a competitive follow-on to its Commercial Lunar Payload Services program -- and the agency intends to launch monthly uncrewed missions to the Moon beginning next year. To support that cadence, NASA moved to raise the CLPS contract ceiling to 4-point-2 billion dollars. (Paywall) The most recent award went to Intuitive Machines -- a 180-point-4-million-dollar contract to deliver seven science and technology payloads to the Lunar South Pole region. That’s Intuitive Machines’ fifth CLPS task order. For context -- this is the company that successfully landed the first commercial spacecraft on the Moon in 2024. On the private side, Lunar Outpost just closed a 30-million-dollar Series B -- oversubscribed -- led by Industrious Ventures. The company now has eight fully contracted lunar and cislunar missions on its manifest before 2030, more than any other commercial surface-mobility provider. Revenue has doubled each year for four consecutive years. The White House is leaning in as well. The Trump administration’s commercial-first architecture is explicitly targeting lunar surface presence by 2028, framing satellite connectivity and lunar logistics as critical national infrastructure. The question worth tracking is not whether the lunar market is real. It is. The question is whether the supply chain serving it can scale fast enough. Component lead times, launch cadence, and ground infrastructure are the binding constraints -- and those are exactly the kinds of gaps that create near-term opportunities for suppliers who move early. -0- The GEO-to-LEO transition [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/geo-to-leo-migration] has stopped being a debate. It is now an operating reality -- and the numbers from early 2026 earnings make that clear. (Paywall) Eutelsat Group’s early-2026 results showed LEO revenues surging nearly 60 percent year-over-year, while GEO revenues declined 4-point-5 percent. For the first time, the growth curve of the new business visibly outpaced the decline of the old one. Eutelsat followed that with a contract with Airbus valued at between $2.34 and $2.57 billion dollars for 340 additional LEO satellites -- backed by a $1.75 billion capital increase supported by the French and British governments. Those governments aren’t just writing checks. They’re treating satellite connectivity as critical national infrastructure, and they want sovereign capacity that Starlink cannot provide. Telesat Canada tells a different version of the same story -- and a more turbulent one. The company faces a 1-point-7-billion-dollar debt maturity wall in December 2026, and creditor litigation alleging it moved its LEO constellation assets beyond the reach of GEO-linked lenders. Telesat has dismissed the suits. Its prime contractor MDA Space is completing a high-volume manufacturing facility in Quebec aimed at a full launch cadence of 156 Lightspeed satellites by end of 2027. SES and Intelsat merged for 3-point-1 billion dollars, creating a combined fleet of 120 satellites and projecting free cash flow above $1.17 billion annually by 2027 and 2028. The merged entity’s highest-growth segments now account for roughly 60 percent of combined revenue -- including medium-Earth-orbit capacity serving NATO and defense clients. The through-line: the concept of multi-orbit has moved from conference keynote buzzword to core operating model. Companies that couldn’t afford to make this transition aren’t around to talk about it anymore. The ones still standing -- Eutelsat, SES-Intelsat, Viasat -- are building hybrid architectures that neither orbit can serve alone. The hard part isn’t the boardroom decision. It’s the engineering: creating a system that will enable seamless handovers between disparate orbits for a passenger mid-flight or a naval vessel mid-maneuver. None of the major operators have demonstrated that at commercial scale. That is the milestone the industry’s credibility depends on. -0- SpaceX has confidentially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is targeting a late June initial public offering. The numbers being discussed are unlike anything the public markets have ever processed [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/the-spacex-ipo-and-the-space-vc-exit]. (Paywall) The most recent reporting puts the target valuation between 1-point-5 and 1-point-75 trillion dollars, with a fundraising goal between 50 and 75 billion dollars. Either figure would shatter the record set by Saudi Aramco’s 29-billion-dollar offering in 2019. At 1-point-75 trillion, SpaceX would enter the public market in the same bracket as Alphabet and Amazon. Prediction markets as of this week placed the probability of a June 30th listing at around 72 percent. SpaceX is essentially three businesses operating in parallel: Starlink, which generates the bulk of current revenue growth; the launch business, which has no close competitor on cost or cadence; and a nascent space infrastructure and A-I platform play that Elon Musk has described as Space A-I Data Centers. For space commerce investors and analysts -- the I-P-O matters beyond the price. A public SpaceX will file quarterly reports. For the first time, the market will have standardized financial visibility into the company that now controls a dominant share of global launch capacity, the world’s largest satellite constellation, and the regulatory approvals shaping the entire direct-to-device market. The information environment around space commerce changes materially the day that S-1 becomes public. -0- A new analysis published this week by the Journal of Space Commerce maps a supply chain constraint [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/the-invisible-bottleneck] that most constellation programs haven’t fully priced in: space-grade solar cells. (Paywall) Novaspace’s latest market report projects 16-thousand-900 small satellites launching between 2026 and 2035 -- roughly 1,400 pounds of hardware delivered to orbit every single day. But that headline number actually understates the pressure on the solar cell supply chain. In April, Space Systems Command awarded 20 Other Transaction Authority contracts worth up to 3-point-2 billion dollars to 12 companies prototyping orbital Space-Based Interceptors for the Golden Dome missile defense architecture -- including Anduril, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, SpaceX, and Raytheon. Each of those prototype satellites carries power requirements that must be met by space-qualified solar cells from the same supplier base already serving the commercial constellation market. None of that demand appears in the commercial procurement pipelines. The qualified supplier base for space-grade gallium arsenide solar cells comes down to two dominant players: Spectrolab -- a Boeing subsidiary in California -- and AZUR SPACE Solar Power, based in Germany. AZUR has been expanding aggressively -- up 35 percent in 2024, 30 percent in 2025, another 25 percent expansion announced in February for second-half 2026. Over three years, that’s roughly a 118 percent capacity increase. The problem is the baseline those percentages are measured against. It was already considered a bottleneck before the 2026 demand acceleration. And the binding constraint in that particular solar cell supply chain isn’t cell assembly -- it’s germanium wafers, the semiconductor substrate on which every triple-junction cell is built. The global germanium wafer market for space solar applications had a total value of approximately 125 million dollars in 2024. That is a small market to underpin 16-thousand-900 satellites, a proliferated interceptor constellation, and multiple sovereign programs. That germanium market is dominated by two players: Umicore, a Belgian materials company -- and China Germanium, a state-linked Chinese enterprise. China accounts for roughly 60 percent of global refined germanium output. In a scenario where export controls tighten or U-S-China trade tensions escalate further, a germanium supply disruption would propagate through the entire Ga-As cell production base. The downstream signal is already visible. Satellite integrators and mission designers have reported significant delays in solar cell procurement, with lead times lengthening and costs rising. For small satellite programs on fixed-price contracts, this is an active schedule and margin threat. For supply chain leaders -- the window to lock in 2027 and 2028 production slots is closing faster than most forward procurement schedules assume. -0- The Satellite Industry Association has released its 29th Annual State of the Satellite Industry Report [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/record-launches-and-broadband-growth], and Ex Terra Media sat down with SIA President Tom Stroup to discuss the findings. The commercial satellite industry wrapped up 2025 with records across the board -- more launches, more satellites, and more subscribers than ever before. Stroup says two forces are behind the surge. “I think it’s a combination of both demand and the ability to be able to manufacture and launch much more cost effectively than in the past. The vast majority of those satellites that were launched last year were for communications purposes. We’ve seen that access to broadband is considered essential across the globe,” Stroup said. “The demand is there for more and more connectivity and it doesn’t matter whether it’s consumers at home or whether it’s on board airplanes or maritime vessels. There’s an expectation that people are going to have access to the broadband service no matter where they are.” The price drop is just as significant as the technology leap. Stroup says satellite broadband is now competing directly with cable and fiber on cost. “The service starts at about fifty dollars a month. The cost of terminals is continuing to decrease. I think that the typical cost now is fifty dollars or less. So the ability to be able to manufacture and launch them and be cost effective is really the other major aspect of it.” Satellite broadband subscribers topped 10 million in 2025 -- a 62 percent jump in a single year. Stroup calls it a milestone -- but says the industry is just getting started. “I think it’s a very important milestone. But in some ways I’m just going to say it’s another number because we’re going to see 15 million, 20 million. The number is just going to continue to increase as more and more people who have not had access to broadband services are able to be served because of the ubiquitous coverage that the industry provides,” Stroup said. That growth is already rattling the competition on the ground. According to Stroup, those cable companies, those fiber companies that are in areas where they’ve been operating as monopolies are going to have to deal with competition from satellite companies that are providing very high speeds, high capacity, at very competitive prices. Meanwhile, manufacturing the satellites driving that growth is a massive undertaking -- and not without bottlenecks. Stroup says the supply chain is under strain. “We end up having to compete for chips as an example with other technology industries. But ours have the additional need of being radiation resistant,” Stroup said. “And there are other components -- just nozzles would be one example, the fuel containers that are used for launch -- those are still relatively small numbers. So those are some of the areas where we’re encountering supply chain issues.” One of the industry’s most-watched emerging sectors is Direct-to-Device -- the ability to connect a standard smartphone directly to a satellite. Stroup says it has moved from science fiction to shop floor. “The systems are being deployed. It’s just been a fascinating transition because we’ve gone from 10 years ago, people saying there’s no way you could make this work, to basically most satellite operators having a strategy in place and feeling that they need to have either partnerships or deployment plans,” he said. “We’ve already seen lives saved as a result of some of the emergency capabilities.” And mainstream consumers are already hearing about it. “Last year for the first time we saw mobile companies advertising their satellite capability -- whether it was at the Super Bowl or award ceremonies,” he continued. “It was the mobile companies who were making the announcements of that capability, because they see it as very important to their ability to compete with other mobile companies.” On Capitol Hill, Stroup says SIA’s top priority is securing U-S influence at the next World Radiocommunication Conference -- known as WRC-27 -- where global spectrum policy will be set. “Over 80 percent of the issues at WRC-27 are going to be related to satellites. I would say that congressional support for the U.S. naming the head of the delegation and then making sure that they’re encouraging the administration to move forward with positions that are supportive of the industry.” Stroup also sees China as the defining competitive threat -- and draws a cautionary parallel to the wireless infrastructure wars of the last decade. “One of the best examples would be Huawei. What they did with respect to infrastructure, especially for the wireless industry -- they were a very effective competitor, offering subsidized equipment that had a very negative impact on other manufacturers, both in the United States and in Europe,” he said. “We’re quite positive that Chinese companies that are going to be providing satellite-based services are going to do so at subsidized rates. So to the extent that they’re offering subsidized services in developing areas of the world, there’s a great risk to the United States. “The good news is we’ve got a lot of innovation capital coming into the industry, supportive government. But that needs to continue to make sure that we maintain our leadership position,” Stroup said The full State of the Satellite Industry Report is available through the Satellite Industry Association’s website. -0- Worth a Second Look Five Skills Every Space Communicator Needs — And Where the Gaps Are [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/five-skills-every-space-communicator] (Paywall) The NASA Station Award That Cannot Slip [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/the-nasa-station-award-that-cannot] (Paywall) Acquisition Would Create Integrated Commercial Lunar Communications Network [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/acquisition-would-create-integrated] Positioning, Without the Satellite [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/positioning-without-the-satellite] When (And Why) NASA Partners Instead of Buys [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/when-and-why-nasa-partners-instead] Theme Stock Music [https://www.pond5.com/royalty-free-music/item/108525138-interesting-facts-60sec-technology-science-production-fun] Provided by Pond 5 [https://www.pond5.com] This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.exterrajsc.com/subscribe [https://www.exterrajsc.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2]

Satellite Spectrum Rules Get a Major Update From the FCC. And the Earth Observation and Satellite Propulsion Markets

The Federal Communications Commission has updated the rules governing how geostationary and non-geostationary satellite systems share spectrum [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/satellite-spectrum-sharing-rules]. The Commission voted 3-0 on April 30 to approve a Report and Order that replaces a framework dating back to the late 1990s. That old framework was known as Equivalent Power Flux Density, or EPFD. The problem is that the satellite market no longer looks like it did in the 1990s. Modern broadband constellations can change signal behavior in real time, based on link conditions. The FCC’s new approach moves toward performance-based protection criteria, rather than fixed limits built for an earlier technical era. The Commission says the change could unlock as much as seven times more capacity for space-based broadband and generate more than 2 billion dollars in economic benefits. But the regulatory point is only half the story. The commercial point is that the FCC is clearing more operating room for satellite broadband to compete directly with cable, wireless and other terrestrial providers. FCC Chairman Branden Carr said at the April 30th meeting that the new rules will benefit consumers. “Today’s FCC decision will help supercharge that competition while expanding our country’s technological leadership,” Carr said. “Even though high-speed next-gen satellite services provide essential connectivity across the country already, Americans are now about to see a big upgrade. With today’s decision, Consumers could see a seven-fold increase in capacity for these high-speed satellite offerings.” The decision keeps pressure on private agreements and good-faith spectrum sharing. But it moves the center of gravity away from old technical caps and toward actual performance outcomes. For executives, investors and program managers, that is the signal to watch. Spectrum policy is now a direct driver of capacity, pricing and market entry. -0- Two new market reports this week tell the same broad story from different ends of the satellite business. One looks downstream, at satellite-based Earth observation. The other looks upstream, at propulsion. Together, they show where demand is growing and where the supply chain may come under stress. First, Earth observation [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/satellite-earth-observation-market]. According to Allied Market Research, the global satellite-based Earth observation market is projected to grow from $3.5 billion in 2022 to $6.4 billion by 2032. That is a compound annual growth rate of 6.6 percent. The demand drivers are familiar, but stronger: agriculture, urban planning, disaster management, climate monitoring and defense. Government procurement is still doing a lot of the heavy lifting, with NASA, NOAA and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency all buying more commercial data and analytics. The market is also shifting from raw imagery toward services. Observation-as-a-service, subscription imagery, on-demand tasking and AI-assisted analytics are becoming the more valuable layers. That is the downstream signal. The upstream signal is propulsion [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/satellite-propulsion-market-projected]. A MarketsandMarkets analysis projects the global satellite propulsion market will grow from a tweak over $2 billion in 2026 to $4.66 billion by 2031. That is a 17.6 percent compound annual growth rate. The reason is simple. Satellites are not passive hardware once they reach orbit. They need propulsion for orbit raising, station keeping, collision avoidance, repositioning and controlled deorbiting. Electric propulsion is expected to be one of the strongest growth areas because it lowers propellant mass and fits constellation economics. But there is a caution inside the growth number. Market size does not equal supplier depth. A market can grow quickly and still be constrained by manufacturing capacity, qualification timelines and a limited base of flight-proven providers. That is why these two reports should be read together. Earth observation growth means more demand for analytics and more government reliance on commercial data. Propulsion growth means more demand for the hardware that keeps satellites maneuverable. All of that points to value moving toward companies that can connect data, hardware, operations and procurement into something customers can use. -0- Next, we turn from market reports to the organizations that help hold the industry together. Space Foundation was established in 1983, and for more than 40 years it has played the role of convener across the global space community. It does not build rockets. It does not operate constellations. Its job is to build the ecosystem around the companies, agencies, investors and international partners that do. That role is easy to understate until the industry gets complicated. Right now, the industry is dealing with Artemis, Golden Dome, national security space, commercial stations, proliferated constellations and harder questions about international partnerships. Rich Cooper, vice president of Strategic Communications and Outreach at Space Foundation, made that point in a conversation on The Journal of Space Commerce podcast [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/space-foundation-convening-the-industry]. “I will say the state of relationships between international partners, who can do what, who is prepared to do what. Obviously, there’s a lot of challenge that’s going on in the world and lots of debate and discussion about what those alliances are and what they may look like in the future,” Cooper said. “But what you also, I would say, saw is relationships that have been built over decades. literally decades of collaboration and cooperation on countless numbers of missions. Those relationships remain as strong today as they were before. And that’s what gives, I would say, a great deal of energy to this community that we know we can do hard things. We know it’s going to take some challenge. We know that there are going to be some obstacles, but we know together we can get there. Artemis II proved that when you have all of the various pieces that came together and it all worked perfectly.” The point being that Space commerce is not just a collection of contracts. It is also a relationship network. It depends on which agencies trust which suppliers, and which international partners can still coordinate when politics get hard. The launch vehicles, the spacecraft and the payloads are visible. The trust network is more behind the scenes. But when programs become multinational and span multiple decades, the trust network becomes a very important part of the operating infrastructure. A piece of the American launch stack is changing hands again. AE Industrial Partners is taking a majority stake [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/rocketdyne-reborn] in Rocketdyne’s upper-stage propulsion assets from L3Harris Technologies in an 845 million dollar carve-out. AE Industrial Partners will acquire 60 percent. L3Harris will retain roughly 40 percent. (Paywall) AE Industrial Partners Managing Partner Kirk Konert told Ex Terra Media just after the acquisition was announced that the company was proud to be restoring a legacy name to the rocket propulsion market. “It’s been part of every lunar mission since the US started going to the moon and bringing humans to the moon and coming back to the moon this year. We’re really excited to be part of part of that in partnership with NASA and national security programs. And it’s I think it’s a really interesting model as we think about what’s happened with consolidation of all their aerospace and space companies over the last a few decades,” Konert said. “And now what we’re seeing is more of a deconsolidation and new entrants being being introduced into the market. This is part of part of that theme in a new way, which where L3 a prime has been part of the consolidation over the last couple of decades is now partnering with a specialized investor like AE industrial to reinvigorate and standalone a new platform in Rocketdyne, which includes some of the key workhorses of propulsion for our space and national security programs in the U.S.” The assets include the RL10 upper-stage engine, in-space propulsion systems, nuclear power assets for exploration missions and launch avionics. The RS-25 engine business is not part of the deal. The RL10 is the center of this story. It powers the Centaur V upper stage on United Launch Alliance’s Vulcan Centaur. That vehicle is tied to National Security Space Launch missions, including payloads for the National Reconnaissance Office, GPS Block III and Wideband Global SATCOM. That means this is not just another aerospace carve-out. It touches national security launch and the long-term industrial base behind upper-stage propulsion. AE Industrial Partners has said it wants to apply modern manufacturing discipline to the RL10 production line. That could mean additive manufacturing, better throughput and relief for a constrained supplier base. But the ownership question matters. Private equity operates on return horizons. National security launch programs operate on long-term infrastructure commitments. Those timelines can coexist, but they are not the same. And engine substitution is not easy. Upper-stage engines are tightly integrated into vehicle architectures. Qualifying an alternative engine for Centaur V could take two to three years of testing and integration work. If RL10 production improves, the deal could strengthen a critical piece of launch infrastructure. If ownership incentives or exit timing create disruption, customers do not have a simple procurement detour. For program offices, investors and primes, the question is whether the owner can steward an engine line that national security customers still depend on. -0- Previously, we talked about a satellite propulsion market forecast showing growth from just over $2 billion in 2026 to $4.66 billion by 2031. Those numbers sound healthy. But a separate supply-chain analysis asks a harder question: who is actually going to build all the thrusters the market assumes will be available? (Paywall) The answer may be thinner than the growth charts suggest. Novaspace has forecast 16,900 small satellite launches through 2035. Analysys Mason has projected more than 36,000 constellation satellites launching between now and 2034. But according to the analysis [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/the-thruster-math-nobody-has-run], fewer than a dozen manufacturers can deliver radiation-tested, low Earth orbit-qualified thrusters at the scale implied by that demand. That is the gap. Demand is rising. The supplier map says the open-market base may not be deep enough. And that base is getting narrower as constellation operators buy propulsion companies for internal use. Muon Space acquired Starlight Engines in April. For Muon, that may be a smart hedge. For everyone else, it removes one more independent propulsion supplier from the open market. This is how supply-chain pressure often shows up before it becomes obvious. The first sign is not always a failed program. Sometimes it is vertical integration. Sometimes it is a supplier that used to be available to the market becoming captive to one customer. Golden Dome adds another layer. The 2028 demonstration deadline will increase demand for hardware that can survive low Earth orbit radiation environments and fit constellation production schedules. For program managers, the action item is straightforward: validate secondary sourcing before the bottleneck becomes a schedule problem. For investors, aggregate market growth is useful, but supplier concentration is where the risk and opportunity sit. This is why the propulsion story is not only a market-size story. It is a capacity story, a qualification story and a make-or-buy story. -0- Finally this week, another supply-chain map has changed, this time in optical intersatellite links. [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/the-oisl-market-after-mynaric] (Paywall) Rocket Lab closed its $155.3 million acquisition of Mynaric AG on April 14. That deal brought Mynaric’s Munich-based CONDOR Mk3 and HAWK terminal lines into Rocket Lab’s space systems portfolio. The acquisition matters because optical intersatellite link terminals are not a broad, commodity supplier market. They are a narrow, program-critical piece of the Space Development Agency’s Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture. As SDA demand accelerates toward Tranche 2 and Tranche 3 deployments, the supplier map matters. The publicly documented SDA-qualified terminal base runs through four named providers: Mynaric, now under Rocket Lab; Tesat-Spacecom U.S.; Skyloom; and CACI. That is a short list. Mynaric began volume production of the CONDOR Mk3 in the first quarter of 2024, but production was not clean. Rocket Lab says it plans to expand capacity, but the public details remain limited. That means if your program, investment thesis or supplier strategy still treats Mynaric as a standalone company, your map is out of date. Rocket Lab is now a more vertically integrated space systems company with a meaningful position in optical terminals. That may improve scale over time. It may also change how customers view dependency risk. This is the same pattern we saw in propulsion. Narrow supplier base. Rising government demand. Vertical integration. Capacity plans that need to be tested against production history. The market headline is consolidation. The operating question is whether the remaining supplier base can scale quickly enough. You Might Also Like (Paywall) The $613 Billion Industry the World Doesn’t Understand [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/the-613-billion-industry-the-world] Vertical Integration Is Now a Valuation Story [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/vertical-integration-is-now-a-valuation] The Hidden Cost of Telling the Space Story Badly [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/the-hidden-cost-of-telling-the-space] The 2028 Deadline Is Real [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/the-2028-deadline-is-real] Theme Stock Music [https://www.pond5.com/royalty-free-music/item/108525138-interesting-facts-60sec-technology-science-production-fun] Provided by Pond 5 [https://www.pond5.com] This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.exterrajsc.com/subscribe [https://www.exterrajsc.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2]

The FCC Reshapes the Satellite Landscape, and That Market is Poised to Thrive

The Federal Communications Commission made two significant moves this week that together paint a clear picture: the agency is on a mission to make America the global leader in direct-to-device satellite connectivity. First, the big-picture move [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/fcc-promotes-american-leadership]. The FCC’s Space Bureau released a decision reaffirming exclusive spectrum rights for existing licensees in key direct-to-device frequency bands — and dismissed multiple requests from rival operators to enter those same bands. The Bureau also rejected two petitions that sought to rewrite the agency’s longstanding spectrum rules. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr called direct-to-device connectivity — meaning fast, broadband service delivered directly from a satellite to your standard smartphone — one of the most exciting frontiers in wireless communications. He said the FCC is laser-focused on making its rules as friendly as possible for investment and innovation in this space, and promised more actions to come. In the 18 months leading up to this week, there’s been more than 28 billion dollars in deal flow across at least 130 megahertz of spectrum intended for direct-to-device services. Chairman Carr called consumers the big winners as competition in this market intensifies. The second and more specific action directly benefited AST SpaceMobile [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/fcc-clears-248-satellite-constellation], a company based in Midland, Texas. The FCC granted AST a permanent commercial license — formally clearing a 248-satellite constellation in low Earth orbit to deliver cellular broadband coverage directly to unmodified smartphones across the United States. This isn’t a minor update. The FCC order substantially expands AST’s previously authorized constellation from 25 satellites to 248, using premium low-band spectrum — 700 megahertz and 800 megahertz — frequencies known for superior signal penetration and coverage range, especially in rural and underserved areas. The service is designed to work with existing phones through AST’s partnerships with Verizon, AT&T, and FirstNet — the national public safety broadband network. No new device. No new plan. Your current phone would simply connect to space when you’re outside terrestrial range. Deployment milestones are binding: AST must get at least 124 satellites into orbit by August 2nd, 2030, and have the full 248-satellite system operational by August 2nd, 2033. The company isn’t without challenges. Its seventh operational broadband satellite — BlueBird 7 — ended up in a lower-than-planned orbit following a Blue Origin New Glenn launch from Kennedy Space Center on April 19th. The company is assessing its options. But the regulatory win is substantial. AST reported nearly $71 million in full-year 2025 revenue, and is targeting between 45 and 60 new satellite launches this year alone. Direct-to-device service in initial U.S. markets is the near-term goal. -0- The IPO pipeline for commercial space is getting busier. HawkEye 360 — a radio frequency intelligence and geospatial analytics company — has officially launched its roadshow [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/ipo-roadshow-launched-by-hawkeye] for a proposed initial public offering. The company is offering 16 million shares of common stock, with an initial price expected to land between 24 and 26 dollars per share. The underwriters also have a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 2.4 million shares at the offering price. HawkEye 360 plans to list on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol HAWK. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are leading the offering as joint book-running managers, with RBC Capital Markets, Jefferies, and BofA Securities serving as additional managers. Baird, Raymond James, and William Blair round out the bookrunner team. A registration statement has been filed with the SEC, but has not yet been declared effective. HawkEye 360 uses a constellation of satellites to detect and geolocate radio frequency signals — a capability with broad applications across maritime monitoring, national security, and commercial intelligence. This IPO, if priced at the midpoint, would value the offering at approximately 400 million dollars. -0- There was a moment, not long ago, when space tourism felt like a billionaire’s novelty. A new market report [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/space-exploration-and-tourism-market] suggests the business case has matured well beyond that. According to a new analysis from HTF Market Intelligence Consulting, the global space exploration and tourism market is forecast to grow from $8.6 billion in 2025 to $35.9 billion by 2033 — a compound annual growth rate of 19.5 percent. The report credits reusable rocket technology as the primary driver — the same innovation that made SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Virgin Galactic viable — for dramatically lowering the cost of access to space. The market now encompasses suborbital civilian flights, private research missions, and longer-term concepts like orbital hotels and lunar stays. Regionally, North America dominates — the U.S. leads the world in reusable rockets and crewed spacecraft. But Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region, with China, India, and Japan all expanding their space programs and commercial partnerships. Europe holds a significant share, backed by collaborative programs and strong government funding. The regulatory environment is also evolving rapidly, with governments worldwide introducing licensing systems, safety standards, and liability frameworks to govern commercial human spaceflight. The analysts see space hotels, orbital stations, and lunar missions as the long-term opportunities that will carry this market well into the next decade. The small satellite market is heading into what analysts are calling its most consequential decade yet — and the numbers are staggering. Space analytics firm Novaspace has released the 11th edition of its Prospects for the Small Satellite Market [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/nearly-17k-small-satellites-forecast] report, covering 2026 through 2035 — and the headline figure is nearly 16,900 small satellites projected to reach orbit over that period. That’s an average of about 1,410 pounds of hardware lifted to space every single day. The report defines small satellites as spacecraft weighing under approximately 1,100 pounds — a category expected to account for one-third of all satellites launched in the period, though only 6 percent of total launch mass. Private investment in the sector reached about $11.5 billion in 2025 alone. The big story isn’t just the volume — it’s the diversification. While SpaceX’s Starlink has historically dominated near-term smallsat demand, Novaspace sees national space programs increasingly stepping in. Sovereign governments are building their own constellations for security, communications resilience, and Earth observation, which distributes market demand across a wider, more stable customer base. But the competitive picture is tightening. Novaspace highlights accelerating vertical integration among constellation operators — meaning the big players are building more of their own components in-house — which is squeezing the market for independent suppliers. The report noted that the smallsat market is entering a more mature phase, where industrial maturity, production readiness, and secure access to demand will determine who succeeds. The key question is no longer who has a concept, but who can execute at scale. This is an industry in transition — from innovation to execution. The companies with established manufacturing, proven supply chains, and contracted customers are positioned to consolidate. Those still scaling face real headwinds. -0- An investigation is complete — and we now know what brought down [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/motor-failures-blamed-for-loss-of] Australia’s first homegrown orbital rocket last summer. Gilmour Space Technologies has released the findings from its investigation into the July 2025 in-flight failure of the Eris TestFlight1 rocket. The conclusion: electrical and thermal faults in the oxidizer pump system of two first-stage motors caused the loss of the vehicle. The Eris rocket lifted off from the Bowen Orbital Spaceport in Queensland on July 30th, 2025 — the nation’s first orbital launch attempt in more than 50 years. The vehicle climbed briefly before losing control and came down in the designated safety area approximately 14 seconds after liftoff. According to the investigation, one of the four first-stage hybrid rocket motors lost thrust about nine seconds after ignition. A second motor followed at around 17 seconds. Together, the failures ended the mission before it ever had a chance. Gilmour Space said in a statement — quote — “Analysis identified two independent failure modes originating from the oxidizer pump subsystem. Electrical and thermal faults were observed in the electric pump motors and associated inverters, including components sourced from an external supplier.” Design, qualification, and process improvements are now underway. The company notes this test flight was always designed to generate data under real flight conditions — and they say that data is already informing updates to vehicle design and operations. A final report has been submitted to the Australian Space Agency. CEO and co-founder Adam Gilmour said the next Eris rocket test is still planned for later this year. The company has since opened a representative office in South Australia and selected new laser communications technology for future missions. Additional launch attempts are planned for the latter portions of 2026. -0- In-depth this week — we’re looking at something that didn’t make many headlines coming out of the 41st Space Symposium in Colorado Springs, but probably should have. [Paywall] While the big crowds gathered around commercial space station displays and AI panels, two exhibits near the back of the hall at The Broadmoor quietly told a more commercially important story [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/wheels-larado-and-grappling]. And our in-depth analysis this week argues those two booths contained more actionable supply chain intelligence than most of the post-Symposium coverage combined. Here’s the core argument: the space industry covers missions. Supply chains are harder to frame as a press moment. So they go unreported — and the commercial window they represent stays open longer for the people who are paying attention. Signal One: Lunar Mobility. Bridgestone — yes, the tire company — had a display of next-generation lunar rover elastic wheel prototypes. No press release. No contract announcement. Just the wheels. And almost no one stopped. That’s a mistake. Lunar surface mobility is one of the least-capitalized and most structurally necessary segments of the emerging lunar economy. Apollo-era wire-mesh wheels won’t cut it for Artemis. Polar terrain, abrasive regolith that’s never been weathered by wind or water, thermal swings of 300 degrees Celsius — those conditions require something categorically different. Bridgestone’s elastic wheel architecture uses thin metal spokes engineered to flex over obstacles without pressurized air — and the company has been developing it with JAXA since 2019. They’ve since signed joint development agreements with Astrobotic and ispace. Almost no one else is working at equivalent technical depth. That’s either a program resilience risk for NASA — or an investment thesis. Depending on which chair you’re sitting in. Signal Two: Debris Detection. The Naval Research Laboratory showed a concept called LARADO — designed to detect small orbital debris objects too small for ground-based radar to track. Objects below ten centimeters. Objects that can still kill a satellite at orbital velocities. No production contract exists yet — but the policy environment around commercial space situational awareness is accelerating rapidly. The Space Domain Awareness market is estimated at $1.7 to $2.2 billion in 2025, growing toward 5 billion by the early 2030s. USSPACECOM has formally named SDA as a commercial procurement priority. A commercial operator that can build a LARADO-class debris sensing capability — and sell it as a subscription data product — is sitting in front of a government customer that has already pre-validated demand through official doctrine. Signal Three: Proximity Operations. The Naval Research Lab also showcased a detailed model of its 45-by-100-foot Proximity Operations Laboratory — a simulation facility for rendezvous, docking, and robotic satellite grappling. On-orbit servicing is real and growing. Northrop Grumman has completed commercial life-extension missions. Astroscale has demonstrated debris inspection operations. The global on-orbit satellite servicing market is estimated at up to $4.7 billion today, with projections above 12 billion by 2034. What the NRL exhibit made visible is that government still holds most of the foundational engineering knowledge — and translating it into a commercial supply chain is an unsolved industrial problem. Three chokepoints stand out: force-torque sensors and robotic actuators rated for vacuum and cryogenic conditions; proximity navigation guidance and control systems; and standardized grapple fixtures. That last one is the most urgent. When grapple fixture standards lock — expected within two to three years — qualified suppliers who moved early will have a structural moat. The window to influence the standard, or at least begin qualification against the leading design, is closing now. The bottom line from all three signals: qualification timelines are long. Government-commercial data relationships are forming now. And early movers in each of these supply chain categories will be dramatically better positioned when procurement catches up to the opportunity — and it will. Paid subscribers can read the full analysis on The Journal of Space Commerce under the Supply Chain tab. They’ll also find additional exclusive in-depth coverage of the issues of interest at Space Symposium. And next week on The Journal of Space Commerce Podcast, I’ll be talking with Rich Cooper, vice president of Strategic Communications & Outreach at Space Foundation. Might have Missed * Record-Setting Test Fires Up Next-Gen Rocket Engine Technology [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/record-setting-test-fires-up-next] * Space Force Awards Link‑182 Development [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/space-force-awards-link182-development] * ESA Advances Lunar Remote Camp Initiative With Award of Parallel Design Contracts [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/esa-advances-lunar-remote-camp-initiative] * Lunar Payload Contract Ceiling Set to Rise 62% to Back Expanded Moon Landing Cadence [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/lunar-payload-contract-ceiling-set] * The 2028 Deadline Is Real [https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/the-2028-deadline-is-real] [Paywall] Theme Stock Music [https://www.pond5.com/royalty-free-music/item/108525138-interesting-facts-60sec-technology-science-production-fun] Provided by Pond 5 [https://www.pond5.com] This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.exterrajsc.com/subscribe [https://www.exterrajsc.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2]