The IC Chat

CHAMPION‑AF Decoded: Watchman Flex vs DOACs

20 min · 29. mar. 2026
episode CHAMPION‑AF Decoded: Watchman Flex vs DOACs cover

Description

In this episode of ICChat, Dr. Ashish Pershad MD MS  reviews and critiques the CHAMPION‑AF trial comparing Watchman Flex left atrial appendage occlusion to DOACs for atrial fibrillation. He explains the trial design, endpoints, and statistical choices, and contrasts the published results with real‑world implications. The episode highlights concerns about non‑inferiority margins, excluded procedural bleeding, lower than expected event rates, and the importance of shared decision making when considering LAAO versus lifelong anticoagulation.

Comments

0

Be the first to comment

Sign up now and become a member of the The IC Chat community!

Get Started

2 months for 19 kr.

Then 99 kr. / month · Cancel anytime.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

All episodes

19 episodes

episode RESHAPE HF II vs COAPT & MITRAL‑FR: Unraveling the MitraClip Debate artwork

RESHAPE HF II vs COAPT & MITRAL‑FR: Unraveling the MitraClip Debate

Welcome to IC Chat with host Dr. Ashish Pershad. In this episode we examine the controversial role of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation, focusing on the COAPT, MITRAL‑FR and the newer RESHAPE Heart Failure II trials. We summarize trial differences in patient selection, anatomy (EROA and LV volumes), outcomes (heart failure hospitalizations, quality of life and mortality), and methodological concerns that influence interpretation of RESHAPE HF II. Dr. Pershad outlines the practical implications for clinicians: selection remains critical, TEER appears to reduce heart failure admissions and improve quality of life in selected patients, but questions about mortality benefit and broad adoption persist.

1. juni 202619 min
episode The IC CHAT episode 17 —Is the MFP necessary for all HR-PCI cases? CHIP-BCIS answers this very question artwork

The IC CHAT episode 17 —Is the MFP necessary for all HR-PCI cases? CHIP-BCIS answers this very question

Host Dr. Ashish Pershad introduces IC Chat’s mission to help clinicians interpret evidence-based medicine and translate trial data into everyday patient care. In this episode he appraises the CHIP-BCIS-3 randomized trial (ACC 2026 / NEJM) comparing prophylactic microaxial flow pump (Impella) versus standard care in very high‑risk elective PCI patients. The trial enrolled patients with low LVEF and high SYNTAX/BCIS scores and used a hierarchical win‑ratio primary endpoint. Results showed no overall benefit for Impella and a concerning signal of increased cardiovascular mortality at two years in the device group, despite similar completeness of revascularization and low bleeding/vascular complication rates. Dr. Pershad discusses implications: avoid routine prophylactic Impella in elective high‑risk PCI, consider staged revascularization, and call for reappraisal of device use and approval processes to prioritize patient safety.

20. apr. 202620 min