The Jim Benson Show, July 5, 2026

The Jim Benson Show, July 5, 2026

The Jim Benson Show What To Do About SCOTUS Ballot, Birthright Rulings China, Venezuela, Cuba, and others have been working to sway US Elections Election Integrity, Judicial Power, and the Warning Over America’s Political Future Jim Benson Show: A Warning About America’s Direction In this episode of The Jim Benson Show, host Jim Benson opens with a strongly framed conservative commentary about U.S. domestic politics, election integrity, constitutional government, and what he describes as a struggle to preserve America from globalist, communist, and totalitarian forces. He sets up the episode as a curated program built around audio/video segments from other commentators, with his own introductions and closing analysis connecting those clips to concerns about courts, voting systems, mail-in ballots, birthright citizenship, and communist influence in American politics. Dr. Steve Turley Segment: Supreme Court Decisions, Birthright Citizenship, and Mail-In Ballots Jim introduces a segment from Dr. Steve Turley, who criticizes recent Supreme Court decisions involving birthright citizenship and mail-in ballot deadlines. Turley argues that Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett acted as “institutionalists” rather than constitutional originalists, particularly in decisions he says harmed conservative priorities. He objects to interpretations of the Fourteenth Amendment that preserve birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants, and he also criticizes a ruling allowing mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be received and counted afterward. Turley frames both rulings as setbacks for election integrity and calls for stronger legislation, executive action, and ultimately possible constitutional amendments. Dr. Steve Turley Segment: Article V, the SAVE Act, and Conservative Legal Strategy Continuing through the Turley segment, the discussion turns to what conservatives might do next. Turley argues that Republicans need future Supreme Court nominees who are “faithful, unapologetic originalists” rather than judges concerned primarily with the court’s reputation. He also discusses the possibility of using an Article V constitutional convention, noting that Republican control of more state legislatures could make constitutional amendments more realistic. In the shorter term, he points to the SAVE Act and federal legislation requiring proof of citizenship and tighter mail-in ballot rules as ways to respond to what he views as judicial failures. Watching the Watchers Segment: Robert Gouveia on Trump’s Election Executive Order Jim then introduces audio from Robert Gouveia’s Watching the Watchers podcast, focused on court challenges to President Trump’s election-related executive order. Gouveia explains that the order sought to use federal data sources to help verify citizenship and voter eligibility, while also directing the U.S. Postal Service not to process mail ballots that did not match approved voter lists. He argues that the federal government already has access to citizenship information through agencies such as the IRS, Social Security Administration, Homeland Security, and others, and he presents the order as an attempt to strengthen election integrity without taking elections away from the states. Watching the Watchers Segment: Judges, Lawfare, and Voter-List Disputes In the same Watching the Watchers segment, Gouveia criticizes rulings by federal judges who blocked parts of Trump’s executive order, including cases involving the League of Women Voters, the Department of Homeland Security, blue states, the Postal Service, and red-state efforts to intervene. He argues that left-leaning organizations and judges use lawsuits to prevent voter-list verification, citizenship checks, and election-integrity measures from taking effect. Gouveia frames these legal battles as part of a broader “lawfare” infrastructure that, in his view, prioritizes broad ballot access over safeguards against fraud. Matt Morse TV Segment: McCarthy, Communism, and the Democratic Party Jim’s final clip comes from the Matt Morse TV channel. Morse argues that Senator Joseph McCarthy was ultimately right about communist infiltration of American institutions, including schools, universities, the military, and politics. He connects that historical argument to what he describes as the modern Democratic Party’s shift toward socialism or communism, referencing New York political candidates associated with Zohran Mamdani and President Trump’s public statements warning that communists are “making their move.” Morse also discusses Donald Trump’s connection to Roy Cohn, who had worked with McCarthy, presenting that relationship as part of Trump’s longer anti-communist political formation. Matt Morse TV Segment: Lara Trump, Donald Trump, and the “Communism vs. Freedom” Frame The Matt Morse TV segment also includes clips of Lara Trump and Donald Trump. Lara Trump argues that socialists have taken over the Democratic Party because of weak leadership and radical education narratives, while Trump says communism is easy to sell because it promises free rent, housing, food, and comfort before eventually producing collapse, squalor, and suffering. Morse reinforces that argument with the phrase “useful idiots,” claiming voters are being deceived by promises of free benefits. Jim closes by agreeing with the broader “communism versus freedom” framing, citing claims about stolen elections, Venezuela, Cuba, China, electronic voting systems, and global election manipulation, then directs listeners to The Jim Benson Show pages, Rumble, Apple Podcasts, and his X account.

The Jim Benson Show, June 21, 2026

The Jim Benson Show Stocks Surge, Oil Plunges On Iran War Peace Deal Greasy Gavin Newsom claims political persecution as feds probe staff and his wife Iran, Election Integrity, and California Corruption Claims Through a Conservative Lens Episode Overview — The Jim Benson Show, The Alex Jones Show, Dr. Steve Turley, and Real Politics with Brian Maxwell In this episode of The Jim Benson Show, host Jim Benson presents a commentary-driven program built around several video clips from other conservative media programs. He explains that the episode will feature clips from The Alex Jones Show, Dr. Steve Turley’s YouTube commentary, Brian Maxwell’s Real Politics, and another Dr. Steve Turley segment. The first half focuses on competing conservative reactions to the Trump administration’s Iran ceasefire and peace framework, while the second half turns to election integrity, mail-in ballot controls, and federal investigations or allegations involving California Governor Gavin Newsom’s political circle. The Alex Jones Show — Iran Deal as Capitulation and Strategic Failure Jim first introduces a clip from Alex Jones, who argues that President Trump was pulled into the Iran conflict under false pretenses and that Israel manipulated the situation for its own strategic goals. Jones frames the ceasefire and memorandum of understanding as a weak outcome, calling the war unnecessary and suggesting that Iran emerged intact or even victorious. He points to headlines describing the deal as capitulation, notes that Israel rejected or criticized the deal, and argues that Trump may now be trying to stop the situation from getting worse. Jim makes clear that he respects Jones’s broader work but believes Jones is largely wrong about Trump’s handling of Iran. Dr. Steve Turley — Iran Deal as Trump’s Strategic Masterstroke Jim then plays a contrasting clip from Dr. Steve Turley, who presents the Iran agreement as a major Trump victory. Turley argues that Trump used pressure, a U.S. counter-blockade, and economic leverage to force Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and enter a 60-day ceasefire and negotiation period. He says Iran’s threat to disrupt global oil markets had long been its strongest leverage, but that Trump broke that leverage by making Iran lose massive oil revenue while keeping global oil prices from spiraling out of control. Jim states that he is much closer to Turley’s position, believing Trump’s actions made the world safer and may create a path toward a more stable Middle East. The Jim Benson Show Commentary — From Iran to America’s Political Fight After the Iran clips, Jim offers his own reaction. He says the future depends on whether Iran complies with the peace framework, but he is hopeful that the agreement can lead to better conditions in the Middle East and eventually greater freedom for the Iranian people. He then pivots to domestic politics, arguing that with the Iran conflict hopefully behind the country, the Trump administration should focus on preserving the American republic, strengthening election reforms, and preventing Democrats from regaining power in the midterms. Jim strongly criticizes Democrats, mail-in voting, open borders, climate-change politics, and what he describes as Marxist revolutionary policies, while also emphasizing that he is not advocating violence or illegality. Dr. Steve Turley — Postal Service Ballot Rules and Mail-In Voting Controls Jim’s next clip is another Dr. Steve Turley segment, this time about the Trump administration’s proposed use of the U.S. Postal Service to impose new controls on mail-in ballots. Turley argues that blue states, especially California, created legally sanctioned election systems that make fraud easier by using automatic voter registration, same-day registration, universal mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting, and long ballot-counting windows. He says Trump’s executive order would require states to submit verified mail-in and absentee voter lists with unique barcodes before the Postal Service processes ballots, creating a federal choke point for mail-in elections. In Turley’s view, this would force states to verify citizenship, track chain of custody, and clean up voter rolls. Real Politics with Brian Maxwell and Dr. Steve Turley — Gavin Newsom, California, and Alleged Corruption The final clips come from Brian Maxwell’s Real Politics and Dr. Steve Turley, both discussing investigations and allegations surrounding California Governor Gavin Newsom, his staff, and his wife’s nonprofit. The clips focus on Newsom’s claim that President Trump and the Department of Justice are targeting him because he criticizes Trump and may run for president. Maxwell and Turley instead frame the probes as investigations into alleged corruption, behested payments, nonprofit donations, state contracts, homelessness spending, fraud, and Newsom’s former chief of staff Dana Williamson, who pleaded guilty to federal felonies. Jim carefully notes that Newsom is entitled to the presumption of innocence and that, according to one report he saw, federal authorities were not currently investigating Newsom personally. Closing Commentary - Watching California and Defending Peaceful Political Action Jim closes by saying it remains to be seen what the investigations will reveal, but he welcomes scrutiny of what he considers the damage Democrats have done in California. He again frames the episode as evidence and perspective for listeners who want to legally and peacefully protect freedom, prosperity, and national survival. The show ends with Jim directing listeners to The Jim Benson Show pages on BBSRadio.com, his podcast platforms, related video sections, and his next episode two weeks later.

The Jim Benson Show, June 8, 2026

The Jim Benson Show Are California's 'liberal' Hordes Finally Waking Up? Trump Admin targets tech billionaire in China funding leftist violence in US Primary Fallout, Election Integrity, and Protest Funding: Jim Benson Reviews Clips from Turley, Gardner, and Wheeler The Jim Benson Show: Jim Benson Opens with Conservative Election Commentary In this episode of The Jim Benson Show, host Jim Benson opens with conservative news commentary following the June 2 primary elections. He frames the program around early election results, especially in California, and argues that the state has been damaged by long-term Democratic control, regulation, taxation, wildfire mismanagement, illegal immigration policies, and election practices that he views as dangerous. Benson also discusses his concern that the 2026 midterms could determine whether Republicans maintain enough power to support President Donald Trump’s agenda and block Democratic efforts to regain control of Congress. The Jim Benson Show: California, Wildfires, Immigration, and Election Rules Benson spends the first portion of the show criticizing California Governor Gavin Newsom, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, and Democratic leadership in the state. He argues that budget cuts, poor fire prevention, burdensome regulations, and social benefits for illegal immigrants have damaged California. He also claims that California’s election laws, mail-in ballot policies, voter registration practices, and restrictions on investigating ballot fraud help Democrats maintain power. This opening commentary sets up the first outside clip, which focuses on California primary results and the possibility of Republican gains. Dr. Steve Turley Show: California Primary Results and a Claimed Political Earthquake The first clip Benson plays comes from Dr. Steve Turley’s YouTube channel, recorded while Turley was in Brazil. Turley argues that California’s June primary results showed a “political earthquake,” pointing to early results involving Republican Steve Hilton in the California governor’s race and reality television figure Spencer Pratt in the Los Angeles mayoral contest. Turley says Republican turnout appeared stronger than expected, voter registration trends favored Republicans, and California’s political map showed signs of a possible shift. Both Benson and Turley caution, however, that Republican victories in California would still be difficult because of the state’s Democratic advantage. Dr. Steve Turley Show: GOP Turnout and Midterm Implications The Turley segment also broadens the California results into a national midterm argument. Turley says Republican turnout was higher than in 2022 and claims that GOP voter registration is improving in multiple states, including traditionally Democratic areas. He argues that if Democrats are forced to spend money defending races in California, they will have fewer resources for battleground states such as Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. Benson uses the clip to reinforce his view that California may be showing signs of public backlash against one-party Democratic rule, homelessness, wildfires, fentanyl, cost of living, and urban decline. Stephen Gardner Show: Mail-In Ballots and Trump’s Election Executive Order The second clip comes from The Stephen Gardner Show, featuring legal commentator Robert Gouveia of Watching the Watchers. Gardner and Gouveia discuss a court ruling involving President Trump’s executive order on election integrity and mail-in ballots. Gouveia explains that the order focuses on two broad areas: federal efforts to help verify voter registration lists and possible U.S. Postal Service procedures for tracking mail-in ballots more securely. He says Democratic organizations and advocacy groups sued to block even the rulemaking process, but a Washington, D.C. judge declined to issue an early injunction because the alleged harms were too speculative. Stephen Gardner Show: Voter Lists, Postal Tracking, and Legal Strategy In the Gardner clip, Gouveia argues that the executive order does not immediately impose illegal requirements, but instead asks agencies to begin considering rulemaking. He describes possible systems such as federal voter-list cross-checking and unique barcode tracking for mail-in ballots, comparing the idea to chain-of-custody protections. Benson introduces the clip as part of his ongoing concern about mail-in ballot fraud and asks whether the ruling, if upheld on appeal, could affect the midterms in time. The segment presents the ruling as a significant early legal win for Trump’s election-integrity agenda. The Liz Wheeler Show: Left-Wing Protest Funding and Roy Singham The third clip comes from The Liz Wheeler Show on BlazeTV, focused on claims about left-wing protest funding and billionaire Neville Roy Singham. Wheeler argues that violent demonstrations in the United States are not spontaneous grassroots protests, but are funded and organized through activist networks tied to communist or far-left causes. She discusses Treasury Department administrative subpoenas involving Hasan Piker, Medea Benjamin, and travel to Cuba, presenting the investigation as an initial step toward targeting Singham and the organizations she says he funds. The Liz Wheeler Show: Subpoenas, Cuba, and Activist Networks Wheeler explains the difference between administrative subpoenas and court-enforced subpoenas, saying that an administrative subpoena can eventually gain legal force if a court compels compliance. She argues that the Trump administration is using the Cuba-related inquiry as a strategic way to investigate a broader network of activist groups, including organizations she connects to the Party for Socialism and Liberation, Code Pink, and the People’s Forum. Benson includes this clip to support his broader argument that left-wing unrest and protest activity are part of an organized political strategy rather than ordinary civic protest. The Jim Benson Show: Closing and Where to Find the Program Benson closes the episode by saying he hopes listeners found the material interesting and valuable. He directs the audience to the show’s pages at bbsradio.com, as well as podcast and video platforms including X, Rumble, and Apple Podcasts. He also encourages listeners to visit the related video section on the show page and says he plans to return in two weeks with another episode. The program as a whole blends Benson’s own conservative commentary with extended clips from outside commentators, each used to support his concerns about California politics, election integrity, and left-wing organizing.

The Jim Benson Show, May 24, 2026

The Jim Benson Show Countering China: US Actions In Venezuela, Cuba, Iran What's being done about unconstitutional racial gerrymandering in Dem States? Jim Benson Frames the Episode Around Elections and Foreign Policy In this episode of The Jim Benson Show, host Jim Benson opens with conservative commentary about the upcoming congressional midterm elections, expressing concern that Republicans could lose control of Congress. He argues that a continuing war involving Iran and rising fuel and energy costs could politically damage President Trump and the MAGA movement. Jim also repeats his belief that prior U.S. elections were corrupted through vote manipulation and foreign influence, and he warns that insufficient action is being taken to prevent what he views as future election interference. He then introduces three recent video segments from commentator Dr. Steve Turley, which make up the majority of the remainder of the episode. Election Integrity Concerns and Jim’s Support for Trump Before turning to the clips, Jim discusses claims involving Venezuela, China, Cuba, election software, electronic voting equipment, Joe Biden, and a book he identifies as Stolen Elections: The Takedown of Democracies Worldwide. He presents these subjects as evidence for his view that election manipulation has affected the United States and other countries. Jim also addresses conflict within conservative media over the Trump administration’s actions toward Iran, saying he has been troubled by criticism of Trump from Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, Candace Owens, and others. Although he acknowledges possible economic and political risks from a prolonged conflict, Jim states that he continues to support Trump and the administration’s actions against Iran’s ruling regime. Turley Presents Trump’s China Visit as Strategic Victory In the first inserted clip, Dr. Steve Turley analyzes a presidential visit by Trump to China and portrays it as one of the most consequential diplomatic meetings of the modern era. Turley argues that Trump arrived with enormous leverage created through tariffs, trade pressure, energy policy, pressure on Iran, and strategic control involving major shipping routes. According to Turley, China’s economy depends heavily on inexpensive oil and exports, and Trump’s policies placed President Xi Jinping in a weaker negotiating position. He interprets the diplomatic praise exchanged by Trump and Xi not as weakness, but as strategic flattery used within high-stakes negotiations. China, Energy, Trade, and the Iran Conflict Turley further claims that the summit produced major changes affecting Iran and the global energy market. He says China signaled interest in purchasing more American oil and gas, which he presents as a major setback for Iran because China had been its largest oil customer and an important economic supporter. Turley also discusses alleged economic agreements involving Boeing aircraft, American soybeans, rare-earth minerals, energy exports, and technology. In his account, these developments demonstrate that Trump used economic pressure to weaken Iran, reduce Chinese dependence on Iranian energy, strengthen American producers, and reposition the United States at the center of a new global economic arrangement. Turley Predicts Escalation Against Iran In the second clip, Turley focuses more directly on the conflict with Iran and the Strait of Hormuz. He states that Iranian forces had closed or severely disrupted passage through the strait, contributing to increased energy costs and international pressure. Turley argues that Iran’s strategy depended on support from Russia and China, but that China’s supposed shift toward American energy and public support for reopening the strait left Iran increasingly isolated. He predicts that Trump may soon escalate military pressure against Iranian naval infrastructure because of the approaching midterm elections, continued disruption of oil markets, and the administration’s desire to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. Tucker Carlson’s Opposition and Turley’s Defense of Trump The final inserted video addresses Tucker Carlson’s criticism of Trump over Iran. Turley describes Tucker as a former close media ally of the MAGA movement who became sharply critical after Trump joined Israel in military action against Iran. He plays excerpts in which Tucker expresses regret over supporting Trump, questions Trump’s foreign-policy direction, and discusses whether Trump’s actions raise biblical concerns. Turley argues that Tucker has become inconsistent and is projecting his own confusion onto Trump. The episode concludes with Turley presenting Trump’s Middle East and China strategy as thoroughly aligned with America First priorities, followed by Jim Benson directing listeners to his program pages and announcing that the show will return in two weeks.

The Jim Benson Show, May 10, 2026

The Jim Benson Show Monumental Supreme Court Gerrymandering Decision Communist Democrats' election-stealing apparatus Being dismantled This edition of the Jim Benson Show analyzes a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding racial gerrymandering, exploring its immediate impact on the upcoming midterm elections and its long-term implications for national political power. The program features commentary on the structural demolition of current electoral maps and allegations of international interference in voting systems. The End of Racial Gerrymandering: The Kalay Decision The U.S. Supreme Court has issued what is described as a "tectonic" ruling in the case of Louisiana v. Calais (referred to as the Kalay decision), effectively ending the decades-long practice of drawing congressional districts based primarily on race. In a significant 8-1 emergency ruling, the Court waived the standard 32-day waiting period to allow states to redraw their maps immediately, ensuring that the upcoming midterm primaries do not proceed under maps recently declared unconstitutional. This decision specifically targets the "vote dilution" strategies previously used under the Voting Rights Act to consolidate political power through racially engineered geography. Judicial Friction and the Path to the 2030 Census The ruling was marked by a sharp internal divide within the Court. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a solo dissent, accusing the conservative majority of abandoning principle for power and causing "chaos" in Louisiana. This prompted a rare and "reprehensible" rebuke from Justice Alito, who, joined by Justices Thomas and Gorsuch, characterized Jackson’s charges as baseless and insulting to the Court. Legal analysts suggest this ruling is merely the first tremor before the 2030 Census, where every congressional district in the country must be redrawn under a "colorblind" standard, potentially forcing a generational shift in how parties compete for votes. Immediate Electoral Shifts in the South States including Alabama, Tennessee, and Georgia are already moving to redistrict in light of the ruling. In Georgia specifically, analysts suggest that redrawing maps to reflect values rather than racial quotas could result in a pickup of two to three Republican seats, which may be enough to determine the national majority in the House of Representatives. Furthermore, concerns were raised regarding the 2020 Census, which allegedly counted illegal immigrants to inflate the population counts of "sanctuary" states, thereby artificially increasing their number of House seats. Allegations of Voting System Vulnerabilities The program also featured testimony from former CIA agent Gary Berntsen regarding the "stolen elections" phenomenon. Berntsen alleges that electronic voting software originally developed in Venezuela has been used to manipulate data in over 70 countries. He claims that a top-secret U.S. cyber team disabled servers in Belgrade, Serbia, just prior to the 2024 election to prevent similar manipulation. These claims are linked to ongoing legal battles involving companies like Smartmatic and Dominion, the latter of which recently settled with Fox News for over $750 million. Media Transitions: The Alex Jones Network Finally, the broadcast highlighted the transition of Alex Jones from the shuttered InfoWars platform to the new "Alex Jones Network." Despite a long-standing bankruptcy action and the loss of his original studios, Jones has launched a new operation, claiming that his previous platform was targeted by "Democrat Party front groups" rather than legitimate creditors. He continues to broadcast via alternative platforms like Rumble and X, maintaining a focus on what he describes as "crushing tyranny." The Kalay decision represents a fundamental shift in American electoral law, potentially dismantling the structural advantages held by the Democratic Party for over four decades. As states rush to redraw maps ahead of the midterms, the political landscape faces its most significant transformation since the passage of the Voting Rights Act, setting the stage for a high-stakes 2030 Census.