The Michael Fanone Show
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit michaelfanone.substack.com [https://michaelfanone.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_7] They told you it was about crime. It wasn’t. That was the whole pitch — armed soldiers on the streets of the capital, M17 pistols and M4 rifles, posted at Metro stations and the Lincoln Memorial, because Washington was supposedly so dangerous it needed a military response. Trump called DC one of the most dangerous cities in the world, declared a crime emergency, and sent in the troops. Now we have the receipts. The Niskanen Center, a nonpartisan think tank, studied what nearly a year of National Guard deployment actually accomplished. On violent crime — the robberies, the assaults, the thing they sold you on, the stuff that makes people afraid to walk home — the report found no measurable effect. None. What did move was the small stuff. Property crime and car break-ins fell about 24 percent. So if your worry was somebody jiggling a door handle on a parked Honda, congratulations, the United States military was on it. Violent crime was already trending down before Trump took office, and the Guard made no measurable dent in it. And the study explains why. The researchers found the Guard was deployed in “the wrong places for the wrong types of crime.” Think about where you actually saw these troops — tourist corridors, transit hubs, the Mall, the shopping blocks of Georgetown. Exactly the spots where a uniform deters a smash-and-grab. But real violence doesn’t happen on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. It happens between people who already know each other, on their own turf, away from the cameras. They put the soldiers where the tourists were, not where the danger was. Here’s the line the White House wants buried. Asked for comment, the administration dismissed the study as out of touch, called the authors keyboard warriors, and claimed Trump turned DC into a safe and beautiful haven. No data. No evidence. Just the word “beautiful” doing a lot of heavy lifting. Now the cost — and it’s your money, wherever you live. Start with one soldier: about $607 a day. A Metropolitan Police officer — an actual trained cop with arrest powers — runs $384. So we paid nearly double per head for people who legally can’t even make an arrest. Scale it up and the Congressional Budget Office puts the DC operation at roughly $1.5 million a day. A Senate report projects the full year north of $600 million. That number eclipses the entire budget of the Metropolitan Police Department and its 4,900 real officers. We spent more parking soldiers next to monuments than we spend on the whole professional police force of the city. And the study’s kicker: a smarter, data-driven deployment of actual police could have gotten comparable or better results for a fraction of the cost. We didn’t buy safety. We bought a big-budget blockbuster with a garbage script. Now the part that doesn’t get enough airtime, and should make every American sit up regardless of party. These aren’t federal robots. The troops came from DC and more than a dozen states — and the staffing tells the story. Early on, 98 percent of the troops flooding the District came from states with Republican governors. Military historians called the scale of that without precedent. Six red-state governors volunteered their people: West Virginia, Ohio, South Carolina, Mississippi, Tennessee, Louisiana. Think about what that means back home. You pull a guardsman off their job, their family, their actual state readiness mission, and ship them to Washington to pose with tourists. The ACLU of West Virginia sued to block its own governor from sending three to four hundred troops, arguing he’d exceeded his authority. And the Guard already learned this lesson the hard way — after January 6th, when 25,000 troops flooded DC, the Army National Guard warned the diversion drained money from real training and readiness. That’s the burden nobody puts on the invoice. Every soldier standing on a quiet Metro platform is a soldier not training, not available for a real emergency, not home. And the states exporting them have cities with worse violence than Washington. Shreveport, Louisiana has a higher murder rate than DC. The governors sending troops to fix the capital are stepping over crime in their own backyards to do it. Here’s where it goes from wasteful to alarming. They’re not winding this down. They’re scaling it up. The administration requested another 1,500 troops ahead of the country’s 250th birthday, pushing toward a force of 5,000. Trump has said there are no plans for the Guard to leave the capital anytime soon — and we now have a study proving the first round didn’t move the one thing they claimed to care about. So ask the question the data forces. If the Guard didn’t touch violent crime, and it costs $1.5 million a day, and it drains readiness from a dozen states, and the answer to all of that is send more — then crime was never the point. The presence was the point. Getting Americans used to armed soldiers on their own streets was the point. A retired general who ran the National Guard Bureau called it exactly that: desensitizing the public to military patrols in American cities. I spent twenty years policing this city. You fight crime with cops who know the blocks, not soldiers posed for a photo op. The study is the proof. The cost is the receipt. The surge is the confession. They told you it was about crime. The numbers say clear as day they were lying. 🟧 Paid subscribers get 15% off your next merch order🟧 Founding Members get 20% off for life You’ll get the link in your welcome email. GET DISCOUNTS BELOW! ENJOY!
254 episodes
Comments
0Be the first to comment
Sign up now and become a member of the The Michael Fanone Show community!