The SciTech Lawyer Perspective

Identity, Trust, and the Legal Foundations of Agentic Commerce: A Proposal for Trust in Depth

40 min · I går
episode Identity, Trust, and the Legal Foundations of Agentic Commerce: A Proposal for Trust in Depth cover

Description

In this episode of The SciTech Lawyer Perspective, host Aaron Gothelf sits down with David Fisher, Founder and CEO of Integra Ledger, a blockchain technology company focused on secure interoperability and trusted digital transactions for the legal industry, to discuss his paper, Identity, Trust, and the Legal Foundations of Agentic Commerce: A Proposal for Trust in Depth, coauthored with Bridget McCormack, President and CEO of the American Arbitration Association. The conversation explores how AI agents are rapidly transforming commerce by autonomously negotiating, transacting, and making decisions. At the same time, the trust infrastructure that has historically enabled markets to function, including identity, legal accountability, enforceable agreements, and dispute resolution, has not kept pace. Fisher explains the paper's proposed four-layer "trust in depth" framework, which connects AI agents to human identity, legal entities, enforceable agreements, and authorized delegation. The framework is designed to help agentic commerce scale within the legal and institutional foundations that have long supported human commerce. The original article can be accessed at: https://www.adr.org/news-and-insights/trust-framework-for-agentic-commerce-disputes/ [https://www.adr.org/news-and-insights/trust-framework-for-agentic-commerce-disputes/]

Comments

0

Be the first to comment

Sign up now and become a member of the The SciTech Lawyer Perspective community!

Get Started

1 month for 9 kr.

Then 99 kr. / month · Cancel anytime.

  • Podcasts kun på Podimo
  • 20 lydbogstimer pr. måned
  • Gratis podcasts

All episodes

11 episodes

episode Identity, Trust, and the Legal Foundations of Agentic Commerce: A Proposal for Trust in Depth artwork

Identity, Trust, and the Legal Foundations of Agentic Commerce: A Proposal for Trust in Depth

In this episode of The SciTech Lawyer Perspective, host Aaron Gothelf sits down with David Fisher, Founder and CEO of Integra Ledger, a blockchain technology company focused on secure interoperability and trusted digital transactions for the legal industry, to discuss his paper, Identity, Trust, and the Legal Foundations of Agentic Commerce: A Proposal for Trust in Depth, coauthored with Bridget McCormack, President and CEO of the American Arbitration Association. The conversation explores how AI agents are rapidly transforming commerce by autonomously negotiating, transacting, and making decisions. At the same time, the trust infrastructure that has historically enabled markets to function, including identity, legal accountability, enforceable agreements, and dispute resolution, has not kept pace. Fisher explains the paper's proposed four-layer "trust in depth" framework, which connects AI agents to human identity, legal entities, enforceable agreements, and authorized delegation. The framework is designed to help agentic commerce scale within the legal and institutional foundations that have long supported human commerce. The original article can be accessed at: https://www.adr.org/news-and-insights/trust-framework-for-agentic-commerce-disputes/ [https://www.adr.org/news-and-insights/trust-framework-for-agentic-commerce-disputes/]

Yesterday40 min
episode The Expanding Digital Border: AI, Surveillance, and the Fight for Justice artwork

The Expanding Digital Border: AI, Surveillance, and the Fight for Justice

In this episode of The SciTech Lawyer Perspective, Host Aaron Gothelf sits down with immigration attorney James Chesser and Kit Walsh of the Electronic Frontier Foundation to discuss James' Immigration and Human Rights Law Review article, "The Expanding Digital Border: AI, Surveillance, and the fight for Justice." The episode explores how borders are evolving into AI-driven "digital filters" that predict risk and intent, reshaping what it means to cross and raising urgent questions about accountability. The speakers examine whether these systems make immigration fairer or simply more opaque—and whether their errors are becoming harder to challenge. The original article can be accessed at: https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/ihrlr/vol7/iss1/2/ [https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/ihrlr/vol7/iss1/2/]

4. maj 202640 min