Cover image of show We Will Rise: National Parks and Civil Rights

We Will Rise: National Parks and Civil Rights

Podcast by National Park Service

English

History & religion

Limited Offer

1 month for 9 kr.

Then 99 kr. / monthCancel anytime.

  • 20 hours of audiobooks / month
  • Podcasts only on Podimo
  • All free podcasts
Get Started

About We Will Rise: National Parks and Civil Rights

Imagine a National Park. Picturing waterfalls and mountains? Or Dr. King's childhood home, Japanese internment camps, and a school that became a battleground for racial integration? National Parks aren’t just wilderness. They are spaces of remembrance, preserving the stories of who we are and how we came to be. Join Park Rangers, researchers, authors, and activists as we discuss what liberty and justice for all means on our public lands. Opinions shared by guests are not the official position of the NPS.

All episodes

8 episodes

episode Episode 8: Brian Forist and Welcoming LGBTQ+ Folks into National Parks artwork

Episode 8: Brian Forist and Welcoming LGBTQ+ Folks into National Parks

Join us for a conversation with Dr. Brian Forist, who is a researcher, author and park ranger. He currently works as a lecturer at Indiana University in Bloomington, and he is focused on visitor centered, two-way interpretation through dialogue on diversity, equity and inclusion, specifically related to the outdoors and environmental professions. He is serves as a guest editor of the May 2023 Special Issue of the Parks Stewardship Forum focusing on LGBTQIA+ experience and expertise in the outdoors. --- TRANSCRIPT: --- Ranger: So my name is Kathryn Gardiner and I'm a park ranger at Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument. And today I'm joined by Dr. Brian Forist, who is a researcher, author and park ranger. He currently works as a lecturer in parks, recreation and the outdoors at Indiana University in Bloomington, and he is focused on visitor centered, two-way interpretation through dialogue on diversity, equity and inclusion, specifically related to the outdoors and environmental professions. Currently, he is serving as one of the three guest editors of a May 2023 Special Issue of the Parks Stewardship Forum focusing on LGBTQIA plus, experience and expertise in the outdoors and conservation. They're call for submissions closes November 1st, 2022, and we'll be talking more about that as well. So thank you so much, Dr. Forist, for joining me today. Dr. Forist: It's a real pleasure to be here. Thanks for inviting me. Ranger: Great. So I was reading a little about the LGBTQ plus outdoor summit you participated in this past April and it was the first I had heard of it. It sounds awesome. Can you tell me why it's important to have conversations around making outdoor spaces safe for queer and trans people, and even beyond that, especially for folks that fit into those categories that are also BIPOC? Dr. Forist: Sure, sure. Uh, let me give you, I'll just offer a little bit of context. The LGBTQ outdoor summit in April of this year, 2022 was actually the 4th LGBTQ Outdoor Summit. The first was in Seattle, maybe six or eight years ago, a followed by one in the San Francisco Bay area, actually at Golden Gate National Recreation area. And then I've been fortunate enough to participate in the 3rd and in the 4th. The third was in Estes Park, Colorado, just outside Rocky Mountain National Park in 2019. And then of course, COVID. And so there was a fourth summit, then this past year. Indeed, the summits focus on. How can we...promote the out of doors as a safe, as a healthy, as a healing, as a community building place for LGBTQ plus plus plus folks. And what do we as professionals in the outdoor professions, what do we need to know to serve our own community or communities and why that's important is that the outdoors has not always been a safe space. You know, certainly we know many marginalized groups of people have had a conflicted or troubling relationship with the out of doors. Not to say that the relationship has always been negative, but there are negative connotations and it may not be safe, particularly in groups or for people who are for queer folks who don't pass, and so. Part of it is simply gaining professional skills but also gaining perspective. Maybe I'll share a little bit about the two summits I've been to because they were dramatically different. In 2019, the focus was really on understanding the intersections, intersectionality between queer identity and all the varying queer identities that exist, and trans and BIPOC identities, and what are the intersections and what are the privileges that we all walk into any situation with? The first part of that summit was what were called identity caucuses. Of course, we all identified somewhere on the LGBTQIA plus spectrum. But we are more than that and in order to uplift BIPOC folks and QT-POC folks, queer and trans people of color, it was really necessary and I maintained it continues to be necessary to examine all of our situations, all of our privileges. So we began with identity caucuses based on race. So those who were white were in one identity caucus, and those who were not were in another and we thought and talked and struggled with things like privilege. And how does that manifest itself? That's an uncomfortable thing. Uncomfortable stuff. However, what I found was that struggling with that and realizing what being a cis white man and a large person at that at that provides me. What what cover it gives me, if you will, in the world and I am certain that it was examining those privileges that I am granted by the world, whether I choose to accept them or not is sometimes a moot point, but understanding those privileges helps me understand I can never understand another person or another groups struggle, but what I can do is have some empathy and some level of of of comparison and understand how I might wield my own power to uplift others rather than simply to assume that power and and and barrel through. So that summit was really focused on those intersections and I facilitated a discussion on queer professionals or the next generation of queer professionals? What is it that my students need to know, my queer students need to know as they move into the profession? And what do my non-queer identifying students need to know to serve queer folks in the out of doors and the advice that I got from my compatriots was so valuable. It was proposed as a presentation and it became a conversation which is wonderful. And that's what interpretation should be, I think too. But I got a lot of really valuable advice for you know what do my students, my queer students, need to know as they move into the outdoor professions? And what do my non-queer students need to know in order to serve queer folks in the out of doors? And it was as simple as understanding and using pronouns. You know, I use he/him/his pronouns. That was one. Folks felt that we needed to know queer history in order to serve queer people in the out of doors. We needed to know, and understand sort of the range of identities it was. It was just really valuable and I think a lot of that came out of this intersectional lens that was very much in play at the 2019 summit, the summit this year was more inward. It was more about and for us because the period from the last summit until 2022 had been a tough time where community was challenged in so many ways through COVID, and so the theme of the 2022 LGBTQ outdoor summit was queer joy. And how do we experience joy in the outdoors? And so rather than having these, you know, deep diving internal examination exercises, we went for a wildflower walks and we learned how to do fly casting and how if you're doing fly fishing, you're also examining the woods and the environment around the stream or river and you're heavily focused on what's blooming and who’s pollinating what's blooming? Because the relationship between fly fishing folk and fish is all about insects. What was really cool also was that it was led by two folks who are, uh, a gay man and a lesbian who are very engaged in outdoor sports, fishing and hunting, which are not necessarily thought of stereotypically as things that queer folks engage in. And their work is twofold. On one hand, it is empowering, uplifting, queer folks who may have grown up with these traditions but have abandoned them for various reasons, but also to, and this is the only time I'll use the word normalize. I'm not sure what's a better word, but to make it clear that queer folks fly fish. And they're trying to change that sport because it is very cis white, male and privileged. But it is such a great way to be in touch with the world around you and so just everything that went into learning how to cast and learning how to read the woods and the the water was about joy and we as queer people, we never, at least I never stop being gay. You know, it's not something you turn on or turn off. And so looking and looking at and learning about the woods and about fly fishing, we were also learning about uplifting others and empowering ourselves and those around us to engage in an activity that is such a source of joy. Other things that happened that were very much about joy were, watching movies together and salsa dancing. And here is what I think is one of those great things about Outdoor Afro, Latino Outdoors, Unlikely Hikers, the LGBTQ outdoor summit. You know women outdoors. Those of us on the margins are always, almost always functioning in a world that in various ways invalidates us or ignores us or makes us invisible. Or outright discriminates, or devalues or legislates against. And that's hard to be in that world all the time. And an affinity group, it recharges you. And gives one the strength as well as skills and knowledge and understanding to then go back into the other world and do good work, but then you've got to recharge. And there are certainly people in our world who would say, oh, you know, there's only queer people in that group. That's discrimination. There's only women there. There's only Black people there, that's discrimination. And I would argue that anyone who says that doesn't understand discrimination and doesn't understand what privilege affords them and how, when one doesn't have privilege, they need to recharge so they can deal with the rest of the world. That's a roundabout route to address your question. Ranger: I don't think it was roundabout. I think that was great. I did read that there was salsa dancing during the the summit and I found that particularly interesting because that's actually how I met my my husband. We're both salsa dancers, so I love that. That was part of it. And we've seen in the salsa dancing community a really cool development of you no longer call the leads the man's part or the follow the woman's part. And people really kind of do whatever. And there are even now salsa congresses which are like weekend gatherings where people teach and learn and exchange and have open dances that are queer focused just to really have a space that's very intentional about being inclusive in that regard. And they're really amazing and beautiful. And it's such a great way to collaborate and connect with another person. Forist: I can imagine. I would argue that there are many contexts which break down our cultural barriers while also uplifting cultural identity that create that special something that you experience in salsa dancing and that I experience with a bunch of queer folks outdoors and it's those contexts that we, I think, need to very deliberately build, and sometimes, you know, I'm always thinking about things from the perspective of park managers as I'm teaching future park managers. Sometimes we facilitate things, or we welcome activities in our parks that we personally are not part of. And so how do you know my students need to know how to open the door and then step back if it's not for them. Ranger: Well, thank you for sharing more about that summit is sounds really healing. And I love the premise of focusing on joy during this past summit. That's one of the things that we've heard from our partners that they would like us to focus on in regards to exhibits that will be forthcoming at the AG Gaston Motel, which is a building we partially own, because so many of the stories about the civil rights movement are about suffering. And those stories have to be told, that's a critical part of the history. But there's another component that ties back to the resilience of the African American community. And a big piece of that is how folks were able to carve out joy amidst incredible, incredibly challenging circumstances, and that's a really important piece to recall. Forist: I couldn't agree with you more. It's so critical. I'm only speculating simply because in the class that I'm teaching right now where we're...it’s called Health and Happiness by Design. And I did an activity that I graded yesterday called eating culture where I asked each student to share a story about some food related experience that embodies their cultural background and one of the students who identified in the online discussions of asynchronous online course, we never see each other, identified himself as African American, wrote about cookouts and all of the food at cookouts. And I can only imagine that in the midst of the black civil rights movement, there were some really great things to eat and and and and there's a source of joy. And as interpreters of history or of the past, particularly the messy past. We, as you said, we need to recognize the trauma, the pain, but we also need to see beyond that. I take my interpretation students every year to the Indiana Historical Society, and we meet with one of their top managers who is just a really insightful person. They actually at at their site they have been doing an LGBTQ History collections project, where they're collecting stories and artifacts and such that that can help tell the LGBTQ story in Indiana. And early in his tenure at the site, the museum said they were gonna do a a queer history, a gay history exhibition and it focused on HIV/AIDS. And OK yes, that is that is a critical story to tell when telling gay history, gay present. But there's a lot more than that. Ranger: Yeah, absolutely. I think that's a really valuable point. On the theme of parks and the welcoming of LGBTQ plus folks you brought this up, that there is, there's both a history of queer people escaping into nature to be themselves and also fearing nature because of the dangers that nature may present. But our park, Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument is an urban one. And so I'm curious with your background as a researcher, as an educator and as a park ranger, how can urban parks such as our own ensure that queer people feel welcomed to be themselves. Forist: Yeah, boy. I think that's a hard question, but it's also a really simple question in some ways. The the simplicity of it is, put the welcome mat out. Sometimes it can be as simple as saying: We welcome LGBTQ visitors. And it's always good to feel welcome in 11 months of the year that are not June as well as June, just like you're gonna welcome...African Americans may inherently feel welcomed at your park because it tells their story, and that's the key, I think, is that representation. It really matters. And so one way to put that welcome mat out is tell the queer stories. And they are there. I guarantee you they are there. It may take a different lens to see them, it may take an adjustment of a lens to see them. It may take some partnerships to see them and it may take some discomfort to see them, but the LGBTQ stories exist and you know I cannot speak for my people, but I can tell you that when I go to a museum, a historic site, a natural area and see a queer story overtly told, I feel welcome. That representation matters. Couple years ago, actually may have been Megan Springate, who was the editor of the LGBTQ Theme Study for the national parks that shared this with me. It might have been somebody else in a forum I was involved in during the pandemic, but there's an article that came out of the museum world a couple of years ago that has really influenced me, and one I now share with my students called queer possibility. And what the article says is that in historical interpretation, when we don't know specifically about whatever the historical actor is, their sexuality or gender identity, the default is they are cisgender and straight. And that's an assumption that we make, and it's an assumption that our society makes. And then they in this article, they encourage creative thinking that allows for queer possibility and then provide guidelines or sort of steps in how can you see queer possibility. And so I share that - Middleton is the author - I offer that because a really important part of making people feel welcome anywhere is that sense of representation and it really goes along way. I met a young queer woman working in the Cook County Forest preserves outside of Chicago last weekend and in our conversation, where she was providing a service for a group called Out in Nature, a queer identifying bunch of nature heads in the Chicago area. She said, you know, I'm always leery of groups, but I feel seen here and just hearing someone say that reminds me how important representation is and that welcome is and seeing somebody not as a visitor, but as a queer visitor or as a female visitor, or as a trans visitor, or as a Black visitor, seeing the person for who they are is important, and one of the ways that you can open the door for them to share their full selves is through that representation in the stories you tell and the exhibits you make. You know your your site is of course, a historic site. We're seeing that in natural areas as well. Folks out at Muir Woods National Monument a year or more ago did a whole program on Queer Ecology where they're really looking hard at the assumed binary in biology and realizing that nature just ain't that. And so anything from interpreting banana slugs to trees that are clones really breaks apart that binary and and looks at ecology through a new lens, and I would argue that new, more nuanced lenses are always important, and not only do they advance knowledge, but they help us become more fully human. And they can change the world. They can be political tools as well. And so. It's simple. Put the welcome mat out. But it's very nuanced and there's lots of elements to it as well. You know and in parks it can be a challenge. When I was at Mesa Verde National Park in 2015 and 16 and I, I think it was 2015, that a bunch of us, we had a very enchanted interpretive crew that summer and a number of us said, hey, let's just put out a Facebook post that says, during Pride Month, we welcome our LGBTQ visitors. And that was the year that NPS Central Office was promoting the #I'moutdoors for Pride Month and we got some pushback. And at first, the pushback felt like being dismissed. And what it was, was it was the person in charge of the social media really wanting to know, where does this welcome fall within our interpretive themes? I argue that the welcome is a welcome and does not need any explanation, but as soon as one of my brilliant co-rangers found a story of a 2-spirit or transgender person from Hopi, one of the descendant tribes who at the turn of the last century to actually lobbied on behalf of Hopi as an openly two-spirit person, there was that interpretive theme link and that that person who at first felt like kind of standoffish and putting a barrier in place, fully embraced it. And that was really great, really great. And so that welcome, takes many forms, can be misunderstood and can be worked through in such a way as to move everybody forward. Ranger: Hmm. Yeah, I think that's great. I wrote an article for Pride Month about Bayard Rustin, who was, you know, Black man, civil rights activist. He helped to...he was like, one of the main architects of the March on Washington and was at times an openly gay man, but had to kind of closet himself in order to be a part of the movement, for various reasons, you know one because it was a faith-based movement and so there was a lot of, you know, discrimination internally, but two because his identity was used as like a political tool by those who opposed the civil rights movement. And you know, I love what you said about there being all of this queer possibility in our history and the fact that we know that Bayard Rustin is gay is is unusual. But the fact that there were queer people, a part of this movement is of course absolutely true there. It wasn't just one gay man. There were so many people involved whose identities were known or not known. And and I think just opening the door for those stories to be shared is something that I envision us doing in the future. In fact, as you were talking, I was thinking about the Gaston Motel, which was built by AG and Minnie Gaston in the city of Birmingham as like a luxury hotel for African Americans and was part of the Negro Motorist Green Book. That is an amazing example of Black excellence and Thursday through Sunday they had this incredible house band that played. They had a restaurant. You know, wall to wall carpeting, they had air conditioning, which was a really big deal back then and you know, really famous people stayed there. Aretha Franklin, Jackie Robinson, Colin and Alma Powell honeymoons there. So there are so many stories of, like, you know very well-known people staying there, but also stories of love and romance. And I wonder if that might be an avenue for us to, you know, open the door to some of those stories of queer love and joy that maybe transpired on the premises that we just aren't aware of because they haven't been encouraged to be told and embraced as part of the narrative. And you know, maybe that's an avenue for us to shed some light on those stories. Forist: Ohh, that just seems so exciting and and you know some of these stories are really hard to find. And then then you certainly know this, but cast your partnership net wide, you know. Because somewhere the stories exist. I'm I'm working on a project right now researching Women in the Works Progress Administration and and employed by the WPA and I'm finding, you know, few records, like actual records that are gonna be helpful and even in oral histories, in the place where I'm doing the work, there's a lot of really great oral histories, but we've only found one where a woman talks about working in the WPA, and one of the historians who conducted some of those oral histories was really wondering if being on relief may not be one of the top things you share in an oral history. And what we find with queer history particularly, recorded history, letters, diaries, et cetera, queer people themselves destroyed things so they weren’t found out and certainly families destroyed things. I've I've heard stories. Can't remember which one who this was but it was an older lesbian woman who when she died, her family was coming in one door while her friends were throwing all of her things out the other so they would get saved rather than destroyed by family. So there's all those dynamics, and it also brings up the, what do you call people? What terms do you use to describe that queer possibility? I'm a real advocate, and I learned this from my friend Susan Ferrantinos, who also in the LGBTQ theme study, the National Park Service, wrote about interpreting queer history and as author of a book on interpreting LGBTQ history, she's a real advocate of using the terms people used for themselves at their time, and so we can get at the queerness with without saying whatever word we might need to say. In my town here in Michigan City, IN where I live, we've got a lighthouse on Lake Michigan and the longest standing light keeper in the United States was here for 43 years, from 1861 to 1904, a woman named Harriet Colfax, and for that full 43 years she lived there with another woman. I've recently learned that according to an article from the Chicago Tribune of 1902 that each of them had been, quote unquote, disappointed in love early in life and bonded together, exchanging engagement rings that they wore for their entire lives together. But I would never say they were lesbians because we do not know. We don't have anything in the record that speaks to their identity. There's plenty in the record, certainly from when they were alive. It changed after they died, which is a very interesting thing. But while they were alive that they were involved in a loving, deeply committed relationship. And what I've always said to my fellow historians or whatever we are around here is that we don't know that they were lesbians. We also don't know they were not. That said, in reference to them, I would, I would simply say, you know, two women in a deeply committed and loving relationship. And I maybe it's just this desire to honor rather than than place my own values on things, but I feel like that honors them without making them a political tool, which I also will certainly do because we need to see that possibility. It's a tough paradox. But I feel like it's really critical to describe people and describe relationships on their own terms rather than projecting on to people. Ranger: Yeah, I think that makes a lot of sense. You know, you're describing the relationship rather than labeling the relationship. And so that and demonstrating that there are many ways that this relationship could have actually transpired, but that we don't know and leaving the door open for the possibility of it being a gay relationship. But again, we don't know and but we certainly do know the context in which the relationship transpired, which was one that was far more marginalizing and oppressive to people and I'm glad you mentioned the heritage theme study because I didn't realize that the National Park Service had put together an LGBTQ+ heritage theme study. This study came out in 2016 and I was wondering if you could share a little about what you know of the intention of the study and something about the study in terms of what it found that you see as predominantly significant? Forist: Yeah. So again, in in 2016, the National Park Service culminated a process that they had begun a few years earlier and and the Park Service will do these theme studies from time to time to look at different topics. And the purpose is to examine the topic with the thought of what places on the American landscape exist where these stories could be told? And so the purpose of the LGBTQ theme study was to identify the themes within LGBTQ history in the United States and present in the United States and what places on the landscape can tell different parts of this story. So I I just recently reviewed the section on Sport and Leisure because sport and leisure has been integral to LGBTQ identity and culture in the United States. There's a whole section on women's music, which was a movement of the 70s, 80s, of women, primarily lesbians, creating an entire music industry because they had been so marginalized by the male dominated music industry, and there were a whole host of artists that emerged as significant icons in the movement. And there were women's music festivals. I just think you know the the land on which a women's music festival took place could be a great historic site to tell that story of self-determination, of culture building, of artistic expression and of identity through that expression. So it was really interesting to revisit that. One of the things that that theme study produced was the impetus for then President Obama to declare Stonewall National Monument in June of 2016 as the first unit of our National Park system to specifically tell the story of LGBTQ civil rights and so Stonewall National Monument now exists. And they are telling that civil rights story, and they're doing it really, really well. They just got clearance to establish a visitor center. And there's a whole partnership that's involved in in putting that together. So the theme study was really, and this is the language of of, of the director of the Park Service at the time, who referred to the Park Service as America's storyteller and any theme study, whether it be the LGBTQ theme study, an Asian American theme study, civil war, civil rights. I believe there had been a theme study on segregation, integration and education, which culminated with the establishment of Brown versus Board of Education National Historic Site and Little Rock Central High School National Historic Site. Latin-X American theme study culminating and culminating is not the right word, but one of the results of it was the establishment of the Cesar Chavez National Monument. Sites of representation. So not just the welcome mat at your site in Birmingham, but an entire National Park site is overtly welcoming of the queer community of the Japanese American community at sites of incarceration like Manzanar and Amache, which is a new one in Colorado, where Japanese American citizens were imprisoned during the Second World War because of their heritage, while being citizens. So Stonewall was established as a product of that theme study, and now I'm I would love to see more, more sites that tell the stories of queer Americans on the landscape. Ranger: Do you feel based on the study that there are other sites that will be forthcoming as new National Park sites and you know, of course, Stonewall being established in 2016 was a huge milestone, but I'm sure there are others that that site that the study identified that may be kind of like waiting in the hopper. What are those sites? Forist: Yeah, I'm not gonna have a good answer for that. I know that there are a number of sites that have been moving through the designation process. So listed on the National Register of Historic Places. I could see National Historic Landmark status or even historic district status. Again, in reviewing the section of the theme study on sport and leisure. Places like Provincetown, MA, Saugatuck and Douglas in Michigan, Key West in Florida. Palm Springs, which have become LGBTQ resort places, those would be great historic landmark districts or heritage areas that that tell a queer story. And certainly like a place I I lived in on Cape Cod for a number of years and a place like Provincetown. You know, it's it's certainly a story of queer people and culture and their connection to the arts, but it's also connection to nature and connection to the land. Out on the outer Cape, where so many queer artists found their muse. You know, on up to poets like Mary Oliver who recently passed a few years ago. They write they paint, they photographed the light. And the the beautiful nature of of that dune environment and such and so. We cannot disconnect that connection to nature to the culture in the identity. Of course, any site that's going to get added it's all about political will and local boosterism. So I'm not sure what that next site will be. We have seen some really cool things get added to the National Park landscape, really in the last the 30 years where we've expanded the stories. Women's Rights National Historical Park and Brown versus Board and Little Rock Central. All the Japanese American imprisonment sites to your site and now the Medgar and Myrlie Evers site that a retired Superintendent friend of mine just visited yesterday, I think the day before and posted pictures on her social media feed. So we're now telling stories that are not as clear cut. I don't think any story was clear cut, though. We used to tell them as clear cut. But we're telling much more nuanced stories, and we're seeing that there are places on the landscape where those are best told. And I think we are understanding the complexity and we're understanding that it's not all about American exceptionalism, that there are sites where we really mucked it up where where we engaged in shameful acts. And in the face of those shameful acts people’s identities were emboldened, were supported and persevered and and that is such an important thing. You know, the Stonewall story is absolutely that. When the President declared the National Monument, he referred to it as the site of a riot that bred a movement. And we can never forget that it was trans women of color who really started that riot, that became a movement. You know, in 2018, I accidentally ended up in New York City the day of New York Pride and I got connected with folks from Stonewall National Monument. So I was able to march in the the, the, the, the Pride March with my colleagues from the National Park Service, which was really a great experience. And that day, one of the greatest moments for me was meeting and photographing a young trans woman along the the march route, and she was holding up a beautiful sign that simply said God bless Marsha and Sylvia, and she was referring there to Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera, two of those trans women of color who were at the forefront of the Stonewall uprising, that riot that became a movement. And so meeting that young person with that sense of history was one of those really lovely moments. Ranger: Ohh thank you for sharing that memory. And speaking of historic memory before we started recording the podcast you had shared with me that in 2009 you were in Birmingham when President Barack Obama was elected. If am I getting that correct? You're nodding. OK. The day of the inauguration, yeah. The day of the inauguration. OK, thank you. Can you tell me a little bit about that experience? Forist: Sure. Can I go all out in? Ranger: Yeah. Forist: Yeah. So I'm Alabama was state #49 for me. And and I'm still waiting for Mississippi to give me a good reason to visit. And it may be them early in Medgar Evers site. But, I was there at a conference, in northern Alabama, and I remember driving into the state and seeing the billboard that advertised the Helen Keller birth home as a historic site. And when I read the Billboard it said, come visit what she or come see what she couldn't. I did not have a good impression. And I know that was not Alabama's fault. But it's hard to to see something like that and not jump to conclusions. I was able to be in Birmingham on the day of President Obama's inauguration and visit the Civil Rights Center. And it was after the inauguration. So they were breaking down from the celebration that was there. But I've gotta say, it was one of those moments that I won't forget, because of the joy. And indeed you know, walking in that park just adjacent to Civil Rights Center and seeing the statue of the children being, you know, attacked by the police dogs and learning about the fire hoses, you know. It's hard to feel joy. But I saw those sculptures as liberating. In that moment of joy, and I felt like as a gay person...I cannot know the African American experience, or as a white person I can't know it. But as a a gay person, this source of joy in my life helped me to see joy as an act of overcoming pain and that's what I felt that day in Birmingham. Standing at the corner and looking up at the neon sign at the 16th St. Baptist Church. Was a real grounding moment. I felt like I was at a place where, again, a horrible, horrible, unspeakable thing happened. And it's there so that we can never forget what happened that Sunday and the loss of those girls. But I feel like I could see through the tragedy and to the power of that sign still standing. I felt the same thing in 2018 when I was in the Pride March in New York with people from Stonewall National Monument and we passed the Stonewall Inn. And you know, there's something really special about feeling the presence of greatness, and in this case, the greatness was five girls who were tragically lost in Birmingham. Or a bunch of Queens that were pissed off and we're going to take it anymore from the New York City police. It's really ordinary greatness and it's the people that then follow in their footsteps and continue their work that gives such hope. Ranger: Thank you for sharing that. So this is kind of a pivot to the work that you do now and the land upon which you do that work. Umm, I read that you work primarily on the traditional contemporary lands of the Potawatomi, the Miami, the Shawnee, and the Kickapoo people. And I I'm curious, how was your work in regards to opening up spaces for queer folks impacted by doing the work on this land, and and the fact that you recognize that this land is not necessarily, the land of of the United States, but these these sovereign nations. Forist: Right, right. To me it's again about that intersectionality about understanding a whole history that calls into question so many many things, but also a land acknowledgement to me is more than simply an acknowledgement of a really awful past, an acknowledgement of the colonial project that you know, we are all part of to some degree and benefit and and devastated by all at once. But I guess I'm enough of a realist to accept that while in the perfect world, you know land would be ceded back to its rightful owners or rightful populations, and then we would behave, those of us who are not indigenous might behave as better guests. But what it really does to me is invoke partnership and in in, in in invoke a bigger tent. To me, a land acknowledgement doesn't stop at acknowledging the people whose land I work on and act as a steward for but to engage in partnership with those people and learn when appropriate and when, given that gift of how to better steward those lands, and again in partnership. So, I work more closely with folks from the Potawatomi nation than any others. And it's constantly trying to remain open and understand what stories her mind to tell and what stories are not mine to tell. That may mean the partnership brings in a person who is more appropriate to tell the story, or accepting that some stories just aren't to be told. I hope it didn't weasel out of that one. It's complex. But it is again sort of at that intersection of...to me it's not just identity. And the idea intersectionality is about these layered identities we wear. But to me, it's about action. That wearing one identity, to me, helps open up the door for empathy and understanding. Again, we can never know someone else's experience, but we can honor that experience. Honor the pain, honor the joy, and and be realistic about it. And so indigenous stories become part of every place that we work in teach and there are queer indigenous stories as well. And that helps us to understand that we've been here for a long, long time and knowing that brings us strength. Ranger: Thank you. I think it's a good time to wrap up with our closing question, which is all about the work that you're doing with this May 2023 special issue of the Parks Stewardship Forum and the focus for this special issue is LGBTQIA+ experience and expertise in the outdoors and conservation. What are you most excited about with this opportunity and what do you want listeners to know about it? Forist: Yeah. So this is a special issue of the Park Stewardship Forum, which is jointly published by the George Wright Society, which is named for the National Park Service first chief scientist from the 1930s, George Melendez Wright. Unfortunately, he passed away very early in his life. But the George Wright Society is focused on evidence-based management of parks, protected areas and heritage sites. The co-sponsor of that journal is The University of California at Berkeley Institute for Parks, People and Biodiversity, and that's an institute with a one of the principles there is John Jarvis, the 18th Director of the National Park Service. So the recent past director during the Obama administration. And this emerged out of a forum that was done a year ago by George Wright Society, their board of directors and the organization itself is really moving into the justice equity, diversity, accessibility, and inclusion arena. And what is the knowledge that's most needed to to to do that and their most recent past issue was on indigenous perspectives and marine conservation. And so they have really stepped up if you will and said let's use this bully pulpit we have, if you will, this academic journal to empower various communities that have really important things to say about conservation. And so after the forum where we were just talking about supporting LGBTQ folks in the outdoors, we were invited, the three panelists on the forum were invited to be co-editors, and so simply being invited as a voice for our communities was an honor and we've thought pretty hard, the three of us that are co-editors myself, Sandy Heath from Northern Arizona University and Forest Cortez from The Nature Conservancy in Chicago, are thinking about how can we make this journal, how can we embed the values of diversity, equity, inclusion and justice in every step of the process? So it's an open call. And when we talk about experience and expertise, it's not about credential, it's about expertise and so we are particularly interested in hearing youth voices, other marginalized voices. We're currently raising money so that every contributor receives a stipend, and so that people are compensated for their work. As, you know, an old white guy, I'm often asking my more, more marginalized colleagues to help me and I'm done with the just expecting them to do it and so one of those things we're doing is we're raising the funds so that everyone will be compensated. If we don't have enough for everyone to be compensated, we will give priority to young people, people of color, people who were unhoused. So that we're leveraging what we have more appropriately. But what I'm really excited about is that this will become a multimedia voice, or sounding board, that will advance our profession, protected areas and conservation and outdoor professions, by expanding the conversation. I don't know what we're gonna get. We've got one proposal so far, and it's very exciting. And I'm really excited about the person who submitted it, who is a straight ally and Forest and Sandy, my co-editors, their immediate response was, well, we've got to get that guy to have some partners because we want to uplift queer voices and the voices are really important one but I love that my colleagues are immediately how can we make it better? We don't know what we're going to get, so that's exciting in a way. It's like putting it out there. We will do some invitations. I really want to get some folks to write about their understanding, experience of queer ecology. We're really interested in places on the land where queer stories are told. And what's really cool about the Park Stewardship Forum, it's fully online and truly multimedia. So there can be art installations, there can be music. I'm gonna communicate with my fly fishing friends that I mentioned earlier. And two wonderful lesbian musician friends who write music about fly fishing to collaborate. And I'd love to see something where my fly fishing instructor friends collaborate with my songwriters and and and do something together. So the the really the, the the doors wide open. Also so many academic journals are a little stuffy and a little full of themselves, and this journal accepts non peer reviewed articles but will also do the peer review. So we have different layers of legitimacy if you will. And one of the things I've always loved, I know that George Wright society better than the Institute at Berkeley, but George Wright has always been really accessible to the broad range of managers in parks and protected areas and going to their conferences, I always relish that you might be at a session on interpretation that is attended by students, indigenous partners and park maintenance people. And so you get that whole range of people really benefiting from the knowledge, expertise and experience shared. So the call is out through the 1st of November and then we will enter into the editing phase. Our job as guest editors is really to sort of facilitate the process, but then become the glue between the pieces and I'm looking forward to co-writing the editorial piece that kind of weaves one contribution into a fabric with the others. And it will come out in May of next year. Ranger: Well, thank you so much for sharing all of that with me. I'm real excited to share this with our listeners and hopefully get the word out about the November 1st deadline to submit their work. Is there any question that I didn't ask that you'd like to speak on? Forist: You know, not that I can think of. What I will offer, and maybe this is totally trivial but a site like yours in Birmingham is such an important site and makes me really proud that it's part of my National Park system. And when I particularly think about the traditions of nonviolence and the thread from Thoreau resisting he war on Mexico and writing his essay on civil disobedience to Gandhi to Martin Luther King, and to Act Up, the AIDS coalition to unleash power uh from the 1980s and 90s and and that that string of nonviolence, a site like years in Birmingham, is the inspiration for change and it's the inspiration for activists who are fully themselves. And embracing an identity that has been devalued by our society, and there's a lot we can all learn from that. And so as a gay person in America, I take great inspiration from the work you do and the work that your site does. Ranger: Thank you so much for sharing that I am. I really appreciate those closing remarks and look forward to future conversations with you as well. Forist: Absolutely. Absolutely. Thank you so much. It's a a real honor to be invited. I I've I've listened a couple of the podcast episodes and I’m not of the caliber of your other folks, but I'm very proud to be here. Ranger: Well, thank you. I appreciate you listening in and hopefully one of these days I'll figure out how to upload them to Apple Podcasts so they're easier for others to listen to as well. That's on my list. Forist: Yeah, it seems like you're doing really well.

22 Nov 2022 - 59 min
episode Episode 7: Gina Mallisham, Marketing Manager at BCRI, on her LGBTQ+ Advocacy Work artwork

Episode 7: Gina Mallisham, Marketing Manager at BCRI, on her LGBTQ+ Advocacy Work

Listen in as Gina Mallisham, Marketing Manager at Birmingham Civil Rights Institute (BCRI) describes her advocacy work on behalf of the LGBTQ+ community in Birmingham. --- TRANSCRIPT: --- Welcome to We Will Rise: National Parks in Civil Rights. Close your eyes and imagine a national park. Are you picturing waterfalls and mountains? Or do you think of Dr. King's childhood home? Japanese internment camps at a school that became a battleground for racial integration? National parks aren't just wilderness. They are spaces of remembrance, founded to preserve the stories of who we are and how we came to be. National parks inspire us to do better, be better, to climb mountains both physical and figurative. Join park rangers, researchers, authors, and activists as we discuss with liberty and justice for all means on our public land. And we are recording. Ranger: Hello, everybody. My name is Kat, and I'm a park ranger at Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument. And today I am so excited to be with Gina Mallisham. She is a Tuscaloosa native who works as the marketing manager at the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute, and she also serves as secretary of the Central Alabama Pride Board of Directors and one of the founding members of Mayor Randall Woodfin's LGBTQ+ Advisory Board. She is also part of the year round staff at Sidewalk and Film Center, where she works as the Shout LGBTQ+ Outreach Coordinator. So I don't know what you don't do, Ms. Gina, but it's always a joy to work with you, and I really appreciate you taking some time out of your schedule to be here to have this conversation with me. Gina Mallisham: Thank you for having me. I'm excited to do this. Ranger: Yeah. So I'll start with my first question. So, Birmingham, Alabama, isn't often one of the first places that come to people's minds when they think of queer-friendly spaces. Yet, when we were first emailing about this interview, you shared a number of things about the Magic City that sounded quite remarkable in terms of how this place shows up for LGBTQ+ folks. So I'd love you to talk about what you feel is commendable, about how Birmingham serves and welcomes its LGBTQ+ population, and then also what advances still need to be made. Mallisham: Yeah, definitely. Birmingham is a very, very welcoming community for all different kinds of people, and that includes transgender individuals and gender diverse youth. And the Magic City has seen so many seasons of progress and perseverance. Our queer community has shown, even in difficult times, that we're capable of becoming better and emerging stronger every single time. And our city has proudly achieved its highest ever total raw score of 108 on the Human Rights Campaign Municipal Equality Index, which we call the MEI. And we also earned an All Star for the MEI, and that's a status for our perfect score, despite Alabama status as a state without any nondiscrimination statutes that expressly protect LGBTQ people. And this 10th edition of the MEI actually examines how inclusive municipal laws and policies and services are of LGBTQ people who live and work there. And so that's just one of many, I can go on and on and on about how affirming the city of Birmingham is. Ranger: Wow. I'm not familiar with the MEI. Could you repeat that one more time? What does that stand for? Mallisham: Yeah. That is the Human Rights Campaign's Municipal Equality Index, or the MEI. Ranger: Oh, that's so amazing. So, Birmingham’s score you said was 108. Mallisham: That's right. Out of it, we got up to 108. Having come from a score so low, I won't even mention it ahead of our current mayor. Ranger: Oh, wow. Is there like a maximum score or is it just like the more points you get, the better? Like in a basketball game. Okay. Mallisham: Right. The more points you get, the better. And then we also have got world class medical care here and human rights activism that's driven by some of the most ambitious social justice leaders. All of them are leading not just for the City of Birmingham, but setting an example for other states, particularly Southern states. We're home to one of the nation's oldest pride organizations, Central Alabama Pride is the state's largest pride organization and we're a nonprofit group of unpaid board members. And we're committed to spreading the message of equality every year with the production of our queer Pride events. And we bring together people from all over Alabama, really the Southeast. Most recently, we clocked over 25,000 attendees at our twelve days of Pride in 2022. Ranger: Wow. Mallisham: We are just showing continued growth every year. And another thing I'm proud of is the New South Softball League. It's based right here in Birmingham and it started in 1982. It's even older than me. And it's a member of NAGAAA, which is the North American Gay Amateur Athletic Alliance. And NAGAAA is a nonprofit international organization and it's made up of folks that are dedicated to promoting amateur athletics for the queer community. And our new south teams compete in tournaments all over the country and they do really well. And I'm not sure if it's the longest, but it's one of the longest running queer sports organizations in the nation. Ranger: I love that. And Hannah and I have been talking about this. Hannah is one of the interns that's been working with us this summer and just the role and importance of play and sports as a means of building relationships and bridging differences between people. And I had never heard of the Athletic League that you mentioned in your email and just now before, but I just love that that's a part of the movement here in Birmingham as opportunities for joy and levity and play. Mallisham: That's right. Yeah. On top of the things that are really important for us, the things that we wake up and forget our actual privileges for us. Our LGBTQ Advisory Board here in the city is constantly working to develop healthy, thriving, queer, inclusive community for the residents so that we can live openly and freely across all segments of our society, free of forms of discrimination and oppression. And we're really focused on continually improving the climate, the civic climate for queer residents and their allies through education and advocacy for inclusive policies. Most recently, we championed gender neutral restrooms and all of the city-owned facilities with single-occupancy stalls. And we're working on reducing the queer homeless youth population in Birmingham. It's a problem not just in our city, but in cities all across the world. And so we've got a really strategic focus on queer and trans people of color. And we're doing this by advocating for organizations like AIDS Alabama's Way Station, which is a project that exists to serve queer and trans people of color, specifically. And we're always looking for collaborations and ways to elevate the needs of the community on the advisory board. The Civil Rights Institute and the Invisible Histories Project are currently working to elevate the stories and issues facing marginalized groups within the queer community with an upcoming gallery project that we just can't wait to present to the world next year. Yes, I want to tell you more about it, but it's a surprise. Ranger: Okay. I'll have to wait. Mallisham: Stay tuned. Ranger: I’ll have to be patient. Mallisham: Follow @BhamCivilRights to learn more about that. Ranger: Okay, cool. Mallisham: Yeah. And then, of course, there's a carefully cultivated network of affirming healthcare professionals and prevention specialists, and we're working to reduce health disparities among Birmingham's queer residents. We organize our efforts to combat rising rates of...new rates of COVID, STIs, STDs, HIV infections in Birmingham. And we are home to a lot of organizations that offer affirming addiction and rehab care, hormone replacement therapy, mental health services that can better quantify and respond to the health needs of our community, which are really specific. And folks from all over the Southeast travel to Birmingham to get their affirming healthcare. Ranger: Wow. I did not know that. And why do you think that Birmingham has become that kind of a space in the south? Mallisham: Right. Well, of course, we can look to our municipal support, for sure. We can look to the fact that we have a high population here, and any place with a high population is going to have a high queer population. But, we're home to Alabama's first LGBTQ primary care facility. We're home to the University of Alabama at Birmingham, which is just world class health care. And the research centers that we have here in Birmingham lead to an awareness of the need and an answering of the need, which is something that the Magic City has always done, is seeing a need and filled it. Ranger: Wow, so beautiful. Mallisham: I'm very proud. Ranger: Yeah, I can see it. You've got this big smile on your face and, like, what a cool...I mean, you already do so much in your work at the Institute, but I imagine that in addition to the very fulfilling work that you do here, that is also something that is incredibly fulfilling and as you mentioned, a huge need. Yeah. Thank you for doing that work. Mallisham: I love doing it. Ranger: So, taking a pivot to civil rights education. We of course know each other through collaborating on civil rights history education, specifically the story of the 1950s and the movement led by the African American community here in Birmingham and the rest of the south. What to you are the similarities and differences between the pursuit of civil rights for African Americans and the pursuit of civil rights for the queer community? Mallisham: Well, I tell you, that is a very good question. It is also a very controversial question. So first we have to recognize that a lot of folks reject the notion that the queer struggle and Black American struggle can't even be compared. The concept really angers some Black Americans who view it as an attempt by a privileged white community to claim a type of victimhood that is distinct from the Black experience in America, even while others view such brave dialogue very favorably. And I would say that I'm of the latter. And so for the sake of courageous conversation, we can note that Black Americans and gays have been targeted because of who they are. And both African Americans and gays have been denied equal access to rights, responsibilities and protections that the Constitution provides. And I think immediately to civil rights icon Julian Bond who was asked about this same connection between the Black civil rights movement and its gay counterpart a couple of years ago. And he told PBS that it was the, quote, immutable characteristics of the individuals that mattered. He said that it's not that these movements are taking from us because the Black movement took from other movements before it. We took from the labor movement and he never heard of anybody from the labor movement complaining about it. And we ought to be proud of this and say, look what we did. We created a model that other people have followed. And that's very much what we do here at the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute is examine these blueprints for transformation in societies so that we can apply them in a contemporary way to make life better for us as we move forward. Ranger: I love that and I think that really gets at the strategy behind the movement. I think something that I've observed that's often lacking, especially in elementary education in regards to the movement is things are framed in sort of this spontaneous way. Rosa Parks got tired one day and didn't want to give up her seat. No, she was part of the movement. She was part of the NAACP. She and her husband were organizers. There was a lot of strategy. And same thing with even just looking at selective buying campaigns in Birmingham. The language that was used, instead of saying boycott, which was illegal in the state of Alabama at the time, calling it a selective buying campaign, demonstrating all the strategy, all the planning that went into it. And by studying the planning, we do get a blueprint for how social justice reform can occur in other sectors of society. And that is one of the wonderful legacies and gifts of the civil rights movement is there is this incredible blueprint of success of this amazing nonviolent movement. Mallisham: Yeah, that's right. And one other thing I'll note in comparison of both movements is that the messaging is the most important. And I don't just say that as a comms professional, but when you organize your party, be it a political party or a social justice group, if you can organize and really narrow in on what that narrative should be, that is the most crucial part. And you can be so strategic that people don't really recognize that strategy. It gets so nuanced that all we remember is the change that came. But we really do have to focus on what made that change come. Ranger: Amazing. So question about intersectionality. What does intersectionality mean in the context of civil rights? And how can an understanding of intersectionality help us to empathize more deeply with the most marginalized among us? Mallisham: Well, first I have to say that I feel like you picked my brain when you picked this question because intersectionality, you can ask anyone who's ever had a conversation like this with me is very important to me because I live in several intersections as a Black woman, as a woman, a woman in the south, a religious woman, a queer-identified woman. There's a lot of intersections just within Gina. And so this is definitely a topic that moves me on a regular basis. I think immediately to Bayard Rustin's humanitarian contributions that are just so much far deep and queer equality, or even equality for Black Americans. He was the chief organizer of the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. And so few people know about his accomplishments because in the sixties he was considered to be a liability. He was considered to be a gay ex-communist, but he was so much more. And most of us, even those of us within the queer community, live with some type of privilege, whether it's racial, class, education, being cisgendered or able-bodied or straight. And I think that the interconnected nature of these social categorizations are always going to overlap and therefore they're always going to create interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage. And we're all just existing in a human experience and maintaining a compassionate perception of privilege and intersectionality could really benefit everybody, not just marginalized people. And I think that empathy comes easily when we reject myths and stereotypes and fight to remove marginalization and social exclusions like homophobia, racism, sexism, anti Semitism and ableism. I think that's really where the buck stops when it comes to understanding intersectionality and making every single one of ourselves better. Ranger: So well said. Thank you. Yeah. Empathy is just the core of so many advances in our society and yet it's something that is so lacking, it seems, in our public discourse today and the way that folks interact. Mallisham: That's right. And it's essential for allyship. And without allyship, no movement can survive without allyship. Ranger: Great. So now we'll get to talk about a topic that I love, and that is the arts. So much of your work outside of the Institute seems to focus around the arts and giving voice to queer communities. What is your personal background in the arts? We'll start there. I've got a couple of questions. Mallisham: Okay. Well, I have always aimed for a nonprofit career, much to the chagrin of my mom, but there's really no denying that my love really involves the arts. My first job was actually on AM radio in my hometown. Ranger: Really? AM radio? Mallisham: Yeah. I played a couple of instruments in a band, and I really loved photography. So yearbook and newspaper were really my favorite outlets through my early twenty’s. And I worked at the Cannonball House and the Hay House in the Harriet Tubman Historical Museums while I was studying Comms at Wesleyan College in Macon, Georgia. And I was lucky enough to earn an internship at Disney World before I moved to Birmingham to start my nonprofit career. Ranger: Okay, press pause for a second. What instruments did you play in the band? Mallisham: Well, actually, I started with bassoon. Ranger: The sexiest of all the instruments. Mallisham: Right. That double read was really expensive and I broke them often, so I switched to clarinet. Okay. And then I got in high school and saw really almost immediately that a lot of the kids graduating with scholarships not just to HBCUs from marching band, but just everywhere, they played brass. So I switched to baritone. And sharing a mouthpiece, also trombone. And that's what I played into college. Ranger: Wow, that's so cool. Mallisham: I love music. Ranger: Do you still play? Mallisham: I should, but I don't. Ranger: Do you have an instrument? Mallisham: I do. I still have a baritone. I can't remember the last time I made time to play it. I also can't imagine, you know, where I would enjoy it in this very compact city without everyone around being like, whoa, you got to stop. Ranger: I've been amazed by how many music jams there are in the city. Mallisham: Yes. Ranger: So we should talk after about this because my husband is a musician and he's found a number - Mallisham: We have a thriving music scene in Birmingham. Ranger: Yeah. And you said you were doing an internship at Disney World. What was that about? Mallisham: Well, I worked in Fantasyland, which is the space behind the castle in Magic Kingdom, on attractions, which was really fun. And so I really got more into the science of arts than anything while I was at Disney because I was lucky enough to work in spaces with the 4D experiences and seeing what happens to an audience when they not only see a film, but when they can smell it and feel it, too. It was emotional for me to watch those people enjoying that all summer. So that was beautiful. I really loved working at Disney. Ranger: How did you like...the smells? Can you tell me about how that happened? Mallisham: Yeah. So, for instance, Mickey’s PhilharMagic takes you into a 4D theater where you're not just listening to Be Our Guest, but you're watching on an IMAX screen, Be Our Guest, and you can smell the pies flying at you, and you can feel a spray from the champagne bottles as they pop open. And as you're listening to “A Whole New World,” from Aladdin, it feels like you're flying around in the Middle East. So it really does transport you to another place. And immersive experiences are my favorite. So I loved every bit of working at Disney World. Ranger: That's amazing. And there's also an accessibility component to that, too. I had the great fortune to work in Argentina for a year, and I attended a play at a theater for the blind, and everything was dark, and it was all about auditory, olfactory and touch sensation, and it was just amazing. And it was so mind opening for me that I could have this experience of a play without even needing to use my eyes at all. And that just kind of.... Mallisham: That’s going on my bucket list. Ranger: Yeah, I’ll tell you more about that later. It was really cool. I hope it's still there. Okay, so I cut you off. You were talking about Disney World and your internship. Mallisham: Yeah, I mean, it was really cool. And I think that cultural heritage of every person is really what makes us human and most complete as people. It's the arts. And I've tried to champion free access to education in the arts because I think that it's a fundamental part of development and an integral part of a successful society, to be completely honest. Back in 2017, I worked with Sidewalk Film Festival to start a program where we made educational opportunities involving films and filmmaking more accessible to local queer youth. It's called shout about youth and it's really just fine arts like film deliver some nonacademic benefits, like promoting self-esteem, motivation, aesthetic awareness, cultural exposure, creativity, improved emotional expression, which is one of my favorites, and social harmony and appreciation of diversity that we really don't get anywhere else like we do in the arts. And filmmakers and film writers, they tell stories that take us to different places and show us different cultures. And great art even lets us see ourselves and our own community through a different lens than we're used to seeing ourselves. And it's one that's not really often granted to queer adolescents, and particularly in the south. So we're really proud of that. And I think that we got, like I mentioned, a really great, thriving music life here in Birmingham, and we have some amazing historical sites. Theater is amazing here. We have so many theaters. So I think we need more programs like that that invite young people in at no cost and make our cultural richness more accessible to them. Ranger: And earlier, before we started recording, you shared a little bit about how the arts were, like, supported and emphasized as you grew up. Do you mind sharing a little bit about that? Mallisham: Most definitely. My mom is, of all the many things that she is, she is a nurturer. And one of the things that she is, one of her gifts is being able to see what really drives you and what makes you excited to live and then nurturing that. And so for my sister, it was very much sports, and they saw so eye to eye on that that I almost felt excluded until she saw how much I love the arts. And she poured into me. She put me in band and gave me opportunities to express myself through art. I sang in a girl's choir for a few years, and if there was a camp or any other opportunity for me to visit a place that I might not otherwise, places that aren't included in the curriculum at my school, then she was there, she was signing me up for it and I was taking part. And I definitely learned an appreciation for cultural arts because of my mom. Ranger: That's such a beautiful story. Mallisham: Thank you, Mama Mallisham. Ranger: We'll have to cut that segment out and send it to her. Yeah. I'm curious. I know that I'm sure you've worked with so many young people on various projects. Was there like, an individual that particularly touched you or that produced, like, a piece of art that particularly touched you? Mallisham: Yeah, I think it was probably that, actually the first year of Shout About Youth. And we of course, as I mentioned before, we got a really strong network here in Birmingham. We realized that having really great queer services in one place only helps once in a person's life. But if we work together, then we can benefit the most number of people. So I was working closely with the Magic City Acceptance Center, and of course, they told all the kids that participate there about Shout About Youth. One of them was a student at UAB at the time, and they came to the festival through that program. And so we would every single day sit them down for a free lunch with filmmakers that were visiting because of sidewalk. And so one of the participants actually met a filmmaker and worked with them to complete a film project that they had in a class at UAB. And they came to me long after the festival was over and was like, Ms. Gina, I just wanted to let you know that I met somebody from California that worked for Logo and they really helped me, and I got an A, and I'm positive this is what I want to do now. And of course, I just started shedding tears. I was so excited that we gave them a networking opportunity. They took advantage of it, and now they have a thriving career in the arts that they might not have had otherwise. So that's probably the thing that touched me most. That and then seeing the parents reactions, because they're really hesitant at first to sign that waiver that says your child is going to be seeing unrated...many of them never-before-seen independent films that focus on queer identity and they're like, oh my gosh, what is my child going to come home having seen? But at the end of it, they're always so thankful and so yeah, that would have to be a close second in my favorite memories of sharing the arts. Ranger: Oh, that's a really cool story. Mallisham: Thanks. Ranger: Well, this is my last question, and actually, after I ask the last question, I will maybe even open it up to see if Hannah has some questions to ask you. As I mentioned, Hannah Smith is the intern that's been working with us from Miles College this summer and she is an amazing artist. And we joke in the office that we're like getting to work with her before she becomes famous. Yeah, and she did a lot of art for the District, and one of the things that she did that I thought was amazing was a portrait of Bayard Rustin for Pride Month. Mallisham: I did too. Congratulations on that. Ranger: Yeah, it was really amazing. So my last question for you, Gina, is about national parks, and I'm curious what your favorite national park is, besides ours, of course, and if you have a memorable experience in the park and what made it significant to you. Mallisham: Yeah, well, that's a hard question. There are so many, and I would encourage every single one of your listeners to visit the National Park Service website and check them out. If you're going anywhere in America, you might as well go visit whatever national park is nearest because there's always something new to learn and experience. And while I absolutely love our Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial in DC, I would have to say Independence National Park in Pennsylvania is my favorite. The staff here at the Civil Rights Institute traveled there for our staff retreat last September to reflect on heritage in the city of Brotherly Love. And I really enjoyed learning how the city of Philadelphia played such a central role in the story of the movement for civil rights. Because there's a whole ‘nother 20th century history of civil rights that proceeds and coincides and exists beyond the events that took place in the south of the late fifty’s and sixty’s. And for Black immigrants, Philadelphia wasn't just a place of employment opportunities that you couldn't get here in the south. It was also freedom from the daily humiliations of Jim Crow segregation. So examining that story of the Northern civil rights movement, really it made us see the problem of race in American society as a national one rather than just a Southern issue. And the park is just so full of history and stories of tragedy and triumph that inspired and renewed our team. And we came back here to Birmingham so ready for the work ahead. And as far as memorable experience, I think that my favorite memory of the space was when our team, we went on a tour and we visited some other historic sites within the city. And US Representative Jordan Harris, shout out to Jordan Harris because we were literally immersed in a history lesson on his tour, and he took us to sites like the home of Paul Robinson and Malcolm X Park and the Edwin Stanton School. And I really enjoyed every bit of it. I think my favorite was Mother Bethel Amy Church, which is the mother church of the nation's Black denomination. It was like, I will not forget about that experience, probably ever. And so, yeah, that's why Independence Park in Pennsylvania is my favorite. Ranger: Wow, so cool. Well, thank you so much for taking the time to do this interview. It was pure joy to get a chance to chat with you more. And in a second, I'll pause and ask Hannah if she has any questions to ask of you as well. Mallisham: Okay. Real pleasure. Ranger: Yeah, thank you. Do you have any questions you want to ask? Hannah Smith: Yeah. Okay. Hmm.... Mallisham: Don't forget to tell her listeners who you are. Smith: Okay. I’m Hannah Smith, an intern at the Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument. I feel as though I've had a good experience with not only just learning new things and learning more about the possibilities for my career, but just being African American and hearing about African American history. I feel like I learned an internship because it kind of hits close to home, where, you know, where your ancestors came from and what they've been through. So I'll say is just how you identify your race and a lot of things that make you you, is that a big part of your job? And, like, what keeps you going for the youth? Mallisham: Very much. Very much a part of my job. I used to wake up every single morning and watch the news. And when I say used to, I mean up until around 2020, I woke up every morning and I watched the news, not just so that I could step into an awareness of what's happening to others all around the world, and not just because I'm obsessed with the weather, but because it helped me find my place. And since I started working here at the Civil Rights Institute, I feel like I find that here at work, and I don't need to find it on the news every morning. As a matter of fact, watching the news first thing in the morning is kind of depressing now, but yeah, definitely who I am as an individual and being proud of who I am as an individual, even as I'm sitting within the space at the Civil Rights Institute, among my coworkers, among our great visitors and our friends from the National Park Service. When I wake up every morning, a Black woman and come to work, a queer woman, get in my car and drive home, a Christian woman or a voting woman, I feel like I find myself a little bit more every day that we do this work. Of course, it's a benefit to be able to find yourself when you're constantly working in a place that champions brave conversations. And sometimes, I won't lie, it can be very exhausting because you never know what is going to come down in the news. But, yeah, to answer your question, I find my identity more, I think, because of where I work. Smith: Thank you. I'm glad I got to make that connection with you because I feel like it's a big part of just, I feel like starting off in college, I feel like you kind of don't know who you are anymore, or I feel like a lot has changed since high school. So I do think with the internship and just working with all of the organizations down here in Birmingham, I don't know, I feel the spirit, the happy energy where it's like people that truly appreciate history and try to change it for the better for the kids coming up in the future. Mallisham: I am too. I'm very glad that we got to relate on that because it's so often overdramatized as an existential crisis, but really it's just a self-awareness and an appreciation and a reverence for who we are. I definitely used to feel like things like white fragility didn't bother me as much, and I was even able to feel empathy towards homophobia. And so now the longer that I work in the space and the more that I speak to other academics within this space, the less empathetic I feel but more aware. Which is why we call it cultural humility and not cultural competency. Because I will never be competent in what it's like to be anybody other than me. But I definitely feel more competent in what it's like to be me as I'm in this space. I'm glad that you chose this field. Hannah Smith: Thank you. I'm happy to be here. Thank you, Kat. Mallisham: Thank you to Miles College. Smith: Well, I can say a big part of the national park's goals and even the program I'm in with Greening Youth Foundation is just to bring more diversity to the National Park Service. I can say, with your experiences, with working with the National Park Service, what would you tell people would benefit them or just being around the people that you've met, what do you think they could gain from the experience and being able to work with organizations like BCRI and knowing you could help them? Mallisham: Man, that list is so long. I will say on the top, though, as I visit different national parks all around the country, one of my favorite things to do is to step over to my friends in the brown hats. You tell me your story because I've read the plaques and I've read the programs and the brochures and what's online, but nothing sounds like and feels like what comes from the rangers, right. And same for the locals, the people that live in these spaces and really know their culture. And so with regard to becoming a park ranger or involving yourself with the National Park Service historic sites or other national parks, it's that you get a chance to develop the narrative that goes on from one generation to the next. What we know about these awesome spaces is almost entirely because of what someone else wrote down or shared. And so if you step into that space and you get to be a part of that history and it's so valuable, I don't know in other countries what's comparable to it. So I would say that about anybody interested in joining the Park Service or historic site. Smith: Well, thank you. I definitely felt that one because I can say signing up for the internship, I didn't expect it to be this energetic. Mallisham: And immersive. Smith: Yeah, different people, different personalities and things I would learn. So I can say it definitely helped me out as far as not feeling like I just threw away a summer for a regular job or it's something that actually shows me what I love to do. And I can say, in a way, professionally and just me personally, it gave me a sense of more maturity, I can say on what I'm just focused on. Mallisham: That's awesome. Smith: Thank you all. I think that's all for my questions. Mallisham: The only thing I can think of, of course, I have to include for your listeners a quick ask, and that's if they come to the Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument or add it to their list of places to visit, the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute sits right in the heart of this ground that peaceful protesters marched on to demand their civil rights. And when President Barack Obama created the monument in 2017, it was because he recognized that this is a sacred must-see destination for people who are on a pilgrimage to retrace the history of the civil rights movement. For three decades now, we've been here and visitors have been coming from all over the world to walk in the footsteps of the people who sacrificed their lives for social justice. Right here at the Institute and through our programming, the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute provides a forum for dialogue and community engagement for all people. And in this current national climate that's intensely grappling with issues on race and justice, I think that the presence of BCRI is needed now more than ever to provide our leadership, training and engagement on racial justice, diversity, equity and inclusion, and, of course, education. And you can find out more about us at bcri.org. Ranger: Thank you. I appreciate that plug. I have to say, as a park ranger, rarely do you get an opportunity to step into a space that's already so robust in terms of what's available, especially when the park is brand new, as is our park. And it's been one of the great honors and joys of this experience for me is that I have so many people who can help me learn and grow, not only as a ranger who is sharing the story, but as an ally. And the Institute is just so amazing for that. So I really appreciate all the work you guys do. Mallisham: Thank you. It's an honor just working with these historians. As a comms person, I'm very used to learning about the programs when it's time to promote them and grow awareness, but they very much allow me to be a part of the program-building process here, which is really rewarding. But it's also extremely intimidating sometimes because these historians know their stuff and they're not afraid to speak it and share it, and it's become very empowering. Ranger: Awesome. Well, thank you so much, Gina. I really enjoyed this interview and look forward to other opportunities to have future conversations as well. Mallisham: Thank you. I'm thankful for you both and for the National Park Service. I'm so glad that you all are here in Birmingham. Ranger: We're glad to be here, too. This is We Will Rise: National parks and Civil rights. Thanks to the Psalters for use of their song Turn Me Round. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe to our series. Until next time. [Music continues] I'm keep on talking marching up to freedom, yeah.

13 Oct 2022 - 39 min
episode Episode 6: Candacy Taylor, Author of Overground Railroad: The Green Book Roots of Black Travel in America artwork

Episode 6: Candacy Taylor, Author of Overground Railroad: The Green Book Roots of Black Travel in America

Author Candacy Taylor discusses the Green Book, known as the “Black travel guide to America.” The conversation spans Black female entrepreneurs, the role of music and clubs in racial integration, and the prison-industrial complex. --- TRANSCRIPT: --- Welcome to We Will Rise: National Parks and Civil Rights. Close your eyes and imagine a national park. Are you picturing waterfalls and mountains? Or do you think of Dr. King's childhood home, Japanese internment camps, and a school that became a battleground for racial integration? National parks aren't just wilderness. They are spaces of remembrance, founded to preserve the stories of who we are and how we came to be. National parks inspire us to do better, be better, to climb mountains both physical and figurative. Join park rangers, researchers, authors and activists as we discuss what liberty and justice for all means on our public lands. Ranger: Okay, all right. Well, hello, everyone. My name is Kat and I'm a park ranger at Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument. It is my honor to be speaking today with Candacy Taylor, author of Overground Railroad, the Green Book and the Roots of Black Travel in America. Published from 1936 to 1966, the Green Book was known as the Black Travel Guide to America. Because of segregation throughout the country, not just in the south, it was incredibly dangerous for African Americans to travel. This guidebook helped them to do so more safely. In recent years, awareness of The Green Book has increased, even leading to a Hollywood movie by the same name. This awareness is certainly thanks in part to Ms. Taylor's work. Ms. Taylor is an award-winning author, photographer, and cultural documentarian. Her work has been featured in The New Yorker and The Atlantic. She is a recipient of numerous fellowships and grants, including those from the Hutchins Center for African American Research at Harvard University and the National Endowment for the Humanities. She has visited more than 6500 Green Book sites and photographed nearly 300 of them. Welcome, Ms. Taylor. Ms. Taylor: Well, thank you. I'm glad to be here. Ranger Kat: Those numbers are amazing. Every time I look at them, I just can't even believe it. But I wanted to start actually with asking how your book tour is going or how it went now that it sounds like you've completed it. Ms. Taylor: Yes, it's been interesting. It was really great. Clearly, we're still in a pandemic, so that's been an interesting experience. Depending on the part of the country I'm in, they just react to the virus differently. So there's all these different protocols. But it was great to see people come out in all kinds of weather. I ran into a few kind of severe snowstorms, and it was quite exciting. But for the most part, what made this book tour so interesting is that I was covering two books, both the young adult version of Overground Railroad that was just released for ages twelve and up. And then there's, of course, the adult version that came out in 2020. But having this material adapted for a young audience, I wasn't sure how it was going to be received. And I don't have kids, so it was fascinating to see middle school kids and high school kids reacting to this material and really understanding how much they don't know about, you know, they're not being taught about like the Great Migration and basic things. I thought that this book would supplement their knowledge about American history and there was just a lot of fundamental things that were new to them. So I thought, wow, this book is really necessary. And I felt very inspired by just the interest and the intimate stories and a lot of the Q and A I wished were recorded because you really do get a pulse of the country when you hear about people's experiences. So it was great. Ranger Kat: I'm glad to hear that. And as someone who has a background working with young people, I completely agree with how inspiring it is to work with them and then also how critical it is that this information is shared with them in a way that's accessible to them. So I think it's just magnificent that you made this book for twelve and up. And I'll be honest, that's the book that I read and it was still incredibly in depth and really rich and of course all the primary source materials that you share and yeah, I thought it was still a very advanced book too. It was very rich. Ms. Taylor: Yeah, we didn't want to dumb it down for them. We really wanted them to rise to the occasion because I think when you do that, people surprise you. Ranger Kat: Yeah, absolutely. There's so many words that I learned from reading books that for many years I mispronounced because I just saw them in books. So I think that's absolutely such an important space for kids, for young people to be challenged. And I love that you said that because young people, that's how they learn through, like you said, rising to the challenge. So, very cool. Well, great. So as I mentioned, I'm a park ranger at Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument and the Park Service co-owns and co-manages a site that was a part of The Green Book and that's the AG Gaston Motel. And I'm wondering, since this is a site that you touch on in your books, could you take us back in time to the early sixties and paint us a picture of what staying at the Gaston Motel might have been like for African American travelers? Ms. Taylor: Yeah, the AG Gaston was such a fascinating property for so many reasons. First, it was owned by this man, right? Mr. Gaston, who was the fascinating character and there's books about him. And he owned an insurance company. He had a chain of funeral homes, he had a bank and a farm, a business college and a string of motels, which was really incredible, obviously for anybody, let alone a black man. No. So of course he was part of the crem de la crème of upper crust society for that area of the country because he was such a knowledgeable and successful businessman. And, of course, his hotel was considered the best place for Black people to stay in that part of the country. It had 32 rooms and custom-made furnishings and it was designed to serve this high class clientele. People dressed in their best clothes. They attended parties. There was a dining room with…they had signature cocktails in the lounge and the top musicians of the day played there. And of course, it's most famous for Martin Luther King, Jr's. war room, quote, unquote, where he had incredible meetings, basically strategizing the next stages of the civil rights era. So for all these reasons, it was really a fascinating, important place. And it's one of the examples I use when people ask me about the movie Green Book that came out that really had nothing to do with the Green Book, unfortunately. But when they take Dr. Shirley to Birmingham in the 1960s, that's when the trip, this road trip with his driver happens. And they have The Green Book, which is the whole point of the movie, right. That they're traveling with The Green Book. But basically the place where they put Dr. Shirley is one of the most downtrodden places where, of course, he's used to nicer and finer things in life and he's very uncomfortable. And the whole point of The Green Book was so that you had options. And had they really been using The Green Book, they would have gone to the AG Gaston because that's where Dr. Shirley would have, you know, felt the most, where he would have gone. To me, it was such an iconic place. And people, as I'm sure you know better than I do the impact it left on the community and people who remember that from their childhoods. It was very special. Ranger Kat: Yeah, incredibly special. One of the things that we're hoping to do this June is oral histories around AG and Minnie Gaston, his wife, whose role has really gone underreported, and to sort of shed some light on not just the movement activities, but the role that the Motel played in the community, exactly what you just shared. And that's another aspect of Black culture that has gone underreported in history. So we're looking forward to working with our partners on that. Ms. Taylor: That sounds great. Yeah. Ranger Kat: I'll let you know more about those details. I think that you might be interested in that, too. Ms. Taylor: Please do. Ranger Kat: I will. I want to pivot to national parks and the role of national parks in The Green Book. You wrote, quote, it was unusual to see national parks marketed to Black Americans. Although approximately 50 million vacationers visited national parks in the more than 90% of them were white. Can you explain to our listeners what prevented African Americans from visiting these places? Ms. Taylor: First of all, when you think about what national parks are and where they're located, they're generally in rural areas because it's in places of nature. Right? Ranger Kat: Right. Ms. Taylor: And just as a generalization, many Black people who traveled would avoid rural areas especially areas they weren't familiar with, because then some of those areas if you got lost, or if you're in the wrong place, or, you know, there were sundown towns throughout the country, and sundown towns were all white communities, and they were all white on purpose. And there would be a sign at the county line saying, “N word, don't let the sun set on here.” And there were just fewer options if you ran into trouble, if you had car trouble, anything, if you were in a more remote area, there were could be severe consequences. So, as a rule, most Black folks gravitated towards a bigger cities, and when they went on vacation or went to see family, they would stay in the cities or places that were more populated, that had Black communities, where there were more Black people. And that's what The Green Book was so brilliant at, was getting you to those centers where there was a Black hairdresser, or tailor, or obviously a restaurant or hotel. So national parks were not really on the radar for most Black Americans. And even today, and even when I was doing the research for this book, there are still campaigns, and I'm sure you can speak to this more than I can, of really trying to get Black folks to come to the national parks. We're still, I believe the last statistic I read was less than 10%, and some, I think in 2009 it was 1% of the people who were coming to national parks were Black. So it has been an issue from the beginning. And even in 1922, there was a debate in the Yosemite National Park, basically determining whether national parks could exclude Black Americans altogether. And it was decided that, I think they said, while Black people couldn't be openly discriminated against, they should be told that the parks have no facilities for taking care of them. So the idea was you could maybe get into the park, but you couldn't use the facilities, or you'd have to find facilities that were just for you. And that was obviously something most people didn't want to deal with. So it was easier to just avoid national parks. Thankfully, in the 1952 edition of The Green Book, there were 27 national parks listed, but depending on where you were in the country, the Shenandoah National Park, Great Smoky Mountains would have colored, quote unquote campgrounds in separate swimming and picnic areas. And the last thing I'll say about maybe a reason why it was different for Black folks, I mean, even in my own family, the idea of the threat of being lynched, my stepfather's cousin was run out of town by the Ku Klux Klan, and oftentimes that image of running through the woods for your life was a real part of our history. And I've seen that image in films and television series for years. But it wasn't until I started writing this book that I realized that that even happened in my own family, and I hadn't known about it. So yeah, woods and rural spaces are complicated for Black people. Black Americans at least. Ranger Kat: Yeah. It's an ongoing challenge in the Park Service and one that there was a Centennial Document that came out in 2016. It marked the hundred years of the existence of the Park Service. And one of the top priorities is diversifying staff and visitation to national parks. And so there is, like a stated intention to do so, but of course, the numbers are what sort of demonstrate how well we're doing. Of course, those are the metrics, and there's still a lot of room for improvement. Speaking of improvement, one of the things I really appreciated about your book is the fact that you really shine a light on the female entrepreneurs in The Green Book. And as I mentioned earlier, one of the things that we're really striving to improve upon in our storytelling is making sure that we're uncovering the history of female entrepreneurs as it relates to Birmingham and then making that a priority in the narrative that we share with the public. And that was something I really appreciated about your book as well. And so I wanted to ask if you could maybe share some of the stories or a story of a female entrepreneur that most resonated with you and why that most resonated with you. Ms. Taylor: Yeah, this was a nice surprise as I was doing the research, because there's a whole chapter in my book dedicated to women in the Green Book for this reason, because it wasn't just that… My gosh, this was a time when women couldn't even have a bank account or credit card, and yet they ran businesses. Right? And these were largely, mostly Black women. I mean, there were about 900 beauty shops in The Green Brook that were largely run by women. And this was a place where you didn't just go and get your hair done. They were social centers where they were political, they were community-based centers. The NAACP was considered a radical organization at this time. And so if you wanted literature from the NAACP, you didn't have it sent to your house, you would have it sent to the beauty shop. And if you, you know, voting day, hairstylists would literally stop, shut down the shop and drive their customers to the voting booths. They were very important part of Black culture. So you had hair salons, you had over 1400 tourist homes, which were homes that were run largely by widowed Black women, and they would have an extra bedroom and a warm meal, and it was kind of among the first Airbnbs. And that was a big part of The Green Book. And for all those migrant families who were fleeing racial terror in the south and moving north because of the Great Migration, this was a real viable, really great option for those who were in rural areas where there weren't commercial businesses and/or didn't have as much money to stay in a hotel or a motel. So for that reason, women played a big role. But one of my favorite female entrepreneurs is Ma Haugabrooks. Well, her name was Geneva, but people called her Ma, and she was based out of Atlanta, and she ran Haugabrooks Funeral Home. And there were funeral homes in The Green Book. The Green Book was like a yellow pages of Black businesses. It was pretty amazing. What other travel guide is going to have funeral homes in it? It's bizarre and great at the same time. But she ran this really successful funeral home, and she was one of those women who her husband had died long before. I mean, she did this all on her own, and she was known as the woman who, quote, unquote, ran Atlanta. And she had so much wealth and so much power. She would, for instance, go to the Cadillac dealership. And one time she wasn't treated well by the person working the floor. He was a sales agent, and he was rude to her. And the manager saw this and fired him on the spot. And he said, you do not treat Ms. Haugabrooks like that. You know who she is. She buys three or four Cadillacs at a time. One of her employees at the funeral home,he was arrested, they wouldn't take him to jail. They would take him to Ma. The cops, the white police officers would take this person to Ma Haugabrooks and say, what do you want us to do with them? Ranger Kat: Wow. Ms. Taylor: It was just incredible. And she was so beloved, and celebrities loved her. There's photographs of her with celebrities. There's a photograph of her in my book. And I just loved listening, hearing stories about her. I did a project with Library of Congress where I interviewed a family member, the Haugabrooks family, and he tells stories about Ma Haugabrooks, and those are archived at the Library of Congress. If you Google my name and The Green Book, those interviews will come up. But yeah, if I had to pick one, there's also other incredible women. But she stands out in my mind today. Ranger Kat: So my next question has to do with the financial burden of Blackness. In chapter three titled The Fight, you detail what the African American community was really up against in terms of institutional racism. You point out that tax-paying African Americans were barred from many basic public services, some, of course, we've already discussed, but additionally, libraries and schools. And you give the example of the $100 billion GI Bill, which was in effect from 1944 through 1971, and how during the height of racial discrimination, the federal government left distribution of these funds up to states. And as a result, quote, only two Black men were recipients of the 3229 Veterans Administration loans distributed in Mississippi in 1947, unquote. And of course, that's obviously data from one state in one year, but it certainly illustrates how white American families were able to gain access to federal dollars while African Americans were not able to. And how were those funds used? You give the example of how families, white families, went on to purchase homes that are often now worth ten times the original purchase price, generating wealth for the white middle class. There are many other examples, of course, of the financial burden of Blackness, but this one really stands out to me because homeownership especially is so critical in the generation of family wealth. I know this is a big question, and many people are discussing this question, but I'm wondering, do you think the federal government has a responsibility in addressing these wealth inequities? And if so, what do you suggest should be done? Ms. Taylor: Right. I mean, yeah, it is a big question, and it's kind of above my pay grade to even give the answer about what should be done, because I don't know what the government is set up to do, but I know what they have done in the past, which is give incredibly large white entitlement programs to build a white middle class. And they've done it many times throughout our history. So the fact that we somehow never seem to have money for Black middle class folks or Black impoverished communities, that we've actually disinvested into these communities, we've taken money out of the Black communities and put it into white suburban communities, and we continue to do this. So it's a choice. I mean, I think, if anything, obviously people like Ta-Nehisi Coates, and there's so many great scholars out of Harvard that are really getting into the minutiae of where the money is, where it's been, what it's been spent on, and what it could be spent on. Robert Sampson, who's written many books about this, and obviously Ta-Nehisi Coates’s article on reparations, I think is the real push towards understanding how it's not that it was slavery. Right? I think this is an abstract concept that because we were enslaved as Black people we deserve reparations. There are injustices and injuries that have happened within our lifetime and within our parent’s lifetimes where we can see why the disparity exists. And I don't know, again, like, what the solution is, but there are so many examples now, I think there's a website, and I forget what's called, it’s something like where's your land? Where Black people can type into a register and see, like, if their land was literally taken from their ancestors or their grandparents and given to white people. And so there's obviously those situations where it was clearly taken from us. And there are some few minor court legislation that's been returned. This land has been returned to people where it was taken from or money has been given, but it's just minuscule. I mean, we're just at the very beginning of unearthing these realities. So I think we're moving in the right direction, but not enough is happening. And not quick enough. And the devastation that I saw on the road documenting these Green Book sites in these traditional Black communities, the level of poverty and violence is just unacceptable. And it's not that Black people are more violent or less able to make a living. It's the social structure and societal systems that have created this situation. So I think if the government can create these situations, they can solve the problem. If they created the problem, they can solve it. So how they do that, Lord knows how the government works, but I think it is on the government. I think it is their responsibility to do it because they've done it before. We've done it, like I said, for the white middle class. And I think that if the excuse of saying that we don't have the money to do it for black middle class is just an excuse and it's about whether or not you intend to or want to change to fix the problem, and we keep getting the same answers that it's not a priority Ranger Kat: Well, hopefully there's positive change in that arena soon. My next question is about white allies, and in the book you mentioned a few businesses who were Black-friendly and have their services listed in the Green Book. Can you give a few examples and maybe explain the risks that these individuals and institutions faced and perhaps what enabled them to take the stand they did? Ms. Taylor: Yeah, I think it's hard to know, obviously exactly what…because if I had to estimate, about 85% of the Green Book sites were Black-owned. But there were so many white businesses, Jewish-owned businesses, that did participate in The Green Book, especially in the later editions in the 1960s. And this, of course, is when I think people saw the writing on the wall after 1954. Sorry, there's a siren. I live in New York City, so it's probably going to get louder and I don't know if I can mute, but maybe it's not going to pass in front of my house. Okay, but yeah, these white allies, I think they saw the writing on the wall after 1954 in the Brown versus Board of Education. There was kind of an imminent reality that there was going to be integration once we started integrating the schools. It was just a matter of time before restaurants and other public spaces would be integrated. So you see more in the later editions, these Brooks Brothers, Disneyland, more of the businesses that maybe were downtown, because in nearly every major and even mid-sized city, 80%, 90% of all the Green Book sites were in Black neighborhoods. They were in these redlined communities, these communities that were cornered. They were literally divided up. And in the north, throughout the South, I mean, they were just very segregated communities. So you start seeing a sprinkling of white businesses participating in the Green Book, and I think they've faced the same threats that in any, even Black businesses face from, you know, there was a woman who was a major business owner of The Green Book who had a place in Columbia, South Carolina, and her place would get shot up by the Ku Klux Klan pretty regularly. They'd shoot up her sign, and she'd fight with them and threaten them, and they threatened her. There was a lot of clashing. There were a lot of people who were not okay with integration. So I do write I think it's in chapter four. You may remember it because you read the book probably more recently than I did, but where Victor green actually writes to Nebraska and south Dakota or North Dakota, sorry, and parts of Montana where he's writing to these white businesses saying, would you be a part? Almost every business in that state was white, and there were no Black neighborhoods that he could rely on to get businesses to list. And the letters that they write him back, the excuses of why they can't do it or why they don't want to alienate their white customers, and they just don't feel like it would be a place where black people would feel comfortable anyway. And I think that largely speaks to the attitude of the time. So that's why I think Balck travel guides like The Green Book were so incredibly important and such a unique opportunity for black people to be in other parts of the country, because without it, it was so dangerous and very difficult, nearly impossible, to know that you could feel safe and to know that you would have placed asleep or food to eat while you were traveling. Ranger Kat: One of the things that I really enjoyed reading about in the green book had to do with the role of music. As a big fan of all sorts of music and dance myself, I was really interested in that section of the book. And there was a quote by Sugar Pie DeSanto, and I hope I'm pronouncing that correctly, her last name. She was a cousin of Etta James, and she said this quote about the Filmore district. The crowd was mixed, and for a while the police didn't like it. They hassled us for a while, but we told the cops to leave us alone. We didn't care about color. We cared about music. Unquote. And music in the book, the way you described it, it seemed like it was this opportunity to bring people together. And so I'm wondering if you could talk more about the role that music played in the green book and perhaps in changing attitudes around race. Ms. Taylor: Well, music, I think music and food have always been the kind of leveling of humanity, right? That's why I think segregation never could have ultimately worked as much as they tried to keep the races separate. There are many instances of different business owners I interviewed who were black businesses, but because the food was so good, they would have to come to their restaurant and even if it was in a state where segregation was illegal. There's a great drop in New Orleans, the whole state of Louisiana. It was illegal for white, black people to be in the same room together. And they would shut it down or arrest people every so often because white people couldn't stay away from the Dew Drop. But the best music was there. And the person who owned the Dew Drop was so irritated after a while because it was right before, of course, in 64, everything changed because they changed the laws. But he was just tired of getting arrested himself or having to deal with it because he couldn't control whether white people wanted to come. Black people weren't allowed to go to the French Quarter, so they went to the Dew Drop because that's where the best music was. But I think that's always been the truth about America, is that what Black folks bring to the culture is so undeniably exceptional and unique, and something only we can do as Black people that white folks want to be a part of it. Right? And so I think that's always been the, like I said, the leveling of humanity. People do forget about a lot of the petty, ridiculous things that maybe make us different. When the music moves you in the same place in your body. And it's about being human. So music played a huge role, and there were over 1000 nightclubs in The Green Book throughout the life of the publication for over 30 years. There's another part of in that chapter on music, the Charlie's Place, that story too. I recommend your listeners read that because that's an incredible piece of history, where it gets shot up by the Ku Klux Klan. But it's a music venue that was so important. I mean, that could be a film in and of itself, just Charlie's Place, and they're trying to bring it back to life today. I think it's history, but it's still living with us, and I think it still speaks to whether we're talking today about sports, the NFL. It's always going to be an issue where Black talent has just risen above and beyond what anybody even imagined it could be. And the way that we incorporate that in our culture, in a fair way in society, we've never been able to really pull that off. So we see it in segregation during that time of the Jim Crow era, but we still see it today. Ranger Kat: Speaking of Black excellence, I think certainly the Greens and Victor Green, who was the creator of The Green Book, are an incredible example of that. So Victor and Alma Green were a married couple, and Victor Green, obviously, is the person who is credited with starting The Green Book. But I'm curious, could you let us know what you think it's important for listeners to understand about the two of them? Ms. Taylor: Oh, yeah, Victor and Alma were fabulous. They lived in Harlem. They lived in the Sugar Hill District of Harlem, which is even more…some of your listeners may know, but it was the place where…it was such a popular neighborhood. It was called, like, the Sweet life if you were in Sugar Hill District. Beautiful brownstones and luminaries. Langston Hughes and Zora Neal Hurston and Thurgood Marshall lived there. They lived across the street from Duke Ellington. And Victor and Alma weren't celebrities, necessarily, but they really fit in. And they didn't have a lot of money, but they had a lot of class and just dressed beautifully. There are reports that even interviewed Alma Green's nieces, her niece. And they remember going to their house in the 50s, and Alma would still have her fuzzy slippers on, and she was even dressed at home in her kind of beautiful fabrics. And they just had an air of class and just felt very, I think, entitled in ways that a lot of Black Americans at the time didn't feel. And for instance, Victor, before the first Green Book was published in Harlem, but very soon after, he went down to Midtown, which was unusual for a Black man to be in Midtown, to go to a public printer with a Jewish family, the Gibraltar Printing Company. And he walks in there. He's over 6ft tall. He's very tall, he's dashing. He's again dressed in a suit. And he walks in there with an opportunity for them saying, I have this travel guide, and I think you should print it. And the son at the time, Howard Glenner, who was probably seven years old, sees this very tall Black man, and he says he wouldn't have even been served at the Greek Diner down the street. So it was really shocking for him to just walk in there and say, hey, I have an opportunity for you. And they end up printing The Green Book for many, many years, and it is a great opportunity for them, and they make a lot of money on it. And then he leaves them because he goes to a better printer that has this new offset printing technology so he could have bigger pictures. So, again, this is a man with a 7th grade education. Ranger Kat: Wow. Ms. Taylor: And yet has the chutzpa to continue the Jewish story. I mean, he has that entitlement in himself that, yeah, no, I have this very exciting opportunity for us to benefit from. So I think…I always say…and Alma too. I mean, she was an incredible part of the story and the success of The Green Book. I'm happy to report that both Alma and Victor are being inducted into the Automotive Hall of Fame this year, and I'll be accepting the award on their behalf, which is amazing. But when they approached me, they said, we want Alma and Victor to receive this award. I'm thrilled. And by the time, 1959, Alma is actually the editor and publisher of The Green Book. And then she runs the Green Book until like the early sixty’s and then it's taken over by Langley Waller. Victor Green dies in 1960, so he never lived to see the passage of Civil Rights Act. But it's an incredible, they were an incredible couple. They never had children. She married him when she was 27 years old, which was definitely older for that generation of women. And they were together for 43 years. So they're wonderful couple and I'm happy, like I said, to celebrate them. And they'll be in the Automotive Hall of Fame. Ranger Kat: Well, on the theme of family, I have a question about your family. And of course this book represents an incredible amount of academic research, but it is at times deeply personal. And throughout the book you reference the experiences of your stepfather, Ron Burford. Am I pronouncing that last name correctly? Ms. Taylor: Yeah. Ranger Kat: And you also dedicate the book to your mother, Carol Burford, who fought incredibly hard for your education, even moving the family from Houston to Ohio so you could receive the highest quality education possible. And you write that it is because of her that you were able to become an author and an artist. I'm curious, what was their response to the book when it came out? Ms. Taylor: Well, it's such an incredible…I guess things don't happen by accident, but it was never intended that this book would be so personal. But because while I was doing the research, my stepfather, Ron, I'd known him since I was twelve and he never told me…He grew up in the Jim Crow South and he was a dark skinned Black man. And he would talk all the time. He loved to tell stories and he's this man from the south and he would just talk our ear off sometimes. But he never shared really intimate stories or things that really happened, especially in regards to race and racism that he dealt with. But when I started writing this book, all of a sudden he was just telling me all of these stories that I never knew. And we developed a very close relationship that we had never had. I mean, we weren't estranged or anything, we just weren't really…he was a big marine, he had a lot of testosterone. He was really masculine and I just didn't get it. I just thought, I don't get you. But we loved each other and he was definitely on my side. He was a great stepdad, but we just weren't really… was closer to my mom. But when I guess I started writing this book, he became a huge part of my life. And I spend all of these just 16 hours, days on the road, just driving, and he would call me and we would talk for hours. You know, throughout these years I was writing the book. So he dies literally the week I start to sit down and write the book, after I've been on the road and doing all the scholarly research. I leave Harvard, I'm on the road for almost six months, and then I finally sit down to write, and I have like eight months to write the book. And he died. And it devastated me and I just couldn't function. I'd wake up every morning, I wasn’t busy at the time, just on a deck staring the Disney Mountains, and I was watching the sun come up. And I would just cry and write his stories because I didn't want to forget the things he had told me while I was on the road. And I remember telling my agent, saying, I know I'm supposed to be writing the book, but I'm just writing stories right now. And I know I'm going to open the book where he tells me the story about the chauffer's hat. Ranger Kat: That piece just like gutted me. Ms. Taylor: Oh my God. And that never would have been in there had he not died. I probably wouldn't have done it because he was kind of a private guy, but he loved being the center of attention. So I know he's looking down on this thinking, yeah, he's very thrilled because he is such a big part of anybody who interviews me about this book, they have to talk about Ron. Yeah, that story was so poignant for me. So I opened the book with that story, and then I realized that his stories were touchstones in almost every chapter of the book. And so he becomes a narrative thread. Like, again, he never would have had he not died. And then at the end of the book, writing the book, I wrote it chronologically, and I'm in the last part, and I know my mother gets sick and she's in the hospital and it doesn't look good. And I woke up that morning and I said, I'm not going to turn my phone on because I know…I was supposed to write the passage where at the beginning of the book, Ron is seven years old. He's in the backseat of the car. They get pulled over by sheriff, and the chauffer's hat is used as a ruse. His father lies and basically says, this isn't my car, it's my employer's car, because he had a nice car and this was usually antagonizing for white police officers. And so Ron realizes there's this chauffeur's hat hanging in the backseat of the car that has always been there, but it's never used and never knew what it was for. But his father basically said, you know, you've got to just not… on't say anything. I'm going to you know, when the cop pulled him over and he pretends he doesn't know his wife and he says, this is my employer's car. This is the maid. And I'm driving her and her son home, and they get to go without any incident. So I knew the beginning of the book was that story. The end of the book was going to be the story about me in the front seat of the car with my mom at seven years old, and we're driving past a chain gang in Texas, and I'm looking at all these men chained up in a field. And I say to my mom, I said, the first thing I said, I was like, Mum, I thought slavery was over. And she said, oh, it is, honey. Why are all these men chained up in the field? Like, it looked just like the images I'd seen in my book in school of slaves. I said, Why are they all chained up? I thought, you know, I was mad. What is going on here? And my mother says, oh, well, they're prisoners. Why are they in chains? She's like, oh, they're prisoners. And I thought, Why are they all Black? And she just couldn't explain institutional racism to a seven year old. I wanted to have that conversation, but I never forgot it. And I knew I was going to write that passage that morning. And then I turned my phone on after I write it, and I find out that she died. So it was so intense to lose both of them in the beginning and the end stages of writing this book. And then, like you said, I dedicated the young adult version to my mom, which came out a couple of months ago because she taught me how to read and write before I went to kindergarten. She spent so much time with me when I was so young, and she fought for me, like you said. She pulled me out of a school because in Texas, where I went to school, there were no Black kids in the A level reading classes. And my mother knew I belonged in the A level reading class. And this one teacher would just harass me, and she was so mean to me. And my mother goes to the school and makes her cry, basically, and threatens her. I know what you're doing. I know that this is about Candacy being Black. She taught me how to read and write. She's like, of course she's in the A level reading course. This was in third grade. And she pulled me out of that school. We moved to Ohio where her parents lived, and I test into the fifth grade, and she just knew in that environment I was going to be held back. So I was just so lucky and grateful to have had a mother like that. Of course, Ron didn't get to see the book because he had passed, and my mother didn't get to either. And it just the thing that just breaks my heart open every time. But again, the way that it happened was so cosmic or just…it was just so crazy that yes, I just feel like there's bigger forces at work here and that I will never understand. But I'm thankful that they get to be a part of this legacy with the book. I just wish they could share it with me. Ranger Kat: You brought up something that I also was hoping to touch upon in the Epilogue. The whole discussion on incarceration and that story of you as a little girl observing the chain gang in a very savvy way, asking your mother about is slavery actually over? When you're seeing this group of entirely Black men laboring. And that personal anecdote, you use that to kind of lead us into…lead the readers into a number of very disturbing statistics. Such as in Chicago's Black community, where there's an imprisonment rate for drug convictions that's over 40 times higher than the surrounding white communities. Even though these white communities had drug use rates that matched the Black communities. And I'm just going to repeat that: 40 times higher. And the money that is poured into maintaining the prison system is absolutely astronomical. You write, quote, when asked why these Black neighborhoods are fraught with problems, the typical answer is that there isn't enough money for education, housing, after school programs, libraries, parks, and grocery stores. But this argument is clearly unreasonable because somehow the government spends approximately $80 billion, $80 billion locking up Americans for nonviolent offenses and petty crimes such as unpaid traffic tickets, shoplifting, and minor parole violations. In some states, it costs $60,000 a year to incarcerate one person. Imagine how that money could be redirected to support communities instead of tearing them down. Unquote. Who or what organizations or people do you see that are trying to change this, and how might people get involved? Ms. Taylor: I think it's such a huge problem, really. It's the thing that keeps me up at night, and it has for probably the last ten years. One of my biggest fears when I was writing this book was like, how am I going to basically, I just didn't want people to say, this book about The Green Book. How do you write about mass incarceration in the same book? And like you said, to me, it's more of the same. And the threat is very clear in terms of what we do today. But I think people like Brian Stevenson, obviously, and his work is…it's really important. I think obviously there have been feeble and minor attempts to change because even the Republicans now realize that the money we spend on incarceration, it's just we can't… we can't afford it anymore, and we can't maintain all of these prisons. And I live in New York. Rikers is about to be shut down because it's so deeply dangerous. The violations that are happening, health code violations, things that are just really basic, we can't maintain the system anymore. It's the biggest incarcerate…we incarcerate more people in the world than anybody else. Again, follow Brian Stevenson's statistics on this. It's really unbelievable. When I was in the front seat of my mom's car, there were about maybe 250,000 people in jail, or no, I'm sorry, there were about 750,000. And now there's no there were 250,000. Now there's 2.2 million people in jail just from and this was after The Green Book, you know, so I follow…there are things you can do. I mean, in my book, I have a short list. What can you do? Most people who have 401Ks don't realize that they are funding the prison industrial complex that you'd have to call your fiduciaries or financial accountants and see. But most definitely between 60 and 80% of people who have no idea that they are against this mass incarceration, but they are funding it. So first of all, don't fund the prison industrial complex. That's one thing you can do. There's other minor things. I mean, even just the Sentencing Project is a really good organization that's doing important work. There's a lot of people sitting in jail who shouldn't be there and have been in there for decades, and they are helping to reverse to right some of those wrongs. Even from my Amazon account, everything I shop on with Amazon, I think it's called the Smile Program, but when I log in under Smile, I've set it so that a percentage of all the things, all the money I spend on Amazon goes to The Sentencing Project. So that's one thing you can do. The Prison Policy Initiative is a really interesting organization that's I'm sorry. The Prison Policy Initiative is an organization that's really doing interesting work. One of the ways this has grown to be such an astronomical problem is because it's been so under the radar. Before we knew it, there were millions of people in jail, and people were like, how did that happen? How did this…the Million Dollar Blocks program was another one that I was studying when I was writing the book, where they would show in places like Chicago, where 80% of the community have been rounded up and put in jail. Like, how does this happen? And because it's happening in places where it's largely Black and Brown, mostly Black communities where they have no institutional power, they're not part of society in a real way, where people care about what's happening to them. And it has been going on for generations now. And this is where we're at. So I feel like it's a very…the numbers matter. And who's tracking this behavior and these consequences? It matters. And so, the Prison Policy Initiative is one of those organizations that seems to start getting real numbers. And the last thing I'll say about this is I've been working on a project. I did a digital interactive map with National Geographic, and I started touching on these things I'm finding with these sundown towns. There were thousands of them. And for people who want to learn more about them, James Loewen is a leading researcher on sundown towns. He wrote a book called Sundown Towns. But looking at his research and creating my own map based on his research of sundown towns, I started seeing where there are some parallels or overlaps where you can see this kind of prison gerrymandering that's starting to happen or it probably has been happening. But again, we don't have the numbers on this, but where we see places that were formerly sundown towns, which were all white, had been 99% white for decades, all of a sudden we'll start having maybe five or 8% Black and Brown people, sometimes even 10%. And then you look closer and you realize all the Black and Brown people are in their private prisons. They're not actually citizens. Ranger Kat: Oh my goodness. Ms. Taylor: And so, of course, when you increase your numbers like that, you get more legislative power in Washington. There's benefits to this, right? So I'd like to know how often that's happening. I started doing some of the research there, but we are just on the cusp of even understanding the magnitude of the problem. And of course, I can't not mention Michelle Alexander's work, The New Jim Crow and her book and obviously Ava DuVernay’s documentary 13th, for people who don't want to read a whole book, just watch 13th and you'll get a snapshot of what's happening. And that's on Netflix. But yeah, we have a lot of work to do. And if we want to continue to basically believe that we live in a free and fair society, we've got to fix this problem. And I don't think it will be fixed in our lifetime. But we have to reverse, we have to stop the bleeding. It is just inhumane. So, yeah, it's a huge issue and I hope people care about it enough to do something. Ranger Kat: Well, thank you for lifting up all those names and organizations. I was not aware of the 401K issue and that's something I'll look into myself personally. So, again, thank you for sharing that. And in the vein of, like, thinking down the road, the mission of the National Parks is near and dear to my heart and it's to set aside spaces for the recreation, education and inspiration of this generation and the next. And I’m paraphrasing that. The Green Book helped African Americans to recreate and National Parks more safely. Green Book sites are also becoming national parks, as is the case here in Birmingham with the AG Gaston Motel. What are some things that our site and others can do to commemorate The Green Book? Ms. Taylor: Well, I think definitely having some kind of…I love what you're doing, clearly. I mean, even just having this podcast and announcing to people that this is happening, but I think having some kind of visual…I do have an exhibition with the Smithsonian. I'm a curator and content specialist for an exhibition on The Green Book. But having a small version of that to show people what The Green Book was, why it was significant, and making sure that people…putting maybe QR codes that lead to other content about this history, whether it's even with the Library of Congress has archived of interviews, but featuring how we cannot just look to our past, I think that's the part that is really a blessing and a curse about history, right? Because there are those of us who love history and will eat this stuff up no matter where we see it. We find it, we seek it out and we love it. But then there are other people who think, well, it was in the past and they just dismiss it. But I think using modern technology and ways to engage people by understanding that a lot of our present, not as only informed by our past, but it's still kind of happening, these layers still happen. So I think, like I said, putting QR codes or different ways of people engaging in this history and retelling their own stories in relationship to these histories that may resonate with them, asking them to contribute their own, you know, maybe parent’s photographs or ways to get people excited about being a part of reimagining this history, right? So I think that's how you get people really invested emotionally. And I hope that again, of course, you and I can talk about this, different ways to do this. And my exhibition with the Smithsonian is about 3500 square feet. So it's very large. But if we have a smaller version of that, maybe it can go to different sites like this because it's very unusual and exciting for the AG Gaston to actually, as a Green Book site, to be celebrated in line with the National Park. That's a first. And so I think more organizations that find those opportunities we had. The first venue for our exhibition was in Memphis at the National Civil Rights Museum because that was the old hotel where King was assassinated. That was in The Green Book. So that was another example where an institution and a museum was actually a Green Book site. And we have a couple of other examples of that in the country. Again, your part is…part of being the National Parks and wanting to really embrace and embolden Black culture and have it be a part of the National Park System. That's progress for all of us. Ranger Kat: I love the QR code idea. We'll look into that. Is there any question you wish I had asked or any last message you'd like to share with listeners? Ms. Taylor: I think we covered a lot. For the most part. I'm just excited that this material continues to affect, you know, people…like organizations like the National Park Service. I would love to talk a little more about preservation and how important that is in getting the National Park System and the National Registrar to really embrace these Green Book sites. I did get a grant from National Park System…National Park Service to rewrite the context on how these Green Book sites should be considered because most of them were located in traditional Black neighborhoods which were marginalized from basic municipalities. Whether they were put in flood zones or different areas that was harder to keep up those properties in a pristine form that sometimes the National Register requires be considered valuable. So we're really trying to change that thinking, that something can be culturally significant and not architecturally perfect. So really getting the…changing that dynamic and that attitude has been the work I've been doing more recently this year. And I don't know if your speakers are local or national, but I'll be speaking at the Washington State Museum in Tacoma, Washington on May 19 because the Smithsonian exhibition is currently there. So for folks in that area of the country that want to see the exhibit or possibly see me, I'll be doing a book signing on May 19. Ranger Kat: Great. That's good to know. Yeah. To be honest, I'm not sure how many listeners we have yet. It's a new podcast, and my technological savvy leaves much to be desired, but thank you for sharing that. Ms. Taylor: Oh, you're going to archive this, so. It will grow and live in the archives. Ranger Kat: Yes. And that's 100% true. And then everything that we produce is in the public domain. So, yeah, that's the hope, is that it will live on forever. So, thank you again so much, Ms. Taylor, for speaking with me today. It truly has been a pleasure and an honor. And I will definitely be reaching back out so we can discuss more concretely, some ways where we can incorporate your work with the Smithsonian and your book and beyond into what we're doing at the AG Gaston Motel. And exciting news on our end. The proposed budget for the next fiscal year has come out, and there's been a significant amount of money slated for the interior renovations of the AG Gaston Motel on the Park Service side. Yes. So we're thrilled about that. And so in the next couple of years, there will be concerted effort to do design and installation of the exhibits within the motel. So I'm sure we'll be reaching out in regards to that. And, yeah, we look forward to hopefully also in the future, hosting you in Birmingham and having the opportunity for you to share more of this research, hopefully in person with people as well. Ms. Taylor: Yeah, let me know when you have more of the events coming up or things happening. Let me know. It sounds like nothing will be happening this year, but I think I'll be in the south. Well, I know I'm doing two talks in Oklahoma and one in Mississippi because the exhibition is moving to the Mississippi Museums in August. So I'll be probably traveling to the south this summer. Ranger Kat: Okay, well, there may be a potential opportunity there as well. I'll reach back out and we can connect on that, too. Ms. Taylor: Okay, that sounds great. Ranger Kat: Great. Well, thank you so much. I hope you have a good rest of your day, and I hope you are able to have some downtime now that the book tour is complete, to just rest. Ms. Taylor: No, it doesn't work that way for me. I'm on the road. It's like all the stuff that I didn't get to because I was on the road is now piled up me. I get, like, 80 emails a day and all this stuff, so it's like and then I leave again in a month, so I've already got to start booking that travel today. So, yeah, it's kind of a whirlwind, but it's better than not having stuff going on. Ranger Kat: That's true. It's better than the alternative, but it's true. Right. Ms. Taylor: But thanks for wishing. I appreciate the sentiment. Ranger Kat: Yeah. Well, again, thank you so much and just really so honored to be connected with you and excited for the work you've done and truly look forward to everything that you'll continue to bring to the conversation around this history going forward. Ms. Taylor: I appreciate it too. Thanks for the work you're doing as well, and I look forward to hearing from you soon. Okay, sounds great. All right, take care. Bye bye. This is We Will Rise. National Parks and Civil Rights. Thanks to the Psalters for use at their song Turn Me Round. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe to our series. Until next time [music continues].

29 Aug 2022 - 1 h 13 min
episode Episode 5: Racial Equity and Social Justice with Denise Gilmore artwork

Episode 5: Racial Equity and Social Justice with Denise Gilmore

Join Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument superintendent Kristofer Butcher as he interviews Denise Gilmore. Ms. Gilmore serves the City of Birmingham as the Senior Director in the Division of Social Justice and Racial Equity in the Mayor's office. The City of Birmingham and the National Park Service co-own and co-manage the A.G. Gaston Motel, and collaboratively support the other stakeholders that make up the National Monument --- TRANSCRIPT: --- Welcome to We Will Rise: National Parks and Civil Rights. Close your eyes and imagine a National Park. Are you picturing waterfalls and mountains? Or do you think of Dr. King's childhood home, Japanese internment camps, and a school that became a battleground for racial integration? National Parks aren't just wilderness. They are spaces of remembrance, founded to preserve the stories of who we are and how we came to be. National parks inspire us to do better, be better, to climb mountains both physical and figurative. Join park rangers, researchers, authors, and activists as we discuss what liberty and justice for all means on our public lands. Kris: Hello, and welcome to the We Will Rise: National Parks and Civil Rights Podcast. I'm Kris Butcher, the superintendent of Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument, and I am joined today by Denise Gilmore. Denise serves the city of Birmingham as the Senior Director in the Division of Social Justice and Racial Equity in the Mayor's office. She started her career in the city as a Director of Cultural Preservation in 2018. Previously, she worked in Washington, DC at the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which, she worked in Detroit, Louisville, Philadelphia, and Atlanta on projects that focused on using historic preservation as a catalyst for neighborhood revitalization. She hails from Kansas City, Missouri, where she has reported the barbecue is superb. Denise, welcome. Good morning. Denise: Well, good morning and thank you, Kris. So you know that I'm a barbecue snob, so you might want to start our conversation off that way. Kris: I in no way want to be confrontational about barbecue. Denise: I am so delighted to join you today for this conversation. Kris: Yes, thank you so much for joining us. And again, I think it's such an important conversation, and your broad experience, I think, is going to be so informative and inspirational and challenging as we go into the second century of the National Park Service existence. And in 2021, we're having these conversations, unfortunately, are as relevant today as they've ever been in history. So before we get into the really hard hitting topics and subjects, if you could, can you talk a little bit about yourself and how you ended up coming to Birmingham? Denise: Okay, let me go back to Kansas City because I think that really is probably the beginning of the work that I'm doing today. It goes back to Kansas City, which, as you said, that is my home. I am officially a Kansas Jayhawk, but in terms of claiming teams and the Chiefs and the Royals, so I claim them all. But my work in the cultural preservation and equitable redevelopment space really began at 18th and Vine in Kansas City, which is the historic African American neighborhood where the Negro Leagues were founded. And, of course, the heyday of the jazz scene was in the 18th and Vine Jazz District. And so I had the opportunity in Kansas City to really lead the redevelopment and revitalization of the 18th and Vine Jazz District. Again, because of desegregation, it had been a good 40 years that the district had really just declined and there hadn't been investment in the district. And I always want to acknowledge our then-Mayor, Emmanuel Cleaver, who is Congressman Emmanuel Cleaver today. He has the vision as mayor that it was so important that this history and culture be saved. I had the opportunity to join the Jazz District and then ultimately to lead the revitalization. And so one of the things that when we talk about the work today, I have to reflect on the fact that I've been in this equitable development and equitable opportunity space long before - it's fashionable now, but 18 years ago, people really weren't talking about that. In fact, people would run the other way when you talked about equity and preserving African American culture and history. It has been really a privilege to be able to know that the work that I'm doing and have done has been to help preserve these African American spaces and places. From there, I had the opportunity to go to the National Trust for Historic Preservation, really as focusing on helping frame the National Trust approach to community development and revitalization. And it comes as no secret to you, Kris, that the historic preservation field has largely been a white led field, and I would say probably up until really about the last five to seven years when there's been a turn to really understanding the importance of saving places for people of color, for Black, indigenous, people of color, for women, LGBTQ, to broaden those stories that are being preserved and told. And so I had the opportunity at the Trust to work in different cities, including Washington, DC, in the Anacostia neighborhood, but also Birmingham was one of the cities in that portfolio and had an opportunity with other colleagues from the Trust to come to Birmingham in 2017 and lead a preservation leadership training. Really, it was for Birmingham, but it was regional in that people from across the state were invited. And then we also had some national participants. And that was really my first opportunity to be in Birmingham and to engage Birmingham, looking at the cultural space. From that, I'll kind of fast forward because I know that we have a lot of other things to get to. But from that, I had the opportunity, of course, you know, 2017 was a pivotal year. So President Barack Obama had just created the Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument before he left office. And so at the federal level, there was a national election, and then locally in Birmingham, there was a municipal election, and Mayor Randall Woodfin was successfully elected in 2017. And so you kind of had that whole year because the political changes at the local and federal level that while the National Monument had been created, there really hadn't been anything really focused to really stand it up. I like to say it was beautiful words on paper, but now how do we put the there there? I had opportunity, Mayor Woodfin invited those of us that had been working on this prior to his election to come and to meet with him and his key leaders at the time to really talk about how do we stand this thing up. So, long story short, the Mayor invited me to come and join his team to help stand up the National Monument. So that's what brought me to Birmingham. I came as Director of Cultural Preservation because the Mayor recognized that Birmingham's legacy and history was important and sacred and that it really needed focused attention on saving these historic sites. Kris: Wow, that's great. It's amazing how all of the things that have happened up until this point really kind of came together in this opportunity that we have in this position and role that you're in now. It's really great and inspiring how things like that happen. So besides Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument, working for the National Trust, what's been your experience with National Parks? I'm going to assume that Birmingham is your favorite National Park site, selfishly, but what is your favorite National Park maybe experience and why? Denise: So that's kind of interesting because you're right. In terms of favorite, it's really hard to pick because for different reasons, of course, I've had the opportunity to experience different national parks for different reasons. So I would say for historic significance, of course, having the opportunity to work in the historic Anacostia neighborhood, the Frederick Douglas Historic Site, his Cedar Hill home. One of the opportunities I had in DC at the Trust was to really work with the local neighborhood preservationist to make sure that we could preserve the homes there, which is hard in DC. So I'm going to even pause before I say this, to try to ensure that incumbent residents could stay, just because of the gentrification pressures in Washington DC. But again, it was another place that it was hard to navigate that neighborhood. And you see that Cedar Hill home site and just know that this was one of our premier thought leaders and so far ahead of his time. I never could figure out too, with all those steps, I said, boy, they really were in good shape. Kris: No doubt. Denise: So that one is one really that was inspiring to me and to really be able to work closely around the historic site in that neighborhood. Another one that I think that always just touches me is the African Burial Grounds in New York City. And again, it's just a thought to understand that these bodies were buried without ceremony, without recognition, without…there. And so that one is always inspiring to me. When I get to New York, I try to go there just for the peace of the site. And so I'll say just for the natural beauty. I have a lot, I don't have just one. But for simple natural beauty, I love Muir Woods and that's one that actually I saw something today that they were trying to protect the trees from the fires that are burning right now, and of course, the Grand Canyon, because I had an opportunity to experience that ground level and took a helicopter ride over it and promised that I would never do that again. Kris: Yeah. Wow. It's really interesting and amazing to hear when people talk about their experiences. And so many people like, their first reaction is Grand Canyon or Muir Woods or Yellowstone or Yosemite. But I think I'm with you. For me, the most inspirational are a lot of the ones that you talked about, especially when you contrast, like, going to Arlington National Cemetery and seeing the respect and the reverence that occurs around the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. And then you contrast that with African Burial Grounds. Wow, this is a really stark difference and a very telling and powerful moment to think about. And honestly, we could go have entire additional conversations about gentrification pressures and what that means and the legacies of desegregation and how that's impacted communities and what that means. So we won't crack into that. We'll maybe have to schedule you for a follow up discussion. But you had mentioned you originally came here as the Director for Cultural Preservation. So can you talk about the transition into your current role as the Senior Director in the Division of Social Justice and Racial Equity? Kind of what inspired that change, and why do you think it's important to the city and to you? Denise: So, in 2018, Mayor Woodfin set out a strategic vision for his administration. And one of those goals included to establish an Office of Social Justice and Racial Equity to focus on creating a just and equitable city. And so because of my work, not only within cultural preservation, but as I said to you, that my work really predates the work in Birmingham and going back to Kansas City and looking at really working in the equity space. And so our office was created really to be the lens for the city, to help really employ social justice as a core principle in the city's policies and the operations and decision making through advocacy, engagement and implementation. Our office is really charged with bringing an equity lens to policies, initiatives and practices. So we had separate offices that were all really impacting the social justice and racial equity spaces, so our LGBTQ liaison on our Office of Peace and Policy, our special initiatives, we had a faith-based outreach, immigrant affairs. So we had people that were doing different things, but all really operating in this space. And so the mayor's vision really was to try to consolidate those efforts through this office. And then, of course, I was pleased when he asked me if I would lead the team. And so I still maintain the cultural preservation portfolio. Kris, as you well know, I'm really good at doing two or three jobs. Kris: That's the understatement of the day there, Denise, yes, ma'am. Denise: So I maintain our cultural preservation portfolio in addition to leading the Division of Social Justice and Racial Equity. Kris: Fantastic. So obviously you've touched on it and helped us understand what racial equity and social justice means. But can you help us understand how these principles are fundamental to your work? You kind of talked about you're wanting it to be a part of everything that the city does. But in kind of maybe a layman definition, what does that mean? What is racial equity and social justice in kind of a day to day context? Denise: So I'll start with, social justice is the belief that everyone deserves equal economic, political, civil and human rights and opportunities. Racial equity is the treatment of people of all races that really results in equitable opportunities and outcomes. So racial equity often addresses systemic and structural change. While there may be a focus on antiracism, it's not just the absence of discriminatory practices and inequities, but the presence of deliberate and intentional practices to change and challenge systems and to redistribute power in an equitable manner. So racial equity is a process. And so these principles are fundamentally embedded in our work in the city through social equity, which includes the space that we work in, Kris, the cultural preservation and historic preservation and promotion of tradition, stories and cultures. Birmingham's history really requires that we respect these legacies of the past, which was as much about social and economic justice as it was about civil rights. My position as Director of Cultural Preservation was unique at the time. There were not positions equivalent to that in other cities and it was really a focus on the cultural assets and the preservation. And I also say promotion, right. So how do we actually develop them for tourism? How do we make sure that people appreciate and they're educated about these sites as well? And so that was a very unique position at the time to be really focused on preservation, both cultural and historic. So when we look at other cities, I'm going to say maybe positions that were similar but not specific. Other cities have like Cultural Affairs or Multicultural Offices and they primarily focus on observances, special events, festivals. So really to maybe celebrate the diversity of the city, if that makes sense, which is equally important. But to draw the contrast between the position that was focused on recognizing that Birmingham had really special, significant historic resources that needed focused attention. Now, the position as Senior Director of Social Justice and Racial Equity was also a unique position. So some cities have offices that focus on diversity and inclusion, which is very common cities, universities, corporations that focus on diversity and inclusion. What you're seeing now is that expansion to diversity, equity and inclusion. So there's more focused attention on not just kind of an equal representation, but the opportunities to make sure that we are really focused on equitable opportunities for all. And so I guess I've had really the opportunity, thanks to Mayor Woodfin, to really kind of be a trailblazer in those two areas as far as municipal government is concerned. So it has been really a privilege to serve in both capacities. It's never a dull moment, Kris. There's so much work that needs to be done, as you well know, through your lens at the Park Service. Kris: Yeah, you're exactly right. It's amazing to have the opportunity and the privilege to work in Birmingham, like you said, that is really blazing the trail and being a leader in this arena and having these conversations and with the Park Service, I think everybody that at least has a passing interest in kind of the Park Service as an organization understands the challenges that it's had with its representation, or lack thereof, being more than 60% male, the workforce, I think almost 80% white. So thinking about the Park Service recently celebrated its first kind of century, its anniversary. What is a National Park Service or any organization, right, that truly values and strives for racial justice and social equity, what does that look like in kind of talking about the access and representation and all the things we've discussed up to this point? Denise: So I would say, first of all, it's really just acknowledgment of the work that has to be done. So when you have data that tells you that your workforce is you said 80%... Kris: Sorry, it's 60% male… Denise: …and 80% white. So that's not even reflective of the diversity of the country, right? And so when you really think about that so, first of all, we really have to acknowledge the work that has to be done. So I'm saying “we” but within the National Park Service, acknowledge where you are, look at your data, and then be willing to assess what that means. So look at your organizational efforts. Does it really reflect the diversity? Look at your top leadership staff, in particular, friends organizations, the people that supports the work of the National Park Service. So it's much more than being caretakers of sites with diverse history, right? It's internal. It's looking at your leadership and holding yourself accountable to establish measurable outcomes. So if you're starting with those stats, then what any organization would say is, okay, this is where we are, but this is where we want to be. And so the leadership would pick something, a five year plan or something, some concrete, measurable numbers that they can work towards so that we can be more diverse and more equitable. But I would also say with numbers like that, it also tells us that it's structural, that it's systemic. It's the way that your hiring practices are. It is that, for whatever the reason, there are barriers to women and Black, indigenous, people of color being able to be in the National Park System from an employee and a leadership standpoint. And so it really calls for really candid, honest conversation when you sit in a conference room, and I'm just going to say, you have 20 leaders and you look around and they all kind of look the same, somebody has to say, why do we look like this? And what we need to do, in a real serious manner, to start changing it? And I would guess that it's structural. So some of it really comes down to the things that, doing things the way you've always done, doesn't work. And so you've got to change that. So I just kind of think about, for example, when my daughter was in college and of course they look for these internship opportunities over the summer. And a lot of the internships, particularly in DC, were unpaid internships. And so a lot of Black children were not able to do these unpaid internships at these, either prestigious…either Capitol Hill or other organizations because they needed to earn money over the summer. Well my daughter actually had the opportunity to do an unpaid internship just because of other scholarship opportunities that she had. But when you look at that, that, again, is the basis for other opportunities. So if you're not able to have basic level entry, it's really hard then later on to say that these people are prepared for leadership. Not knowing the inner workings of the Park Service, but Kris, you asked me, so, you know, I'm going to opine, I would say that it really needs a real hard look at those numbers and then a leader to say, “We're going to change that.” Kris: Wow. Yeah. I think you absolutely hit the nail on the head. There's not just one challenge, right. There are multiple. The barriers to entry and just the intake, but also something at the very foundation. Right. If you keep doing the same thing for 100 years and it has always looked the same, then that's probably one of the issues, right. And like you talked about unpaid internships, that's not necessarily, I think most of our internships, there's at least a stipend that comes along with it. But for so many employees, specifically in the park ranger field, which is what, so many people who visit a national park site, their first and in many cases only experience with the National Park Service or employees, it's not uncommon to be a seasonal, which is four to six months over multiple years at different places across the country, and then having to find a different job somewhere else until you get enough hours in that you can qualify for a hiring authority to be brought into the Park Service. And it's a huge barrier for people who can't have that level of uncertainty for where their paycheck is going to come in when this temporary assignment is over. Denise: That's an absolute barrier because especially if you think about people young and starting their careers, they're probably looking for at least something that resembles full time employment. But that's a perfect opportunity for the Park Service to really examine that and to change their structure and their systems so that it becomes more available to people of color. Kris: Right. Denise: So, yeah, it's a big undertaking. Kris: And it requires all of us, and it requires, I think, voices like yours that have, again, such a diverse experience and robust experience to help us examine ourselves, because that's always hard to find, maybe identify your own shortcomings or weaknesses. So have trusted voices help you identify areas that you can be better, I think is so important. So thank you so much for your observation. I think I think it's spot on. Denise: Well, you have to be willing to actually acknowledge the work that needs to be done. Kris: Right. Denise: You have to acknowledge that you're not where you want to be. And so what do we need to do to get there? Does that mean that we need, for example, implicit bias training for leadership and for staff and for people to understand that we all have biases and they show up different ways? And so it's not just a racial bias. They're all different types of biases that we have. So I think it's really recognizing that and having a leader that's willing to say, “We're going to change this. We're not going to continue to do what we've always done.” Kris: Right. Well, I think, again, I can't thank you enough for one of the conversations that we had about and you kind of challenging me, and to look at where are we getting services from. And essentially, where are we putting our financial resources as the Park Service to procure services and supplies? Are we patroning minority owned businesses and women own businesses, equitably. Right. Or are we going to kind of the same old tried and true places we've always gone? Because that's easy, right. That's quick, right. Denise: And those vendors you've always worked with, they have learned how to navigate the system. Where the BIPOC community, maybe they've not. And so that means are there extra steps that we have to take? Do we need to do workshops to train, to understand how to complete the RFPs, to how do we become a vendor? And it takes some extra effort, as opposed to just, “We posted it and these are the people that responded, so we're done.” I think that that's the other thing, not just the Park Service. You said earlier this is really the challenge for the country in many different aspects, is to really look at how we have done, really, I'm going to say business as usual. And that to rethink that if we really want to reach people that we've not reached, we really have to change our behaviors and our approach. Kris: Yeah, that's so true. So we can pivot a moment. Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument is fairly unique in the National Park Service. There are almost 425 National Parks Service sites across the country, some large, some small, some old, some new. But Birmingham is fairly unique in that it was established with the intent of having federal ownership or the piece of the Park Service directly owns and manages be very small in the footprint of the national monument boundary. And everything else within it is either a city owned property or park or building, nonprofit, a church, something like that. And all of us are charged and obligated to manage this together collaboratively and to work together, which is a challenge, right. The more people in a room you have, the harder it is sometimes to get consensus, but it's also an unbelievable opportunity to bring together people who've been doing this work forever and lived this story and truly embody everything that the park and the Park Service wants to do. Can you talk a little bit about some of the successes and the things that have been achieved specifically in the civil rights district, in the national monument, but really even citywide in regards to racial equity and social justice? Denise: So, Kris, basically your comment is really one of the things I think is really one of the biggest successes, is that we have all come together to work for the preservation of these historic sites. And I think actually to form a collective vision for social justice, racial equity, preserving the history, to ensure that I always say current generations, because we can't skip to future generations without making sure we're engaging current generations. And so that's one of the things that I really think that we can't overlook, was our ability for all of us to come together and to work collectively toward this thing that was decreed as the Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument. And it's our collective efforts that are really making the national monument a success. And I think that, again, we have so many opportunities within the various sites to be able to tell these stories. But also, for example, right, 16th Street Baptist Church, they were offering a COVID vaccine. So, I mean, you think about it, so history, yes, current day needs, absolutely. So being responsive to the needs right now. And so it has, of course, the foundation of the history to build upon. But all of these sites, Historic Bethel is actively working to help redevelop and to stabilize the neighborhood around the church. So the sites become a catalyst for other revitalization and other opportunities around these historic sites. And of course, with Urban Impact leading the northwest downtown planning process, it really gives an opportunity to really look at redeveloping, revitalization of the broader civil rights district. So I am really proud of our collective, collaborative efforts and the fact that as far as the city, the city is able to support these efforts, we're able to bring resources, even our work on the Gaston Motel, to be able to understand that the work that we're doing is really not for us, it's for future generations and it's for posterity sake as well. So I'm really pleased with our collaborative work. Kris: I'm so glad you said that because I think, again, so many national park sites stand as monuments or testaments to something that happened in the past and we can infer and take lessons and apply them, like you said, to the current generation but also to the future. But here in Birmingham, the sites that make up the national monument and countless others in the city, their work and advocacy and their fight for what we're talking about didn't stop, right? They are still leaders in their communities and in their city and in this world. And it's such an inspiring place to be because it is really hallowed ground all across the city. So we've talked about a lot about, I think, organizational change which can be kind of overwhelming, especially if you feel like you're at maybe the lower rungs of an organization. You're not in the boardroom or whatever. But obviously we all have a responsibility as individuals to be leaders and to be people who are championing and fighting for equity and justice. Can you help tell and help us talk about how can an individual contribute towards achieving these goals? What can I do as a single person to be on the front lines fighting for this thing or these things that I believe in and think are important? Denise: So, first of all, recognizing that racial equity is not a program. It's not something that we just plan, we do and we're done. That, it really is about a process. It's an approach. It's a mindset with achievable outcomes. And so it's really about a day to day practice of how we shift our behaviors and powers. So what does that mean? Does that mean that we adopt antiracist principles? That we are holding ourselves accountable at all levels? We're trying to work together to transform our respective spaces and then really just the commitment to continued improvement and education. So for an individual, if you're not really understanding or familiar with racial equity and racial equity principles I always say education is really probably the best place to start with most things is to inform yourself. So does that mean that maybe you take a training on implicit bias or antiracist principles so that you understand how you show up? Are there things that you're doing individually that you could take a different approach or a different attitude or that you didn't even recognize, maybe, that you had certain, I'm going to say prejudices meaning as prejudging people, right? I would say that certainly as an individual, start with your own knowledge and your own understanding of how you show up in your spaces and what you can do to contribute to a better workplace, it could be your church, it could be your school, wherever you are. But in this case, we're talking about the spaces in which we work. And it becomes important because we interact with the public in the work that we do. I think it's even more important for training for park rangers, training for our respective staff, to understand - and leadership - to understand some of these, I'm going to say, kind of basic principles in regard to social justice and racial equity. Kris: That's so powerful. And you're right, they are basic. They should naturally just be a part of everything we do. But I think to your point earlier, assuming that is really what partly we're failing because there is some ignorance and a lack of understanding, education about what this means. And so thank you so much for taking the time to help us have this dialogue and hopefully begin to expose this idea, this kind of way of being an employee, a citizen, just a human being of valuing social justice and racial equity and understanding that there are things in place, systematic things in place that have been in place for so long that prevent that equity and truly are challenges for so many of our neighbors and our family and our friends to succeed. And again, just thank you so much for taking the time to speak to us. Is there anything, as we kind of wrap up here that you'd like to say? Denise: Again, thank you, Kris. So as we really think about our conversation today, just recognizing that from the city's perspective, I'm here because Mayor Woodfin was intentional in that he wanted an administration to reflect his goals and his values, which included embracing and directing the organization to be deliberate in assessing our policies, our practices, initiatives, and really in recognition that we are, as is the National Park Service, a public service organization, and in that we serve the public, we have to demonstrate a commitment to practicing social justice and racial equity principles, basically with the goal to make sure that we can achieve equitable outcomes. That honest assessment of where we are is really the starting point for that. I have the opportunity now to participate with a cohort of cities through the Living Cities Network Closing the Gap Initiative that really strives to help municipalities work on racial equity efforts to close the wealth gap. It has been really for this past year that we participated and so that has allowed us access to resources, access to training. It really becomes important not only just to say we're going to be in this space, but that we're educated. We also have the opportunity within the city to participate as part of the Complete Communities Initiative with Implicit Bias training for all of the city's department and division directors. So again, understanding that the policies and the way that we show up is representative of how the city shows up and what a resident sees. And I would say that if you just extrapolate that out, that when the Gaston Motel is complete and we have visitors coming in, we want to make sure that all of the folks who staff that site and as well as our other sites, that we understand the space that we're, in we understand that we're able to interact with our visitors in a way that is respectful of them, of their culture and is welcoming. And so I would just say, in closing, that our work is just really too important not to give it our full selves. And I actually would even say that what we have the privilege to do, Kris, is not even work. It's really a calling. It's because we get to preserve these historic sites for future generations and understand that we do step on sacred ground every day that we show up at these sites. Kris: There's absolutely no way to improve upon that. So I will just say I could not agree more. Thank you so much. And I hope all of us have been inspired and challenged to, like you said, embody and live these principles in every day and everything that we do. Denise, thank you so much for your time. Denise: Thank you, Kris. I really appreciate it. Thank you. Ranger: This is We Will Rise: National Parks and Civil Rights. Thanks to the Psalters for use of their song Turn Me Round. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe to our series. Until next time. [Music Continues]

28 Jun 2022 - 48 min
episode Episode 4: But for Birmingham artwork

Episode 4: But for Birmingham

Tune in as we interview Dr. Glenn Eskew, author of the book But for Birmingham: The Local and National Movements in the Civil Rights Struggle. --- TRANSCRIPT: --- Ranger: Welcome to We Will Rise: National Parks and Civil Rights. Close your eyes and imagine a National Park. Are you picturing waterfalls and mountains, or do you think of Dr. King's childhood home, Japanese internment camps, or a school that became a battleground for racial integration? National Parks aren't just wilderness. They are spaces of remembrance founded to preserve the stories of who we are and how we came to be. National parks inspire us to do better, be better. To climb mountains both physical and figurative. Join park rangers, researchers, authors and activists as we discuss what liberty and justice for all means on our public lands. The following episode features an interview with Dr. Glenn Eskew, author of the book, But for Birmingham. The first 30 minutes are detailed synopsis of the book. If you haven't read it, this is a great opportunity for a deep dive. If you have read it or just want to listen to the author interview, skip to minute 30. Ranger Kat: So I'm so thrilled to be speaking with you about your book, But for Birmingham: the Local and National Movements in the Civil Rights Struggle. And I have to say just a couple of days ago, an uncle of mine teaches African American history at a college in Michigan, and he and his wife sent us a bunch of books about African American history in the region. And one of the books he sent us was your book wonderful? Dr. Eskew: Wonderful! Ranger Kat: Yeah. And I haven't spoken to him about it yet, but I can't wait to message him and say, guess who I spoke to today? Your book has traveled far and wide and is one of the books that really, I think, does an incredible job of explaining the movement in Birmingham, a really overall incredible, incredible summary, but also really gets into the details. And I've had the good fortune of reading it. But I'm wondering for those who haven't read it, if you could give us a couple of minutes of a synopsis of the book? Dr. Eskew: Sure. And what I would do and sketching out the story is begin by setting the stage of looking at Birmingham. Most people are aware that it's a city rooted in industry, that was founded after the Civil War. So it has no Antebellum past, no official history with quote the enslavement of people, and was rather born of the brash New South, with foreign capital coming in to invest and extract the mineral wealth from the region. And that aspect of that, that story is accurate up through really the civil rights struggle of the 1950s and 60s. And so it helps to frame the story within the context of the iron and steel industry. Because the iron and steel industry, while it was not premised in enslavement, it used a racially divisive bifurcated wage to exploit labor for the benefit of the industrialists. White people ended up earning about twice as much as Black people. That goes back to after the war, all the way up to the civil rights era. And so if you begin to comprehend that the story is rooted in economic exploitation that used race to divide people and to take advantage of them economically, then you can see how folks got so vested in maintaining segregation. White people who saw it is their only way to get an advantage, and African Americans as the barrier that's keeping them from gaining access. And it's within that framework that we find the civil rights struggle itself. Now the movement comes about in the post-World War II era. It's led by, the modern civil rights movement is led by ministers, people in churches who are, by virtue of that, independent of white authorities and white business owners. So they're able to speak with that kind of independent voice. And these Church leaders were articulating the goals and aspirations of their members, members who wanted in the post-World War II period to gain access to the system, to get the better things in America that were being mass produced, now that the country had defeated the Nazis and Japan and created American hegemony. And to get that, they recognize the need for education, the need to get into schools that were adequately supported. And the civil rights movement then clearly reflects this expression of desire to gain access to the system across the board, both economically and politically and socially, all lumped into the notion of integration. In Birmingham, that movement, which was really kind of a new reflection, was symbolized by the work of the Reverend Fred L. Shuttlesworth and the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights, a group formed in 1956 that brought together the activist members of the city's NAACP chapter that had really been kind of moribund. Shuttlesworth, when he moved to the city, he was a native of the city, well, he had grown up in Birmingham, he had left, but came back after the Second World War when he was brought in as pastor at Bethel Baptist Church in Collegeville, which was a prominent Black church in Birmingham. And as pastor of that congregation, he became active in the NAACP, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, as its membership chairman, working to recruit people into the organization. But the state of Alabama in 1956 hands down a ruling trying to get the membership records of the NAACP. And in the process, the organization decided to close its doors in Alabama rather than identify the people who were in it, knowing that they would be the targets then of white supremist violence. And so when the NAACP got outlawed, Shuttlesworth decided to create a new group. Well, in many ways, there had already been pushing within the NAACP to reflect this kind of activism. But Shuttlesworth was particularly charismatic man, and he believed that God was helping him fight segregation and that he was, in a sense, especially after he survived the bombing of the Church, Bethel Baptist and the Parsonage on Christmas night of 1956, believed that God had saved him to fight against segregation. Now, he had attended Alabama State University in Montgomery. He was friends with Ralph David Abernathy. Abernathy is a key pastor involved with the Montgomery bus boycott. He's the one who encouraged his friend at that point, Martin Luther King, Jr. to get involved in the bus boycott. King, of course, gets selected to lead the MIA. And Shuttlesworth was actually in Montgomery witnessing all of this taking place in 1955 when the organization is formed. Consequently, he takes that idea with him up to Birmingham in 1956. And it's through his Alabama Christian Movement that we see the nascent civil rights movement in the city accomplish its successes, challenging segregation at the railroad depot, challenging Birmingham Terminal station it was called, challenging segregation with the effort to desegregate the public schools, this occurring during the height of the Little Rock crisis in 1957. When the bus boycott decision is handed down the year before in Montgomery, in December of 56, Shuttlesworth and the Alabama Christian Movement announced they're going to ride the buses in Birmingham in a desegregated fashion because the courts have ruled that legal, and it's on that night that the Klan bombs the Church and Parsonage and nearly killed Shuttlesworth. He really reflected that desire for change, and as a charismatic leader, was willing to risk his life to achieve those goals of gaining equal access to the American system, ending segregation and achieving first class citizenship, as it was called. The movement, though, kind of runs along. Because of its emergence in 1957, Bull Connor, who had been the city Commissioner since the 1930s and had gained a reputation for at first preventing biracial unionism and then resisting desegregation, had been able to come back into political power just barely by something like 110 votes. He beat the incumbent who had replaced him in office and Connor returned to power as the Commissioner of Public Safety basically vowing to defeat Shuttlesworth in the Alabama Christian movement. The larger, one of the larger arguments in the book is to contrast this local struggle with the national movement. Now, when I started the research back in the 1980s, there was a general assumption about the Birmingham story that Dr. King had come to Birmingham, created a movement, and had a strategy that played out as he envisioned, forcing the hand of the federal government to then declare desegregation. And that general narrative, written by journalists and by some of the early scholars, never really looked at what happened on the local level, downplayed the significance of Reverend Shuttlesworth and the Alabama Christian Movement and really kind of misinterpreted the story, seeing civil rights as an external thing that came into communities, a national movement brought into local protests. In that sense, it played into the old arguments of the white supremists who tried to dismiss the civil rights struggle as one of outside agitators. But the reality was, of course, that no, there had been a local movement, this local movement demanding change had existed before Montgomery and had really come about in tandem with the effort there with the bus boycott, so that there were a series of these local movements that came together to create what will be called the Southern Christian Leadership Conference SCLC and select Dr. King to lead it. And that effort by Dr. King was to coordinate these local protest groups. Now there had already been a national movement in what you would call the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. It had existed since 1910 and had focused on voting rights and other kinds of reform, pushing legislation with the federal government. And it had chapters in Birmingham and elsewhere, that’s what the state had outlawed. But those were really tightly controlled by the external organization in New York, and they largely worked within the framework of segregation. They kind of compromised with a larger segregated social structure to accommodate the interests of the Black elite that ran the organization. What Shuttlesworth does is challenge that and the Black elite in Birmingham, what was called at the time the Negro leadership class. The traditional Negro leadership class didn't control Shuttlesworth or these ministers of these congregations of these Black working class people who were demanding a more activist approach. That's the organization, the Alabama Christian Movement, that invites King and the SCLC to come to Birmingham in the spring of 1963. They created the great event we know of as the Birmingham Demonstrations, where Bull Connor brings out the police dogs at first and tries to use violence to suppress the demonstrations, ultimately turning to fire hoses to blast the youth who get involved in the demonstrations and tip the scale in the end to achieve the victory won in the streets of Birmingham. And that larger story that we know of also points to something fundamental that I argue in the book. And just quite simply, that is, the old iron and steel industry was in decline. The political economy of the south has been changing since the 1930s and 40s. The Great Depression and the Second World War: those 2 global events had brought about the end to the industrial paternalism that was the basis of the bifurcated race wage, the segregated system. And once that industrial economy began to collapse, that segregated social structure no longer made sense. And the bifurcated race wage that justified paying white people a little more than Black was increasingly impractical. What was replacing it was a potentially new economy, one rooted in the service sector that saw racism as a kind of irrationality on capitalism, and as a result, was willing to sacrifice segregation for the benefit of a larger, integrated economy. There was more to be gained. “Money is green,” as A.G. Gaston, the Black millionaire in Birmingham, liked to say. And there were representatives of that new political economy, recognizing what was going on in Birmingham and seeing how a defensive racism was really holding the city down, limiting its evolution and development and mobilized against it. That effort was led by a man named Sidney Smyer, who was the head of the Birmingham Realty Company, real estate being one of the key elements of the service sector, where you rent space for your business or commercial enterprise. And Smyer mobilized likeminded progressives, people, many of whom were inspired by John F. Kennedy in this era of the space age and opportunity. Smyer mobilized them to at first change the form of government to try to get rid of Bull Connor. And this was accomplished by adopting legislation to replace the City Commission with the Mayor Council form of government. Connor challenged that defeat of his election as Mayor by filing a lawsuit against the very change of government that he had just run for Mayor off. But it tied it up in the courts, and it left two governments in charge of Birmingham at the height of the demonstrations. One, the old City Commission, with Connor still in charge of the police and the fire departments, and the other, the new City Government of a Mayor and City Council. They kind of duplicated their actions day after day. And so you see, Birmingham itself was undergoing a very significant transformation. And then finally, what the book looks at that was distinctive about it, too, is how the Black community was no more monolithic than the white community. White people had long seen the Black community is kind of monolithic, meaning that there weren't really distinctions or divisions within it per se. Rather than seeing the Black community as divided as the white one with an elite Black class kind of dominating institutions, and the Black masses of people working in these menial jobs, and the two not necessarily having the same interest at heart. Such was the case, certainly, with the white community. There was a white elite in Birmingham. There was the white working class in Birmingham, and there was a middle class and a kind of petty bourgeoisie between the working class and the middle class in Birmingham. And they all had different interests in seeing the city function. The white elite, as residents of the city know full well, live in the privately incorporated communities of Mountain Brook and Vestavia Hills, and Homewood. And that's where they lived at the time of the civil rights struggle. The white working class was scattered across the entire industrial sector of Birmingham, the Birmingham district it's called. And there was a kind of middle class that if it didn't live over the mountain, it lived in the city proper, but had vested interests in maintaining segregation. That was the electorate of Bull Connor, and he would pull a majority of it. These were people who held their jobs as firemen or policemen or clerks in the city government or staff at a local store because they were white, because they were given that privilege, and so they had a vested interest in maintaining it. Now, looking back, we can see how this all came together in the demonstrations of 1963, and through federal intervention, we get desegregation, which brings about an end to the legal white supremacy that required the separation of Black and white, got rid of justifying the bifurcated race wage that allowed legal payment of white people more than Black people for the same job. That got rid of disenfranchisement, preventing African Americans from voting, and enabled them to gain Black political empowerment. We can see how all that played out. But what we also can see now is that the service economy emerged full blown, that that transformation allowed for things like the University of Alabama at Birmingham and the medical school to expand and become the dominant employer in the city, bringing with it those dynamic jobs in the medical industries that employed people regardless of their race and still exploited labor. But did it through different means. It wasn't simply rooted in race, and that transfer information becomes more clear. And the economy then became in sync with really the national economy that had evolved by the time of the Second World War and was the case across the nation by the Sixties and and Seventies. The protest in Birmingham also brought to a head this clash between local and national interests. And one thing my book argues that some people agree with and others disagree with is the idea that the local movement led by Shuttlesworth did not appear to receive its objectives in the immediate outcome of the demonstration. And then, in fact, as the protests were playing out in May of 1963, it looked as if Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and the SCLC had been able to wrestle out of a snatch victory at the very last moment by convincing the federal government to intervene and therefore achieve desegregation. And Shuttlesworth and the Alabama Christian Movement had been holding out for a wider transformation of the system. In some ways, that argument is rooted in the notion of the protests, really, in the even in the 1930s, when during the unionization drives the Great Depression, there were calls for what was known as industrial democracy, getting better jobs that paid living wages, economic change in the system with a redistribution of wealth. And yet, as things evolved by the 1950s and 60s, the economic issues have been pushed off the table, and reform has really kind of centered on the idea of civil rights, meaning an end to discrimination in the public sphere. Getting rid of the white and colored signs, having a seat at the lunch counter. But as Ella Baker would note, you know, if you don't have the money to buy the hamburger, it doesn't do you a lot of good to get the seat, right? And so Shuttlesworth and the Alabama Christian Movement had been pushing for getting African Americans hired as policemen, getting them hired as clerks in the local stores, gaining economic change in addition to removing the signs. But it appeared in ‘63 that King was able to end the demonstrations with the promise that something was going to change. And so that feeling of shortcoming became very real. And the book’s epilogue points to this shortcoming in its persistence. And this is what we're hearing today. It's all about the failure of the movement to have addressed the fundamental issue of economic inequality. To be fair to the Movement, that wasn't always part of the effort. The local and national movements struggled because the national movement claimed the victory of change and left Birmingham, King did, and as it happens, he kind of left in charge people like AG Gaston or Lucius Pitts at Miles and certainly Arthur Shores, members of the Black elite and kind of left Shuttlesworth and the leaders of the Alabama Christian Movement out of that leadership, Black leadership that was working with the white one. And we'll see Attorney Shores then become the first African American on the city Council. And we see the Black elite having been able to work within the desegregated framework that emerges of political leadership in the city that's in the 19, latter Sixties and Seventies. But the issue of economic reforms became more ambiguous. And the epilogue of the book kind of points to that. When the logic of how the civil rights movement occurs, removing the signs, gaining equal access, desegregating the space, plays out at Shoal Creek, an exclusive white country club south of the city that not only didn't let black folk in, didn't let Jewish people in, wouldn't let you were me in or anybody else who's just white and happens to maybe you're a nice guy, but if you're not a millionaire, you can't join my club. Right. And the logic for the movement was, well, until you let some African American in and treat them as equal, then your not, of course, it's not an equal set up. It's a class thing. And it really pointed to instead, we have gross inequality in this nation. It persists. It existed back then, and the movement didn't really mobilize to tackle it like it might have. There had been an effort in the 1930s, but it had failed. Nevertheless, the changes that occurred in Birmingham in 1963 were of not only national significance but global significance, because those demonstrations, those nonviolent protests that kept going because of a handful of people committed for weeks and ultimately tipping the scale with the thousands of people who filled the streets and filled the jails. That transformation did bring about the end legal white supremacy in the nation through the implementation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that required desegregation of public space, the right to sit at a lunch counter or a restaurant, assuming you have the money, the right to vote and participate in the political system, of the right to go to the school that you want to go to. That change happened. And it happened because of Birmingham. Ranger Kat: Thank you. And you brought up a lot of things that hopefully will have time to discuss later. But before we go into some of the details of the book, I want to ask you a personal question. I did some Googling and looked into you as a person. And I know you've been working and living in Georgia for a number of years as a College Professor and researcher and author, of course. And I'm curious if you're from the south, and just in general, what spurred this deep interest in looking so in depth at the story in Birmingham? Dr. Eskew: Sure. Yes. I'm a native Southerner, although I was born in 1960, so these events happened when I was in diapers, and I was not aware of any of it when it was taking place. But I became fascinated with the idea of Southern history and the transformation of it. And so I wanted to explore that story. And my approach was to find somewhere that would allow me to consider how the south went from being the region of agricultural production of cotton, the old plantation, labored on by the enslaved. How did that change into the dynamic south that we saw in the 80s when I was in graduate school in a place like Atlanta, o,r as my major professor encouraged me, to look at Birmingham, and so I did. And looking at Birmingham was able to not only explore that transformation, because in many ways, Sloss furnaces, the Alice furnaces, and the housing near it on the south side, those were industrial plantations. This is not that different from what you would find in Dallas County, outside Selma or anywhere else in the Deep South. And indeed, the culture of industrial paternalism that developed in Birmingham was very similar to the culture of the plantation itself. And so finding that and then seeing how it was completely transformed by the 1980s was the challenge for me. And Atlanta offered a great contrast with Birmingham, because Birmingham was a company town and the big horse, not the only horse, but it was the main horse in town, was the United States Steel Corporation, locally, the Tennessee Coal and Iron Company. And as a result of that, it controlled town like any small Southern County seat that has a textile mill in it. The mill would control town. Here we find the industry being controlled by this entity, and it was externally owned. It was owned by shareholders in New York and in Pennsylvania and around the world. And that undue influence of external forces, this outside control, created its own dynamic of inferiority among the white elite in Birmingham who, you know, they didn't really control their destiny. They were trapped within it. Unlike in Atlanta, where Atlanta, you had this interesting mix. It had manufacturing. It also had service. It had transportation, and those elements were all in kind of balance. And so there wasn't a single economic structure or entity or industry or political economy that dominated Atlanta. The diversity allowed for a greater influence of local people and Atlanta had the good fortune of indigenous capital, that is, money generated in the region that was put in local banks and control by local people that could then benefit the local community. Unlike Birmingham, where the money was really externally brought in and then taken right back out with interest through profits. Ranger Kat: I want to ask you a question about money and the role that money plays in racism. One of the things that I found incredibly well researched in your book was the economic disadvantage that's woven into racism. And you mentioned just a moment ago, it's one thing to take down signs that delineate where African Americans can go and where white people can go. It's another to be able to access a system that is financially just out of your league. You mentioned the quote by Ella Baker, and you know how she said, there's no use at gaining a seat at the table if you don't have any money to buy anything at the restaurant, which I think is an excellent quote. And you also mentioned, too, how obvious that disparity was if you look back at what salaries were like. And in your book, for example, in 1950, the average annual salary for a white man was $2274, and the average for a black man was $1,087. These are annual salaries. I'm wondering, why is it important to remind people that racism isn't about signs? It's not about name calling. It's about economic disenfranchisement. Why is that important? And why is that often not discussed? Dr. Eskew: Oh, that's an excellent question and a hard one. And I'll begin by also emphasizing Ella Baker observation that it's bigger than a hamburger. Right? So it's more than just economic. These gains in the sense that civil rights reform and an end to racial discrimination, of course, has all kinds of implication for reflection of self-worth and value and just the whole notion of equality among people and freedom. True freedom. So I don't want to sound like it's simply a matter of economic issues or that it's simply a matter of spatial issues, of gaining actual space to something like being able to sit at the lunch counter. However, the reality is that political economies often use divisions for purposes of exploitation. One of the maximum principles of capitalism is you reduce cost and you can increase profits. And one of the easiest ways to reduce cost is to lower wages. And this could be, in the case we're looking at with the struggle in Birmingham it's over race, but it's also seen in gender, with gender discrimination in employment. We're still trying to get the Equal Rights Amendment past to pay women the same wage as men. And as we've seen in this pandemic, the gross inequalities in wages that women earn and the terrible situation in which they find themselves so vulnerable because of the pandemic as a result of the employment opportunities that they confront. So it could be written from the perspective of these industrialists, places like Pittsburgh were rife with ethnic discrimination. And you had had some of that in Birmingham with Italians who had been brought in to work in the iron and steel industry in the Birmingham district being discriminated kind of in between Asians, same way, in between Black and white. But the bigger crux in the bigger point is simply that economies often use tactics such as racism to divide workers. And I think it's no surprise that we can apply many of these lessons that I discovered, so clearly evident in the Birmingham of the 1950s and 60s to the recent past we've just experienced. ow racism is used to divide workers. I think we could even go so far as to see our nation currently confronting a declining old economy like the iron and steel one in in Birmingham, only today, it's the Petroleum based economy, which is not just the gas pump, mind you, it's the banks that finance all of that. It's the insurance companies that prop it all up. It's the plastic industries and then the use of plastics by consumers and manufacturers, all that's coming out of petroleum, all of that reflective of this economy that is no longer sustainable in our changing environmental situation. We see evidence of that being propped up. And yet we also see a new economy that's proposed that is transnational or global, if you like, that is driving a different kind of focus, that being one of renewable energies that creates its own dynamic for jobs and opportunities in progress. Those two political economies are currently at war. And the question is, in the end, which is going to win out. And we know deep down the petroleum one's going to die. We're going to run out of petroleum. Well, likewise, the use of race can be used in that old political economy. And I think that's why, in part, we've seen efforts to emphasize racial division and our recent political climate. Ranger Kat: I'd like to ask you about the role of women, the LGBTQ+ community, differently-abled folks, in both the local and the national movement. I think, especially in the Birmingham campaign, where you have these really charismatic leaders like Shuttlesworth and Dr King, it's easy to focus the Movement and what they accomplished on their ability to lead. But through reading your book and understanding more of the movement, it really was this diverse movement of many. I mean, you mentioned the Children's Crusade and how that was sort of the tipping point, an inflection point in the Movement. How seeing these foot soldiers, some as young as six years old marching in the streets, really sort of shifted federal policy. But there were also folks like Ella Baker who we've quoted now a couple times, and students at Miles College who were really sort of encouraging this direct action campaign rather than the rhetoric that was more common among national leaders. And I'm wondering if you could maybe mention some women or some other diverse individuals who feel really contributed to the Movement that maybe we don't hear about, and maybe we should talk about more and hear about more. Dr. Eskew: Well, Ranger Gardiner, you just pointed out the big flaw in the book, I'm afraid. I did not give women enough credit in the narrative and that I fully believe is a result of being attracted to the charisma of Reverend Shuttlesworth and other African American male leaders, particularly in the church, who are the typical ones we seem to think of in this period of the Movement. But Ella Baker was very familiar with Alabama, having for years worked with the NAACP, mobilizing chapters and running voter registration campaigns in the state. And I would really call out several names, number one, for the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights, it's true success, it wasn't just Reverend Shuttlesworth in his charisma or his, quote, lieutenants like Bishop Calvin Woods and his brother Abraham or some of the other pastors. But it was Miss Lola Hendrix, an African American woman who helped keep the records and who ran the telephone tree that was integral to the Movement’s success. She would be tipped off by Reverend Shuttlesworth that he wanted to hold a meeting or that there would be someone at a mass meeting that he wanted the community to hear. And she would get on the phone and use that phone to contact other women who contacted other women who contacted other women. And everyone then materialized, at Shuttlesworth’s request, but it was a role of the women that accomplished that. And it's the women who are demonstrating as well as the men. Men might have led the March, but they're women participating in it. And I think of young women students during the Children's Crusade of 1963. Myra Carter Jackson was one of the great one of the great foot soldiers of this effort. And yet her family had gotten involved years before with the Alabama Christian Movement, before the Children's Crusade came about. And she had been participating in these mass meetings. And then when the children marched, she was right out there marching, as was Janice Wesley Kelsey. She, too, was a student who got recruited into the Children's Crusade and then demonstrated. And I have in the book there are a couple of white people, like Martha Turnipseed, a white woman who was a student at Birmingham-Southern who was interested in the idea of what's going on here with this civil rights protest. She attends a demonstration. Tommy Reeves, a seminarian, gets involved and just shows sympathy, and white Methodist authorities run him out of town. I think Turnipseed got expelled from Birmingham-Southern. So young people and women are really the key to the success. And in the end, it really is that crowd of young folk in the Children's Crusade that forces the change. But I would add, if it hadn't been for Reverend Shuttlesworth and that Alabama Christian Movement, that group of churches scattered around the Birmingham District that met on Monday nights, week after week after week in mass meetings since 1956, had he not kept that going, there never would have been a Birmingham demonstration to attract all those students and protesting in May of ‘63 to begin with. And I believe it was Andrew Young who, coming into Birmingham and confronting this really shocked that Dr King discovered when he got there in April, that not all of the Black ministerial leadership was behind Reverend Shuttlesworth, that the Black community was not united in support of the demonstrations, as had been the case in Montgomery with the bus boycott. Young would say that it was only about 10% of the churches, Black churches in Birmingham, that were actively in the movement, and that's the reality of it. But what that tells me and should tell everyone is it never will be everybody getting involved. It's always that committed core, that dedicated few who don't give up, who keep fighting, who make the change. And I think we see that time and again in history. Ranger Kat: So I thought to ask you more in depth questions about that push and pull between the national and the local movement. But I think you did a really excellent job summarizing that initially, as well also as the ambiguity of the ending of the Birmingham campaign. But I'm wondering, there's a moment in the epilogue, which you titled Ambiguous Resolution, which I think kind of says it all, where you mention the story of the integration of Birmingham's Shoal Creek Country Club in 1990. I believe I'm calling it the right name, and you mentioned it briefly in your summary. But I'm wondering if you could go more into detail as to what happened and why, for you, that's kind of emblematic of the source of changes it actually took place in Birmingham and how, for the Black masses, a lot of those changes were more symbolic rather than material. So I'm wondering if you could explain that one case study and may be connect it to the larger story of what happened as a result of the movement in Birmingham. Dr. Eskew: I'll try if I don't get it right, ask me again on another day, and I'll, I'll actually get through reading that epilogue again. Ranger Kat: [laughter] Fair enough. Dr. Eskew: And get to that. But Ambiguous Resolution, I think, points to why we're still having problems today. And for a lot of people, certainly in the white community, I believe their attitude has been, “we solved this already with the civil rights movement,” and the reality is the movement was successful. I don't want to suggest anything else in the sense that, as Congressman John Lewis was oft to say, “all you have to do is go back and look and see what it was like when we started and see what things are like today. And you'll see the change.” There has been dramatic change in the 50 years since the demonstration. We no longer have spaces that are demarcated white and colored. We no longer have laws that are designed to project onto society white supremacy. All of that was removed through the Civil Rights Act 1964, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, and we received a great deal of support through Black political empowerment accomplished by the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Yet what we've seen is the erosion of those rights in voting by new strategies of disfranchisement and voter suppression that are rampant today. And yet taking away the vote of someone is not the same thing as forcing them to sit on the back of a bus. Right? Those are separate things. Alright. So ambiguous resolution really points to the fact that the civil rights movement didn't address because, quite frankly, it was outside the purview of it economic inequalities, the persistence of that. It did try to resolve the problem of vested racism and white supremacy in institutions. And yet I would suggest your readers if they make it through the chapter on Bull’s Birmingham, and they discover how horrific police brutality was in Birmingham with the legal lynchings, they were called. The justifiable homicides of unarmed Black men by white policemen in 1950s Birmingham. How's that different than today? Right? This is nothing new. And of course, the violence is used just to really kind of prop up law and order. The law and order designed to protect private property and economic interests. Only today it's not denying someone access to the shopping mall. Everybody can go in the mall. Right? Doesn’t d you any good if you don't have any money. And so in the ambiguous resolution epilogue, I kind of point to, and in some ways it's unfair of me to, suggest that Abraham Woods and the local Black leadership is up in arms over the need to have an African American millionaire admitted to a private white country club on the outskirts of town as a symbolic gesture that yes, indeed, we are all equal. I understand why they did it. And I understand the logic that led them to that point, being the logic of the civil rights struggle, gaining equal access to the system. Now, to be fair, in the civil rights era, that meant the public sphere, things that were open to the public in general, private places were left out of the realm of this sphere. What you do in your private community is your business. If you want to be a Church that does not allow Black people in your Church because you believe in the Church of white supremacy. And somehow you can rationalize that with your, quote, Christianity. It's a private entity. Right? But it pointed to the hypocrisy that was the reason Kneel-Ins were held at white churches during the civil rights movement. How dare you express Christian belief and not extend the welcoming hand to your Black brothers and sisters? Well, Shoal Creek was a country club which still exists south of Birmingham, a beautiful space that had an outstanding golf course that was so impressive it had been able to attract the PGA, the international golfing competition. And this too points to the kind of the contradictions of the larger transformation. It pointed to Birmingham's success. The success of having weathered ‘63, undergone racial change, created a brand new dynamic service economy that was no longer rooted in the filthy, racist iron and steel industry, but now expressive of a dynamic medical industry and education and progress and thinking and the whole consumption and all of that stretch from 65 to 280 and in between that you can see south of town suggested that. Economic growth, progress, the change that the city had experienced and slap in the middle of it: Shoal Creek. And here it was hosting this international spotlight, and the founder of the country club, Hall Thompson, made the mistake of saying that, “well, we let everybody in here except the Blacks,” right? And consequently, the protests began and understandably so. And in the end, Shoal Creek desegregates by allowing an African American member, a member of the Black elite in Birmingham, to become a member of the Country Club. And through that, desegregation really provided a similar kind of resolution to what had occurred initially in ‘63. It didn't change the lives of any of the Black masses of folk trapped in the inner city of Birmingham in public housing that was increasingly being bull-dozed in slum areas with limited opportunities, in schools that were struggling to to educate the students, and in a new dynamic political economy that without an education, left you with limited job opportunities. And I would dare say that one could suggest we still confront these problems today. Ranger Kat: I think many would agree with that. So I wanted to ask you a question about the role of children in the Birmingham campaign and segue into a question about a message to young people today. And I think that your conversation around this ambiguous resolution is a good segue in that there's more work to do, there's more work to be done, and that's kind of how the book ends. When I finished the book, I'll admit I felt sad. I felt frustrated. I felt like I wasn't given the resolution that we’re often given and more simplistic narratives about the civil rights movement. And I both appreciated you for that and also felt, again, that sense of frustration and like, wow, what was it, what truly was accomplished materially, economically, because it still seemed in your appraisal that the financial political situation in Birmingham remained very fraught. So, something that is, I think, really inspiring about the Birmingham Campaign is the role that children played in the Children's Crusade predominantly. And today we're seeing another resurgence of young people who are incredibly involved in trying to make the world a better place, whether that's racial justice, climate change, etcetera. And I'm curious, based on your deep historic knowledge of social movements, specifically civil rights in the South, would you say that the involvement of young people is critical to that success. And then, given that there is obviously still work to be done, what is your message to young people today who want to make changes for the better? Dr. Eskew: Young people hold the key. They're the ones who have the most to gain. If you consider the role of the youth in Birmingham, coming in at just the right moment, the crucial time with the Children's Crusade in May of ‘63, and they were brought in in part because of the leaders of the struggle, Dorothy Cotton, one of Dr. King's key staff members, James Bevel, Isaac Reynolds, Ike Reynolds. These folks worked with those young people, training them in nonviolence. But young folks are committed, and they're willing to work and put their necks out to gain change. And we see that in the Black Lives Matter effort today. It's young people who are driving the demand for change in race relations in America today, who are pushing to force reconciliation with the past, to come to terms with America's legacy as a white supremacy nation, and to address those inequalities that persist, recognizing how racism has functioned for so long, to hurt so many people. And if we look at the civil rights struggle as a whole, the real push at key moments that kept it moving forward was that of young people. We often think of the Brown versus Board of Education case with Linda Brown. It's her father who files the lawsuit. But I like to point to Moton High School in Virginia, which is also one of the five cases that made up the Brown decision. There we find the students themselves walking out of their school because of the inequality that they experienced in that facility, the failure of the local community, the white school board, to provide African American youth with educational facilities that would enable them to be prepared for the future. It's the Little Rock students who confront the violence and hostility of the white mob as they bravely continue to participate in the year-long process of desegregating Central High. And while after Montgomery, Dr. King and other civil rights leaders in local communities like Reverend Shuttlesworth and elsewhere across the south mobilized the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. It really kind of spun its wheels, this national movement, looking at replicating what the NAACP had been doing, holding voter registration drives, waiting to come to the aid of a demonstration or protest like Montgomery had been, something that erupted organically, in a sense, out of a local community. And it's the students who are the ones, the young people who create those opportunities. They do it with the sit-in movement in Greensboro, North Carolina, on February 1, 1960, when four black men from North Carolina A&T sit down at a Woolworths and refuse to leave, demanding equal access to service. It's young people like John Lewis, who is a seminarian in Nashville, volunteers to participate in the first Freedom Ride that it is civil rights organizations that mobilize it, CORE, Congress Of Racial Equality, but it's young people like John Lewis who volunteers and gets on that Freedom Ride and gets beat up on that Freedom Ride. And when the original ride is called off after Birmingham, it's young people from Nashville who had organized to sit-in movement led by Diane Nash and others, who come to Birmingham to continue the Freedom Ride and to maintain that dynamic. It's young people from around the nation who to join in Freedom Fides and get arrested, white and black, and be sent up to Parchment Prison in Mississippi, it’s young people that bring in that demand for change time and again. And it's the same story we see today. I think it's clear not just in Black Lives Matter, but Greta Thunberg and others who are pushing the demand for change on the environment. They're doing so because they know full well that world they're inheriting, and either it's going to be scorched or or it's going to be livable. And similarly, America has to come to grips with its history and address the wrongs of the past. That was really the final outgrowth of Dr. King's strategy of nonviolence. It wasn't just to have a demonstration and then to affect change at the local level. It was also to accomplish a reconciliation, to come to terms with the past and to create what he called the beloved community, a world in which we all can live. And humanity has lots of examples of the need to come together or confront annihilation. We used to hear more frequently about nuclear weapons and disarmament, and that's been pushed aside. But it's still very much a reality in our society, but it's been displaced by the greater needs of the need to address the environment. But we also have to address gross inequality, or we're going to see the masses of the people pushed to the limit and rise up and challenge the handful of one percenters out there who seem to be benefiting from the system. Ranger Kat: I'd like to close on the question about World Heritage Sites, and I know that you've been working to add many civil rights sites to be a part of UNESCO's World Heritage Site roster. So I was looking into a little bit about what it takes to become a UNESCO World Heritage Site and what the mission statement is. So I'll read just the small portion. The mission statement of the World Heritage Sites is “to preserve and protect sites around the world considered to be of outstanding value to humanity.” What is the value that the story of Birmingham and the sites in this region, what is the value that they bring to humanity? And why do you feel they deserve to be recognized on a global scale? Dr. Eskew: Thank you for that question, too, because, yes, I've been hard at work with colleagues on developing a serial nomination of US civil rights movement sites to be proposed for potential inscription on the World Heritage list. And Birmingham, I think, and to go back just to say about young people again. Young people hold the key, but it does no good if they don't get involved. Whenever I meet with students and talk about what occurred in Birmingham during the civil rights era, I encourage them to get involved for change for the change that they believe in, to get registered, to be able to vote so they can vote change in with politicians. If you don't get involved, if the children hadn’t marched in the Children's Crusade, there would not have been the changes we see coming out of Birmingham. And it's that very change. It's that outgrowth of those young people, Black folk standing up against Bull Connor’s fire hoses in Kelly Ingram Park, those six year old little kids who marched down the street and then on to a city bus to go off to the Stockade at the state fair ground and be locked up. It’s those young people who were spun down the street like a tumble weed through the force of the water of the hoses or got bitten by the dogs. Those young people point to why Birmingham is globally significant. It's globally significant because it demonstrated the power of nonviolent protest to force a nation to address injustice. As a result of the demonstrations in Birmingham, the federal government, through the Civil Rights Act of 1964, required desegregation, required an end to legal white supremacy in American society. If you consider that within the framework of the world and you think about how around the globe there's always been discrimination, it might not be racial, might be ethnic, might be based in rooted in religion. It might be gender discrimination or sexuality might be against the aging or against people with issues of ability. There's so much evidence of discrimination written into and built into the fabric of societies. And here, for the first time, a federal government said, no longer. We're going to require the space be open to all people equally. Public space accessible all. And as it has come to be interpreted, well, initially, it was the issue of race. When the Civil Rights Act was being prepared in the Congress and debated, a slick legislator put in the word gender, thinking it would kill it, because who's going to give women the same spaces they give men? It got passed instead. And suddenly we see among the greatest beneficiaries of this are women. We since interpreted it to mean equality over sexuality issues for gays and lesbians, queer, transgendered people. It was applied to the needs of folks with disabilities so that they would have access to public space, too. We've seen it writ large across the board. Nowhere else in the world had that occurred. And it comes out of the demonstrations and protests that happened in Birmingham. It's a glorious story. It's one of which to be proud. And it's one to celebrate. That here, local people, young people mobilized, came together, demanded change. And through that demand ultimately forced the federal government power to answer. And it's the only way we're ever going to get change on any of these other issues is if people mobilize and demand it. Ranger Kat: Thank you so much. This has been such an amazing conversation. I really appreciate not only your knowledge about the story, but the passion with which you speak about it. It will be a conversation I return to for many, many years to come, and hopefully we can have others, too. Dr. Eskew: Well, thank you. It's wonderful to get to write about the brave people who made the difference. Certainly, it's driven by a desire to see us also deal with the problems in our own societies and accomplish the change we need for us all to be able to live together. Ranger: This is We Will Rise: National Parks and Civil Rights. Thanks to the Psalters for use of their song, Turn Me Around. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe to our series. Until next time. [Music outro].

13 Apr 2022 - 1 h 18 min
En fantastisk app med et enormt stort udvalg af spændende podcasts. Podimo formår virkelig at lave godt indhold, der takler de lidt mere svære emner. At der så også er lydbøger oveni til en billig pris, gør at det er blevet min favorit app.
En fantastisk app med et enormt stort udvalg af spændende podcasts. Podimo formår virkelig at lave godt indhold, der takler de lidt mere svære emner. At der så også er lydbøger oveni til en billig pris, gør at det er blevet min favorit app.
Rigtig god tjeneste med gode eksklusive podcasts og derudover et kæmpe udvalg af podcasts og lydbøger. Kan varmt anbefales, om ikke andet så udelukkende pga Dårligdommerne, Klovn podcast, Hakkedrengene og Han duo 😁 👍
Podimo er blevet uundværlig! Til lange bilture, hverdagen, rengøringen og i det hele taget, når man trænger til lidt adspredelse.

Choose your subscription

Most popular

Limited Offer

Premium

20 hours of audiobooks

  • Podcasts only on Podimo

  • No ads in Podimo shows

  • Cancel anytime

1 month for 9 kr.
Then 99 kr. / month

Get Started

Premium Plus

Unlimited audiobooks

  • Podcasts only on Podimo

  • No ads in Podimo shows

  • Cancel anytime

Start 7 days free trial
Then 129 kr. / month

Start for free

Only on Podimo

Popular audiobooks

Get Started

1 month for 9 kr. Then 99 kr. / month. Cancel anytime.