Hillbilly Crime Investigates

Will The Real Senator Brandon Smith, Please Stand Up, Please Stand Up

1 h 18 min · 22 de may de 2026
Portada del episodio Will The Real Senator Brandon Smith, Please Stand Up, Please Stand Up

Descripción

In this episode of Hillbilly Crime, the host analyzes a Fiscal Year 2025 executive branch spending review released by the Kentucky Auditor of Public Accounts (6:02). Rather than just reporting the figures, the host investigates the lack of transparency, competitive bidding, and potential waste in state spending. Key takeaways from the audit review: * Advertising Expenditures: The report notes nearly $40 million in advertising costs, with concerns raised about the lack of competitive bidding for certain service contracts (12:04-13:34). * Travel Expenses: The host questions the necessity and public benefit of over $7 million in out-of-state travel (including high-end hotel stays) and over $23 million in in-state travel, conferences, and catering (17:42, 20:18). * Vague Spending: The host highlights an "Other expenses" category totaling $118 million that lacks sufficient detail or categorization, describing it as a "hiding place" for potential mismanagement (39:34-40:13). * DCBS Outsourcing: The Department for Community Based Services (DCBS) is scrutinized for spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on outside legal and evaluation services despite already having extensive internal staff (42:25-46:33). * Policy Critique: The host shares personal experiences regarding the treatment of Suboxone patients and questions the effectiveness and justification of mandatory counseling requirements within the Medicaid system (50:51-54:42). The host concludes by calling for viewers to provide any relevant public records, invoices, or documentation to help follow the "money trail" from Frankfurt to the mountains, emphasizing that the goal is not gossip but a demand for accountability and receipts (54:42-55:41).

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Hillbilly Crime Investigates!

Empezar

2 meses por 1 €

Después 4,99 € / mes · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts exclusivos
  • 20 horas de audiolibros / mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

50 episodios

Portada del episodio Mountain Money Train: Amler Millions

Mountain Money Train: Amler Millions

Tonight’s Hillbilly Crime episode digs into the Mountain Money Train — the flow of AMLER grant dollars across Eastern Kentucky and the long shadow they cast over our communities. We break down how these grants are awarded, who benefits, and why so many families feel left behind while the same hands keep catching the money. I walk through the history of AMLER funding, the promises made to coal counties, and the reality we’re living with today. We look at the projects that moved forward, the ones that stalled out, and the questions nobody in power seems eager to answer. If you’re trying to understand where the money went, who controlled it, and how these decisions shape our region’s future, this episode lays it out plain. Appalachian truth, Appalachian voice, Appalachian receipts.

28 de jun de 20261 h 31 min
Portada del episodio Chicken Little Court: The Sky Is Falling?

Chicken Little Court: The Sky Is Falling?

This video from Hillbilly Crime provides a critical examination of a recent change-of-venue hearing in the Mickey Stines case, where the former sheriff is charged with the murder of Judge Kevin Mullins. * Jamie Hatton's Testimony: The host analyzes the 10-minute testimony of Letcher County Attorney Jamie Hatton (14:36-24:53). While the testimony highlights community talk and the existence of "Team Mickey" vs. "Team Judge" factions, the host points out that Hatton admitted no one explicitly told him they could not be fair or ignore evidence (12:48-13:10). * The "Chicken Little" Argument: The host argues that the move to change the trial's venue is based more on "courthouse panic" and speculation than on proven legal necessity. She emphasizes that voir dire (jury selection) exists specifically to screen for bias, and suggests that anonymous community comments are not a reliable metric for jury pool integrity (30:04-32:45). * Controversy Surrounding Matt Butler: The video explores the behavior of Commonwealth Attorney Matt Butler, including allegations that he avoided being served with a subpoena regarding the venue motion and attempted to exclude the defense investigator from the courthouse (36:26-41:20). * Public Record vs. Panic: The host stresses that for such a high-profile case, the judicial system requires solid evidence for a venue change rather than just community rumor or the convenience of officials (54:21-55:05). * Small Town Dynamics: Much of the discussion highlights the influence of local political circles and the perception of the "good old boy" system within the Letcher County courthouse (43:12-46:19). * Conclusion: The host reiterates that while the case is undoubtedly significant and emotionally charged, the integrity of the judicial process depends on adhering to constitutional standards rather than responding to media or community pressure (1:09:09-1:10:09). Key AnalysisMain Takeaways

12 de jun de 20261 h 17 min