Draw Me Anything with Jason Chatfield

DMA#48: Drawing Sneaky Art in Times Square: AI Slop & the Radical Act of Paying Attention

12 min · 5 de may de 2026
Portada del episodio DMA#48: Drawing Sneaky Art in Times Square: AI Slop & the Radical Act of Paying Attention

Descripción

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.newyorkcartoons.com [https://www.newyorkcartoons.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_7] As always, if you want to watch the full replay, please upgrade to Paid. I really appreciate your support. If you want to test the absolute limits of your nervous system, try sitting in the middle of Times Square with a sketchbook, a pen, and an open microphone... It is a sensory assault. It does not smell like inspiration; it smells like roasted nuts, diesel exhaust, and the sweat of ten thousand tourists realising they’ve lost their Marriott room key. The noise is a physical weight. Sirens, pedicabs aggressively looping Alecia Keys, and people dressed as off-brand Spider-Man aggressively demanding five dollars for a photo. “Drawing in New York is combat journalism. You’re trying to capture lightning in a bottle while the bottle is being kicked down Broadway by a guy screaming at his phone.” But this is exactly why I do this. When I started New York Cartoons, the core promise to you, the reader, was that I wasn’t just going to send you polished, sterile drawings from the safety of an air-conditioned studio. The promise was to show you what living, surviving, and creating in New York City actually looks like. The chaos, the invisible labour, and the absurd encounters that fuel the work. So, for this week’s episode of Draw Me Anything, I took the studio to the street! My guest was the brilliant Nishant Jain, better known to his massive audience as The Sneaky Artist. Nishant came down from Canada to sit with me in the blistering epicentre of Manhattan. For an hour, amidst the absolute bedlam of Times Square, we drew the chaos in real-time. Before the stream started, a tall man holding a brown paper bag whipped towards us before locking eyes with me… it was, of course, my neighbour and pal Anthony LeDonne [https://substack.com/profile/1390125-anthony-ledonne]. Because of course it was. (You can see his SYML entry here. [https://www.newyorkcartoons.com/p/18-anthony-and-lauren-ledonne]) When I introduced him to Nishant, I’d mentioned we were nerding out about Derrida last time we spoke. When he asked who that was, I knew he’d be in for an education… Nishant gave him a primer on the arsehole French philosopher and his musings. I could see the hamster in Anthony’s brain begin to sweat, then die in a mad panic. Derrida: It’s one helluva conversation starter. What started as a live drawing session quickly spiralled into one of the most profound, quotable, and vital conversations I’ve had in years. We talked about everything from French philosophy and the existential threat of tech companies to the mindfulness of observation and the stark contrast between Canadian politeness and New York velocity. Here’s what happens when you put two process-junkies in the loudest intersection on Earth… Part I: Vancouver VS. New York There’s a distinct difference in the way a New Yorker observes the world versus the way a Canadian does, and watching Nishant work was a masterclass in pacing. Nishant possesses a terrifying level of calm. He didn’t fight the chaos. He observed it. “In Canada, the environment gives you the space to think,” Nishant told me, his eyes tracking a guy in a chaotic neon jacket. There is a physical and auditory room to breathe. The silence lets you construct the narrative. But in New York, the noise forces you to react. It’s an entirely different muscle. He’s right. Drawing in New York is combat journalism. You’re trying to capture lightning in a bottle while the bottle is being kicked down Broadway by a guy screaming at his phone. But despite the velocity of the city, Nishant’s process is startlingly deliberate. As we talked, he casually built what would become a beautifully complex drawing of the scene. He wasn’t rushing. He was practising what he calls the radical act of paying attention. “...your body and mind are absorbed in the union of an ask, which is to look to interpret and then to put it down, translate it. And in a lot of ways, you shut out a lot of concerns, you stop thinking about time, you stop thinking about your responsibilities of service, and you're just here for a while.” Part II: The Mindfulness of the Pen, and the Radical Act of Paying Attention We spend so much of our time talking about “mindfulness” as this sterile, corporate buzzword. (I’ve written about this before [https://www.newyorkcartoons.com/p/10-profound-insights-from-10-years]) Tech companies have commodified it. They sell us apps that ding to remind us to breathe, which we check on the same glowing rectangles that are actively destroying our attention spans. Nishant’s approach to drawing is the exact antidote to this. For him, drawing isn’t about producing a piece of “content” for an algorithm. It is a grounding mechanism. “Drawing isn’t about making a pretty picture,” Nishant said, his pen moving carefully across the paper. “It is about forcing yourself to sit still in a world that profits entirely off your distraction. When you draw something, you are forced to actually see it. You aren’t just looking at it. You are understanding its geometry, its weight, and its relationship to the things around it. You are acknowledging its existence in a way that taking a photograph never will.” That hit me like a freight train. In the digital mailstrom, we take thousands of photos we will never look at again. We consume the world in half-second swipes. But when you drag a pen across watercolour paper, you’re making a physical record of time spent. You are saying, I was here, and I paid attention. “The modern world wants us to skim,” he added. “Drawing is the refusal to skim.” If you’re a free reader, now is the time to upgrade. A subscription costs less than a bad bodega sandwich, and it directly funds the real, human, unapologetic art that the tech companies are actively trying to automate out of existence. Support the artists who are actually paying attention. Please upgrade to become a paid subscriber [http://www.newyorkcartoons.com/subscribe](only $1 per week) Part III: Derrida, Language, and the AI Plagiarism Machine Naturally, sitting in the glowing neon Mecca of American capitalism, the conversation pivoted to the tech overlords and the looming shadow of Generative AI. If you read my essays, you know my stance [https://www.newyorkcartoons.com/t/ai] on the “AI Slop Machine.” I view it as a cultural parasite. But Nishant brought a deeply intellectual, philosophical lens to the conversation that completely reframed the issue for me. He brought up Jacques Derrida. For those who skipped French Philosophy in college, Derrida was the father of “deconstruction.” He famously argued that language isn’t just a tool we use to describe reality; language creates the boundaries of our reality. We can only understand the world through the vocabulary we have to describe it. “Think about what AI actually is,” Nishant explained. “These tech companies aren’t building ‘intelligence.’ They are building predictive language models. They are machines that guess the next word, or the next pixel, based on a massive, stolen dataset of the past.” He paused to add a shadow to the drawing of an awning. “If Derrida is right -if language shapes our reality- then handing our visual and written language over to a machine is incredibly dangerous. An AI cannot create a new vocabulary. It can only recycle the old one. It homogenises human experience into an average. It regresses us to the mean.” This is the exact problem with AI art. It looks perfect at first glance, but it contains absolutely zero humanity. It has no point of view. It doesn’t know what it feels like to sit on a cold metal chair in Times Square while a siren blares in your left ear. “When a human draws a line,” Nishant said, “even if it’s a wobbly, imperfect line, it contains intention. It contains a decision. The AI slop has no intention. It is just statistical probability masquerading as art. And humans are biologically hardwired to eventually reject things that have no soul.” He added something that I really wanted to write down for a discussion later: “...the point of AI is not to make articles; the point of AI is to make an endlessly spinning mill of content to feed their social media algorithms to hypnotise and make you into addicts so that you become a passive consumer instead of a creative.” Part IV: The Finished Masterpiece By the end of the 50-minute conversation, my own drawings were a frantic, scratchy, high-energy reflection of the anxiety of Times Square. It looked like New York feels. But then Nishant held up his sketchbook. I actually stopped talking for a second. Look at that, I said on the stream. It was incredible. This guy had just casually, while dissecting French deconstructionism and the ethics of tech conglomerates, built the most insanely beautiful drawing of the intersection. It wasn’t just a rendering of buildings and tourists. It had life in it. You could see the deliberate choices he made -what to include, more importantly, what to leave out, what to emphasise. It was the absolute antithesis of an AI-generated image. It was a physical artefact of a human being paying deep, mindful attention to a chaotic world. Watch the Full Replay… Reading these quotes and clips is only half the experience. If you want to actually see the process -if you want to hear the sirens, see the pen hit the paper in real-time, and watch two working artists navigate the muck of New York City while talking about the survival of human art, you need to watch the replay. This is the promise of New York Cartoons. I don’t hide the process. I don’t put a filter on the reality of this job. The full, uncut, 50-minute video replay of our Times Square drawing session is available right now for paid subscribers.

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Draw Me Anything with Jason Chatfield!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

32 episodios

episode DMA#50: Aussies in New York Getting Sandwiches with Ben Gollan artwork

DMA#50: Aussies in New York Getting Sandwiches with Ben Gollan

My drawing board is currently covered in a mix of art supplies and aggressively pungent deli meats. I’ve got a puddle of Higgins ink dangerously close to a towering pastrami on rye, and my entire apartment smells of mustard. Outside my window, a sanitation truck is violently reversing down 9th Avenue. The floorboards are vibrating. On my monitor, looking entirely too relaxed for a man navigating the crazy New York City culinary scene, sits Ben Gollan, a fellow Aussie expat making a go of it in the big smoke. If you enjoy my work and would like to support, please upgrade to become a paid subscriber [http://www.newyorkcartoons.com/subscribe](only $1 per week) Ben’s the undisputed Sandwich Tour King of New York. He runs a wildly successful walking tour company called ‘A Man and His Sandwich’, where he guides people through the absolute best, most artery-clogging delis in the five boroughs. But the thing that always short-circuits my brain about Ben isn’t his encyclopaedic knowledge of cured meats. It’s his backstory. It’s always deeply comforting to talk to another expat. We spent a significant portion of the hour just being two Australians with thick accents, complaining loudly about the structural inefficiencies of New York City while simultaneously admitting we’d never live anywhere else. We got into the gritty reality of the New York hustle. If you’re an Aussie expat, you know the exact cultural whiplash we’re talking about. Back home, we have this insidious thing called the tall poppy syndrome. If you try something outside the box, people immediately try to cut you down. Ben mentioned that when he goes back to Australia and tells people he runs sandwich tours, they laugh and ask what his real job is. But here in New York? People look at him and say, “That’s a great idea, I bet you’re the best.” The city runs on that delusional, infectious encouragement. It’s the only place where a hungover, out-of-work chef from South Africa can stare at leftover Indian paratha bread and some banh mi scraps in his fridge, accidentally invent a pulled-pork paratha taco, and suddenly end up running three wildly lucrative storefronts. (That’s the true story of Goa Taco [https://www.thrillist.com/eat/new-york/gao-taco-nyc-paratha-tacos], by the way. A legendary Lower East Side staple born entirely out of desperation and a hangover). As I mentioned, Ben’s a fellow expat Australian. Back in Sydney, he was a crisply dressed corporate lawyer working for the government. He traded the courtroom for the chaotic, unforgiving streets of New York back in 2016, all to support his wife’s career. Somewhere along the line, a single pastrami sandwich at a now-defunct East Village deli completely derailed his professional trajectory. He ate the sandwich, had a culinary epiphany, and decided he was going to dedicate his life to the space between two pieces of bread. There’s something deeply terrifying about abandoning a stable, lucrative law career to yell about sandwiches on a Brooklyn sidewalk. But it’s the kind of unhinged creative pivot I completely admire... During our Draw Me Anything session, I set myself the absurd task of drawing a photorealistic pastrami sandwich while we talked. I quickly realised that drawing bread’s a nightmare. Bread’s just a chaotic sponge. You try to capture the crust with pilot pen, and it just looks like a diseased rock. Ben’s got this incredible, magnetic energy. You can see exactly why his tours are perpetually sold out. The live chat was losing its collective mind over his deli recommendations. You could feel the audience getting hungry through the screen… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.newyorkcartoons.com/subscribe [https://www.newyorkcartoons.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2]

Ayer1 h 2 min
episode DMA#53: Drinking Your Own Bath Water: A Morning with Rich Sparks artwork

DMA#53: Drinking Your Own Bath Water: A Morning with Rich Sparks

There’s a cartoon early in Rich Sparks’s new book of a man my age, alone in a bath, lifting a spoon to his lips. No setup, no crowd, no scene. Just the act, and a title underneath: “Youp.” Where I’m from, that’s a diagnosis. My uncle Greg taught it to me as a child: “Mate, get a load of this bloke. He drinks his own fucken bath water.” (Australian for arrogant.) First cousin to tall poppy syndrome, that great national project of never letting anyone tout their own success. I opened the book to that page first, and decided the next hour of my morning was spoken for. Which is roughly how the whole conversation went. A book with no thread, which is the whole point… The reason for the visit was Horseshoes and Tardigrades and Other Drawings [https://amzn.to/4vpA5DX], [https://www.amazon.com/Horseshoes-Tardigrades-other-drawings-Sparks/dp/1954158432] Rich’s new collection, put out by our mutual pal Marty over at The Weekly Humorist [https://humorist.shop/collections/books/products/apple-snider-2026-wall-calendar-by-rich-sparks-america-s-little-brother-returns-lazier-louder-more-lovable-than-ever]. A book of single-panel cartoons is one of the hardest things in the world to assemble, and I say that as someone who has tried. There’s no narrative. No theme. No throughline to hide behind. It’s just a brain, decanted onto a few hundred pages, arranged so a stranger will smile no matter where they crack it open. I got my copy in the mail the other day. I had mail to sort- urgent, adult, responsible-immigrant mail. Instead of opening my Jury Duty letter, I sat down with the book instead and didn’t move for an hour and a half. Morris watched me from the floor with the quiet judgment of a dog who knows the difference between work and joy and resents being excluded from the second. Rich works out of Chicago, has been at it for decades, and turns up pretty much anywhere a cartoon can legally be printed- the New Yorker, Air Mail, the lot. The story goes that he got his start redrawing a Ring bell for service sign on the scale in the produce department of a grocery store, then quietly updating it every week until customers started coming by to see what it said. That’s the whole career in miniature, really. Couldn’t not do it. “Getting a dog right doesn’t mean getting a dog funny.” This is the line I came away with, and I suspect it’ll rattle round my skull for months. (it’s around the 40:47 mark). We got talking about reference, because Rich draws his animals from photos. I thought he knew what a dog looked like. Then I spent months -months!— trying to work out the shape a dog makes when it leaps to catch a ball, only to discover that the real anatomy of a jumping dog is so deranged it looks like a printing error. He personally lands, as you do, somewhere between the truth and the lie. I quoted the late James Stevenson, the New Yorker cartoonist, who said that “Until you draw a picture of something, you are apt to be dead wrong about what it looks like.” And that’s the trade, isn’t it? You think you know your own father’s face until you try to put it on paper and realise you’ve been carrying around a rough sketch your whole life. But here’s the bathos (because there’s always bathos). Even after all that fastidious study of the real, Rich’s actual insight is that accuracy isn’t the job. You can chase the truth of a thing for weeks and still have to abandon it at the last second for the funnier pose. There’s a reality inside the panel, and it is not this one. I think about that with caricature. The likeness lives in the asymmetry- the bit of a face that’s slightly wrong is the bit that’s most them. Same with bodies. Rich said he sees the human form in three dimensions, rotating, and that when genuine symmetry turns up it’s so rare it’s almost shocking to look at. The rest of us are gloriously, correctly lopsided. The algorithm would like to convince you otherwise. The algorithm can drink its own bath water. Here’s the bit where I rattle the tin. These recaps take a while. The interview’s the fun part- the writing-up is me, alone, in the studio, doing the cartoonist’s equivalent of drawing the dog’s back leg forty times until it’s both true and funny. It’s a solitary job, as Rich said. If you’ve read this far, you’re my kind of reader, and I’d love you to consider upgrading to a paid subscription. It’s a dollar a week. That’s less than a single bad coffee in this city, and considerably less than a good one. It keeps the lights on, the cheap whiskey in the glass, and the bath water in the bath, where it belongs. The men in the cartoons are all his father. This was the moment the whole hour tilted. I’d been banging on about the glasses -Rich draws this specific flat-topped frame, the kind where you can’t see the eyes, and I’d built an entire theory about Scott McCloud [https://amzn.to/4fXab5Y], and how a reader projects themselves onto a face they can’t quite read. Then he said the men in the drawings are his dad. Or versions of his dad. The glasses, the little moustache, the high-waisted trousers, the bit more hair than a man that age has any right to keep. He’s been drawing his father, over and over, for a career. We didn’t dwell. Cartoonists never do. We pivoted immediately to the fact that he draws nearly everything with a Uniball Vision. Because the ink isn’t waterproof, I sometimes cheat a little wash out of it with a water brush- making it look like I hauled a full watercolour kit to the desk when really I just smudged a pen. The deep cuts, the dick jokes, and Vlad the Employer The book is stuffed with what I can only call cartooning deep cuts. There’s a Leonardo da Muncie, a Charlie Brown gag built on the first Peanuts strip ever published. There’s a podcast hosted by a dog that I would, hand on heart, subscribe to over most of the human-hosted ones currently clogging the feed. And then there’s Vlad. Rich has a Vlad the Impaler in the book, and seeing it sent me straight back to my own- a Vlad the Employer I drew years ago, the warlord interviewing a candidate, captioned “You start Monday!” I went to enormous, faintly insane lengths to get the costuming, jewellery and spear historically correct, because the New Yorker employs fact-checkers and I wasn’t about to be caught out on the haberdashery of a fifteenth-century warlord. The joke is stupid. I knew it was stupid. I drew it purely to please myself and threw it into the batch as filler, fully expecting it to make the good ones look better by comparison. It’s the one Bob Mankoff took one look at and said O.K. [https://jasonchatfield.medium.com/part-3-my-last-day-submitting-cartoons-to-bob-mankoff-c28f926ad701] -which, as anyone who’s submitted a batch knows, is never the one you bet on. You send your bangers and your sacrificial throwaway, and the machine reaches past all of it for the daft one you never meant anyone to see. We also fielded a chat question from Cartoons by Collins [https://open.substack.com/pub/dancollinscartoons] about how on earth Facebook hasn’t banned him, given the, ah, anatomical confidence of certain drawings. Rich’s answer was a masterclass in living with the unknowable: he genuinely doesn’t know whether it’s a buggy AI, a phantom moderation team, or simple cosmic luck, and he’s decided that thinking about it is the surest way to summon it. “I feel like I’m always on the verge of getting in trouble,” he said. I told him that’s a wonderful place to live. I should know. I’m subletting there too. Chickening out at Disneyland The detail I can’t shake: Rich has been to the Billy Ireland Cartoon Library at Ohio State (the site of this year’s Reuben awards [https://nationalcartoonists.com/registration-now-open-80th-reuben-awards-ncs-conference/]). It’s the largest cartoon collection on Earth, the actual Disneyland for people like us, originals sitting in flat files like it’s nothing. And while he was there, he spotted the curator Caitlin McGurk behind a door. A social media friend. Someone who’d have been thrilled to meet him. And he got starstruck and couldn’t bring himself to say hello. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.newyorkcartoons.com/subscribe [https://www.newyorkcartoons.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2]

18 de jun de 202652 min
episode DMA#53: "Don't Call It a Recap" with Austin Kleon artwork

DMA#53: "Don't Call It a Recap" with Austin Kleon

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.newyorkcartoons.com [https://www.newyorkcartoons.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_7] Over Austin Kleon [https://substack.com/profile/800132-austin-kleon]’s shoulder, the whole time we talked, Lynda Barry watched us. Not the actual Lynda Barry; an original manuscript page from Cruddy, hanging on his studio wall next to an outtake from Making Comics. He calls them his Guardian Spirits, and the plan is to keep adding to them until he’s got a full pantheon of demigods looming over his desk. I understand the impulse completely. I’ve got a drawing of Larry David in my studio that Luke Watson painted for me, and he glares at me every day with an expression that says, “Is that really the version you’re gonna go with? Aeeeeh, it’s prettaaay pretty good.” This was Austin’s second time on Draw Me Anything, [http://www.drawmeanything.com] http://www.drawmeanything.comand I’d be lying if I said we covered the book in an orderly fashion. We started with 63 people in the chat and ended with 350, which means roughly 287 people wandered in midstream to find two middle-aged cartoonists arguing about whether Hook is secretly a midlife-crisis film. It is. More on this later. It gets worse. (Bangarang!) Don’t Call It a Book Tour The new book is called https://amzn.to/4oHiPYZDon’t Call It Art [https://amzn.to/4oHiPYZ], [https://amzn.to/4oHiPYZ]and Austin, a man committed to the bit, named the promotional run for it the Don’t Call It a Book Tour. Previous books got 25-city tours. This one got three cities: Austin, Nashville and Cleveland, which he described as “kind of like a straight shot to Cleveland type tour.” If you enjoy my work and would like to support, please upgrade to become a paid subscriber [http://www.newyorkcartoons.com/subscribe](only $1 per week) He slept in five beds in six days. “This is a young person’s game,” he said, and every comedian who’s ever done the road nodded so hard the vertebrae in their necks audibly clicked. The week after a launch, he told me, all the things that keep you alive as a creative person, the sleep, the walks, the daily ritual, go straight out the window. The man who wrote the book on sustainable creative practice blew himself out promoting a book about sustainable creative practice. “I wish the books worked on me better,” he said, which might be the most honest thing anyone has ever said on this series. Nobody Knows Anything, Confidently We got into the publishing industry, which Austin summarised via William Golding’s old line that nobody knows anything: true of Hollywood, true of books. Nobody in publishing knows what sells books, he said, “but they’ll say something confidently to you about it.” Everyone’s chasing BookTok, which is lightning in a bottle, on purpose, which is not how lightning or bottles work. The only thing that actually sells a book, he said, quoting Ann Patchett, is one person holding it up and saying I love this. Word of mouth. That’s it. That’s the whole machine. And then he reached for Charles Portis, because of course he did. There’s a line in Gringos about two men who “had known the despair of selling things that people didn’t want,” and Austin pointed out that this is the entire creative life. Nobody is asking for another book. Nobody asked for another cartoon. Nobody wanted a live-action Moana. You make the thing anyway, and then you present it, over and over, like Marshawn Lynch running through a man’s chest. Austin apparently plays the Beast Mode clip [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1XKjzq1_aM] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1XKjzq1_aMto himself on a loop when the self-promotion shame creeps in. If you run through somebody’s face, over and over and over and over and over …. eventually they can’t take it any more. This is also, coincidentally, my approach to open mics. The shame is real, though. You think: my audience must be so sick of hearing about this thing. Meanwhile, an actual paid subscriber to Austin’s newsletter walked up to him in Nashville and said If I’d known you were in town, I’d have brought all my friends. The man works across the street from the hotel. He pays money to be told these things. He did not know. So no. Nobody is sick of hearing about your thing. They have not heard about your thing. The Taco Bell Theory of Art My favourite framework of the day came from, and I want to be clear that I am quoting a bestselling author here, Taco Bell. [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/04/24/taco-bells-innovation-kitchen-the-front-line-in-the-stunt-food-wars]Austin loves their “distinctiveness rule”: you can change the taste, or you can change the form, but never both at once. That’s how he thinks about his readers. Keep the familiar square format, but fill this book with his kids’ drawings and new textures, so it reads like an Austin Kleon book that was somehow drawn by his children. (This “RED” rule [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/04/24/taco-bells-innovation-kitchen-the-front-line-in-the-stunt-food-wars] stands for relevance, ease, and distinctiveness.) He’s unapologetic about thinking of his audience while he works, which felt almost transgressive to hear out loud. “My readers have given me everything,” he said. “This idea that I wouldn’t think about them when I was writing is just weird to me.” His books, he insists, aren’t pure art anyway; they’re the byproducts of him trying to make stuff. The Montel Jordan principle: this is how we do it. Not how you have to do it. This is how we do it. Neither of us went to art school, which is probably why we both find kids so instructive. They don’t know the correct way to do anything, so they just let it rip. Why the Book Exists at All The title comes from a John Baldessari quote: I learned so much about art from watching a kid draw. Kids don’t call it art. They’re not making Art; they’re just doing stuff. There’s a Brian Eno line in the book to match: people do much better when they don’t think they’re being artists. If you don’t call it art, you’re likely to get a better result. Austin described the book as being for anyone who’s lost that lovin’ feeling: you’ve been doing the work a long time, maybe even successfully, and the joy has quietly left the building. Where Keep Going [https://austinkleon.com/keepgoing/] https://austinkleon.com/keepgoing/was about pushing through a world gone mad, this one is Keep Going 2.0: the call is coming from inside the house. The chaos isn’t out there. It’s in here, with the deadlines and the invoices and the creeping suspicion that your passion has become your landlord. I know this feeling intimately. Twenty-one years as a full-time cartoonist, and people still say “you’re so lucky, you get to do what you love every day,” and I want to grab them by the lapels and explain that they have no idea how hard it is to stay in love with a thing that is actively driving you insane. It’s not drudgery exactly. It’s more like the fruit has started to turn, and instead of leaping out of bed to bite the apple you’re standing in the kitchen at 7am wondering if you can make some sort of bread out of it. Charlie Bucket’s Midlife Crisis Which brings me to my Willy Wonka theory, which I made Austin sit through and now you will too. End of the film. Great Glass Elevator. Wonka looks down at Charlie and says, “Don’t forget what happened to the man who suddenly got everything he ever wanted.” Charlie asks what. And Wonka says he lived happily ever after, but what he should say is:

12 de jun de 20267 min
episode DMA #52: The Patron Saint of NYC Comedy Photos, with Mindy Tucker artwork

DMA #52: The Patron Saint of NYC Comedy Photos, with Mindy Tucker

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.newyorkcartoons.com [https://www.newyorkcartoons.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_7] When I first moved to New York 12 years ago, I did what every terrified transplant does: I asked other comedians for advice… This was a mistake, because comedians are a bag of cats and no two of them agree on anything. One told me to do every open mic in the city. One told me to do none of them. One told me, with great seriousness, to “find my inner hobgoblin,” which is the kind of thing people say when they have no actual information to give you and would like you to leave them alone please. But there was one piece of advice that came back every single time, from every single person, like a liturgical response… “Go get yourself a Mindy [http://withreservation.com].” Stop using Facebook photos for your headshot, you absolute disgrace, and go get a real one done by Mindy Tucker. So I did. That’s how we met. I schlepped to her studio in Brooklyn, helped her haul lighting gear around Williamsburg in search of a wall that wasn’t a condo yet, sweated through a shirt, and carried the gear back up the stairs again. We did things this way because we couldn’t afford a studio, and back then you could still shoot outside before the entire borough turned into guarded glass. That was twelve years ago. This week, Mindy came on Draw Me Anything, and I finally got to tell a few thousand people what the New York comedy scene has known for two decades: she’s the best there is. Draw Me Anything is a livestream & podcast about artists, comedians, writers, and the people who make things. This newsletter costs less than an IPA in this neighbourhood, which, in my experience, is money well spent either way. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber to keep it going… Here’s the thing about Mindy that took me years to understand. She doesn’t just take a good photo. She gets something out of you that nobody else can. Comedians are a nightmare to photograph. We’re always on. We’re cracking wise, busting balls, performing, running a bit, because the bit is a shield and the camera is a threat. Point a lens at a comic and watch them deploy their entire personality as a defence mechanism. Mindy disarms all of it. Her trick, which is not really a trick, is time. She found that comedians needed more time, and that if you gave people time they seemed to calm down and stop being nervous. She gives you a job. She has you help her move a light. And somewhere in the puttering and the “oh wait, stay right there,” the armour comes off, and she catches the actual person underneath. When I told her this, she explained where it comes from, and it’s the best origin story: Her dad was a chaplain. Not a desk chaplain, a sports chaplain. He’d pray with the team before the game, sit through the game, and if a player got hurt, he’d be the one riding in the ambulance, relaying what was happening back to the church. And Mindy looked at me and said, with total clarity: “Basically what I’ve done is I’ve taken what my dad has always done, and I’ve added photos.” It was recently Jim Gaffigan, of all people, who first pointed this out to her. Four years into shooting comedy, he told her: “Your dad’s a preacher*, that’s why you get along with performers, you lived with a performer.” He just read her whole life back to her like a palm. She didn’t fully clock it herself until later. The wax-on-wax-on moment; this realisation that she’d been training for the thing her whole life without knowing it.(*Other famous preachers-turned-comedians include the incredible Sam Kinnison and one-time NYC Regular Justin Smith) A million of us. In a box. Now to the actual reason she came on… Mindy’s launched something called Mindy’s Comedy Archives, and you need to understand the scale of it before you understand why it matters: She has, at last count, over one million photographs. A million. And that number was current as of the day she taped her second and third episodes, so it’s already wrong, and wrong in the upward direction, because she keeps adding to it… I went on a bit of a tear about this on the show, so forgive me, but: there is no real history of New York comedy. There are scattered special reviews, the odd opinion piece in the Times, a Chortle write-up here and there. But there is no cohesive, visual, living document of this absurdly specific art form in this absurdly specific city. Except there is. It’s in Mindy’s hard drives. Last week I had Myq Kaplan on, [http://drawmeanything.com] and we talked about the brutal churn of a comedy career: the bright-eyed arrival, the agent, the manager, the late-night spot, the sitcom, the rollercoaster with no terminus. Myq’s point was that once you realise that’s the career, the constant insane flux, that’s the whole thing. What Mindy has is that flux, frozen, frame by frame. One comedian over an entire career, from their very first nervous headshot all the way through shows and festivals and late-night spots, and you watch them change. Their posture, their costume, their face. They age. They evolve. Nobody else has documented this the way Mindy has. She did it by accident, one shoot at a time, for twenty years. The formatis beautifully simple. A comic comes in and gets handed a box of photos. It starts with the very first photo Mindy ever took of them, and they go in chronological order, telling her as much or as little as they want about what was going on in their career and in the New York comedy scene at the time. The first episode, out this week, is with Rosebud Baker, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hsvctVZKfg&t=40s] and Mindy calls it the blueprint. Rosebud starts in a 2014 group photo, a gaggle of comedians, and by the end they’ve done a Netflix special cover and land on her book cover. “That’s why we live here.” The first episode didn’t go perfectly. The blog post wasn’t up on time. The workflow wasn’t sorted. And Mindy’s attitude toward all of it was the thing I keep turning over. She told Rosebud, essentially: it’s not perfect, can you help me get started?

2 de jun de 20264 min
episode DMA#51: 'Truths Are Just Jokes That Nobody Laughed At' with Myq Kaplan artwork

DMA#51: 'Truths Are Just Jokes That Nobody Laughed At' with Myq Kaplan

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.newyorkcartoons.com [https://www.newyorkcartoons.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_7] Let me tell you who Myq Kaplan [https://substack.com/profile/5512319-myq-kaplan] is, because if you’re not already a fan, that changes today. He’s been doing comedy for going on twenty-five years. He has a Comedy Central special. He was a finalist on [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmzGcO-UGSk]Last Comic Standing [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmzGcO-UGSk]. He’s been on Comedy Bang Bang and Keith and the Girl more times than I can count. He has two specials on YouTube - AKA and Rini [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0uf9i_z-Aw&t=932s] - and a new one he’s just recorded. He runs a Substack called Myq Kaplan's Arty Har-Hars [https://open.substack.com/pub/myqkaplan], which you should subscribe to immediately after this. He is one of the most densely packed laughs-per-minute comedians working anywhere in this city, and I say that as someone who has been watching this scene very closely for fifteen years. He is also the reason I once shot IPA out of my nose at a comedy show on Second Avenue. But we’ll get to that. The first thing you need to know about Myq Kaplan is that his name is, by design, a barrier to entry. “I brought it upon myself, obviously, the spelling of my name,” he told me, almost immediately after we started recording. “There’s a little bit of a barrier to entry. But once you get past, then I feel like there’s a lot of reward.” He then, in the same breath, held up a microphone. “That’s a Myq” he said. I say “by design” because everything about Myq’s comedy is by design - the spelling of his name, the precision of his phrasing, the way a simple prop becomes the punchline to a joke that is also, if you look at it properly, a philosophical position about the rewards of paying attention. Nothing is accidental. The commitment to craft runs so deep that it’s become invisible, which is when craft becomes art. The name story is one I’ve been dining out on since 2014. I was a young, fledgling comedian appearing on a certain popular podcast [https://www.jasonchatfield.com/blog/tag/ykwd], and I was doing my plugs at the end of the show. Bob Kelly was hosting. I was reading names off the lineup for an upcoming show - I think it was the Producers Club - and I arrived at Myq’s name, and I said: “and Meek Kaplan.” The room turned on me. Louis J. Gomez. Dan Soder. Joe List. All of them looking at me with the particular expression that New York comics reserve for someone who has just revealed a catastrophic gap in their knowledge. “You f*****g Australians,” somebody said. “How have you never heard of Myq Kaplan?” They laid into me for twenty minutes. About my accent. About my ignorance. About the basic expectation that someone doing comedy in New York should know who Myq Kaplan is, which is, I’ll grant them, a fair point. And then, having absorbed all of this - having been fully educated and corrected and aware - I subsequently introduced Myq on stage that night as “Meek Kaplan.” Again. Myq received this with extraordinary grace. “Your trauma is my treasure,” he said. But the real first time I encountered Myq Kaplan was not that night. It was earlier - 2011, or thereabouts. I was still coming to New York as a tourist then, once a year, for a month at a time, in the way that people who are going to end up living somewhere do before they commit to actually living there. I was going to as many comedy shows as I could, trying to understand the scene, sheepishly introducing myself to people and then overthinking every conversation afterwards on the subway home. The show was called Kabin. It was on Second Avenue, the back room of a bar. Rebecca Trent booked it. It was, by the general consensus of everyone who was there at the time, the best comic hang in the city. Their fifth anniversary show, I think it was, went from six in the afternoon until five in the morning. 11 hours. I was in that room for most of it. I had a beer in my hand. Sean Donnelly was hosting, or someone like Sean Donnelly. Whoever it was said, with the full weight of insider authority: you are going to love this next guy. I took a sip. Myq Kaplan walked on stage and said something. I genuinely do not know what it was. I have never known. What I know is that the beer - an IPA, specifically, which made the whole thing considerably worse - travelled at velocity through my nasal cavity and exited my face in a direction that beer is not supposed to exit. My eyes were streaming from the carbonation. I was making sounds that grown adults should not make in public. Eight minutes later, Myq left the stage, and I was a different person. It is a trauma-memory. The kind that’s vivid, not because it was bad, but because it was so involuntary. The laugh didn’t ask my permission. “That’s very, very kind, very thoughtful for you to share,” Myq said when I told him this story on the podcast. “Better than a spit take. Your trauma is my treasure.” If you enjoy my work and would like to support, please upgrade to become a paid subscriber [http://www.newyorkcartoons.com/subscribe](only $1 per week)

31 de may de 202618 min