Podcast 11.25. The becoming subject of the brain, part 4.

Podcast 11.25. The becoming subject of the brain, part 4.

The brain as becoming subject. The brain is not static, it evolves over time. Its centers must be located in time, not space. A very Bergsonian concept. Here we will explore Hugh Jackson and Constantin von Monaco as interpreted by Gilles Deleuze, and learn that the brain becomes, mutates, and this occurs as event through time and memory. Companion notes here: https://www.deleuzemodeste.com/copie-de-vers-un-neurologie-crystaline-1 [https://www.deleuzemodeste.com/copie-de-vers-un-neurologie-crystaline-1]

Podcast 11.25. The becoming subject of the brain, part 3.

Looking at the first perspective of the brain - specifically neurons biology. But we are staying with Deleueze's reasoning, and therefore this podcast will fix some errors from the last one and try to do a definitive analysis of the brain in the classical image of thought.

Podcast 10.25. The becoming subject of the brain, part 2.

Here we are following at St. Denis, a sceance from 1984 and one of the last regarding cinema and the brai .

Podcast 09.25. The becoming subject of the brain.

We are still victims of a very poor and outdated image of thought. What is the brain? Where is memory stored? Where is my soul located? Or my spirit? Where do my emotions come from? We continue to adhere to classical and long outdated images of thought. So we will look into the becoming subject of the brain and hopefully deterritorialize much of what we take for granted.

Podcast 08.25. Introduction: Smooth Walls & Dark Matter. Capture in the age of ultra-liberalism.

In any case, let's return to our main objective: how to capture, dissect, remove, and add intensive components in order to create new areas of discernment and becoming. Revitalize a concept, give it new life. In a way, the concept of “Black Hole - White Wall” is relative to the era of Milles Plateau's publication, perhaps to a time when the factory, let alone the corporation, represented a primary means of control over the socius, extracting the desire for profit while maintaining sufficient rigidity to guarantee a high level of control. Once a subject identifies and assumes a binary identity, it sinks into the black hole of subjectivity, ensuring that its uncoded flows will always have a limit and that the machinery of capitalism can thus continue to turn safely. This concept was our fish, which we attempted to open up, understand its living components, analyze them, see what is still vital and which components could be refreshed, what new futures this refreshed concept could have. Only a Sicilian fisherman could perhaps understand the perverse joy of attempting such an operation. It is certain that Deleuze often operated in the same way, but, as he mentioned, the philosophy of his time was saturated with the history of philosophy, so that, from a certain point of view, the bastardization of past philosophers constituted a “line of flight” toward something new.