Music Row Dealmakers

Judicial Hot Take: Sedlik v. Kat Von D - Is the 9th Circuit’s Two-Part Infringement Analysis Fatally Flawed

44 min · 27 feb 2026
aflevering Judicial Hot Take: Sedlik v. Kat Von D - Is the 9th Circuit’s Two-Part Infringement Analysis Fatally Flawed artwork

Beschrijving

Send us Fan Mail [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2500070/fan_mail/new] Dealmakers Barry Neil Shrum, Esq. and Dennis Glenn Disney Esq. discuss the 9th Circuit's recent opinion in the Sedlik v. Kat Von D case involving Jeffery Sedlik's famous "Shh" photograph of Miles Davis, which Kat Von D tatooed on the arm of her friend.  In the 9th's opinion, there were two concurring opinions which bemoaned the application of the "intrinsic" component of the 9th Circuit's two party analysis, arguing that the objective standard should be abolished.   Support the show [https://www.buzzsprout.com/2500070/support]

Reacties

0

Wees de eerste die een reactie plaatst

Meld je nu aan en word lid van de Music Row Dealmakers community!

Probeer gratis

Probeer 14 dagen gratis

€ 9,99 / maand na proefperiode. · Elk moment opzegbaar.

  • Podcasts die je alleen op Podimo hoort
  • 20 uur luisterboeken / maand
  • Gratis podcasts

Alle afleveringen

21 afleveringen