In Plain Sight: The Problem of Evil (Part 2)

In Plain Sight: The Problem of Evil (Part 2)

In In Plain Sight – The Problem of Evil (Part 2), the discussion moves beyond abstract philosophy into the biblical reality beneath humanity’s deepest wounds. This episode argues that the Christian worldview uniquely identifies evil as a real intrusion into a good creation—rooted in rebellion, pride, and distortion—and is the only worldview that both names evil honestly and accounts for its origin, meaning, and ultimate defeat. Rather than denying suffering or dismissing moral outrage, Christianity explains why evil feels wrong, why dignity still matters in the midst of pain, and why hope is rational even in darkness.

In Plain Sight: The Problem of Evil (Part 1)

Over the next two episodes of Stand Firm in Dark Waters, we tackle the problem of evil. In Part One of “In Plain Sight: The Problem of Evil,” we face the question that won’t stay theoretical: if God is good, all‑powerful, and all‑knowing, why does evil exist—and why does it so often feel like it’s winning? We start with philosophical clarity by defining evil, distinguishing moral evil (human cruelty) from natural evil (disease and disaster), and separating the logical, evidential, and deeply personal arguments. Then, we enter the skeptical case through Mackie’s inconsistent triad, Hume’s dilemma, and modern arguments about gratuitous suffering—pain that appears pointless and undeserved. Along the way, we expose a hidden assumption behind many objections: If God has morally sufficient reasons, we should be able to see them. Part One lays the philosophical groundwork for the problem of evil, whereas Part Two shifts from philosophy to Scripture to trace evil’s origin and God’s answer.

Is Faith Irrational? Or Is Reason Incomplete?

In this episode, “Is Faith Irrational? Or Is Reason Incomplete?”, we examine the false divide between faith and reason. Drawing from Scripture, philosophy, and history, Apologist Ric Osuna explains why Christian faith is not a blind leap, why reason is never truly neutral, and how faith restores and completes human understanding. From biblical teaching to Enlightenment skepticism, from modern relativism to contemporary legal and cultural debates, this episode invites listeners to step out of the shadows and see reality clearly in the light of Christ. If you’re wrestling with doubt, navigating cultural pressure, or seeking confidence that Christianity can stand up to serious scrutiny, Stand Firm in Dark Waters is designed to help you think more deeply, live more faithfully, and remain anchored in turbulent times.

The Moral Law and the Case for God

What if the greatest danger we face today isn’t political division—but moral erosion? In this episode of Stand Firm in Dark Waters, we examine the case for objective moral truth in an age shaped by relativism. Drawing from C.S. Lewis’ concept of the Moral Law, we explore why our shared sense of right and wrong is not something we invent, but something we recognize—even when we fail to live up to it. From cultural shifts and philosophical skepticism to insights from thinkers like Immanuel Kant, this episode asks whether moral awareness is best explained by chance and social convention—or by a moral Lawgiver. This is the first episode in a series examining why many thoughtful people believe God is not merely a comforting idea, but the most reasonable explanation for the reality we live in.

The Resurrection of Jesus: History, Legend, or Reality?

Welcome to Stand Firm in Dark Waters: Faith Amid the Storm. In this Easter launch episode, Ric Osuna—Apologist, Author, and Coach—begins where Christianity either stands or falls: the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. This episode addresses truth, doubt, and spiritual warfare with clarity and conviction, examining the Resurrection not as a comforting idea, but as a claim about public history. We walk through three areas: (1) what Christians confess, (2) what skeptics argue, and (3) what conclusions are best supported by historical evidence. You’ll meet “Marcus,” a thoughtful modern skeptic who respects Jesus as a moral teacher but struggles with exclusivity and miracles. With Marcus, we consider major objections: “dead men don’t rise,” the legend hypothesis, hallucination claims, and challenges to Gospel reliability. Then we evaluate key historical foundations you highlight in the script: Jesus’ crucifixion (widely attested), the burial tradition, the empty tomb question, the role of women as first witnesses (criterion of embarrassment), early creedal material, and the rapid conversion of skeptics like Paul and James. Finally, we ask: Are miracles rejected because the evidence is weak—or because some rule them out in advance? If the Resurrection is dismissed solely because it is supernatural, the debate shifts from history to philosophy. This episode invites believers to stand firm, and it warmly welcomes those who are unsure about God, wrestling with doubt, or seeking faith in Christ to listen, reflect, and pursue truth with integrity.