Infrared vs. Gas vs. Electric Broilers — The Hierarchy, the Blind Spot, and Who Actually Wins

Infrared vs. Gas vs. Electric Broilers — The Hierarchy, the Blind Spot, and Who Actually Wins

Anthony Fors and Jon Beresford run the broiler conversation all the way through — infrared vs. gas vs. electric — and the point isn't just which one wins. It's that most salespeople aren't having the conversation at all. Anthony's household is a broiler household. Fish, meat, vegetables, browning, finishing — the bake element barely gets touched. And his frustration is that in most luxury range sales conversations, the broiler gets a passing mention at best. Customers spend 45 minutes on burner configuration and the broiler gets "it has X passes" and the conversation moves on. That's a real missed opportunity, especially in the luxury cooking space where the broiler type can meaningfully change the cooking experience. The episode starts with the anti-broiling problem: most customers are either indifferent to the broiler or have been burned by it — usually literally, usually by an electric broiler that underdelivered. Jon compares it to picking up a sport for the first time with the worst possible equipment. You don't hate the sport. You hate that equipment. Electric broilers have created a layer of low expectations that gas and infrared now have to sell against before the real conversation can even start. Gas is a significant jump from electric — even the old tube-in-the-drawer versions were meaningfully better. Infrared is a different category entirely. Not a step up from gas — a genuine break from what broiling feels like. The qualifying question is whether infrared is like the high-BTU burner conversation (specific to how someone cooks) or whether it's an across-the-board upgrade that changes the experience regardless of cooking style. Jon and Anthony work through where that line sits — and then declare a winner. New episodes every day. Rate and subscribe wherever you listen.

Speed Queen on the Record: TC5 vs. TR7, the Warranty Weapon, Front Load's Problem, and Why It Isn't Just an American-Made Story

Anthony Fors and Jon Beresford sit down with Speed Queen's Randy Radtke for a conversation that's been months in the making — and it doesn't disappoint. They start where they always start with Speed Queen: TC5 vs. TR7. Anthony says what he always says — he goes to his grave saying the TR7 is the better-constructed machine. But with Randy in the room he adds something he says he'll probably only say once: the people who love the TC5 are not wrong. They're buying a value system, not a spec. You're not going to engineer your way out of that conversation with a better argument. The skill is reading the customer in the first 60 seconds. The one who makes a statement when they walk in has already decided. Sell them the TC5 and do it with conviction. From there, Jon makes the case that the 7-year in-home labor warranty is a weapon — and most independent dealers aren't using it. His approach: don't explain it. Ask the customer what they have now, ask what happened when they used it, and let them sit with the distance between that and what Speed Queen is offering. A customer who's been burned isn't looking to be convinced. They're looking for a reason to believe in something different. Anthony then gets into Speed Queen's front load problem — the brand has built such a dominant top load identity that their own front load machines have to fight the brand's reputation every time a salesperson tries to surface the conversation. He calls it 50% Speed Queen's brand identity problem and 50% floor perception. The opportunity is sitting there for the dealer willing to slow down and qualify the customer past the brand name. The back half of the conversation covers Pet Plus and what its origin story reveals about how Speed Queen makes decisions, why the independent channel is genuinely the only environment where the Speed Queen story can be told correctly, the Power Index data showing Speed Queen owning top load with two simultaneously running stories in the top five, and why Ripon isn't an American-made talking point — it's a manufacturing control argument that makes the warranty and the cycle test actually possible. New episodes every day. Rate and subscribe wherever you listen.

The Lone Wolf Salesperson — Knowledge Hoarding, Hidden Costs, and Why the Floor Sighs With Relief When They're Gone

Last week's Saturday deep dive covered the salesperson who stops learning. This week Jon Beresford and Anthony Force tackle the companion problem — and in some ways the trickier one to address: the lone wolf. The lone wolf isn't someone who's checked out or slowed down. They're often your top performer by the numbers. They've been on the floor long enough to build real relationships, real credibility, and what everyone assumes is a very real book of business. And somewhere along the way they've made a calculation — consciously or not — that they work better alone. Jon walks through how this starts, what it actually looks like day to day, and why the costs to the business are almost always invisible until they compound into something that can't be ignored. The knowledge hoarding piece is specific: it's not just product knowledge being held back. It's everything — approaches, relationships, strategies, the way certain customer types get handled, the shortcuts that took years to develop. None of it gets shared. None of it transfers to the floor. It just lives with one person, and it walks out the door if that person ever does. Anthony brings an analogy from his first career as a high school band director that maps almost perfectly: two jazz bands, both with a generationally great lead trumpet player. Both times, when the star wasn't there, the trumpet section sounded better. The other players had been unconsciously pulling back — playing softer, deferring — in a way that the section didn't even realize until the lead was gone. The concert where the lead was absent was the best the section had ever sounded. The episode closes on two questions that matter for any dealer sitting on this problem. How often is the lone wolf actually changeable — and when is it time to stop having the conversation and just act? And how overstated is the "book of business" threat? Anthony's take: in appliances, significantly overstated. Trade professional loyalty doesn't survive the end of a project, and every future project is up for grabs no matter who holds the relationship. The best time to make the change was fifteen years ago. The second best is today. New episodes every day. Rate and subscribe wherever you listen. Referenced this episode: → The Salesperson Who Stops Learning — https://www.podbean.com/eas/pb-mb4gr-1b02ac9

Retail Council: TC5 vs. TR7, the DCS Stagnancy Problem, and Why Your Floor's Job Is to Inspire — Not Just Display

Shannon O'Hara and Jon Beresford are back with the latest from the Steel Cod Retail Council — anonymous responses from the owners, managers, and top salespeople on the retail side who you'd actually want to hear from if you could. Three questions this week, and all three have something worth sitting with. The TC5 vs. TR7 conversation came back pro-TC5 from the council, and Anthony is clear on why that happens — there's a very specific kind of conviction behind the classic agitation story and he genuinely respects it. But his camp is the TR7, and the reason he keeps landing there isn't about preference or aesthetics. The TR7 service call frequency is running significantly lower than the TC5 series. Once you have that data in your hands, the debate stops being emotional and becomes an engineering argument. He walks through who the TC5 is genuinely right for — it's a real answer for a real customer — and how to use the service data to have the honest conversation with a customer who has already sold themselves on the TC5 but maybe shouldn't be there. The word "stagnant" came up more than any other word when the council described DCS, and Anthony wants to spend a minute on it because it's probably the most important word in the whole episode. Stagnant doesn't mean bad product. It means the floor ran out of a reason to talk about you. The energy shifts, the enthusiasm shifts, and eventually the recommendation follows — toward the brands that keep giving something new to say. Alfresco winning the question isn't the headline. The reason is the headline. And there's a lesson in there for every outdoor brand with floor presence right now, including some that probably feel comfortable enough that they shouldn't have to worry. And then the pizza oven result — most of the council isn't displaying, selling, or seriously thinking about outdoor pizza ovens. Anthony uses that answer to say something he's clearly been wanting to say for a while. A floor's job is not to display what sells. It's to inspire. The products doing the most important work in a showroom are often the ones that never move the most volume. They're the products that open a door in a customer's mind — that make them start imagining a version of their outdoor space or their kitchen or their home that they'd never allowed themselves to fully picture before. And when that happens, the ceiling on what they're willing to invest becomes a completely different number. The dealer who builds that floor isn't just selling appliances. They're building something their competitors cannot replicate, no matter how similar their product selection looks. New episodes every day. Rate and subscribe wherever you listen. 🔗 Referenced this episode: → Julie Burns / Monogram episode: https://www.podbean.com/eas/pb-nsimf-1af9d49

Pellet Grill vs. Gas Grill — Why They're Not Competitors and How to Know Which One You Actually Need

The pellet grill vs. gas grill debate has been framed as a war. Jon Beresford says it never was one — and the industry's insistence on treating it like one has been creating customer confusion and ownership mismatch for over a decade. His position is simple: for the vast majority of households, gas is the primary outdoor cooking platform and pellet is secondary. Not because pellet grills are bad — some of them are genuinely phenomenal — but because the two things serve fundamentally different cooking behaviors that shouldn't be competing for the same job. Jon explains why pellet grills took off in the first place: they solved an emotional problem. Offset smoking had always required fire management, wood management, temperature babysitting, and a steep learning curve. Pellet grills lowered the intimidation barrier so far that anyone could smoke a brisket without becoming a pit master first. The internet celebrated that, long-form smoking content performed incredibly well, and the hype snowballed. But the internet's version of outdoor cooking and the reality of how most people actually use a grill aren't the same thing. The aspirational trap is real and common. People see the advertising, convince themselves they'll smoke everything, and buy in. Then Tuesday night comes and dinner needs to be on the table in ten minutes — and nobody is starting a pellet grill. That's the moment gas separates itself. Anthony speaks to this from product training days: he had to bribe salespeople not to smirk during pellet hamburger demonstrations while everyone waited 27 minutes and counting for the grill to come to temperature. The actual comparison that makes sense, Jon says, is a cast iron pan vs. a gas burner. Nobody argues that one replaces the other — they solve different cooking experiences entirely. Gas and pellet should be thought about the same way. Gas for speed, flexibility, high heat, and quick recovery. Pellet for low and slow, smoke, and long-form cooking. The salesperson who separates those lanes clearly — and helps the right customer see that they could have both — is doing better work than the one still pretending these two platforms belong in the same conversation. New episodes every day. Rate and subscribe wherever you listen.