
Discussions On Psychoanalysis
Podkast av Grégoire Pierre & Edgard Danielsen
Every month we try to offer a good enough, candid and open discussion on different aspects of psychoanalysis. We invite our audience to share with us ...
Prøv gratis i 60 dager
Etter prøveperioden kun 99,00 kr / Måned.Avslutt når som helst.
Alle episoder
55 Episoder
Dear Listeners, In this episode, your hosts continue their discussion based on the article "The Intolerance of Diversity in Psychoanalytic Institutes" by Kenneth Eisold. Let us know what you think, and follow us on BlueSky (discussionsonpsya.bsky.social). Thank you for listening [03:04] Tension around networking [06:02] Analysis and whealth [08:23] "You need to go back to analysis" [13:47] What is the analysis for? [18:12] Training Analysis [20:43] Tensions in the cross identifications [24:30] Submission to bad treatments [27:23] Ending

Dear Listeners, In this episode your hosts based their discussion on a 1994 article written by Kenneth Eisold, "The Intolerance of Diversity in Psychoanalytic Institutes". Happy New Year! [02:56] Little things the paper does not address. [06:47] Survival & History. [08:54] Tension between belonging to a group of analysts and being available to the diversity of our patients. [14:22] Institutes & Loneliness. [17:23] Different trainings, similar outcomes. [20:22] Theory & Loss

Dear Listeners, In this episode, your hosts discuss different ways to choose a psychoanalytic institute and a supervisor. [0:25] Intro [3:44] How we chose our institute [9:08] Institutes & Academia [13:16] What is the point of a psychoanalytic institute? [17:31] The infamous 800 level at NPAP [18:17] Why do we need a place to train? [24:15] A personal analysis is not enough [27:22] Why would eclectic be better? [30:18] The pros of a specialized institute [36:42] Choosing a supervisor or many [46:29] Important but hard to know aspects of an institute [51:00] Limited amount of staff members [52:08] Ability to integrate the conflicts in the present and the past [56:51] Ending

Dear Listeners, In this episode, your hosts are discussing how analysts choose their analysants. [2:52] To choose or not your analyst? [8:55] What is an "interesting patient"? [11:43] Beyond an embellished story? [19:21] No family therapist [22:44] Recognizing our own limitations [27:30] Ending

Dear Listeners, In this episode, your hosts have a discussion on how to choose an analyst: where, when, how, etc. [00:27] Intro [03:50] Conflict of interest [04:17] Choosing an analyst inside or outside an Institute? [07:00] Seeing the analyst at a party [16:50] Incestuous dynamics [17:26] What about people who are not in training? [27:11] MDs, SWs, Analysts? [31:37] Ending
Tilgjengelig overalt
Lytt til Podimo på telefonen, nettbrettet, datamaskinen eller i bilen!
Et univers av underholdning på lyd
Tusenvis av lydbøker og eksklusive podkaster
Ingen annonser
Ikke kast bort tid på å lytte til annonser når du lytter til Podimos innhold.
Prøv gratis i 60 dager
Etter prøveperioden kun 99,00 kr / Måned.Avslutt når som helst.
Eksklusive podkaster
Uten reklame
Gratis podkaster
Lydbøker
20 timer i måneden