Agentic AI, AI & Writing, and a 4Cs Resolution
In this episode of the Unofficial Office Hours podcast, host Justin Hodgson [https://www.linkedin.com/in/justinhodgson/], joined by co-host Miranda Rodak [https://www.linkedin.com/in/mirandarodak/], welcomes Anna Mills [https://www.linkedin.com/in/anna-mills-oer/]—community college writing instructor, AI faculty developer, author, and co-editor of the upcoming Bad Ideas About AI and Writing—for a thoughtful and wide-ranging conversation about AI, writing, and the future of higher education.
The episode begins with a critical examination of agentic AI systems capable of completing coursework on behalf of students, raising urgent questions about autonomy, authorship, and what remains of learning when academic workflows can be fully automated. Drawing on her public advocacy and open letter to major AI companies, Anna reflects on the ethical responsibilities of developers and institutions, and the disproportionate risks these technologies pose for already vulnerable student populations .
The conversation then turns to the 4Cs resolution on the right to refuse AI, exploring what meaningful choice looks like in environments where AI tools are increasingly embedded by default, and why refusal can function as a generative and political act rather than simple resistance .
In the final segment, the discussion briefly explores the upcoming collection Bad Ideas About AI and Writing (WAC Clearinghouse [https://wacclearinghouse.org/]), examining common misconceptions—particularly the idea that AI is neutral—and why that framework / model felt like the right fit for this conversation
A nuanced and deeply informed conversation about AI, pedagogy, equity, and the future of writing and learning in higher education.
See Anna's work at annamills.substack.com [https://annamills.substack.com/] and/or at annarmills.com [https://www.annarmills.com/]