Andy Myers: Why PRO™ Matters for Federal Tech Transfer Professionals

Stephen Crutchfield: Inside FLC's T2 Mechanisms Chatbot for Federal Tech Transfer

Federal technology transfer can be difficult to navigate, especially for someone approaching a government laboratory for the first time. From CRADAs and licensing agreements to material transfer agreements, each option serves a different purpose. Simply figuring out where to begin can become a hurdle before a conversation ever takes place. Stephen Crutchfield helped develop the Federal Laboratory Consortium’s T2 Mechanisms chatbot, a tool designed to make that first step easier. Users describe what they hope to accomplish with the government and what resources they need. The chatbot then points them toward a mechanism that may fit their situation while offering a straightforward explanation of how it works. In this episode, Stephen shares how the team turned dozens of federal authorities into a much simpler decision tree. We talk about the work involved in refining the chatbot and why it is meant to guide users rather than replace a technology transfer professional. He also explains how a clearer starting point could make federal laboratory partnerships feel more accessible to companies and researchers. In This Episode: [02:32] Stephen explains how the T2 Mechanisms chatbot helps people outside the federal government find a possible starting point. [04:08] The team reviewed federal laws and agency authorities before narrowing them into simpler concepts. [06:45] An extensive spreadsheet evolved into a decision tree built around what non-federal partners hope to accomplish. [08:25] Each result includes a recommended mechanism with an explanation and references to the authority behind it. [09:02] The tool introduces users to their options while leaving the final recommendation to technology transfer professionals. [11:12] Testing the decision tree required repeated adjustments when certain answers produced the wrong result. [11:40] Feedback from the technology transfer community could help shape future versions of the chatbot. [12:33] The generated recommendation also teaches users about the basics of each mechanism. [13:08] A reminder to explore the chatbot with different inputs and see how its recommendations change. Resources:  Federal Labs Consortium [https://federallabs.org/] Federal Labs Consortium - Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/federallabs] Stephen Crutchfield - LinkedIn [https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephen-crutchfield-0651bb31/] T2 Mechanisms Chatbot [https://federallabs.org/learning-center/t2-toolkit/t2-mechanisms] Stephen Crutchfield: Commercializing Navy Research Through Strategic Matchmaking [https://federallabs.org/flc-highlights/podcast/season-2,-episode-9]

David McFeeters-Krone: Finding the Right Partner for Your Toughest Technical Problem

Some technical problems are too specific, too complex, or too far outside a company’s normal day-to-day work to solve alone. A manufacturer might have a product that works at the bench level, but not at scale. A process might be close, but the yield is inconsistent. A team might know what it needs to make, but not who has the equipment, expertise, or research capabilities to help them get there. In this episode, we talk with David McFeeters-Krone about how the Center for Advanced Technology Solutions, or CATS, helps companies work through those kinds of challenges. Through the Manufacturing Extension Partnership, his team helps small and medium-sized manufacturers define the real problem, find the right technical resources, and build connections with federal labs, universities, Manufacturing USA Institutes, vendors, and other partners who may already have part of the answer. David also shares why these partnerships matter beyond one company or one technical fix. When a business can get past a production hurdle, improve consistency, shorten a supply chain, or avoid a costly dead end, that progress can support U.S. manufacturing, strengthen competitiveness, and help federal lab technologies create real-world impact. His work is a reminder that successful tech transfer often comes down to connecting the right people, problems, and capabilities at the right time. In This Episode: [02:10] David McFeeters-Krone shares how he entered tech transfer through MIT’s Technology Licensing Office after studying physics and unexpectedly landing a role among a team largely connected to MIT. [03:29] His career expanded into NASA-supported technology commercialization work, where he helped move federal technologies into the marketplace and connected companies with opportunities to collaborate. [04:14] The early tech transfer landscape was still developing after Bayh-Dole, with universities and federal labs working through many of the licensing practices and questions that still shape the field today. [05:21] Current work through NIST’s Manufacturing Extension Partnership focuses on helping small manufacturers improve operations, solve production issues, and strengthen their ability to compete. [06:24] CATS, the Center for Advanced Technology Solutions, supports companies facing technology-related production problems by connecting them with partners who can provide expertise, facilities, capabilities, or research support. [07:31] Licensees, CRADA partners, vendors, and other lab-connected companies are strong candidates for support because they are often trying to scale new technologies or solve unfamiliar manufacturing challenges. [09:10] Many companies struggle because their internal teams are already focused on research, payroll, insurance, customers, and daily operations, while CATS can focus directly on finding the right technical solution. [09:47] Materials, composites, metals, 3D printing, machining, aerospace, biomedical, and agricultural technologies all come up in this work, but the real strength is knowing how to investigate the problem and find the right expert. [10:50] More established companies are often easier to help quickly because they already know their market and have more business structure in place, but early-stage companies can also benefit from technical matchmaking. [12:10] Strong partnerships can help smaller companies build credibility, find the right words to explain their needs, and show that they can work responsibly within a broader commercial ecosystem. [13:32] A soy-wax manufacturer needed help improving formulation consistency while staying within biological requirements, leading to a CRADA with USDA researchers to explore better options. [14:33] A composite air taxi company avoided costly dead ends by connecting with Oak Ridge-related resources that could evaluate manufacturing options and identify a more practical path forward. [15:51] Shortening supply chains is becoming a major priority, especially when companies can bring production closer to home or help existing suppliers build the capability to make what is needed. [17:10] Domestic manufacturing, defense procurement needs, and support for small manufacturers are all creating more urgency around investment, technical connections, and better use of existing U.S. capabilities. [18:14] Federal labs and their partners can move faster by working with organizations like MEP, CATS, Apex Accelerators, and Small Business Development Centers that are already eager to help companies succeed. [19:51] Listeners can learn more about MEP through NIST, follow CATS on LinkedIn, or contact David directly through Intellectual Assets for help finding technical resources and partnership opportunities. Resources:  Federal Labs Consortium [https://federallabs.org/] Federal Labs Consortium - Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/federallabs] David McFeeters-Krone - LinkedIn [https://www.linkedin.com/in/dmkdmk/] David McFeeters-Krone - Intellectual Assets [https://www.intelassets.com/team] Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) [https://www.nist.gov/mep] Center for Advanced Technology Solutions by MEP (CATS) [https://www.intelassets.com/cats] T2 Stars: David McFeeters-Krone Earns His Title as a T2 Connector [https://federallabs.org/communications/federal-lab-news/david-mcfeeters-krone-earns-his-title-as-a-t2-connector]

Deana Jones: Advancing Agricultural Innovation Through Technology Transfer

Agricultural research depends on strong partnerships, practical solutions, and technology transfer strategies that connect federal science with the producers and industries it serves. Dr. Deana Jones brings that perspective to her work as Director of the USDA Agricultural Research Service’s U.S. National Poultry Research Center, where she leads a broad portfolio spanning poultry food safety, product quality, feed safety, avian viral diseases, and related agricultural research. In this episode we discuss how technology transfer shows up in agricultural research, where collaboration often depends on trust, long-term relationships, and well-structured agreements. She shares how her team works with industry, universities, and other partners to move promising ideas forward while protecting the research, the collaborators, and the path to real-world use. We also talk about building technology transfer into the culture of a research center from the beginning, not as an afterthought. From encouraging scientists to involve OTT early to highlighting a newly approved in-shell peanut moisture meter, she offers a candid look at leadership, partnership, and the work it takes to turn federal research into practical agricultural solutions. In This Episode: [03:04] Dr. Deana Jones shares how growing up around agriculture, poultry farming, and 4-H shaped her path into science [04:02] Leading the U.S. National Poultry Research Center and championing research that delivers practical solutions [06:18] The center’s broad research portfolio, from poultry food safety and feed safety to avian viral diseases [07:42] How technology transfer works in agricultural research through agreements, partnerships, and real-world testing [09:07] The surprising scope of poultry science and the many disciplines involved in supporting the industry [12:21] Why trust, respect, and long-term relationships are essential when working with producers and industry partners [15:46] Becoming the person stakeholders think of when they have a problem, even when the answer is outside your own lab [17:13] Building a culture where scientists think about technology transfer early, not after the research is complete [19:32] Bringing OTT into research planning, equipment decisions, and partnership timelines from the beginning [21:48] A newly approved in-shell peanut moisture meter that gives farmers faster results and supports better grading decisions [25:37] Moving the peanut moisture technology from early field testing to licensing, collaboration, and USDA approval [29:58] What FLC’s Laboratory Director of the Year recognition means to Deana and the team behind the work [31:44] Emerging opportunities in poultry research, including artificial intelligence, diagnostics, and avian disease mitigation [34:07] How federal labs can shorten the path from discovery to practical solutions through stronger partnerships [35:29] Advice for early-career technology transfer professionals on showing up, learning the science, and building trust [38:42] Why agricultural innovation depends on broad, collaborative teams that look at the whole problem [40:11] Making the most of long-term agricultural research projects by gathering as much useful information as possible [42:07] Closing thoughts on Deana’s work, the FLC Learning Center, and resources for listeners Resources:  Federal Labs Consortium [https://federallabs.org/] Federal Labs Consortium - Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/federallabs] Dr. Deana Jones: Advancing Feed Safety [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apD4Cuhi3So] USDA Agricultural Research Service [https://www.ars.usda.gov/] Dr. Deana Jones - LinkedIn [https://www.linkedin.com/in/deana-jones-a9a51074/]

Launching Innovation for Impact: A New Forum for National Security Tech Transfer

Technology transfer is already challenging, but it gets even more complicated when national security is involved. Federal labs are trying to move important research and capabilities out into the world, while also protecting sensitive information, managing risk, and making sure the wrong details do not end up in the wrong hands. That is the thinking behind Innovation for Impact: A National Security Technology Transfer Forum, a new FLC event taking place December 1 through 3, 2026, in Leesburg, Virginia. I am joined by FLC Vice Chair David Lee and FLC Promote Committee Chair Annie Bullock Yoder to talk about why this forum was created, who it is meant to serve, and what attendees can expect from the federal-only training tracks and Industry Engagement Day. This conversation looks at the larger moment facing the federal innovation community right now. There is a real need for speed, collaboration, and practical training, but there is also a need to protect the research, resources, and partnerships that matter most. David and Annie share how this new forum is being shaped around those realities and why bringing the right people into the same room could make a meaningful difference. In This Episode: [02:43] Annie Bullock Yoder explains how the idea for Innovation for Impact grew out of the FLC’s post-COVID shift away from regional in-person training events. [03:28] National security has become a critical focus for federal technology transfer, especially as labs balance accelerating innovation with protecting sensitive resources and data. [04:35] David Lee describes the forum as a way to bring together practical in-person training and stronger engagement with industry partners. [05:26] The event is designed to give tech transfer professionals and supporting attorneys focused training, then connect that critical mass of federal lab expertise with industry. [06:57] The event will take place December 1 through 3 at the National Conference Center in Leesburg, Virginia. [07:27] The first two days will focus on federal-only legal and tech transfer training tracks, while the third day will serve as an Industry Engagement Day. [08:12] Potential partners include academia, defense contractors, companies interested in entering the defense space, and state or local agencies working in homeland security. [09:19] Possible training topics include handling classified material in CRADAs, working with security offices on DD 254s, and managing university partnerships with foreign collaborators. [10:52] Success will be measured partly through feedback, but also through the longer-term relationships, agreements, and technology outcomes that may follow the event. [12:09] Strong attendance would be an early sign of success and would show whether there is real demand for this kind of focused FLC-led event. [13:16] Survey responses and return attendance would help the FLC understand whether the training and partnering opportunities provided meaningful value. [14:19] If the model works, similar forums could eventually be adapted for other federal lab focus areas such as biotech, pharma, energy, environment, infrastructure, or agriculture. [15:30] Practical reasons to attend include training, knowledge-sharing, networking, and the chance to make industry partners more familiar with federal lab capabilities. [16:51] The planning timeline includes the June 15 topic submission deadline and the goal of opening registration before the end of August. Resources:  Federal Labs Consortium [https://federallabs.org/] Federal Labs Consortium - Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/federallabs] Innovation for Impact: A National Security Technology Transfer Forum [https://federallabs.org/events/a-national-security-technology-transfer-forum] FLC Vice Chair David Lee [https://federallabs.org/about/who-we-are/executive-board] FLC Promote Committee Chair Annie Bullock Yoder [https://federallabs.org/learning-center/pro/committee-members]

Angela Lewis: What It Takes to Lead a High-Impact Federal Lab

Federal laboratories play a critical role in moving ideas from research into real-world use, but that work depends on more than technical expertise. It takes leadership, strong partnerships, and a clear understanding of how innovation supports the mission. At Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane Division, that mission is centered on delivering capability to the warfighter, and technology transfer has become an important part of how that work gets done. Dr. Angela Lewis, Technical Director at NSWC Crane and the 2025 FLC Lab Director of the Year, brings more than three decades of experience across operations, strategy, and leadership. She has helped shape how one of the Navy’s most mission-critical labs approaches innovation, builds external partnerships, and connects research with outcomes that support national security. She was also featured in last year’s Lab Directors Forum at the FLC National Meeting, where she shared perspective on leading in complex environments and using technology transfer as a strategic tool. This conversation follows Dr. Lewis’ career journey, including how her understanding of technology transfer evolved and why culture matters so much when building a strong innovation ecosystem. She also shares practical lessons for other federal labs, from engaging leadership to creating the structures, incentives, and partnerships that help technology transfer move from good ideas to measurable mission impact. In This Episode: [02:16] Dr. Angela Lewis shares how she first came to Crane as a high school intern, knowing very little about the organization but recognizing it as a place that offered strong career opportunities in her community. [03:10] Her career path at Crane has included continuing education, leadership development, and opportunities to grow while staying connected to the daily mission of supporting warfighters. [06:09] Technology transfer helps Crane build the right team for each phase of a project, from academic research to small business prototyping to large defense partners capable of fielding solutions at scale. [07:07] Dr. Lewis explains that her view of technology transfer changed while serving as chief of staff and hearing Crane’s T2 director explain the range of mechanisms available for working with outside partners. [09:14] Because Crane operates much like a zero-profit business, the organization has to deliver on cost, quality, and schedule in order to maintain demand from program offices. [12:01] Dr. Lewis frames technology transfer as part of being a good steward of taxpayer-funded intellectual property and making sure federally developed ideas have a path to broader impact. [15:17] Crane’s innovation ecosystem includes research and education partnerships across 39 states, 60 universities, and more than 168 industry partners. [16:03] Dr. Lewis says technology transfer could not remain the responsibility of one office if Crane wanted it to become part of the organization’s DNA. [18:50] Building a true innovation ecosystem requires more than a list of contacts; Dr. Lewis describes it as an active process of seeking out the right partners and maintaining meaningful engagement. [20:10] Crane deepens outside relationships through efforts like the Distinguished Lecture Series, temporary faculty programs, and collaborative joint research projects. [21:03] The Indiana Research Consortium shows how shared vision and active collaboration can make a multi-party CRADA work at scale. [22:37] The consortium’s turning point came in 2024, when Purdue University, Indiana University, and Notre Dame signed a Memorandum of Understanding to create a formal structure around shared defense technology priorities. [24:53] By its third event in 2024, Silent Swarm had grown from 17 participating technologies to more than 50, creating a larger venue for industry, academia, and government labs to collaborate. [26:34] Silent Swarm brings together realistic environments, platforms, data collection, government subject matter experts, and operators who can evaluate technologies in a warfighting context. [27:35] Dr. Lewis says metrics matter, but the real measure of technology transfer success is whether partnerships are aligned with the Navy’s most pressing mission needs. [29:26] Strong technology transfer culture depends on leadership behavior, especially making T2 visible, measured, and clearly tied to the organization’s priorities. [30:05] During annual strategic alignment discussions, Crane’s leadership team reviews technology transfer and partnership activities alongside budgets, workload, and project planning. [32:09] For technology transfer professionals, Dr. Lewis’ practical advice is to use the Federal Laboratory Consortium network and learn from peers rather than trying to build programs alone. Resources:  The Transfer Files - Federal Labs Consortium [https://federallabs.org/flc-highlights/podcast/the-tech-transfer-files] FLC Learning Center [https://federallabs.org/learning-center/flc-learning-center] Dr. Angela Lewis - Federal Labs Consortium [https://federallabs.org/flc-highlights/awards/angela-lewis] Dr. Angela Lewis - Naval Sea Systems Command [https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Media/Biographies/Article/2261193/dr-angela-d-lewis-ses/] NSWC Crane Announces Its First Female Technical Director [https://federallabs.org/flc-highlights/federal-lab-news/nswc-crane-announces-its-first-female-technical-director] Dr. Angela Lewis - LinkedIn [https://www.linkedin.com/in/angela-lewis-8b2bbb13/]