Willem Hoyng's UPC Unfiltered (AI) Podcast
This week, our AI hosts break down Prof. Willem Hoyng’s expert commentary on a broad set of new Unified Patent Court decisions, with a strong focus on evidence production, confidentiality, preliminary injunction practice, cost recovery, and the practical consequences of UPC case management. In this episode, we cover: ⚖️ Evidence Production & Inspection Measures: Recent decisions address R. 190 RoP requests, seizure and inspection orders, and the balance between useful evidence-gathering and proportionality during ongoing litigation. 🔐 Confidentiality & Access to Documents: Several cases examine confidentiality regimes, access to pleadings and evidence, attorneys’-eyes-only arrangements, and how confidential material should be handled both during and after proceedings. ⏱️ PI Practice, Urgency & Burden of Proof: The week highlights the burden on PI applicants to prove infringement, the consequences of weak evidentiary support, and the Court’s approach to withdrawal and court-fee reimbursement after a likely unsuccessful PI application. 🛠️ Case Management, Deadlines & Appeals: The decisions also cover hearing-date discipline, extensions, expert-hearing requests, FRAND case management, and procedural questions around review and appeal routes. 📖 Read the full written analysis here: https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/detail/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-20-2026 [https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/detail/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-20-2026] 🔍 Explore the case law and Unfiltered Commentary on our UPC Intelligence Platform: https://upcintelligence.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/ [https://upcintelligence.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/] Disclaimer: This post and the podcast are AI-generated. The commentary reflects Prof. Willem Hoyng’s personal views.
70 Folgen
Kommentare
0Sei die erste Person, die kommentiert
Melde dich jetzt an und werde Teil der Willem Hoyng's UPC Unfiltered (AI) Podcast-Community!