The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 3) (6/27/26)

Bill Gates Denies He Has Ever Been To Little Saint James

Bill Gates’ representatives denied claims circulating online that he repeatedly visited Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, Little St. James. A spokesperson for Gates said the allegation was false and stated that Gates had never been to the island. The denial came after social media posts alleged Gates had traveled there dozens of times, tying him to one of the most notorious locations associated with Epstein’s sex-trafficking allegations. Gates’ team did acknowledge that Gates had met with Epstein in the past, but said those meetings were connected to philanthropy and global health discussions, not visits to Epstein’s island. The claims about repeated island trips were also challenged by available flight-log reviews, which did not show evidence that Gates traveled to Little St. James dozens of times. Gates’ connection to Epstein remained controversial because the meetings happened after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, but the specific claim denied was that Gates repeatedly visited Epstein’s island. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bill Gates didn't visit sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein's island repeatedly [https://nypost.com/2020/05/15/bill-gates-didnt-visit-sex-criminal-jeffrey-epsteins-island-repeatedly/]

Virginia Roberts Blasts Alan Dershowitz Claims Of Exoneration

Virginia Giuffre rejected Alan Dershowitz’s claim that he had been fully exonerated after their defamation fight ended in a settlement. Dershowitz had publicly celebrated the resolution, pointing to Giuffre’s statement that she “may have made a mistake” in identifying him as one of the men Jeffrey Epstein trafficked her to. He treated that language as proof that he had been cleared. Giuffre, however, made clear that the settlement did not mean a court had vindicated him, did not mean a jury had found in his favor, and did not give him the right to declare himself officially exonerated. Giuffre’s position was that ending the lawsuit was not the same thing as proving Dershowitz’s version of events. The litigation had dragged on for years, both sides had accused the other of lying, and the settlement closed the case without a trial or a legal finding on the underlying allegation. Dershowitz has always denied Giuffre’s claims, but Giuffre pushed back against his attempt to turn the settlement into a public-relations victory. Her message was simple: the case may be over, but Dershowitz does not get to rewrite that ending as total exoneration just because he says so. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.thedailybeast.com/epstein-victim-virginia-giuffre-says-alan-dershowitz-is-not-exonerated-no-matter-what-he-says [https://www.thedailybeast.com/epstein-victim-virginia-giuffre-says-alan-dershowitz-is-not-exonerated-no-matter-what-he-says]

The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 3) (6/27/26)

The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy. One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf [https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf]

The Revenge Of The Nonce: Andrew And The Alleged Plot For Revenge Against The Monarchy (6/27/26)

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is reportedly furious with King Charles and blames his older brother for his collapse inside the royal family, according to claims attributed to unnamed sources and repeated by Sky News Australia. The claims portray Andrew as “hellbent on revenge,” angry over being pushed out of royal life, removed from Royal Lodge, and increasingly isolated from the institution he once represented. The central allegation is that Andrew believes Charles is deliberately trying to erase him and the York branch of the family, including Sarah Ferguson, Princess Beatrice, and Princess Eugenie. The piece frames Andrew as a growing headache for the monarchy because, in this telling, he refuses to accept responsibility for the scandals that destroyed his public role and instead sees himself as the victim of palace politics. It also claims Andrew wants more financial support from Charles and may be willing to make trouble if he feels his family is being cut off or humiliated further. The broader point is that Andrew, already disgraced by his Epstein ties and stripped of most public royal standing, is now being depicted as someone with little left to lose — which makes him a dangerous internal problem for a royal family trying to contain the damage and move on. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 'Nothing much left to lose': Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor 'hellbent on revenge' as he blames one key royal for his downfall | Sky News Australia [https://www.skynews.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity-life/nothing-much-left-to-lose-andrew-mountbattenwindsor-hellbent-on-revenge-as-he-blames-one-key-royal-for-his-downfall/news-story/a9aed496a5e26019da3ec717e9631cfb]

Judge Orders DOJ to Hand Over More Unredacted Epstein Files (6/27/26)

A federal judge has ordered the Department of Justice to turn over unredacted versions of some Jeffrey Epstein-related files or explain why the redactions should remain in place. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan sided with independent journalist Katie Phang and the Public Integrity Project, finding that the DOJ likely violated the Epstein Files Transparency Act by withholding or heavily redacting certain materials. The DOJ has until July 2, 2026, to produce less-redacted documents, including sender and recipient information from emails, names of alleged co-conspirators in a draft indictment, and underlying FBI interview notes tied to an allegation against Donald Trump, which Trump has denied and which ABC notes was uncorroborated. Sullivan also ordered the DOJ to publish a log explaining all redactions. The ruling adds another layer of pressure on the DOJ, which has already faced criticism from lawmakers and transparency advocates over how it handled the release of Epstein files after Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act. According to ABC, the department has released thousands of pages but has also been accused of unnecessary redactions, missed deadlines, and withholding millions more pages that officials claim are duplicates, explicit material, or outside the law’s scope. The Public Integrity Project framed the ruling as a major transparency win, arguing that the government ignored the law to protect the rich and powerful, while the DOJ has continued to insist it complied with the statute. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Judge orders DOJ to turn over some unredacted Epstein files - ABC News [https://abcnews.com/Politics/judge-orders-doj-turn-unredacted-epstein-files/story?id=134228532]