Should We Have Empathy for Everyone? | Arguing With the Internet #8

Should We Have Empathy for Everyone? | Arguing With the Internet #8

Should we strive to empathize with everyone, including those who represent the worst of humanity? On this episode of Arguing with the Internet, neuroscientist Louis Martin and philosopher Matthew Willis tackle this topic, addressing questions such as: do we need to feel the emotions of others in order to be moral? Can too much empathy lead us astray in our moral decision making? If we empathize with abusers and despots, does that impair our ability to empathize with their victims? Contact us at arguingwiththeinternet@gmail.com View podcast on YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCstyOWbTQLzXF2v-IW1WFzA]

Are We Living in a Simulation? | Arguing With the Internet #7

Could the world we know actually be a computer program? In this episode, neuroscientist Louis Martin and philosopher Matthew Willis discuss arguments for and against simulation theory. Topics considered include: How likely is it that our universe is simulated? Regardless of whether or not we’re simulated, should we care? Do abnormal experiences provide evidence for the simulation hypothesis? Contact us at arguingwiththeinternet@gmail.com View podcast on YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCstyOWbTQLzXF2v-IW1WFzA]

Should We Abolish the Death Penalty? | Arguing With the Internet #6

Does the state have moral authority to execute its citizens? On this episode, neuroscientist Louis Martin and philosopher Matthew Willis discuss the death penalty, considering questions such as: is life in prison worse than death? How much should we consider victim’s wishes during sentencing? Can the death penalty be applied equitably? Contact us at arguingwiththeinternet@gmail.com [arguingwiththeinternet@gmail.com] View podcast on YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCstyOWbTQLzXF2v-IW1WFzA]

Do We Have Free Will? | Arguing With the Internet #5

Whenever we make a choice, does it make sense to say we could have chosen differently? On this episode, neuroscientist Louis Martin and philosopher Matthew Willis discuss the elusive concept of free will. Topics considered include: Should we listen to our intuitions about free will? Do neuroscience or psychology elucidate this issue? Should our beliefs about free will influence our thinking about punishment and rehabilitation for criminals? Contact us at arguingwiththeinternet@gmail.com [arguingwiththeinternet@gmail.com] View podcast on YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCstyOWbTQLzXF2v-IW1WFzA]

Is It OK to Have Kids? | Arguing With the Internet #4

Having kids is a perfectly normal thing to do, but is it ethical? On this episode, neuroscientist Louis Martin and philosopher Matthew Willis discuss arguments for and against having children. Questions include: Do one’s life circumstances influence the morality of procreating? Should we care that children cannot consent to being born? Should steep declines in birth rates for rich counties influence our decisions about this issue? Contact us at arguingwiththeinternet@gmail.com [arguingwiththeinternet@gmail.com] View podcast on YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCstyOWbTQLzXF2v-IW1WFzA]