LIVE: US Senate - PLAUSIBLE MECHANISMS OF COVID-19 INJECTIONS CAUSING CANCER AND ATTACKS ON SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS AND RESEARCH

The passing of an icon. The fight continues.

The Broken Truth Legal Podcast, part of the Freedom Counsel series on BrokenTruth.TV, returned this week with its first episode since the passing of co-host and Freedom Counsel founder Warner Mendenhall. In a poignant opening, host John Davidson paid tribute to his dear friend and colleague, noting that Warner passed away after a courageous battle with colon cancer. Davidson emphasized that “the show must go on and the fight continues,” echoing Warner’s own words and spirit. A more elaborate online memorial is planned. The episode features Arizona attorney Ryan Heath of The Gavel Project [https://www.thegavelproject.com/] and California attorney Jeremy Friedman, discussing a landmark student free speech case currently headed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The conversation underscores the ongoing mission Warner championed: defending constitutional rights, exposing government overreach, and connecting attorneys in the fight for medical freedom and due process. Warner Mendenhall: A Life Devoted to Accountability and Freedom Warner Mendenhall was a tireless advocate for ordinary citizens against government abuses, corporate fraud, and the erosion of constitutional liberties. A politically active Ohioan, he served two terms on the Akron City Council in the early 1990s, where frustration with the city law department’s responses to constituent concerns prompted him to attend law school. He earned his J.D. from the University of Akron (after a B.A. from the same institution and an M.A. from Kent State University) and was licensed to practice in the late 1990s. His early legal victories included exposing block grant fraud and successfully defending charter amendments in Akron—cases that solidified his calling as a mission-driven attorney. Warner founded the Mendenhall Law Group [https://warnermendenhall.com/] (with offices in Akron, Ohio, and Boston, Massachusetts), building a practice focused on holding governments and corporations accountable. His areas of expertise included the False Claims Act (qui tam/whistleblower litigation involving Medicare, Medicaid, defense contracting, and federal grant fraud), municipal law, eminent domain and property law, personal injury, bankruptcy, criminal defense, and small business matters. He was admitted to practice before the Ohio Supreme Court, multiple federal district and circuit courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court.Warner’s work gained national prominence during the COVID-19 era. He represented whistleblowers challenging mandates and hospital protocols, often pro bono. Notably, he served as counsel for Brook Jackson in her high-profile lawsuit against Pfizer, alleging irregularities in the company’s COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. He also litigated multiple cases against Ohio public universities over COVID shot mandates and other matters involving medical freedom and informed consent. In 2023, following the COVID Litigation Conference in Atlanta (sponsored by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation and his own firm), Warner founded Freedom Counsel [https://freedomcounsel.org/]. The organization serves as a vital network connecting hundreds of attorneys, medical professionals, scientists, and citizens dedicated to fighting mandates, shutdowns, medical interference, dangerous hospital protocols, vaccine-related issues, data manipulation, and broader attacks on personal rights and liberties. Its mission aligns closely with Warner’s lifelong passion: educating the public, elevating important cases, and empowering individuals denied due process and constitutional protections. Warner co-hosted the Broken Truth / Freedom Counsel Podcast, where he brought his sharp legal insight, cowboy-like willingness to “throw punches” for justice (as John Davidson fondly recalled), and deep commitment to the rule of law. Tributes following his passing—from U.S. Senator Ron Johnson, Brook Jackson, and many others—highlighted him as a fearless champion for medical freedom, the vaccine-injured, and constitutional principles. He built coalitions, mentored attorneys, and continued strategizing legal resources even in his final days. The Ryan Heath Interview: Misuse of Anti-SLAPP Laws and a Student’s Fight for Free Speech The episode shifts focus to a compelling case that Warner personally championed as lead counsel for the U.S. Supreme Court proceedings: G.W. v. Coronado Unified School District, et al. Ryan Heath (Arizona attorney and founder of the nonprofit Gavel Project) and co-counsel Tracy Henderson (California attorney) represent the plaintiff—a brave young woman who, as a teenager in early 2022 at Coronado High School (a performing arts school on Coronado Island in San Diego), protested the lingering mask mandates through expressive conduct. The student would enter class, politely remove her mask, and refuse to leave, clearly conveying her disagreement with the policy. In response, over six weeks, teachers allegedly humiliated her, alienated her from classmates, kicked her out of class, denied her learning materials and the opportunity to take tests with peers, and even moved entire classes to different rooms to avoid her. She missed approximately one-third of the academic year. During a lockdown drill, she was isolated alone in an unlocked bathroom—described as a potential “fish in a barrel” scenario. Ryan Heath detailed how the school’s actions amounted to viewpoint discrimination and compelled orthodoxy, violating core First Amendment principles established in cases like Tinker v. Des Moines and West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette. The lawsuit, filed in San Diego Superior Court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (and including a California Bane Act claim for interference with civil rights by intimidation or threats), alleged expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment. The student was not disruptive, posed no danger to others, and was exercising her right to dissent peacefully. The complaint also named over 20 individual defendants alongside the school district.In a shocking turn, the school district and individual defendants filed four anti-SLAPP motions (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation under California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16). They argued that their own actions—punishing and silencing the student’s dissent—constituted protected free speech. The trial court granted the motions, crediting the defendants’ affidavits over the plaintiff’s sworn statements and ruling that the conduct was protected “as a matter of law” without identifying specific protected statements or actions. The California Court of Appeal (Fourth District) affirmed, skipping the required two-prong analysis: defendants failed to meet their initial burden of showing the suit arose from protected activity on a matter of public interest, yet the burden improperly shifted to the plaintiff. This led to significant attorney fee awards against the young plaintiff (now in her early 20s and a college graduate), currently in the low six figures with ongoing appeals. Co-counsel Tracy Henderson faced sanctions of $13,000 personally, a requirement to take a class, and a bar report for challenging jurisdiction in a subsequent appeal—actions Ryan Heath and Jeremy Friedman described as retaliatory. The case is now before the U.S. Supreme Court via petition for writ of certiorari. Procedural complications have arisen because Tracy Henderson was not initially listed on the appellate caption despite her direct interest; the SCOTUS clerk requires clarification. The team filed a petition for writ of mandate in the California Supreme Court to correct this clerical issue before a June 19 deadline, with plans for potential sticker amendments or refiling if needed. Robert Barnes has signed on pro bono, and there is hope he will assume a lead role. Jeremy Friedman, a California attorney and friend of Warner’s, provided expert analysis on the anti-SLAPP statute’s original purpose: protecting citizens from baseless “lawfare” suits that chill First Amendment activity by draining resources. Here, the law was allegedly inverted—used as a sword by the government to punish dissent and award fees to the powerful. Both attorneys stressed the dangerous precedent: if punishing viewpoint discrimination can be reframed as protected government speech, it could eviscerate civil rights claims nationwide (e.g., against police or other officials enforcing policies). Ryan Heath shared his broader work through The Gavel Project, including teaching students civil disobedience modeled on Rosa Parks, leading protests across California, and filing related lawsuits. He worked alongside Warner on other matters, including a successful Arizona case for Dr. Lee Vliet and Truth For Health. He described Warner as a mentor and dear friend whose loss is devastating, especially as lead counsel on this SCOTUS effort. View court briefs here. The Fight Continues Throughout the episode, the tone was one of grief mixed with resolve. John Davidson, Ryan Heath, and Jeremy Friedman all affirmed that Warner would want the movement to press forward. The case highlights critical issues: the proper application of anti-SLAPP laws, protection of student expressive conduct in schools, and the need for higher courts to correct lower-court errors that undermine constitutional rights.Warner Mendenhall’s legacy endures through Freedom Counsel’s network, the cases he elevated, and the attorneys he inspired. As the podcast continues, it carries forward his commitment to truth, accountability, and liberty. For those wishing to support Freedom Counsel’s work or learn more about the ongoing legal efforts, visit freedomcounsel.org. The battle for constitutional principles does not end—it evolves, strengthened by the foundation Warner helped build. Rest in peace, Warner. Your work lives on. Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv [https://www.brokentruth.tv?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

LIVE: US Senate - PLAUSIBLE MECHANISMS OF COVID-19 INJECTIONS CAUSING CANCER AND ATTACKS ON SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS AND RESEARCH

Washington, D.C. — On Wednesday, June 3, 2026, Sen. Ron Johnson chaired a Senate subcommittee hearing focused on whether COVID-19 mRNA injections could contribute to cancer and the reported attacks on researchers raising those concerns. The session brought together oncologists, scientists, and a cervical cancer survivor. Johnson opened by recounting how he first connected with witnesses like Dr. Sabine Hazen during the pandemic, when she described FDA-supported research being undermined. He criticized pharmaceutical industry influence over media, regulators, medical organizations, and journals, and pointed to safety studies on genotoxicity and carcinogenicity that were never completed before the shots received emergency authorization. Ranking Member Sen. Richard Blumenthal pushed back, quoting the National Cancer Institute’s conclusion that there is no evidence the vaccines cause cancer, lead to recurrence, or speed up disease progression. He stressed the importance of cancer research funding and warned that questioning vaccines could harm public trust and immunization rates. Witness Accounts Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a veteran oncologist known for immunotherapy work, described seeing long-stable melanoma patients relapse weeks after receiving boosters. He observed similar patterns in other cancers, including aggressive colorectal cases in younger adults. Dalgleish pointed to T-cell exhaustion, immune tolerance, and multiple ways mRNA might interfere with tumor suppressor systems. Dr. Wafik El-Deiry, a p53 tumor suppressor expert, explained how spike protein from the virus or vaccine may impair the body’s key cancer defense mechanisms. He compiled reports of over 300 post-vaccination cancer cases from 27 countries, some showing spike protein inside tumors. Dr. Saskia Mostert presented findings from her team’s analysis of excess deaths across Western countries. Their BMJ Public Health paper documented more than 3 million excess deaths between 2020 and 2022. She faced professional repercussions, including an institutional investigation and eventual resignation. Dr. Sabine Hazen, a gastroenterologist and microbiome researcher, detailed several retracted studies on COVID in patient stool samples, early treatment protocols, and vaccine effects on beneficial gut bacteria like bifidobacteria. Dr. Asim Malhotra, a British cardiologist, recounted his healthy father’s death from cardiac arrest shortly after Pfizer vaccination. He called for halting the shots. Defense of Current Position Dr. Julie Gralow, Chief Medical Officer of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, maintained there is no solid clinical evidence linking mRNA COVID vaccines to new or faster-growing cancers. She highlighted benefits for cancer patients facing COVID risks and the potential of mRNA platforms for future cancer therapies. During questioning, Johnson exposed gaps in Gralow’s understanding of the specific mRNA technology used. She initially stated that the mRNA degrades rapidly and believed the injection largely stayed in the arm. Johnson pressed her on the modified pseudouridine that prevents rapid degradation, lipid nanoparticle biodistribution throughout the body (including organs), persistent circulation of spike protein and mRNA, and DNA contamination concerns. Gralow acknowledged the need for more research on several points. Tamika Felder, a 25-year cervical cancer survivor and advocate, shared her personal story and emphasized the success of HPV vaccines in preventing certain cancers. She agreed with Johnson that cancer patients would want to know if any environmental factor, drug, or vaccine could increase their cancer risk. Lively Exchanges and Challenges to the Narrative The later portion of the hearing turned into a pointed back-and-forth. Johnson challenged Gralow on the modified pseudouridine in the mRNA, its persistence in the body far beyond initial claims, biodistribution beyond the injection site (citing rat studies showing accumulation in organs), and reports of DNA contamination in the vials. Gralow acknowledged the need for further research but maintained that large population data showed no overall cancer increase. Witnesses described clinical observations of hyperprogressive cancers and spike protein appearing in tumor tissue — something El-Deiry called completely unexpected and worthy of urgent study. Dalgleish noted coroners refused to test tumors for spike despite requests. Multiple witnesses detailed sustained attacks on their work. El-Deiry described how his publications faced relentless campaigns on PubPeer, a platform originally meant for spotting fraud but now often used anonymously to harass researchers challenging mainstream views. He said the attacks intensified after his HHS service and publication of cancer case reports, with no findings of misconduct yet ongoing reputational damage. Johnson referred to the site as “Pub Smear” and entered a detailed blog post documenting El-Deiry’s experience into the record. Hazen recounted papers passing rigorous peer review only to be retracted later over minor issues, sometimes by critics with competing patents. Mostert and Malhotra echoed the pattern of institutional retaliation, leaked investigations, and career threats. Dalgleish highlighted rejected papers on virus origins with the exact same phrasing from multiple journals: “not in the public interest.” Johnson also questioned reliance on modeling studies claiming millions of lives saved, presenting actual U.S. death data that contradicted them, and criticized FDA’s VAERS algorithm that senior officials were warned would hide safety signals like sudden deaths. He contrasted this with the retracted Surgisphere study that undermined early treatments like hydroxychloroquine. The discussion touched on informed consent failures, the first-time use of pseudouridine-modified mRNA in humans, barriers to autopsies and tumor testing, and the need for merged registries. Witnesses called for open scientific debate without fear of professional destruction. Closing Thoughts Johnson described the hearing as part of a larger effort to confront how science and policy operated during the pandemic and restore public trust. He kept the record open for additional submissions through June 18, 2026. The full transcript and video are available through Senate records and BrokenTruthTV coverage. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv [https://www.brokentruth.tv?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

Dr. Sabine Hazan - Targeted for a Hypothesis

In a compelling new episode of Freedom Counsel on BrokenTruth.TV, host John Davidson sits down with renowned gastroenterologist and microbiome expert Dr. Sabine Hazan. The conversation dives deep into the critical role of the gut microbiome in health, immunity, and the ongoing debates surrounding COVID-19 treatments and vaccines. Dr. Hazan, founder and CEO of ProgenaBiome, a genetic sequencing research laboratory in Ventura, California, brings decades of experience as a clinician and investigator. A 1992 graduate of Dalhousie University, she has led numerous clinical trials and pioneered research linking gut bacteria—particularly Bifidobacterium—to disease outcomes, including COVID-19 severity. During the interview, Dr. Hazan shares insights from her groundbreaking work, which was among the first to detect SARS-CoV-2 in fecal samples via whole genome sequencing. Her research highlights how disruptions in the gut microbiome may influence susceptibility to infection and overall immune response. She discusses observations of microbiome changes following COVID-19 infection and interventions, emphasizing the potential importance of maintaining beneficial bacteria for health resilience. The episode explores challenges in scientific research during the pandemic, including difficulties in publishing findings that diverged from dominant narratives, as well as the promise of microbiome-focused approaches to understanding and addressing complex health issues. Watch Dr Sabine Hazan in this clip from “Epidemic of Fraud”. A Timely Conversation Ahead of Senate Testimony This Freedom Counsel interview is particularly significant as Dr. Sabine Hazan is scheduled to testify tomorrow, June 3, 2026, before the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. [https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/subcommittees/investigations/hearings/plausible-mechanisms-of-covid-19-injections-causing-cancer-and-attacks-on-scientific-publications/] The hearing, titled “Plausible Mechanisms of COVID-19 Injections Causing Cancer and Attacks on Scientific Publications,” will examine potential links between COVID-19 vaccines and cancer mechanisms, alongside issues of scientific censorship and publication interference. Dr. Hazan will appear on Panel I alongside other experts, contributing her microbiome expertise to discussions on these critical public health questions. Her testimony is expected to shed light on research findings, potential biological pathways, and the importance of open scientific inquiry. Why This Matters Freedom Counsel continues BrokenTruth.TV’s commitment to hosting honest conversations on topics often sidelined in mainstream discourse. John Davidson’s interview with Dr. Hazan provides viewers with expert perspectives on gut health, immunity, and the need for transparent science—especially relevant as Congress examines long-term impacts of pandemic policies. Watch the full interview on BrokenTruth.TV to hear Dr. Hazan’s full discussion. With her Senate appearance tomorrow, this episode offers essential context for understanding the stakes in ongoing investigations into COVID-19 science and policy. Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv [https://www.brokentruth.tv?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

Major Thomas Haviland Discusses White Fibrous Clots on Broken Truth’s “Freedom Counsel”

In a recent episode of Broken Truth’s Freedom Counsel, host John Davidson interviewed Major Thomas Haviland, a data analyst and retired military officer known for his research on unusual white fibrous clots observed by embalmers and some medical professionals since 2021. Haviland has conducted multiple surveys on the topic and collaborated with scientists to investigate the composition and possible causes of these clots. Origins of the Research The discussion referenced the 2022 documentary Died Suddenly, in which several embalmers reported finding unusual white, fibrous structures in the veins and arteries of deceased individuals, beginning around mid-2021. Haviland contacted the Ohio Embalmers Association shortly after viewing the film. The association’s president, Woody Wilson, confirmed observing similar clots, which led Haviland to launch formal surveys. These surveys expanded from the United States to several other countries, including Canada, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. According to Haviland’s 2024 survey results, 83% of the 301 embalmers who responded (250 individuals) reported seeing the white fibrous clots, with an average occurrence in approximately 27% of the bodies they handled. Scientific Analysis and Proposed Mechanism Haviland is working with a team that includes retired polymer chemist Greg Harrison in Australia and neuroscientist Dr. Kevin McCarron in Japan. Their analysis suggests the clots may involve an interaction between the body’s fibrinogen (a natural clotting protein), the spike protein associated with COVID-19 vaccines, and the phospholipid nanoparticles used in mRNA vaccines. Testing conducted on clot samples has included: * Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), which showed low levels of iron, potassium, and magnesium compared to typical blood clots, but elevated levels of phosphorus, sulfur, and occasionally tin. * High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), which indicated unusual ratios of fibrinogen chains (approximately 9:4:1 for beta, gamma, and alpha chains, versus the normal 1:1:1 ratio). Haviland noted that these findings differ from standard fibrin clots and drew a comparison to “white clot syndrome” observed decades ago in connection with certain heparin formulations. Reports from Living Patients Haviland also described contact with Dr. Basharat, a cardiologist and endovascular specialist in Jacksonville, Florida. According to Haviland, Dr. Basharat reported removing similar white fibrous clots from living patients in his catheterization lab over a period of several years. Communication with the physician later ended after he cited instructions from hospital administration to cease discussion of the matter. Update from Tennessee In June 2025, Haviland spoke at the Tennessee Funeral Directors Association annual convention at the invitation of then-president Taylor Moore. During the presentation, 18 out of 28 embalmers indicated by show of hands that they had observed the white fibrous clots in the first half of 2025. A survey conducted at the event reported the clots appearing in roughly 17% of cases, along with instances of microclotting in smaller blood vessels. Haviland suggested that such microclots could potentially contribute to symptoms such as reduced oxygen exchange and related health issues, though he emphasized this as part of ongoing discussion. Response from Health Authorities Haviland stated that his outreach to the FDA and CDC over the past three years has not produced substantive responses. He also noted that many embalmers and medical professionals have been reluctant to discuss the phenomenon publicly. Additional Resources For more information on Haviland’s surveys and related research, he directed viewers to the Clotastrophe Substack, managed by Laura Kasner. The full interview is available on the Broken Truth YouTube channel and Rumble. The topic remains a subject of continued investigation and debate within parts of the medical and research communities. Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv [https://www.brokentruth.tv?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

Dr. Simone Gold: Nevada Court Dismisses AFLDS Wrongful Death Suit With Prejudice

Dr. Simone Gold Exposes Media Smears, Coroner Bias, and a Frivolous Lawsuit That Cost AFLDS Over $250,000 — Now Fully Dismissed With Prejudice In a decisive ruling that mainstream media has yet to acknowledge, a Nevada district court has fully dismissed all claims against Free Speech Foundation, Inc. d/b/a America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) in a high-profile wrongful death lawsuit (case file PDF’s at bottom of the article). The case, Estate of Jeremy Parker et al. v. Medina Culver, D.O. et al., Case No. CV23-00219 (Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County, Dept. 8), alleged that AFLDS bore responsibility for Jeremy Parker’s death after he obtained a hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) prescription through a third-party telemedicine referral listed on AFLDS’s informational website. Dr. Simone Gold, physician, attorney, and founder of AFLDS, joined host John Davidson and co-host Jennifer Kennedy, Esq. of Freedom Counsel on BrokenTruth.TV to discuss the case, the evidence, institutional biases exposed during litigation, and the broader fight for medical freedom. Background: A Case Amplified by Media and Politics Jeremy Parker, 52, died suddenly on February 3, 2022, at a friend’s home in the Reno/Sparks area. His widow, Jelena Hatfield, and other family members filed suit, claiming a single therapeutic dose of HCQ — prescribed months earlier via telehealth — caused his death. The narrative was heavily promoted by The Intercept and Time Magazine, which linked the tragedy to AFLDS and “right-wing doctors” pushing repurposed COVID treatments. Dr. Gold emphasized AFLDS’s limited role: the organization is a nonprofit focused on education, public information, essays, videos, and medical freedom advocacy. It never employed prescribing physicians, conducted telemedicine, maintained patient records, or owned telehealth platforms. It simply listed independent providers as resources for patients seeking awake doctors during a time when many physicians were restricted from early treatment options. Court Rulings: Complete Dismissal With Prejudice On August 29, 2025, the court held a hearing and later issued an Order Granting Defendant Free Speech Foundation, Inc. d/b/a America’s Frontline Doctors’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third-Amended Complaint With Prejudice. The court rejected claims of wrongful death, negligence, deceptive trade practices, and breach of contract against AFLDS.Key reasons included: * No underlying tort or duty owed by AFLDS, a public information nonprofit. * No viable vicarious liability (apparent authority) theory under Nevada law (NRS 41.085). * Failure to comply with medical malpractice affidavit requirements (NRS 41A.071). * Claims of negligent referral or supervision not recognized in Nevada. * Lack of consideration or mutual assent for any alleged contract. Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! This post is public so feel free to share it. The dismissal with prejudice means the claims were so fundamentally deficient that no amendment could cure them — a strong judicial rejection. A later Omnibus Order (addressing remaining issues) granted summary judgment to co-defendant Dr. Medina Culver, D.O., denied AFLDS’s request for attorney’s fees, and denied plaintiffs’ challenges to costs. Despite the complete victory on the merits, AFLDS was left bearing over $250,000 in defense costs after more than two years of litigation involving multiple experts (cardiologists, pathologists, and HCQ specialists) and repeated amended complaints. The Fatal Flaws: Autopsy, Death Certificate, and Bias The court filings and discovery highlighted glaring discrepancies: * The autopsy documented dilated cardiomyopathy — a floppy, enlarged heart with high risk of sudden death, often linked to chronic alcohol use. This critical finding was omitted from the official death certificate. * The death certificate, signed by Washoe County Medical Examiner Dr. Laura D. Knight, listed only: “Sudden Death In The Setting Of Therapeutic Use Of Hydroxychloroquine.” * Parker received 10 tablets (2,000 mg total) in August 2021; his wife maintained he took only one. Blood levels were sub-therapeutic. HCQ experts confirmed a single 200 mg dose could not cause death. * Emails between coroners revealed political skepticism toward HCQ and AFLDS, raising questions about scientific objectivity in a legal document with major financial and reputational consequences. Plaintiffs’ expert evidence was weak compared to the defense’s high-caliber specialists. The prescribing physician’s motion for summary judgment was also granted, further underscoring the lack of causation. Media Role and Ambulance-Chasing Allegations Dr. Gold criticized The Intercept and Time for sloppy reporting that ignored basic facts: the prescription header showed a separate telehealth platform (not AFLDS), the prescription predated death by months, and AFLDS had no direct involvement. No reporters contacted AFLDS for comment. Attorney Luke Busby was described as continuing the case long after evidence showed it was meritless. Why This Case Mattered This lawsuit was part of a larger pattern: using tragedy to discredit safe, generic, decades-old medications like HCQ, intimidate early-treatment advocates, and chill free speech on medical issues. AFLDS’s survival and the with-prejudice dismissal represent a victory for truth over narrative.As Dr. Gold noted, defending the case drained significant resources from a modest nonprofit doing vital work — including amicus briefs supporting medical freedom cases at the U.S. Supreme Court on Emergency Use Authorization issues. Listen to the full interview on BrokenTruth.TV for Dr. Gold’s detailed, unfiltered account, sworn testimony highlights, coroner emails, and discussion of ongoing medical freedom battles (including the upcoming GoldCare.com town hall on Hantavirus with Dr. Robert Malone).Court documents, including the dismissal order, Omnibus Order, and death certificate, are available below. Medical freedom depends on sunlight — this case shows what happens when politics overrides pathology and journalism skips due diligence. AFLDS continues the fight at AFLDS.org [http://AFLDS.org]. Thanks for reading BrokenTruth.TV! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.brokentruth.tv [https://www.brokentruth.tv?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]