Proposed Rules For an Article V Convention

Four Podcast Addressing the Runaway Convention Fear

This podcast combines the following four podcasts: * A Solution as Big as the Problem (Michael Farris, J.D.) * Can We Trust the Constitution: Answering the Runaway Convention Myth (Michael Farris, J.D.) * The Myth of a Runaway Amendments Convention (Robert G. Natelson, Professor of Law, University of Montana) * Five Myths about an Article V Convention (Rita Peters, ESQ.)

Proposed Rules For an Article V Convention

This is the draft rules for the future Article V Convention, as authored by constitutional scholars Robert G. Natelson and edited by a caucus of 200+ state legislators. A version of these rules were successfully tested at the 2023 and 2016 Simulated Article V Conventions

The Necessary and Proper Clause Does Not Empower Congress to Control an Amendments Convention

Opponents of an Article V convention seem eager to ascribe more powers to Congress than is supported by law. Learn more by listening to this essay by Robert G. Natelson, Professor Law for the University of Montana. Natelson's work has been cited as high as the Supreme Court level.

The Article V Solution and the Absurdity of Inaction

Paralyzing fear is the most common rationale among opponents of an Article V convention for proposing amendments. Meanwhile, all levels of the federal government continue to centralize power and infringe on the rights of the people, threatening the sustainability of the American republic. This essay was written by Rita Peters, Esq., who serves as the Vice President for National Legislative Strategy for Convention of States Action.

Five Myths About an Article V Convention

In this audio essay, Rita Peters, Esq., debunks five common myths about the Article V convention process. Peters serves as the Vice President for National Legislative Strategy for Convention of States Action.