Created Souls

Created Souls

On Descartes’ Queer Theory and Freshmen Writing in Troutt

44 min · 9 de ago de 2024
Portada del episodio On Descartes’ Queer Theory and Freshmen Writing in Troutt

Descripción

In exploring Pastor Seth Troutt's, "Queer Theory as Actualized Cartesianism," published in Mere Orthodoxy, I discuss the problems with the parallel and 'connection' developed between Cartesianism and Queer theory (or transgender ideology) of which those in his circles would object. While Troutt touts certain common objections often advanced in a variety of academic discussions or in popular discussions, it reflects a superficial reasoning that exhibits a problematic tendency to conflate various terms, concepts, and ideas that deserve clear definition. However, Troutt does not provide clear definitions for most of the technical terms he uses and as a result muddies the discussion and poisoning the well against Descartes and those who follow him. But, more importantly, the whole article represents a clear instance of the fallacy called non-sequitor. Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/created-souls/exclusive-content [https://redcircle.com/created-souls/exclusive-content]

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Created Souls!

Empezar

2 meses por 1 €

Después 4,99 € / mes · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros / mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

14 episodios

Portada del episodio On Descartes’ Queer Theory and Freshmen Writing in Troutt

On Descartes’ Queer Theory and Freshmen Writing in Troutt

In exploring Pastor Seth Troutt's, "Queer Theory as Actualized Cartesianism," published in Mere Orthodoxy, I discuss the problems with the parallel and 'connection' developed between Cartesianism and Queer theory (or transgender ideology) of which those in his circles would object. While Troutt touts certain common objections often advanced in a variety of academic discussions or in popular discussions, it reflects a superficial reasoning that exhibits a problematic tendency to conflate various terms, concepts, and ideas that deserve clear definition. However, Troutt does not provide clear definitions for most of the technical terms he uses and as a result muddies the discussion and poisoning the well against Descartes and those who follow him. But, more importantly, the whole article represents a clear instance of the fallacy called non-sequitor. Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/created-souls/exclusive-content [https://redcircle.com/created-souls/exclusive-content]

9 de ago de 202444 min