Deepwater Horizon, Part 2: Sensemaking in Industrial and Communicative Crises

Pirates of the Carriage Fees: The 2025 Disney-YouTube TV Negotiations on the High Seas of Must Have Content

On October 30, 2025, a significant disruption unfolded for YouTube TV subscribers as the entire Disney suite of networks disappeared from their screens. Iconic channels like ABC, ESPN, FX, and National Geographic were suddenly inaccessible, following a breakdown in negotiations between Disney and Google over a new carriage agreement. This two-week standoff left viewers unhappy and placed immense pressure on executives from both companies, who engaged in a public relations battle to shape the narrative.  This episode explores the Disney–YouTube TV blackout, presenting an understanding of the negotiation mechanisms in play. Through distributive bargaining, integrative negotiation, and issue linkage, I investigate how both stakeholders articulated their aims in public discussions and behind sealed doors, highlighting the intricacy of today's media negotiations. Discover why the future of television may hinge as much on negotiation tactics and unique fees as on the programming and sports you enjoy. The absence of these channels highlighted a rapidly evolving media landscape where content, platforms, and subscribers are increasingly interdependent. Note: This episode contains a 2025 news clip by ABC. The audio is used for purposes of commentary and critique under Fair Use (17 U.S.C. § 107). Acknowledgement: The scripted exchanges between YouTube TV/Google and Disney negotiators are completely staged for the episode, and they do not depict actual transcribed talks. Any similarities are by chance. These are also for purposes of commentary and explanation.

The Routine of Chili Crisp: Social Practice Beyond Another Peppery Condiment

In this episode of Decisions at the Fulcrum, we explore the intriguing journey of chili crisp and the brand Fly by Jing, which has made a delightful Sichuan chili crisp available in U.S.-American kitchens, transforming a simple jar into a vessel of cultural storytelling. More than just a condiment, chili crisp embodies the rich flavors and memories of Chengdu, inviting us to explore how a distinct culinary tradition can find a home in a new context.   Set against the vibrant backdrop of a Sichuan eatery, I encounter the sensory explosion of 麻辣 (málà): its heat, tingling sensations, and aromatic blend of garlic, fermented beans, oil, and peppercorns. This episode poses a compelling question: how does a flavor established in one place transfer and become routine in another?   The exploration reveals Fly By Jing is a compelling case of decision-making, with the crisp, the spoon, the grocery aisle, pantry shelf, countertop, and foods in need of a kick. I will also talk about Sichuan cuisine and the lexicon of spiciness, heat, and condiments in U.S.-American food retail.   Join me as I visit the bustling fly restaurants of Chengdu and the western grocery to consider how taste travels from restaurants to retail. Through a lens of social practice theory, I uncover how materials, competences, and meanings intertwine, turning novelty into routine. Fly By Jing serves as a fascinating case study at the intersection of flavor, culture, packaging, and the practice of flavor application.

Keep the Phone: Fairphone and the Diffusion of Repairable Design

If a smartphone company asked you to do something incredibly unexpected, they would exclusively urge you to maintain your phone. In this episode of Decisions at the Fulcrum, we look at Fairphone, a Dutch smartphone company that developed its brand around repairability, modular design, replaceable parts, and a subtle disruptive premise: a device does not have to be treated as disposable when the battery dies, the camera wears out, or the crowd begins muttering about the upcoming model. The Fairphone case doesn't represent a mere fantasy. It's an bona fide device found in many European countries. The current episode focuses thought on the practice of repairability as product advantage and communication strategy. Fairphone invites customers to look at their devices as a maintainable. The component parts can accessed and replaced by users, allowing them to keep it longer than many learned was feasible. Batteries, cameras, displays, and spare components become indications of autonomy and consistency. In this episode, I go to Amsterdam, where the idea was advanced, and read about diffusions of innovation to understand the case. Adoption is measured by perceived benefits, compatibility with established routines, complexity, trial, and observability. A changeable battery seems reasonable until you have to purchase the item, locate a tool, read the manuals, and then decide whether the repair is feasible. Fairphone exemplifies how innovation occurs as upkeep that's gradual, and, perhaps more a valuable decision to hold onto.

Postwar Justice and the Asia-Pacific War: Jenny Chan on Unit 731, Public Memory, and the Aftermath of World War II in Asia

World War II is frequently taught within a clear framework: democracy defeated fascism, justice accompanied victory, and the conflict ended with surrender and trials. However, the history of the Asia-Pacific battlefield confuses the story being given. In this episode of Decisions at the Fulcrum, I talk with Jenny Chan, Director of Pacific Atrocities Education, about stories that are still underrepresented in public discourse, including the history of Unit 731, biological warfare, occupation, survivor accounts, and post-war accountability practices. Our conversation delves into how Cold War fears influenced what justice meant after the war. We explore why certain perpetrators were tried but others were granted immunity, and how data obtained through human experiments became part of national intelligence reasoning. We also explore the pedagogical challenge of conveying difficult histories rather than reducing it to simplistic nationalist or political perspective. This episode explores how institutions, educators, archivists, and political interests influence which atrocities enter public memory. Our conversation moves then to her work developing Pacific Atrocities Education's archives, lesson materials, publications, exhibits, and public engagement initiatives.   Learn more about Pacific Atrocities Education: Website: https://www.pacificatrocities.org/ [https://www.pacificatrocities.org/?utm_source=chatgpt.com] Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/pacificatrocitiesedu/ [https://www.instagram.com/pacificatrocitiesedu/] YouTube, Pacific Front Untold: https://www.youtube.com/c/pacificfrontuntold [https://www.youtube.com/c/pacificfrontuntold] or https://youtu.be/kXfGybFXTJE [https://youtu.be/kXfGybFXTJE]

The Bottle is Filled with Possibility: Morphological Analysis and Sweden's EPR Case

What happens to a package after you are finished with it? A bottle, a cardboard sleeve, a mailer, a charger box: all of these seem minor independently, until we enter the maze of bins, collection systems, producer obligations, recycling markets, municipal capacity, and public behavior. In this episode of Decisions at the Fulcrum, I visit Sweden 🇸🇪 to look at the Extended Producer Responsibility system. It's a case showing how "ordinary" objects require extraordinary decision-making occasions. Today's guide is morphological analysis, a method developed by Swiss astrophysicist Fritz Zwicky and then adapted by Tom Ritchey and others for complex policy and organizational decision-making. Rather than rushing toward an answer, morphological analysis needs decision makers to first map the field: identify the parameters, list possible conditions, and try out combinations to see which can genuinely hold together. It is a method for uncertainty, structure, and creative problem-solving. Through Sweden's producer-responsibility planning, I examine waste and recycling as a conundrum of distributed responsibility. Producers, consumers, municipalities, recyclers, regulators, and markets all make what happens after the product is used. Morphological analysis is the best fit for intricate decision instances like this one because it addresses a better (and harder) question: what future/s are we assuming, and do all the pieces of a strategy seem coherent together? Relevant Show Links: https://www.swemorph.com/pdf/gma.pdf [https://www.swemorph.com/pdf/gma.pdf]  https://www.oneplanetnetwork.org/knowledge-centre/policies/extended-producer-responsibility-sweden [https://www.oneplanetnetwork.org/knowledge-centre/policies/extended-producer-responsibility-sweden]