Intellectual Property | SnIPpets | Fieldfisher

Anna Pasternak v Lara Prescott [2022] EWHC 2695 (Ch

4 min · 3 de may de 2023
Portada del episodio Anna Pasternak v Lara Prescott [2022] EWHC 2695 (Ch

Descripción

Fieldfisher IP expert and director, Sheena Sheikh Brown [https://www.fieldfisher.com/en/people/sheena-sheikh-brown], summarises the weighty decision of Anna Pasternak v Lara Prescott [https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2022/2695.html] [2022] EWHC 2695 (Ch) in this 5 minute SnIPpets podcast.   In brief, in 2022, the UK High Court dismissed a detailed copyright claim brought by the great-niece of Boris Pasternak (author of Doctor Zhivago), that a substantial part of the "selection, structure and arrangement of facts and incidents" in her biographical work about Boris's muse were copied by the author of a work of historical fiction. The Court did however find infringement of an extract from a translation of another work.

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Intellectual Property | SnIPpets | Fieldfisher!

Empezar

2 meses por 1 €

Después 4,99 € / mes · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts exclusivos
  • 20 horas de audiolibros / mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

6 episodios

Portada del episodio Anna Pasternak v Lara Prescott [2022] EWHC 2695 (Ch

Anna Pasternak v Lara Prescott [2022] EWHC 2695 (Ch

Fieldfisher IP expert and director, Sheena Sheikh Brown [https://www.fieldfisher.com/en/people/sheena-sheikh-brown], summarises the weighty decision of Anna Pasternak v Lara Prescott [https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2022/2695.html] [2022] EWHC 2695 (Ch) in this 5 minute SnIPpets podcast.   In brief, in 2022, the UK High Court dismissed a detailed copyright claim brought by the great-niece of Boris Pasternak (author of Doctor Zhivago), that a substantial part of the "selection, structure and arrangement of facts and incidents" in her biographical work about Boris's muse were copied by the author of a work of historical fiction. The Court did however find infringement of an extract from a translation of another work.

3 de may de 20234 min