Trump Has Allowed Netanyahu to Control Negotiations, and it's hurting Americans

Axios Says US–Iran Deal Reached as U.S. and IRAN trade missile fire | Daniel McAdams

Congress is hollowing out, and the consequences show up first in foreign policy. Dan McAdams returns to talk with us about what Thomas Massie’s primary loss signals for antiwar oversight, why the Ron Paul era of forcing floor debates through appropriations fights is largely gone, and how that vacuum makes it easier for Washington to slide into the next conflict without friction. We dig into Iran and the so-called ceasefire: the strikes, the responses, and the familiar pattern of narrative manipulation where the U.S. can provoke, then rebrand escalation as “defense.” We also unpack the latest claims of a draft Trump Iran deal, why leak-driven reporting deserves extra skepticism, and how media pipelines can function like message distribution for competing interests rather than real journalism. From there we move to Israel and Gaza, including Netanyahu’s comments that point toward annexation, the U.S. role in funding and arming the campaign, and the way Lebanon and Hezbollah complicate any regional settlement. We also discuss harrowing firsthand accounts of Gaza’s blockade and a political paradox: anti-intervention voices are breaking through culturally, but votes and power haven’t caught up yet. Finally, we zoom out to Latin America, from Javier Milei and BRICS anxiety to U.S. drug war strikes in Guatemala and the danger of normalizing kill-first policy without due process. Subscribe for more independent foreign policy analysis, share this with a friend who still trusts the “expert” class, and leave a review so more listeners can find the show. CHAPTERS: CHAPTER MARKERS * 0:00 Welcome And Big Questions Ahead * 1:10 The Void After Thomas Massie * 4:20 How Ron Paul Fought The Machine * 6:09 Ceasefire Hits And Iran Narrative Games * 10:24 Draft Deal Claims And Media Mouthpieces * 13:30 Bolton Talking Points And War Profits * 17:16 Netanyahu Signals Gaza Annexation * 19:09 Lebanon Linkage And Hezbollah’s Comeback * 22:26 Gaza Blockade Horror And Culture Shift * 25:58 Milei Skepticism And BRICS Anxiety * 27:50 Drug War Strikes And No Due Process * 30:00 Final Thoughts And How To Help Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands [https://redcircle.com/brands] Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy [https://redcircle.com/privacy]

Trump Continues to Test Limits of Iran Ceasefire, How Will Tehran Respond?

A ceasefire is supposed to lower the temperature, not provide new vocabulary for the same war. We unpack reports that the U.S. bombed targets in Iran after a ceasefire and why calling it “self-defense” can still function as a direct escalation. I walk through what those strikes signal, how each side tries to define the rules midstream, and why Iran may tolerate only so many “limited” hits before choosing a bigger response. From there, we get specific about the hard constraints behind the headlines: weapons stockpiles, interceptor burn rates, and how long it can take to replace key munitions. That context changes everything about threats, deterrence, and the realism of returning to a high-intensity U.S. Iran war. We also break down Marco Rubio’s public talking points on Iran’s nuclear program, what U.S. intelligence and international monitoring have said, and the reported outlines of a possible memorandum of understanding that touches sanctions relief, frozen assets, and shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Trump’s White House remarks add another layer, including talk about Hormuz control and a shocking shot at Oman, one of the most important mediators in U.S. Iran diplomacy. We connect that to the bigger regional picture, including Israel, Lebanon, and the Washington voices pushing to keep the fight going. Finally, we pivot to Jill Biden saying she feared Joe Biden was “having a stroke” during the 2024 debate and what that raises about cognitive decline, transparency, and the massive war powers concentrated in the presidency. Subscribe for more deep dives, share the episode with a friend who follows U.S. foreign policy, and leave a rating or review. What part of this standoff do you think is most likely to break the ceasefire for good? CHAPTER MARKERS * 0:00 Quick Intro And Today’s Agenda * 1:50 U.S. Strikes Iran After Ceasefire * 7:58 Rubio’s Claims And Nuclear Narratives * 11:31 The Reported MOU And Deal Terms * 13:57 Trump’s Presser And Oman Threat * 17:14 Sanctions Leverage And Frozen Assets * 19:55 JCPOA Rewrite And “Regime Change” Talk * 28:03 Midterms Politics And War Messaging * 29:38 Israel, Lebanon, And Ceasefire Pressure * 33:10 Bolton’s Push To Keep Fighting * 35:44 Jill Biden On The Debate Scare * 39:39 Closing And Next Show Tease Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands [https://redcircle.com/brands] Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy [https://redcircle.com/privacy]

Trump Has Allowed Netanyahu to Control Negotiations, and it's hurting Americans

Memorial Day brings out a lot of scripted lines, but we want to talk about the part that gets avoided: what American wars actually cost, who pays, and how often the public is left holding the bill while elites chase ideology, influence, and profit. We start by looking at the human consequences for service members and veterans, and why so many deployments overseas end with the same problems still on the table, just with more graves and more resentment. Then we shift into the biggest moving story right now: Iran negotiations, the Iran nuclear program, and why the phrase “on the brink of a deal” can be more propaganda than reality. We break down uranium enrichment in plain language, what the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty allows, and why demanding “zero enrichment” is not a technical detail but a deal-killer. We also explain how Lebanon and Hezbollah change the endgame, why escalations in southern Lebanon can function as sabotage, and how the Strait of Hormuz becomes real leverage that reshapes every calculation. We also react to Trump’s messaging, including his push to fold Iran into the Abraham Accords, what those normalization deals have meant in practice, and how they can drive an arms race while adding impossible complexity to already fragile diplomacy. Along the way, we play and respond to clips featuring Cory Booker, plus a debate moment where Mearsheimer and Walt confront Pompeo and Nuland’s talking points, and we close with a quick look at Thomas Massie signaling a possible national run. Subscribe for more, share this with someone who follows US foreign policy, and leave a review with the one question you still have after listening. CHAPTER MARKERS * 0:00 Memorial Day And War Costs * 2:38 Why Iran Talks Look Close * 6:12 Netanyahu Demands Zero Enrichment * 10:18 Lebanon Becomes A Dealbreaker * 14:22 Trump Adds The Abraham Accords * 18:55 Temple Mount Pressure On Jordan * 22:05 Strait Of Hormuz Fee Workaround * 26:02 Israel Escalates Strikes In Lebanon * 28:52 Cory Booker Hits Trump From Right * 32:12 Mearsheimer Walt Versus Pompeo Nuland * 38:18 Thomas Massie Hints At 2028 * 40:05 Wrap Up And Listener Requests Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands [https://redcircle.com/brands] Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy [https://redcircle.com/privacy]

Trump Has Lost in Iran, What Will He Do Next?

Trump says he wants “few people killed,” then talks like bombing Iran is a weekly calendar event. That contradiction is where we start, because the public narrative around the Iran war keeps snapping from all-out threats to last-minute “negotiations” as deadlines magically extend. I walk through why that cycle looks less like strategy and more like a president boxed in by bad options, public messaging, and allies with their own priorities. From there, we get into the part most outlets blur: the difference between political victory laps and what US intelligence and reporting suggest on the ground. If Iran can rebuild its drone program faster than expected and still holds a large share of missile and launcher capacity, then “we crippled them” becomes a dangerous story to believe. We also talk about what Iran likely learned from recent strikes and why modern drone warfare and air defense evolve at a pace that makes simple claims obsolete. Then we widen the lens to the power side of the equation: can Trump actually control Netanyahu, or is Washington being pulled by Israeli pressure through Congress? I connect that to a Washington Post-reported defense strategy that burns through American interceptor stockpiles, and to the Thomas Massie primary loss, where massive spending and media targeting mattered more than most people want to admit. If you want clear Iran war analysis, Strait of Hormuz leverage, uranium enrichment stakes, and the US politics that shape it all, hit play. Subscribe, share the show, and leave a review, what’s the one detail you think the mainstream story keeps avoiding? Chapter Markers 0:00. Open And Today’s Agenda 1:32. Trump Talks “For The Iranian People” 6:50. Military Boasts Versus Leaked Assessments 12:48. Iran’s Red Lines On Any Deal 16:38. Can Trump Actually Control Netanyahu 19:00. US Interceptors Spent Defending Israel 22:20. Massie’s Loss And The Money Machine 29:59. Final Takeaways And Subscribe Request Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands [https://redcircle.com/brands] Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy [https://redcircle.com/privacy]

Prof. Joe Terwilliger on Getting "Loomered" and the Potential for a Deal with North Korea

A professor makes a $500 campaign donation and suddenly gets cast as the “most important man in America” pulling congressional strings. That absurd story is the perfect doorway into what we really care about here: how narratives get manufactured, why propaganda works, and what it’s doing to both domestic politics and foreign policy. We start with science diplomacy and cultural diplomacy, the old-school idea that researchers, students, artists, and athletes can keep human ties alive even when governments can’t stand each other. Joe explains how that cooperative model is being redefined across the West into something closer to state leverage, where technology sharing and academic exchange are treated as tools to punish rivals. We connect that to a broader post-truth media environment, where sound bites beat evidence, repetition beats nuance, and voters can be segmented by where they get their news. Then we move to North Korea and try to replace slogans with incentives. We talk Kim Jong-un’s regime survival logic, the strategic reasons nuclear deterrence persists, and why US policy whiplash makes long-term deals hard to trust. We also dig into North Korea’s tightening relationship with Russia, China’s concern about influence and instability on its border, and how sanctions can push sanctioned states into deeper trade and technology cooperation. Finally, we touch on rare earth minerals and why they could matter in the next phase of Korean Peninsula geopolitics. If you want a clearer framework for understanding science diplomacy, misinformation, and North Korea strategy, listen through and share it with someone who only sees headlines. Subscribe, leave a review, and tell us what you think credible peace and credible reporting should look like. Chapter Markers 0:44. Welcome And Science Diplomacy Shift 6:23. Laura Loomer’s Claim And The Facts 11:11. Did Epstein Come Up With Massey 12:11. Massey Loses And Money Talks 14:39. Post Truth Media And Generational Gaps 17:33. North Korea Primer And Trump Clip 18:29. Deterrence Logic And Regime Survival 24:30. Russia Ties China Moves And Trust 26:40. Two Koreas Arms Control And DMZ 31:52. Sanctions Backfire And Economic Modernization 36:12. Rare Earth Minerals And Closing Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands [https://redcircle.com/brands] Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy [https://redcircle.com/privacy]