The IC Chat

The IC Chat

The IC CHAT episode 17 —Is the MFP necessary for all HR-PCI cases? CHIP-BCIS answers this very question

20 min · 20 de abr de 2026
Portada del episodio The IC CHAT episode 17 —Is the MFP necessary for all HR-PCI cases? CHIP-BCIS answers this very question

Descripción

Host Dr. Ashish Pershad introduces IC Chat’s mission to help clinicians interpret evidence-based medicine and translate trial data into everyday patient care. In this episode he appraises the CHIP-BCIS-3 randomized trial (ACC 2026 / NEJM) comparing prophylactic microaxial flow pump (Impella) versus standard care in very high‑risk elective PCI patients. The trial enrolled patients with low LVEF and high SYNTAX/BCIS scores and used a hierarchical win‑ratio primary endpoint. Results showed no overall benefit for Impella and a concerning signal of increased cardiovascular mortality at two years in the device group, despite similar completeness of revascularization and low bleeding/vascular complication rates. Dr. Pershad discusses implications: avoid routine prophylactic Impella in elective high‑risk PCI, consider staged revascularization, and call for reappraisal of device use and approval processes to prioritize patient safety.

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de The IC Chat!

Empezar

2 meses por 1 €

Después 4,99 € / mes · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts exclusivos
  • 20 horas de audiolibros / mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

18 episodios

Portada del episodio The IC CHAT episode 17 —Is the MFP necessary for all HR-PCI cases? CHIP-BCIS answers this very question

The IC CHAT episode 17 —Is the MFP necessary for all HR-PCI cases? CHIP-BCIS answers this very question

Host Dr. Ashish Pershad introduces IC Chat’s mission to help clinicians interpret evidence-based medicine and translate trial data into everyday patient care. In this episode he appraises the CHIP-BCIS-3 randomized trial (ACC 2026 / NEJM) comparing prophylactic microaxial flow pump (Impella) versus standard care in very high‑risk elective PCI patients. The trial enrolled patients with low LVEF and high SYNTAX/BCIS scores and used a hierarchical win‑ratio primary endpoint. Results showed no overall benefit for Impella and a concerning signal of increased cardiovascular mortality at two years in the device group, despite similar completeness of revascularization and low bleeding/vascular complication rates. Dr. Pershad discusses implications: avoid routine prophylactic Impella in elective high‑risk PCI, consider staged revascularization, and call for reappraisal of device use and approval processes to prioritize patient safety.

20 de abr de 202620 min