3-Minute Reframe with Cameron Conaway

How Layoffs Changed Us

In 2025, Cameron Conaway was leading one of the best teams of his career at Cisco when the company announced it was laying off 4,000 people. What followed wasn't just grief — it was a quiet, almost invisible shift in behavior. He stopped taking risks. Some colleagues stopped asking for feedback entirely. Others asked for it performatively, hoping visibility would protect them. In this episode of 3-Minute Reframe, he connects that experience to a landmark 1981 paper by Barry Staw, Lance Sandelands, and Jane Dutton on threat rigidity — and explores why a threat environment is often the exact moment we become least able to give or receive honest feedback. Show Notes: Threat-Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior — Staw, Sandelands & Dutton (1981) [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2392337] 3-Minute Reframe Archive [https://cameronconaway.com/3mr/]

Double-Loop Learning

For nearly twenty years, Cameron Conaway bit his nails down to nothing every time he sat down to write. He tried willpower, deterrents, accountability — nothing worked. What he didn't know was that he was fixing the behavior without ever questioning the belief underneath it. In this episode of 3-Minute Reframe, he connects that personal story to organizational psychologist Chris Argyris's landmark research on double-loop learning — and leaves you with one question worth a five-minute timer. Show Notes: Double Loop Learning in Organizations — Argyris, HBR (1977) [https://hbr.org/1977/09/double-loop-learning-in-organizations] 3-Minute Reframe Archive [https://cameronconaway.com/3mr/]

Steph Curry, Age 15

Before the championships, before changing the game of basketball forever — Steph Curry spent the worst summer of his life deliberately getting worse. At 15, his father Dell Curry told him his shot had to be completely rebuilt. For three months he could barely make a basket. In this episode of 3-Minute Reframe, I use Curry's story to explore one of the most underrated growth skills there is — the willingness to get worse before you get better, and how to know whose feedback is actually worth that kind of sacrifice. Show Notes: It's More Than Just the Shot — Kevin O’Connor, The Ringer [https://www.theringer.com/2019/02/12/nba/steph-curry-warriors-2019-all-star-game-charlotte] 3-Minute Reframe Archive [https://cameronconaway.com/3mr/]

The Goo Stage

"Is everything alright?" That's what a Chief Marketing Officer asked Cameron before delivering feedback that rattled his ego and left him disoriented in ways he couldn't explain. He didn't have language for what happened next. Virginia Satir did. In the 1970s, family therapist Virginia Satir mapped something she kept seeing in the families she worked with: change doesn't move in a straight line. After a foreign element arrives — a piece of feedback, a job loss, a diagnosis, a conversation that changes everything — what follows isn't smooth transition. It's chaos. Performance drops. Clarity disappears. You may feel less capable than before the change began. And then there's the butterfly. Inside the chrysalis, a caterpillar doesn't gradually transform — it dissolves completely into goo. A cellular soup of pure chaos. It is, for a time, neither caterpillar nor butterfly. That dissolution isn't a sign something went wrong. It's the biological prerequisite for what comes next. The reframe: if you're in the middle of something that feels unresolved right now, consider the possibility that you're not failing to change. You may simply be in the goo. Show Notes: Download the Satir Change Model [https://cameronconaway.com/change-management/#frameworks] The Satir Model (Satir et al., 1991) [https://www.amazon.com/Satir-Model-Family-Therapy-Beyond/dp/0831400781] Giving Feedback for Impact After Receipt [https://cameronconaway.com/blog/giving-feedback-iar/]

The 90-Second Rule of Emotions

Have you ever felt an emotion that seemed to last all day — long after the moment that triggered it had passed? In this episode, Cameron shares the story of one of the worst presentations of his life — a packed room, a disaster on stage, and an embarrassment that followed him into the shower and stayed for days. It took years to understand why. Harvard-trained neuroanatomist Jill Bolte Taylor documented something remarkable while studying her own stroke in real time: the physiological lifespan of an emotion is approximately 90 seconds. The chemicals flood your body, peak, and flush out. After that, if the feeling persists, it's because we're choosing — consciously or not — to keep retriggering it. The reframe: the next time a feeling hits hard, ask yourself — am I still feeling this, or am I now feeding it? Show Notes: Taylor, J.B. (2008). My Stroke of Insight. Viking. [https://amzn.to/3Qg7BNG] Related: Somatic Literacy [https://cameronconaway.com/somatic-literacy/]