A Set to you

Colour Theory

I should suggest further on the previous piece the phonolgy of a mar-ked interest towards market rather than marked, in endeavouring for no commits past initial posting in recognizing each of these scheduled ahead. Let me know here if there are any topics worth a fundamental elaboration. Your perspective is worthwhile to me provided you have taken your understanding to each of the prior fundamentals previously. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit ryanmarett.substack.com [https://ryanmarett.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

Marked Intrigue

The analogy The World of Games carries weight here. I imagine in the fundamental I will establish tile games as analogues to TCG with heavy weight to embodiment, but chess here will have to suffice for understanding. As a call to action, let me know in a separate channel if there is an instance of a game you have played that particularly informs how you have thought about something in your life. I want to learn from you. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit ryanmarett.substack.com [https://ryanmarett.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

Language for functional expression

This nearly functions as a vector since I was talking to someone about language yesterday, but we did not chase the thread. Let me know if you prefer the format of a full reading at the beginning prior to commenting or the previous format. As always, if you would like to chase a thread elsewhere, the channels are always open, if not the ones you prefer. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit ryanmarett.substack.com [https://ryanmarett.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

Magic Numbers

A fundamental. Prior reading as inspiration to me on abugida: https://www.cambridgemaths.org/blogs/fibonacci-hierarchy/ [https://www.cambridgemaths.org/blogs/fibonacci-hierarchy/] The breadcrumbs serve to bridge further understanding rather than obstruct meaning. Feel free to share if you have determined the connection implicit to the riddle of the background. If this post is monetized later, this will be replaced for Fair Use with the solution. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit ryanmarett.substack.com [https://ryanmarett.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]

To Dual

This convers the following in order of elaboration: gender, identity, dynamo, and diarchy. As a call to action, reach out over separate channels if you would like to spark a conversation. If enjoyable, we could sufficiently see another vector. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit ryanmarett.substack.com [https://ryanmarett.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]