States vs. Federal Power: Inside the Immigration and DHS Debate - Bill Jasper

Do Immigrants Help the Economy? Breaking Down the $14.5 Trillion Debate - David Bier

Bill Bernardoni sits down with David Bier of the Cato Institute to unpack a major new study on immigration and its impact on government budgets. The findings challenge a common narrative—arguing that immigrants have contributed trillions more in taxes than they’ve taken in benefits. From Social Security and education costs to welfare usage and labor participation, this conversation digs into the data, the criticisms, and why the debate over immigration economics is far from settled.  Do you think the economic argument for immigration is being overlooked in today’s political debate?

States vs. Federal Power: Inside the Immigration and DHS Debate - Bill Jasper

Bill Bernardoni is joined by Bill Jasper of the John Birch Society to break down the constitutional argument behind state sovereignty and federal authority. From the “Make America States Again” initiative to the role of ICE and DHS, the conversation explores where immigration enforcement fits within the Constitution—and whether today’s federal structure has drifted too far from the founders’ original intent. It’s a deep dive into states’ rights, national security, and the growing divide over immigration policy. Should immigration enforcement be primarily a federal responsibility, or should states have more control?

Iran Aftermath Questions & A Florida Political Scandal That’s Raising Eyebrows - Andrew McKay Part 2

Bill Bernardoni and Andrew McKay take a deeper look at what comes after potential conflict with Iran—questioning whether regime change or democracy is even realistic based on history and recent global examples. Then, the conversation shifts stateside to a jaw-dropping controversy in Florida, where the state’s attorney general is facing scrutiny over a six-figure adjunct teaching salary and broader concerns about political influence in higher education. It’s a conversation about power, accountability, and what happens when systems start to blur. Which is more concerning right now—uncertainty in U.S. foreign policy or potential abuses of power at the state level?

Epstein Fallout, Foreign Policy Confusion, and the Rubio Factor - Andrew McKay Part 1

Bill Bernardoni is joined by Andrew McKay for a wide-ranging conversation that cuts through the noise—from the latest developments tied to the Epstein case and what accountability really looks like, to the uncertainty surrounding U.S. foreign policy in Iran and beyond. They also break down the contrast between President Trump’s unpredictable approach and Marco Rubio’s more traditional worldview, raising bigger questions about strategy, leadership, and what comes next. Do you think unpredictability in foreign policy is a strength or a risk for the U.S. right now?

CIA Secrecy, Wyden’s Warning & The Case Against DHS: Patrick Eddington Speaks Out - Part 2

In this segment of America’s NewsHour, Bill Bernardoni continues his conversation with Patrick Eddington, senior fellow in Homeland Security and Civil Liberties at the Cato Institute and a former CIA analyst. The discussion centers on a concerning letter from Senator Ron Wyden raising red flags about undisclosed CIA activity, the importance of intelligence oversight, and what it means when classified concerns surface publicly without details. Eddington explains how Wyden’s approach creates accountability while protecting sensitive information, and why that alone signals the issue is serious. The conversation then shifts to a broader critique of the Department of Homeland Security, including ICE operations, TSA authority, and whether the post-9/11 structure of DHS has undermined constitutional norms. It’s a wide-ranging and candid look at intelligence power, congressional oversight, and the future of federal security agencies. Should Congress fundamentally restructure or even abolish agencies like DHS and rein in intelligence authorities to better protect civil liberties?