Anatomy of Conflict

Would Esther Perel Beat a Judge in Mediation?

53 min · 18 de may de 2026
Portada del episodio Would Esther Perel Beat a Judge in Mediation?

Descripción

A litigator with 15+ years of Big Law experience sits down with Ryan to settle a real disagreement: does a great mediator need to know the law — or just know people? Dani Audette has seen mediations fail because the mediator didn't do their homework. Ryan thinks a master therapist beats a subject matter expert every time. They don't fully agree. And when AI enters the argument, it gets messier. Also: why most lawsuits should never be filed, what happens to a conflict once a judge owns your schedule, and the medical term for when the cure makes you sicker than the disease.

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Anatomy of Conflict!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

23 episodios

episode Why the Next Generation of Experts Won't Stay in Their Lane artwork

Why the Next Generation of Experts Won't Stay in Their Lane

Think doubling down on a single niche is the only way to perfect your craft? In this episode of Anatomy of Conflict, we completely flip the script on traditional professional advice for mediators, therapists, and facilitators. We dive into the massive competitive edge of becoming intentionally "poly-skilled"—proving that adjacent obsessions, from building custom AI tools to studying neuropsychology, are actually the secret weapon for sharpening your core practice. By breaking out of rigid professional silos, we expose how a broad, interdisciplinary surface area of knowledge gives you a compounding advantage in empathy, pattern recognition, and high-stakes problem-solving. Stop letting conventional wisdom keep your expertise in a box, and discover why expanding your world is exactly what makes you the most valuable person in the room.

22 de jun de 202618 min
episode The Question That Ends Most Founder Fights artwork

The Question That Ends Most Founder Fights

Attorney Cody Blades has one question she asks every client before any negotiation starts: if there were no restrictions, no court, no opposing party — what would you actually want to happen? It sounds simple. It isn't — most people answer it once, then spend the next three conversations contradicting themselves, and catching that contradiction becomes her actual job. Ryan and Cody dig into why that's the real product, not the asset purchase agreement, not the negotiation math — the part where a client says "I don't care about owning the business" and two weeks later won't let go of it. It's the same move a good therapist pulls, naming your own inconsistency back to you, which is exactly why a calculator that does 150%-down-to-the-middle math was never going to be the whole job. Cody Blades represents founders and business owners in Minnesota at blades.law.

19 de jun de 202653 min