Applied AI Australia
$28M Spent on AI. One Question Tells You If It's Working. Subscribe - Know a CFO still measuring AI by project count? Forward this. Episode Summary: 90% of Australian companies have invested in AI. Only 40% are seeing results. The problem isn't the technology. In Part 1, we showed you which type of AI leader you are: Believer, Driver, or Builder. In Part 2, we reveal why that's only half the picture. There are two tracks of AI maturity and most organisations only measure one. Anthony Mittelmark calls it the Two-Track Trap: your AI usage might be advancing, but if your organisation isn't built to carry it, the investment leaks value. This episode gives you diagnostic questions most leadership teams can't answer, a real case study of how one multinational reframed AI as a valuation play, and a 48-hour action you can run this week without budget or approval. What you will learn: * Why treating AI projects like IT projects is the #1 reason programs stall * The four levels of AI usage maturity (Tool User to AI-First) and where most companies are stuck * The second maturity track nobody measures: organisational readiness * Why tactical AI integration can make the rest of the business worse * How a multinational used upstream data IP to change their valuation narrative * A 48-hour brutal audit you can run with your leadership team this week Key Frameworks: Two-Track Trap Track A: AI Usage Maturity (Tool User > Process Runner > Commercial Operator > AI-First) Track B: Organisational Maturity (leadership articulation, business resistance, architecture to roadmap) Most companies measure Track A and ignore Track B. That's where investment leaks. Portfolio Mindset: Every AI project must deliver commercial value, build reusable capability, and advance organisational AI fluency. Valuation Reframe: Not "what does your org look like in 2030" but "how will it be valued in 2030?" Key Stats: * 12% of Australian leaders say GenAI is transforming their business (vs 25% globally) * 90% invested in AI, only 40% seeing results (Frontier, March 2026) * Financial services moving to AI-first: cost-to-serve gap makes it impossible to compete without it 48 Hour Challenge: Ramon: 30 mins. One page. Can leadership articulate why you're investing in AI (commercial reasons, not efficiencies)? Is the business resisting - where and who? What does next-gen CX look like? Does tech map AI architecture to a roadmap with cost-benefit? For every AI initiative, does the org support it or is tech running ahead? If you can't answer with confidence, there's a gap. Anthony: List every AI tool, subscription, pilot, and POC. Portfolio strategy or just a collection of stuff? CEO to CFO: are we aligned on AI investment and what's the return? "The board doesn't need another AI update. They need a name to it next quarter." Timestamps * 0:00 - Intro: the two-track blind spot * 1:00 -Why AI programs stall: IT projects vs portfolio mindset * 5:00 - The four levels of AI usage maturity * 8:30 - The Two-Track Trap: organisational readiness * 11:30 - What happens when leadership can't articulate why * 14:30 - Level 3 usage, Level 1 organisation * 17:30 - The $500M CEO building a business within her business * 19:00 - Upstream data IP and valuation narrative * 21:30 - Does this project advance your AI thesis? * 23:00 - The brutal audit * 25:30 - Close: AI maturity runs on two tracks Part 1 (Believer, Driver, Builder): Here [https://open.spotify.com/episode/6a8VWPYDUyl6XXPUcSfak9?si=0d58b44b26134bc2] Applied AI Australia: * https://appliedaiaustralia.com.au * https://www.linkedin.com/in/ramonrod * Podcast + Executive Newsletter [https://substack.com/@appliedaiaustralia] Guest: Anthony Mittelmark, 20+ years AI strategy across ASX 100 companies and high-growth ventures.. * LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/anthonymittelmark [https://linkedin.com/in/anthonymittelmark]
17 episodios
Comentarios
0Sé la primera persona en comentar
¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Applied AI Australia!