Breaking Brand: Reputation hits and misses Podcast
TRANSCRIPT Prince Andrew has been stripped of his title the Duke of York. His name will seemingly forever be tarnished by his links to Jeffrey Epstein and the damning revelations in Virginia Giuffre’s book that have come to light these past few days have served as a self-inflicted pile-on that Andrew has experienced over the last six years. I make no apologies for my lack of neutrality. The King has had enough. The heir to the throne, Prince William, is none too pleased either – he has pledged to go for the jugular of his uncle should he ascend to the throne during Andrew’s lifetime. It is an ugly situation yet one that some media outlets have questioned whether this really does seal Andrew’s reputational fate and suggesting that a comeback may be possible? This is precisely what LBC radio were asking earlier this week, and I shared my thoughts for an article they published on Monday – you can see a link to this in the comments. So, is there a way back for the Prince? Can he rebuild his reputation over time – will he even try to? It is rare for a high-profile figure caught in the media’s glare to not bounce back from a public backlash and loss of reputation. Full cancellation, it seems, is uncommon. In Andrew’s case, however, this feels like the end of the road. Much like it is for his ex-wife. Indeed, I recently talked about the former Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson’s own reputation crisis which also centres around her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. In the last podcast, No way back: Fergie’s ferocious fall from grace seals reputation fate, I stated that “… given the severity of charges Epstein was found guilty of. the Duchess of York’s continued pursuit of a familial relationship with him has put paid to any possibility of a reputation reconciliation.” When it comes to Andrew, ditto. There will likely be no future role for him from a Royal family perspective and almost certainly none as a public figure. The only reason why it has taken this long for the door to be firmly shut on him is the depth of his pockets to fund his lawyers and a determination among the higher echelons of the Royal household to mitigate any risk of a reputational fallout affecting other senior Royals by association. Media coverage of Andrew’s involvement with Jeffrey Epstein has been damning but might have been much worse if it wasn’t for the legal defence team he employed. They let the investigation into Andrew’s actions drag on for as long as possible. This meant that the public were denied a swift outcome and the longer it continued without resolution the less appetite there was among the public and the media to continue reporting on it. Andrew has been a publicity disaster for the Royal family ever since ‘that’ infamous interview with Emily Maitlis – then of Newsnight, now of The News Agents – a great podcast I urge you to try out if you haven’t already. The King, for his part, has, in my view, handled this supremely well much like he has successfully managed the Harry and Meghan situation. But events have conspired in recent weeks to further weaken any chance of a possible reputation resurgence for Andrew – the revelation of Sarah Ferguson’s involvement with Epstein, and now the damning revelations in Virginia Giuffre’s book. Media cycles run fast, and interest quickly wanes. For Andrew, there is a sense that more will come out about the degree of involvement he has with Epstein. This is not going away anytime soon, but his career and profile most certainly have. [See LBC radio article mentioned above [https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/prince-andrew-routine-day-life-5HjdFf9_2/]] This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit breakingbrand.substack.com [https://breakingbrand.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1]
8 episodios
Comentarios
0Sé la primera persona en comentar
¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Breaking Brand: Reputation hits and misses Podcast!