Depends on How You Look at It

Episode 30: Does Amillennialism Require Partial Preterism? A Discussion with Nick Potts

2 h 23 min · 9 de may de 2022
Portada del episodio Episode 30: Does Amillennialism Require Partial Preterism? A Discussion with Nick Potts

Descripción

In this episode, Nick Potts and I discuss partial preterism and its relationship with Amillennialism. We go through many texts and concepts pointed to by partial preterists and discuss a different approach than the options typically given. We discuss futurism and preterism and try to point out the strengths and weaknesses of both systems. Nick explains the hermeneutic of modified idealism and shows why he thinks it best captures the urgency of biblical eschatology while also respecting what is clearly in the past. Nick and I had a free flowing discussion and circled around many different aspects of theology that we believe play a vital part in eschatology. I loved this discussion and I learned so much once again from simply having an honest conversation with a brother in Christ. https://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/61/61-3/JETS_61.3_461-492_Beale.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0e0BpUQvU0y4-I4vcYnQUs04s5yEBy1K5W5kgB4XX6lUHgamzfR1ux51E

Comentarios

0

Sé la primera persona en comentar

¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Depends on How You Look at It!

Prueba gratis

Empieza 7 días de prueba

$99 / mes después de la prueba. · Cancela cuando quieras.

  • Podcasts solo en Podimo
  • 20 horas de audiolibros al mes
  • Podcast gratuitos

Todos los episodios

34 episodios

episode Episode 33: A Lively Discussion of Death with Glenn Peoples, Sam Frost, and Chris Date artwork

Episode 33: A Lively Discussion of Death with Glenn Peoples, Sam Frost, and Chris Date

In this episode, I was honored to have Glenn Peoples, Sam Frost, and Chris Date on the show to discuss spiritual and physical death. We spend the first part of the episode hearing from Sam Frost about his recent writing on the topic of spiritual death and what happened to Adam in the garden. We then shift gears into a conversation between two dualists and two physicalists about the nature of death and the intermediate state. It is a long episode with lots of very strange concepts and opinions. I had a great time hearing from all my guests on this show. Here are some links for those interested in more content from my guests. www.chrisdate.info http://www.rightreason.org https://vigil.blog/

22 de ago de 20222 h 24 min
episode Episode 32: Partial Preterism and Postmillennial Hermeneutics (A Follow Up Discussion with Nick Potts) artwork

Episode 32: Partial Preterism and Postmillennial Hermeneutics (A Follow Up Discussion with Nick Potts)

In this episode, I have my friend, Nick Potts back on the show to address some pushback from our Postmillennial friends. We go through many of the Postmillennial arguments and discuss why we don't find their interpretation convincing. I quote a few popular Postmillennial Preterists and we discuss what we think is a better way to frame all these issues. I want to be clear that this episode is not a slander fest. No, Nick and I love our Postmill friends and we love folks like Jeff Durbin and Gary DeMar. I respect these men more than I can articulate. However, I must be honest when they say things that trouble me. Jeff Durbin Sermon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KonCfHiJYE&t=2865s Gary DeMar Podcast https://garydemar.libsyn.com/

6 de jul de 20221 h 48 min
episode Episode 30: Does Amillennialism Require Partial Preterism? A Discussion with Nick Potts artwork

Episode 30: Does Amillennialism Require Partial Preterism? A Discussion with Nick Potts

In this episode, Nick Potts and I discuss partial preterism and its relationship with Amillennialism. We go through many texts and concepts pointed to by partial preterists and discuss a different approach than the options typically given. We discuss futurism and preterism and try to point out the strengths and weaknesses of both systems. Nick explains the hermeneutic of modified idealism and shows why he thinks it best captures the urgency of biblical eschatology while also respecting what is clearly in the past. Nick and I had a free flowing discussion and circled around many different aspects of theology that we believe play a vital part in eschatology. I loved this discussion and I learned so much once again from simply having an honest conversation with a brother in Christ. https://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/61/61-3/JETS_61.3_461-492_Beale.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0e0BpUQvU0y4-I4vcYnQUs04s5yEBy1K5W5kgB4XX6lUHgamzfR1ux51E

9 de may de 20222 h 23 min