Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Faces Another Public Humiliation (7/29/26)

Survivors Detail Abuse at Interlochen and Encounters With Jeffrey Epstein (7/29/26)

An independent investigation commissioned by the Interlochen Center for the Arts documented approximately 70 firsthand accounts of alleged sexual misconduct by adults affiliated with the prestigious Michigan arts school and summer camp. Investigators conducted about 180 interviews and identified 47 accused individuals, including faculty members, teachers, residence staff, donors, trustees and visitors. The reported conduct stretched from the 1950s through the 2010s and ranged from grooming, sexual comments and inappropriate touching to allegations of rape, oral sex and long-term sexual relationships between adults and students. Former students described lasting consequences, including PTSD, damaged relationships, extensive therapy and abandoning musical or artistic careers because Interlochen had become inseparable from the abuse they said they experienced. The investigation began after a former student reported alleged misconduct by longtime faculty member Byron Hanson, leading Interlochen to invite other alumni to come forward. Seven alumni gave firsthand accounts involving Hanson from the 1960s and 1970s, while numerous other employees and associates were accused of misconduct across later decades. The report also expanded scrutiny of Jeffrey Epstein’s access to the campus: two alumni reported sexual contact by Epstein after meeting him through Interlochen, where he was a donor and maintained a lodge. Interlochen said none of the 47 accused individuals remains employed there, referred the names to prosecutors and law enforcement, and announced additional safety, accountability and survivor-support measures while acknowledging that the institution must confront the harm described by its former students. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 70 Interlochen students allege past grooming, sex assaults by 47 adults [https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2026/07/28/students-allege-grooming-sex-assaults-by-interlochen-staff-since-60s/91085021007/?gnt-cfr=1&gca-cat=p&gca-uir=true&gca-epti=z115342p116350l003050c116350e1195xxv115342d--47--b--47--&gca-ft=254&gca-ds=sophi]

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Faces Another Public Humiliation (7/29/26)

The City of London Corporation is developing a new internal procedure that could allow it to revoke Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Freedom of the City of London. Officials concluded that no existing legal mechanism permitted them to simply remove the status, which Andrew obtained through patrimony in 2012 because his father, Prince Philip, was a Freeman. The Corporation had previously asked Andrew to surrender the distinction voluntarily, but he refused, prompting members to pursue a formal process for taking it away. The effort represents another blow for Andrew after King Charles stripped him of his royal titles, dukedom and major honours in 2025 amid continuing scrutiny of his association with Jeffrey Epstein. The legal difficulty is that the Freedom is considered a property right rather than merely a ceremonial honour, giving it protections under British law and the European Convention on Human Rights. Once the new procedure is approved, the Court of Common Council would still need to hold a separate vote specifically determining whether Andrew’s Freedom should be revoked. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor suffers fresh blow as legal officials creating mechanism to remove honour from him [https://www.gbnews.com/royal/andrew-mountbatten-windsor-suffers-blow-strip-honour]

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And His Friends In High Places (7/29/26)

Jeffrey Epstein’s social circle demonstrated that his influence was never confined to one profession, political party or social class. He cultivated relationships with billionaires, bankers, attorneys, academics, scientists, politicians, diplomats, royalty, celebrities and leaders of prestigious institutions. Many of these people were treated as pillars of respectable society, yet they continued meeting with Epstein, accepting his hospitality, pursuing his money or benefiting from his connections even after his 2008 conviction made his conduct impossible to dismiss as mere rumor. Their presence around him helped manufacture the appearance that Epstein remained legitimate, important and safe to associate with, giving him a protective layer of prestige that ordinary criminals could never have assembled. Not everyone in Epstein’s orbit participated directly in his crimes, but the broader network contained no shortage of enablers who looked away, minimized warning signs, opened doors or continued doing business with him when they should have walked away. Some provided professional services, some introduced him to influential people, some defended him publicly and others treated his criminal history as an inconvenience rather than a moral disqualification. Epstein understood that respectability could be borrowed from the people surrounding him, and every prominent person who continued welcoming him helped reinforce the illusion that his wealth and connections mattered more than the girls and young women he abused. His story was therefore not only about one predator, but also about the supposedly respectable world that repeatedly made room for him. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Mega Edition: Who Approved Jeffrey Epstein's Fake Science Foundation Hustle? (7/29/26)

According to allegations from survivors and reporting about Epstein’s post-conviction activities, Jeffrey Epstein used the Florida Science Foundation as a convenient front to make his movements and work-release activities appear legitimate while he was serving his unusually lenient sentence and later living under supervision. The supposed nonprofit gave Epstein a respectable-sounding workplace connected to science and philanthropy, but critics have argued that it functioned largely as a shell that allowed him to leave custody, maintain access to his office and continue operating with remarkably little oversight. Rather than being confined in any meaningful sense, Epstein was permitted to spend long stretches away from jail under conditions that appeared tailored to his comfort, raising serious questions about whether authorities adequately verified what the foundation actually did or how Epstein was using it. Women have alleged that Epstein continued sexually abusing them at the foundation’s office while he was on work release and subject to court-ordered restrictions, meaning the conduct allegedly occurred under the noses of the jail, probation officials and local law enforcement. The accusations suggest that the very arrangement presented as punishment and rehabilitation instead restored Epstein’s access to vulnerable young women and gave him another controlled environment in which to offend. Authorities had already been warned about the scale of his predatory behavior, yet the supervision system reportedly failed to detect or stop what was happening, reinforcing the conclusion that Epstein’s wealth, lawyers and connections allowed him to turn a nominal sentence into something dangerously close to business as usual. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Mega Edition: The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 20-23) (7/28/26)

The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence. Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: dl (justice.gov) [https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl]