One Assassination, A Century of Consequences (and Everything Else)

One Assassination, A Century of Consequences (and Everything Else)

We're Back! Life gets in the way sometimes. This episode goes all over the place, starting with the assassination that shaped modern history and discussing the butterfly effect it has on our modern day. We touch on America's interventionalist wars of the 20th century, Communism, Fascism, the borders of our modern world, high speed rails and where the future for China and The United States may lie.

"The Dow Is Over 50,000 Right Now"

The stock market. That is what Attorney General Pam Bondi seemed concerned about during a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee. Not Americans being shot by I.C.E. agents. Not the release (or lack thereof) of The Epstein Files. The stock market. And if you, like Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky), dared challenge her, then you might be the latest person to have a case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Was this the normal American political theatre? Or was this this the latest in what seems to be a growing list of people surrounding President Trump to be swept up in his cult of personality? Join us this episode as we recap AG Bondi's testimony, how it differed from Kash Patel's and how one or both of them may have perjured themselves. We give our thoughts on why these files likely won't see the light of day anytime in the near future, and why Democrats and Republicans alike will use the victims and the files as political tools, but neither side will likely ever make a meaningful attempt to release the information for fear of bringing the entire elite class down. Furthermore, we discuss how the Intelligence Community, Mossad or the C.I.A., also likely play a part in keeping these files behind closed doors. After all, blackmail only works if the secrets stay secret.

The Epstein Files Transparency Act

On November 19, 2025 The Epstein Files Transparency Act was signed into law. The law clearly stated that by December 19, 2025 the Epstein Files were supposed to be released unredacted (save for information pertaining to his victims) in their entirety. But, as of this episode's recording, only a portion of those files have been released. Even worse, what the DOJ has released has been black inked page after black inked page. And with the recent batch of files that were released, information pertaining to victims was released. Worse still, some of what was released were graphic images of the victims, including some that may have been taken while they were underage. In this episode, we breakdown how both the Democrats and the Republicans ignored the Epstein Files until the pressure from the American public was too much to ignore. We discuss President Trump's constant flip-flopping on the issue, and why the government seems more concerned with protecting the identities of the alleged perpetrators than getting justice for Epstein's victims.

What Constitutes A War?

In this episode, we discuss a debate between Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) on what the word 'war' means and who should be declaring it. We talk about the geopolitical chess game that the United States is playing with Venezuela, Greenland and potentially soon Iran. We discuss how Israel has played a part in America's decision making about foreign intervention when it comes to states in the Middle East, and how they might be doing it again, as well as what kind of ally they really are. We talk about how Congress has steadily given more and more of it's powers to the Executive since WWII and how they have not kept up with increasingly faster military technology, and in a world were seconds can matter in a first strike, how they need to make new laws to help make decisions faster.

A Second I.C.E. Shooting....

A second tragic shooting involving I.C.E. took place today in Minneapolis. In this episode we discuss the events that led up to the shooting as well as how political tribalism has shaped the conversation around it. We talk about the issues America faces with policing in general, as well as how much of the blame is shared by law enforcement, protestors and politicians. We discuss how government officials on both sides of the aisle responded to the shooting, how political ideology and confirmation bias played a part in their statements, and how a potentially defective gun may have caused both sides to have it all wrong.