Everybody Gets Pie's Podcast
Why do so many Americans say housing costs are a top concern — but still oppose new housing in their neighborhoods? UC Davis law professor Chris Elmendorf shares surprising research revealing that aesthetics and feelings about developers may matter more than self-interest or NIMBYism. In this conversation, we cover: - Why just saying the word "developer" drops support for new housing by 4+ points - How Hollywood has generated an estimated 1 billion negative representations of developers - Why "small local homebuilder" gets a dramatically different reaction than "big real estate developer" - What a video of a developer rescuing dogs has to do with housing policy - Why ugly buildings hurt housing support even among renters who would benefit from lower rents - The vacancy chain concept — and why it's one of the most persuasive arguments for building more housing - The story of how a Twitter thread helped revive California's "builder's remedy" law - What the pro-housing movement should actually focus on to win long-term This is the Season 1 finale of Everybody Gets Pie. Tune in for another season soon! Follow & Support Everybody Gets Pie X: @pie4everybody [https://x.com/pie4everybody] Bluesky: @everybodygetspie.bsky.social YouTube: @EverybodyGetsPie [https://www.youtube.com/@EverybodyGetsPie] Instagram: @everybodygetspie [https://instagram.com/everybodygetspie] TikTok: @everybodygetspie 🎙️ Subscribe, share, and let us know who you’d like to hear on the next episode!
15 episodios
Comentarios
0Sé la primera persona en comentar
¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Everybody Gets Pie's Podcast!