Exoconscious Humans Podcast
What’s Going on with Disclosure? Want to Talk About It? * David Grusch’s comment on ET as Sentient Plasmoid Life * Avi Loeb chairing the new UAP Science Advisory Council * New global protocols prohibits anyone from responding to alien signals without approval: International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) and SETI Are you wondering where you, as a contactee, psychic, or independent UFO researcher, fit into this unfolding intelligence, military, and government Disclosure? Join us for a discussion of these developments. Let’s Talk about what’s going on. Invitation: Join our Exoconscious Humans Zoom: Thursday, June 18 Who: We are a group of Exoconscious Humans. We’ve been meeting weekly for 3 years. What: We discuss our contact, history, current events, and experiences When/Where: Zoom Meeting this Thursday, June 18 at 12:00 Noon EDT/ 9:00 AM PT How: Email me at rhardcastlewright@gmail.com or respond to this Substack to request a Zoom link. Details for our Disclosure Discussion Part 1: David Grusch: NHI is Sentient Plasmoid Life Substack: Did you catch David Grusch’s Sentient Plasmoid Life comment? [https://open.substack.com/pub/rebeccahardcastlewright/p/grusch-just-said-sentient-plasmoid?r=foc3f&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web] (you can read or listen) Whistleblower, Grusch described non-human intelligences known to the US government as “sentient plasmoid life.” Three words. Dropped casually. Picked up by social media. And almost universally... misunderstood! Most people have no idea what a plasmoid is — and that’s not an accident. Out of 4,000 US degree-granting colleges and universities, only 7 offer plasma science degrees or research programs. The rest of the plasma research? Classified. Housed in defense labs, military programs, and black budget operations. QUESTIONS For Discussion: * What is sentient plasmoid life — in plain language * Why the US military has quietly controlled plasma research for decades * Connection to Catherine Austin Fitts’ $21 trillion in missing government money * Why “ET as plasmoid” is a perfect cover story for covert weapons programs * Most empowering part — YOU are a plasma being Part 2: Avi Loeb is chairing the new UAP Science Advisory Council From Avi Loeb’s Medium article announcement: [https://avi-loeb.medium.com/a-uap-science-advisory-council-to-the-u-s-f7262e57b0df] The three UAP file releases thus far attracted more than a billion views and a lot of chatter on social media. However, to paraphrase the wisdom of basketball players: “we must keep our eyes on the orbs, not the audience!” What could be a better way of doing that than the establishment of a new “UAP Science Advisory Council” by the White House, AARO, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the FBI, and all Intelligence Community members. This is not wishful thinking but a reality now. Over the past week, I was tasked by the above organizations to create a research team of young scientists who will serve on this council. The Council under my leadership includes the following members: I was tasked by the White House, AARO, ODNI, the FBI, and the Intelligence Community to lead and assemble a team of scientists and experts for a new UAP Science Advisory Council. Bio’s follow. QUESTIONS for Discussion: Please note in the BIOs below, the HEAVY EMPHASIS ON AI, COMPUTATION, BRAIN-CENTRIC RESEARCH * Is this Advisory Council formed for UAP Data Collection? * If So, WHY? Were they formed to declare First Contact? * Are they formed providing DATA for Golden Dome’s autonomous space vehicles, drones, satellites, weapons, and surveillance systems? Autonomous vehicles NEED Data to function. (Avi Loeb worked on President Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative, which was a precursor to Golden Dome.) Star Wars? * Is Avi’s Council Official? No Executive Order, No Federla Register Notice, Not in GSA database, No DOD/WH Press Release. @AZolin312 on X * Will Advisory Council data declare Disclosure of ET Threat—ET as a Cover Story for HUMAN weapons? * Why the absence of Experiencers? What does our absence indicate? NOTE: Claude AI was used for research. UAP Science Advisory Council Members: Dr. Avi Loeb (Chair) — Frank B. Baird, Jr. Professor of Science at Harvard, theoretical astrophysicist and cosmologist, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and head of the Galileo Project. He previously served on the White House’s President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and chaired the National Academies’ Board on Physics and Astronomy. Relationship to UAP: He’s the most prominent academic voice arguing UAP deserves rigorous scientific (not just anecdotal) study, and was personally tasked with assembling and chairing this council. Prof. Carol Cleland — Philosopher of science focused on astrobiology and the definition of life; has publicly debated the evidence for extraterrestrial life alongside Loeb. Council role: anomaly identification — helping define what counts as a genuine scientific anomaly versus a misidentification. Dr. Richard Cloete — PhD in computer science from Harvard. Council role: applying AI tools to data analysis and data management for UAP datasets. Freethought Blogs [https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/06/14/since-were-talking-about-ufos/]Substack [https://rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com/about] Dr. Omer Eldadi — PhD, Research Scientist in Psychology at Reichman University. Council role: combining data management, AI, and human psychology, handling the council’s data infrastructure as well as the human-factors side of UAP reporting (i.e., witness psychology). Freethought Blogs [https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/06/14/since-were-talking-about-ufos/]Substack [https://rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com/about] Rear Adm. Tim Gallaudet, USN (ret.) — Oceanographer and former acting NOAA Administrator, also a Disclosure Foundation advisory board member. A research affiliate of Harvard’s Galileo Project and longtime advocate for government transparency on UAP, with a particular focus on undersea and transmedium phenomena — directly relevant given recurring reports of USOs (unidentified submerged objects). EyeganicsEyeganics [https://www.eyeganics.com/] Ross Howard — Listed by Loeb with a focus on communication for the council. Limited additional public biographical information is available as of this announcement. Dr. Devesh Nandal — National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow at Harvard’s Center for Astrophysics. Council role: applying computational modeling techniques (numerical analysis and astrophysics) to UAP phenomena. Freethought Blogs [https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/06/14/since-were-talking-about-ufos/]Substack [https://rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com/about] Prof. Garry Nolan — Stanford pathology professor and molecular biologist, co-founder of the Sol Foundation. Relationship to UAP: brings molecular biology and materials science expertise to anomaly investigations — he’s previously analyzed brain imaging from self-reported UAP experiencers and examined purported anomalous physical materials. SubstackSubstack [https://rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com/about] Dr. Regina Sarmiento — PhD in astrophysics, working as a data scientist at Harvard. Council role: a Galileo Project researcher applying AI-assisted, machine-learning techniques to UAP data analysis and management. Freethought Blogs [https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/06/14/since-were-talking-about-ufos/]Substack [https://rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com/about] Dr. Michael Shermer — Founder and publisher of Skeptic magazine, science writer, and one of the most prominent professional skeptics on paranormal and UFO claims. Council role listed as “the study of anomalies” — his inclusion brings a rigorous, debunking-oriented counterweight to the council’s analysis. Prof. Peter Skafish — Cofounder and Director of Research at the Sol Foundation, a research and policy institute dedicated to UAP and their implications for science, government, and civil society. A cultural anthropologist focused on ontology, modernity, religion, and translation, with a PhD in anthropology from UC Berkeley. His UAP-specific work involves using anthropological perspectives on cosmology and pluralism to anticipate how non-human intelligences associated with UAP might think, and how that thinking may or may not align with human frameworks, and to offer policy recommendations for a societal response to UAP. YouTube + 3 [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjZGp_n3bYM] Prof. Matthew Szydagis — Physics professor in the Department of Physics at the University at Albany. Council role: instrumentation and data collection; he has reportedly led UAP-related metamaterials research analyzing anomalous samples, including the so-called “Art’s Parts” linked to Roswell, working alongside other independent UAP research groups. Freethought Blogs + 2 [https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2026/06/14/since-were-talking-about-ufos/] Dr. Jennice Vilhauer — Listed by Loeb with a focus on quantitative psychology. As with Ross Howard, detailed public bio information specific to this appointment isn’t yet widely available. Part 3: New global protocol prohibits anyone from responding to alien signals without approval: International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) and SETI IAA SETI Declaration of Principles created the global protocols for responding to Alien Signals. [https://www.seti.org/research/seti-101/protocols-for-an-eti-signal-detection/] The purpose of this Declaration is as follows: to affirm our commitment to conduct the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence in a scientifically and academically rigorous manner; to establish best practices, principles and guidelines for scientists to confirm putative evidence of intelligent extraterrestrial beings; to provide guidance to the scientific community for the announcement of a confirmed SETI detection which balances the community imperative of providing timely and accurate information to a wide-ranging audience, with appropriate consideration for the safety and exposure of individual scientists involved; and to proactively inform the global public of these procedures and guidelines. The 2026 SETI version was published around June 1, 2026, and expands what counts as a detectable signal — now explicitly covering narrow-band radio signals, laser emissions, infrared excess from large-scale energy use, anomalies suggesting megastructures, and physical artifacts, not just radio signals as the 2010 version implied. The Revised Protocols will need to be approved by a wider scientific community Who is Involved? Beyond the IAA SETI Committee itself, a new Permanent Post-Detection Sub-Committee is being established that will include international experts in ethics, law, social sciences, and communications — not just astronomers, to handle the societal aftermath of any confirmed detection. While the UN is cited in some articles—they are a voluntary organization with no binding authority. Protocols Apply to Whom? The IAA SETI Committee adopted these principles to guide individuals, institutions, organizations, and other entities participating in the scientific SETI specifically, work based on astronomy and related disciplines that searches for technosignatures or evidence of past or present intelligent life and technology beyond Earth. What are Protocols Asking? The key behavioral asks are (1) verify any ET candidate signal across independent teams and instruments before announcing, (2) actively rule out mundane explanations first, and (3) never reply to a confirmed signal unilaterally — any response requires international consultation. Do Protocols Apply to CE5/Contactee Groups? These protocols don't apply to CE5 groups or individual contactees! The document is explicitly limited to scientific SETI, meaning astronomy-based technosignature detection using instruments. Who Counts as First Contact/Disclosure? Who counts as a legitimate party to "first contact" (credentialed institutions, government bodies, international scientific committees)? The SETI protocols implicitly reinforce a hierarchy where scientific instrument-based detection by recognized institutions is treated as the only legitimate channel for "contact." What Counts as Exoconscious Human Contact: The lived experiences of contactees and CE5 participants — who may represent the largest body of "contact data" — remain entirely outside any formal science framework. The Institute for Exoconsciousness is the first Post-Disclosure Organization. Members, as contactees, have made First Contact and are architecting a Post-Disclosure Civilization. Invitation: Join our Exoconscious Humans Zoom: Thursday, June 18 Who: We are a small group who identify as Exoconscious Humans. We’ve been meeting weekly for 3 years. What: We discuss our contact, history, current events, and experiences When/Where: Zoom Meeting this Thursday, June 18 at 12:00 Noon EDT/ 9:00 AM PT How: email me at rhardcastlewright@gmail.com or respond to this Substack to request a Zoom link. Want to explore Plasma Science? [https://open.substack.com/pub/rebeccahardcastlewright/p/plasma-may-be-the-missing-science?r=foc3f&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web] Join our Plasma Science Study group, meeting monthly on the 3rd Saturday Upgrade to Paid $8/month subscription Exoconscious Humans is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Rebecca Hardcastle Wright, PhD [https://exoconsciousness.com/], is founder of the Institute for Exoconsciousness (I-EXO) and the originator of Exoconsciousness—the innate human ability to connect, communicate, and co-create with extraterrestrials, multidimensionals, and spiritual beings. A futurist, author, and educator, she advocates for natural human consciousness, innate psychic intelligence, and individual moral sovereignty amidst the era of artificial intelligence, synthetic realities, and engineered social control. Her work bridges consciousness science, plasma physics, post-disclosure ethics, and space policy, positioning humanity within a natural order founded on inalienable rights, spiritual ensoulment, and equality and peace in the cosmos. Educator and author of influential books [https://exoconsciousness.com/books], Rebecca served on Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell’s [https://exoconsciousness.com/blog/f/edgar-mitchells-wikileaks-emails-to-john-podesta-are-authentic] Quantrek science team and developed a unique experiencer coaching method [https://exoconsciousness.com/about-coaching]. She builds community and shares insights through her coaching [https://exoconsciousness.com/about-coaching], Exoconscious Humans Substack [https://rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com/], Podcast [https://rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com/podcast], and YouTube Channel [https://www.youtube.com/@exoconscioushumans]. Exoconscious Humans: Will Free Will Survive in an Increasingly Non Human World? [https://amzn.to/4qHTY7s] Subscribe to our YouTube: [https://www.youtube.com/@exoconscioushumans] Join our Exoconscious Humans Podcast [https://rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com/podcast] Join us on Social Media: https://www.facebook.com/exoconscious [https://www.facebook.com/exoconscious] https://www.instagram.com/exoconsciousness/ [https://www.instagram.com/exoconsciousness/] https://www.linkedin.com/in/exoconsciousness/ [https://www.linkedin.com/in/exoconsciousness/] https://x.com/exoconscious [https://x.com/exoconscious] Get full access to Exoconscious Humans at rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com/subscribe [https://rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4]
9 episodios
Comentarios
0Sé la primera persona en comentar
¡Regístrate ahora y únete a la comunidad de Exoconscious Humans Podcast!